US Launches Christmas Strikes on Nigeria—the 9th Country Bombed by Trump

Spread the love

Original article by Brett Wilkins republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

President Donald Trump makes phone calls to US troops on Christmas Eve, from the Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, on December 24, 2025. (Photo by Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump—who calls himself “the most anti-war president in history”—has now bombed more countries than any president in history.

President Donald Trump—the self-described “most anti-war president in history”—has now ordered the bombing of more countries than any president in history as US forces carried out Christmas day strikes on what the White House claimed were Islamic State militants killing Christians in Nigeria.

“Tonight, at my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria, who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries!” Trump said Thursday in a post on his Truth Social network.

RECOMMENDED…

Donald Trump

Trump Says Ground Attack on Venezuela Imminent—Plus Colombia, Mexico Also in US Crosshairs

Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth salute

Trump: US Forces ‘Striking Very Strongly’ Against 70+ Targets in Syria

“I have previously warned these Terrorists that if they did not stop the slaughtering of Christians, there would be hell to pay, and tonight, there was,” the president continued. “The Department of War executed numerous perfect strikes, as only the United States is capable of doing.”

“Under my leadership, our Country will not allow Radical Islamic Terrorism to prosper,” Trump added. “May God Bless our Military, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead Terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter of Christians continues.”

A US Department of Defense official speaking on condition of anonymity told the Associated Press that the United States worked with Nigeria to conduct the bombing, and that the government of Nigerian President Bola Tinubu—who is a Muslim—approved the attacks.

It was not immediately known how many people were killed or wounded in the strikes, or whether there are any civilian casualties.

The Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that “terrorist violence in any form, whether directed at Christians, Muslims, or other communities, remains an affront to Nigeria’s values and to international peace and security.”

The US bombings followed a threat last month by Trump to attack Nigeria with “guns-a-blazing” if the country’s government did not curb attacks on Christians.

Northwestern Nigeria—including Sokoto, Zamfara, Katsina, and parts of Kaduna State—is suffering a complex security crisis, plagued by armed criminal groups, herder-farmer disputes, and Islamist militants including Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP/ISIS) and Boko Haram. Both Christians and Muslims have been attacked.

Since emerging in Borno State in 2009, Boko Haram has waged war on the Nigerian state—which it regards as apostate—not against any particular religious group. In fact, the majority of its victims have been Muslims.

“According to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, more Muslims than Christians have been targeted in recent years,” Chloe Atkinson recently wrote for Common Dreams. “Boko Haram has massacred worshipers in mosques, torched markets in Muslim-majority areas, and threatened their own coreligionists.”

“The crisis in Nigeria is not a holy war against Christianity.”

“It is true that Christian communities in the north-central regions have suffered unimaginable horrors as raids have left villages in ashes, children murdered in their beds, and churches reduced to rubble,” she said. “The April massacre in Zike and the June bloodbath in Yelwata are prime examples of the atrocities taking place in Nigeria.”

“The crisis in Nigeria is not a holy war against Christianity,” Atkinson continued. “Instead, it’s a devastating cocktail of poverty, climate-driven land disputes, and radical ideologies that prey on everyone and not just any distinct group.”

“By framing Nigeria’s conflict as an existential threat to Christians alone, Trump is not shining a spotlight on the victims,” she added. “Instead, he is weaponizing right-wing conspiracy theories to stoke Islamophobia, the same toxic playbook he used to fuel his ban on Muslims, and which left refugee families shattered at America’s borders.”

Former libertarian US Congressman Justin Amash (R-Mich.) noted on X that “there’s no authority for strikes on terrorists in Nigeria or anywhere on Earth,” adding that the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF)—which was approved by every member of Congress except then-Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)—“is only for the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks.”

“The War Powers Resolution doesn’t grant any authority beyond the Constitution,” Amash added. “Offensive military actions need congressional approval. The Framers of the Constitution divided war powers to protect the American people from war-eager executives. Whether the United States should engage in conflicts across the globe is a decision for the people’s representatives in Congress, not the president.”

In addition to Nigeria, Trump—who says he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize—since 2017 has also ordered the bombing of Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, LibyaPakistanSomaliaSyria, and Yemen, as well as boats allegedly transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean. Trump has also deployed warships and thousands of US troops near Venezuela, which could become the next country attacked by a president who campaigned on a platform of “peace through strength.”

That’s more than the at least five countries attacked during the tenure of former President George W. Bush or the at least seven nations attacked on orders of then-President Barack Obama during the so-called War on Terror, which killed more than 940,000 people—including at least 432,000 civilians, according to the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

Trump continued the war on ISIS in Iraq and Syria started by Obama in 2014. Promising to “bomb the shit out of” ISIS fighters and “take out their families,” Trump intensified the US campaign from a war of “attrition” to one of “annihilation,” according to his former defense secretary, Gen. James “Mad Dog” Mattis. Thousand of civilians were killed as cities such as Mosul, Iraq and Raqqa, Syria were flattened.

