Category: Climate Crisis

  • 2023 Destroys Global Heat Record as Fossil Fuel Emissions Boil the Planet

    Spread the love

    Original article by JAKE JOHNSON republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Indonesian firefighters work to extinguish a wildfire in Ogan Ilir, Indonesia on September 14, 2023.  (Photo: Muhammad A.F/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

    “How many more records does it take before we phase out fossil fuels and deal with it?” asked one climate campaigner.

    European scientists officially confirmed Tuesday that 2023 was the hottest year on record, surpassing 2016 by a huge margin as greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels continue to drive global temperatures to terrifying new highs.

    The conclusion from the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service was hardly unexpected given the unparalleled heatwaves that gripped large swaths of the planet last year, ushering in what the head of the United Nations called “the era of global boiling.”

    Last year’s global average temperature was 14.98°C, 0.17°C warmer than 2016, 0.60°C warmer than the 1991-2020 average, and 1.48°C warmer than the 1850-1900 pre-industrial level, according to Copernicus.

    “2023 was an exceptional year with climate records tumbling like dominoes,” said Copernicus deputy director Samantha Burgess. “Not only is 2023 the warmest year on record, it is also the first year with all days over 1°C warmer than the pre-industrial period. Temperatures during 2023 likely exceed those of any period in at least the last 100,000 years.”

    Liz Bentley, chief executive of the U.K.’s Royal Meteorological Society told CNN on Tuesday that after last year’s record-shattering summer, scientists predicted that global warming would reach around 1.3°C above pre-industrial levels.

    That projection, Bentley said, has been “annihilated” by the new Copernicus data, which shows that planetary warming is perilously close to the Paris accord’s 1.5°C target.

    “If you look at climate projections, when we expect to see temperature changes of close to 1.5°C, indeed it has come sooner than many would have expected,” Bentley added. “We’ve definitely seen an acceleration towards that, rather than it being a kind of linear progression. It feels like it’s rising much more exponentially.”

    Scientists expect 2024 to be even hotter than last year, raising the stakes for badly lagging global efforts to rein in planet-warming fossil fuel production, which in 2023 hit record levels in the United States—the largest historical contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.

    “How many more records does it take before we phase out fossil fuels and deal with it?” asked climate campaigner Mike Hudema.

    Copernicus director Carlo Buontempo said in a statement Tuesday that “the extremes we have observed over the last few months provide a dramatic testimony of how far we now are from the climate in which our civilization developed.”

    “This has profound consequences for the Paris Agreement and all human endeavors,” said Buontempo. “If we want to successfully manage our climate risk portfolio, we need to urgently decarbonize our economy whilst using climate data and knowledge to prepare for the future.”

    Original article by JAKE JOHNSON republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

  • All the pesky, woke scientists and experts against Rishi Sunak’s catastrophic oil and gas bill

    Spread the love

    https://www.bigissue.com/news/environment/rishi-sunak-oil-gas-bill-science-north-sea/


    The government says new oil and gas projects will leave the country less reliant on foreign energy. Image: Unsplash

    MPs will vote on Rishi Sunak’s Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill. But the scientific opposition is already overwhelming

    …

    New oil and gas fields are incompatible with the 1.5C threshold

    “No new oil and gas development is possible if the world is to stay with the Paris Agreement temperature limits,” said the International Institute for Sustainable Development last year.

    “Governments should stop awarding licences and permits to explore for or develop new oil and gas fields or coal mines, or other long-term infrastructure to produce, transport, or consume fossil fuels,” the report said, highlighting what needs to be done to stay within 1.5C threshold of warming.

    Every country must stop licensing new oil and gas, says the head of the UN

    “Every country must be part of the solution,” said UN secretary general António Guterres after the release of last year’s IPCC report. “In short, our world needs climate action on all fronts – everything, everywhere, all at once.”

    As part of this action, Guterres made “ceasing all licensing or funding of new oil and gas” a fundamental part of the “Acceleration Agenda” – and encouraged all nations to sign up.

    New investments in oil and gas show governments aren’t serious about the climate crisis

    In 2021, the International Energy Agency said new oil and gas should stop that year. Three years on, Rishi Sunak’s government is planning to go full steam ahead.

    “If governments are serious about the climate crisis, there can be no new investments in oil, gas and coal, from now – from this year,” IEA director Fatih Birol told the Guardian at the time.