Trump declared victory over ISIS in 2018—and again the following year.

Some social media users suggested Trump’s “warmongering” is an attempt to distract from the Epstein files scandal and alleged administration cover-up.

“Bombing Nigeria won’t make us forget about the Epstein files,” said one X user.

Original article by Brett Wilkins republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn't bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn’t bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.

Trump’s Reckless War Drums in Nigeria Stink of Islamophobia and Imperial Arrogance ›

Continue ReadingUS Launches Christmas Strikes on Nigeria—the 9th Country Bombed by Trump

Before Executing 2 Shipwrecked Sailors, US Admiral Consulted Top Military Lawyer: Report

Spread the love

Original article by Jessica Corbett republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley, left, walks to a holding room in the Capitol Visitor Center on December 4, 2025, before briefing members of Congress on boat strikes. (Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

A military spokesperson refused to comment on what the admiral told Congress beyond confirming that “he did inform them that during the strike he sought advice from his lawyer and then made a decision.”

The journalist who initially revealed that President Donald Trump’s administration killed shipwrecked survivors of its first known boat bombing reported Tuesday that the admiral in charge consulted with a US military lawyer before ordering another strike on the two alleged drug traffickers who were clinging to debris in the Caribbean Sea.

Just days after Trump announced the September 2 bombing on social mediaIntercept journalist Nick Turse exposed the follow-up strike that killed survivors, citing US officials. The attack has sparked fresh alarm in recent weeks, since late November reporting from the Washington Post and CNN that Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley ordered the second strike to comply with an alleged spoken directive from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to kill everyone on board, which Hegseth has denied.

RECOMMENDED…

Top Dem Says Video of Military 'Attacking Shipwrecked Sailors' Among 'Most Troubling Things' He Has Ever Seen

Top Dem Says Video of Military ‘Attacking Shipwrecked Sailors’ Among ‘Most Troubling Things’ He Has Ever Seen

US Navy Destroyer USS Sampson docked in Panama amid regional tensions with Venezuela

UN Experts Say Those Ordering and Carrying Out US Boat Strikes Should Be ‘Prosecuted for Homicide’

After the first strike, “Bradley—then the head of Joint Special Operations Command—sought guidance from his top legal adviser,” according to Turse. He interviewed several sources familiar with the admiral’s recent classified briefing to Congress, former members of the Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) Corps, and ex-colleagues of the JSOC staff judge advocate to whom Bradley turned, Col. Cara Hamaguchi.

As Turse reported:

How exactly [Hamaguchi] responded is not known. But Bradley, according to a lawmaker who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a classified briefing, said that the JSOC staff judge advocate deemed a follow-up strike lawful. In the briefing, Bradley said no one in the room voiced objections before the survivors were killed, according to the lawmaker.

Five people familiar with briefings given by Bradley, including the lawmaker who viewed the video, said that, logically, the survivors must have been waving at the US aircraft flying above them. All interpreted the actions of the men as signaling for help, rescue, or surrender.

Bradley, now the chief of Special Operations Command, declined to comment, the reporter noted. SOCOM also declined to make Hamaguchi available, though the command’s director of public affairs, Col. Allie Weiskopf, said: “We are not going to comment on what Admiral Bradley told lawmakers in a classified hearing. He did inform them that during the strike he sought advice from his lawyer and then made a decision.”

Tuesday’s reporting caught the attention of the former longtime executive director of Human Rights Watch (HRW), Kenneth Roth, who has stressed that not only is it “blatantly illegal to order criminal suspects to be murdered rather than detained,” but “the initial attack was illegal too.”

Various other experts and US lawmakers have similarly condemned the dozens of strikes in the Caribbean and Pacific Ocean since September—which as of Monday have killed at least 105 people, according to the Trump administration—as “war crimes, murder, or both,” as the Former JAGs Working Group put it after the Hegseth reporting last month.

“Extrajudicial executions,” declared public interest lawyer Robert Dunham on social media Wednesday, sharing Turse’s new report and tagging the groups Amnesty International USA, HRW, and Reprieve US, as well as the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and independent experts who report to the UN Human Rights Council.

Those experts on Wednesday rebuked Trump’s recent aggression toward Venezuela, including not only the boat strikes but also threats to bomb the South American country and attempts to impose an oil blockade. They said that “the illegal use of force, and threats to use further force at sea and on land, gravely endanger the human right to life and other rights in Venezuela and the region.”