    Fresh fossil fuel investments ‘undermine’ UK leadership on climate change

    Successive governments have claimed the UK is a leader in climate change. But in a March 2023 letter from 700 UK-based experts, Rishi Sunak was warned: ”If the UK allows any new development of oil and gas fields, it will severely undermine those claims of leadership by contributing to further oversupply of fossil fuels, and making it more difficult for the world to limit warming to 1.5°C”

    …

    https://www.bigissue.com/news/environment/rishi-sunak-oil-gas-bill-science-north-sea/

  • Comment by dizzy on Rosebank and North Sea fossil fuel exploitation

    Spread the love

    In May 2022 then UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak sabotaged the oil and gas windfall tax so that it was converted to a huge fossil fuel subsidy driving fossil fuel exploitation of the North Sea. This is a massive implicit fossil fuel subsidy while the UK government claims not to participate in fossil fuel subsidies. The UK taxpayer will be 91% financing development of the proposed Rosebank Oil development in the North Sea near the Faroe Islands. It is difficult to see any monetary benefits or justifications for the UK government financing foreigners to take North Sea oil. The UK plays no part other than paying for it, giving it away and buying it back from the international market at market rates if needed. The oil is going abroad and will be bought from abroad. Somebody please ask Rishi Sunak where is the benefit to UK.

    Referring to subsidies to develop the Rosebank oil field, image of UK Prime Minister reads Hey foreigners in huge boats, I'll pay £3billion to take all our oil.
    Referring to subsidies to develop the Rosebank oil field, image of UK Prime Minister reads Hey foreigners in huge boats, I’ll pay £3billion to take all our oil.

    It is very likely that fossil fuel exploitation is unviable without fossil fuel subsidies.

    https://www.statista.com/chart/31016/volume-of-global-fossil-fuel-subsidies-timeline/

    According to calculations by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), seven trillion U.S. dollars were spent on direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels in 2022. The war in Ukraine and the resulting rise in energy prices are partly responsible for the significant increase in the previous year.

    But even before that, the trend was already upwards, as this infographic illustrates. Subsidies are also likely to increase in the future. According to analysts, the reason for this is the economic growth of the Global South and the resulting increase in the consumption of coal, oil and gas.

    Government support for fossil fuels is equivalent to just over seven percent of the planet’s economic output. A direct comparison with another important government budget item, for example, shows how enormous this sum is. Education spending by all countries combined accounts for 4.3 percent of global gross domestic product.

    Countering fossil fuel subsidies, according to the IMF, would not only offer a chance to put humanity back on track to meet its climate goals, but could also prevent 1.6 million premature deaths per year and increase government revenues by $4.4 trillion.

    Everything you need to know about the Rosebank oil field

    Rosebank oil and gas field approved: “Handouts to corporations at the expense of the rest of us” – Greenpeace comment

    Sunak’s UK oil subsidy could have insulated 2m homes, says thinktank

    Addendum: Sunak is wasting this vast sum of money for some unknown reason. Is it corruption, does he expect some back in his back pocket or perhaps a job paying millions for nothing after being PM?

    What I wanted to say was about these terrible floods that we’re experiencing at the moment. They are made much worse by climate change – that there is far more water in the air, that our climate has been destroyed. Getting back to this vast sum that Sunak is wasting. He’s wasting this vast sum and as a consequence our climate will be further damaged, will deteriorate further when it’s already fekked.

  • Resigning ex-minister Chris Skidmore wrong on climate, says Jeremy Hunt

    Spread the love

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67900935

    …

    Mr Hunt told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that when he became chancellor, he worked closely with Mr Skidmore on climate change issues.

    He said: “The independent panel for climate change that we have in this country are very clear that even when we reach net zero in 2050, we will still get a significant proportion of our energy from fossil fuels, and domestic oil and gas is four times cleaner than imported oil and gas.”

    …

    dizzy: four times cleaner is just total BS, isn’t it?

  • Green Party’s Carla Denyer on Chris Skidmore’s resignation

    Spread the love
    Image of the Green Party's Carla Denyer on BBC Question Time.
    Image of the Green Party’s Carla Denyer on BBC Question Time.

    Green Party co-leader Carla Denyer reacts to the resignation of Tory environment champion Chris Skidmore:

    “As the world burns, the Tories turn in on themselves. The government’s green credentials are truly in tatters.

    “The climate crisis is here and now and being experienced by people across the country, but the Prime Minister can’t hold on to anyone who has any good intentions toward the environment.

    “Labour has to be held to account as well – it refused to block Rosebank and other new oil and gas licences. How long before Labour’s own green champions feel their principles are too compromised to continue?”