Original article by Jessica Corbett republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn't bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn’t bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Continue ReadingBefore Executing 2 Shipwrecked Sailors, US Admiral Consulted Top Military Lawyer: Report

Doctors call for ‘less name-calling and more deal-making’ from Health Secretary Wes Streeting

Spread the love

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/doctors-call-less-name-calling-and-more-deal-making-health-secretary-wes-streeting

 Resident doctors on the picket line outside Leeds General Infirmary, on the first day of a five-day walkout over pay and jobs, which could see up to half of the medical workforce in England could stop work, December 17, 2025

RESIDENT doctors are keen to resume talks with the government to avoid further strikes but “must see less name-calling and more deal-making” from Health Secretary Wes Streeting, said the British Medical Association (BMA) today.

Medics will enter 2026 a “renewed can-do spirit,” added the union as they returned to work after a five-day walkout in England as part of their long-running dispute over jobs and pay.

The BMA’s resident doctors committee chair Dr Jack Fletcher said: “What we need is a proper fix to this jobs crisis and a credible path towards restoring the lost value of the profession.

“That must mean the creation of genuinely new jobs, and it could involve a responsible multi-year approach to restoring doctors’ pay.

“Those are solutions that mean we can build out our future workforce to end the current crisis, solutions which are very much within government’s power.”

The strike followed 83 per cent of resident doctors voting to reject a government offer for more specialist training places but no extra pay. Turnout was 65 per cent.

Dr Fletcher said that medics are “frustrated by the year that has just passed,” which saw Mr Streeting compare them with juvenile delinquents and “moaning minnies.”

“There have been plenty of opportunities for strike action to have been avoided but all too often the government has moved too little and too late,” he added.

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/doctors-call-less-name-calling-and-more-deal-making-health-secretary-wes-streeting

Continue ReadingDoctors call for ‘less name-calling and more deal-making’ from Health Secretary Wes Streeting

MAGA implodes: Will Israel’s power over Washington collapse next?

Spread the love

by Jasim Al-Azzawi

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

US President Donald Trump greets the crowd at a Make America Great Again event at Gastonia Municipal Airport on October 21, 2020 in Gastonia, North Carolina, United States. [Peter Zay – Anadolu Agency]

The MAGA empire has turned inward. Its warriors no longer march shoulder to shoulder in lockstep but carve at one another like rival warlords. The movement that once roared in unison now splits along a single, explosive fault line: America First versus Israel First. Two convictions, two armies now face each other inside the same ideological fortress, each convinced it alone holds the mandate of destiny. On one side stands Steve Bannon — raw, furious, unapologetically nationalist. On the other stands Ben Shapiro — polished, venomous, the cultural enforcer of unyielding loyalty to Israel. The alliance that once dominated the American right is devouring itself at an increasing pace. What was once unfathomable is now undeniable: the eighty-year consensus that Israel dictates the boundaries of conservative politics is cracking apart, and the reverberating tremor is shaking the very columns of American power.

The explosion happened in public, not whispered in back rooms or podcasts, but detonated onstage at the first Turning Point USA conference after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. It should have been a sombre moment of unity. Instead, the air stiffened with accusations. Ben Shapiro, self-appointed guardian of ideological purity, initiated his scorched-earth tirade. Unabashedly, he fired the first salvo. He spat contempt at Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Steve Bannon himself. He called them “charlatans” and accused them of extremism. But beneath the theatrics lay the real crime he could not forgive; they dared even entertain the suggestion that American loyalty to Israel is not beyond question. The Israel First Rubicon had been crossed. And Shapiro — furious, brittle, panicked — declared ideological jihad.

Bannon’s deafening reply was not a rebuttal. It was a devastating indictment. He took the same stage and drove a sharp spike through the heart of the illusion that the American right still bows obediently and wholeheartedly before Israeli dictates. Shapiro, he roared, was “a cancer spreading through the body” of conservative politics — not simply wrong, but dangerous, parasitic, devouring the movement from within. This was not an improvised cable-show rhetoric. This was a declaration of civil war inside the American right. And Bannon knew precisely what he was doing and why. The skirmish is not about conference insults. It is about the 2028 presidential election, about power, about whether American nationalism means sovereignty… or subservience.

READ: Israeli army claims tens of thousands of Houthis are preparing attacks from neighbouring countries

The televised public fracture now bleeds into the rank and file. MAGA supporters are forced to choose: Is America sovereign, or is Israel sacred? For decades, that question, among the most critical questions of our time, was forbidden. To ask it was political suicide. To answer it honestly was exile. But history has a cruel habit of forcing buried truths to the surface. And Charlie Kirk — before his death — had already begun whispering those questions. The ghost of that defiance now stalks the movement that bears his name.

Bannon’s latest strident eruption tore the mask off entirely. With brutal clarity, he declared what Israeli leaders never believed they’d hear from their most powerful allies: Israel does not own American foreign policy anymore. He mocked Netanyahu’s protests of “partnership.” He described a protectorate, a client state, a vassal state, terrified of losing its grip instead. And Bannon claimed something far more astonishing — that Trump’s inner circle is already acting accordingly. He describes Kushner, Witkoff, Vance, Rubio negotiating with Qatar, Turkey, Egypt, the UAE — shaping Gaza’s future without asking Tel Aviv’s permission. Israel — long used to dictating American position — now finds itself abruptly sidelined, gripped by fear of being reduced to a secondary role.

Bannon pushed further still. He declared what Netanyahu and his supporters fear most: Israel’s Greater Israel fantasy has destroyed Israel. It overreached. It strangled itself by pursuing a repugnant occupation despised worldwide. The country now wails in rage as the leash slips. Israel is not ascendant. Israel is in the throes of death.

The break is not merely political. It is theological. Cultural. Civilizational.

Bannon predicts a tectonic reversal of a century of Middle Eastern geopolitical order. He claims the United States is unwinding, in months, what empires took decades to build. Turkey — once conquered, now returns. Regional states — Egypt, UAE, maybe even Saudi Arabia — are poised to define the future of Gaza. Hamas may fade into irrelevance. Israel screams in protest. And Washington shrugs and walks away.

OPINION: The cracks in MAGA: the American right is divided over the Middle East

His most explosive idea lands like a theological bombshell: a three-state solution that includes a Christian sovereign stake in Jerusalem. Not symbolism. Not rhetoric. Power. Security. Permanence. Something neither Israel nor Palestinians want even to imagine… but something Bannon argues the world will now impose.

The verdict is merciless: Israel no longer dictates terms. It receives them. Accept the regional future… or walk alone. No money. No arms. No shield. Israeli exceptionalism — once unquestioned gospel in Washington — now may become a relic with time.

The reaction from Israel’s defenders is predictable and frantic. Tucker Carlson is crowned “Antisemite of the Year” by StopAntisemitism, a desperate, brutal attempt to enforce obedience through public shaming. Once, this label would have destroyed a career. Now? It engenders laughter and ridicule. It is worn as a badge of defiance within the America First camp—a signal that a new right exists, a new era has begun—one that refuses to kneel.

This is not a policy debate. This is an ideological exorcism. The American right is purging something that has dominated it for generations. And the fight will be savage and relentless.

The MAGA movement now stands at an existential crossroads. One road leads back to submission — back to the politics of obligation, automatic military aid, unconditional diplomatic protection, the eternal promise that America’s destiny is forever chained to Tel Aviv’s agenda. The other road is brutal, nationalist, and unapologetically self-interested. America First, without disclaimers. America First, without foreign veto. America First, without fear.

The knives are drawn. The war has begun. And the world will watch a battle like no other. 

And when the shouting ends, when the slogans fade, when the smoke clears over this ideological battlefield, one truth will remain: American conservatism will never return to what it was… and Israel will never again command what it once did.

OPINION: America’s double game with international justice: When power poses as principle

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Experiencing issues with this image not appearing. I suspect because it's so critical of Zionist Keir Starmer's support of and complicity in Israel's genocides.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpA
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza's hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.

Continue ReadingMAGA implodes: Will Israel’s power over Washington collapse next?

Reform slammed as further attacks on BAME politicians revealed

Spread the love

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/reform-slammed-further-attacks-bame-politicians-revealed

 Reform UK leader Nigel Farage arrives at the Reform UK South East conference, at Sandown Park Racecourse in Esher, Surrey, January 10, 2025

LABOUR slammed Reform UK today amid a deluge of damning evidence against the right-wing party’s mayoral candidate Chris Parry, who said David Lammy should “go home to the Caribbean.”

Nigel Farage’s party has faced calls to drop the retired Royal Navy officer as mayoral candidate for Hampshire and the Solent after it emerged he had posted on X in February: “Lammy must go home to the Caribbean where (his) loyalty lies.”

In a press conference on Tuesday, Reform deputy leader Richard Tice claimed that he was “not familiar” with Mr Parry’s remarks against the Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary, but added, “whether we think he’s doing a good job or a bad job is just part of politics.”

Reform UK continued to refuse to condemn Mr Parry yesterday amid new reports that he suggested at least eight other politicians from minority ethnic backgrounds do not have a primary loyalty towards Britain.

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/reform-slammed-further-attacks-bame-politicians-revealed

Nigel Farage blames the Muzzies.
Nigel Farage blames the Muzzies.
Continue ReadingReform slammed as further attacks on BAME politicians revealed