Category: new authoritarianism

  • A decade on …

    Spread the love

    A decade on I’m starting to feel very much like I did a decade ago – that the state is out to get me personally. Actually, it’s more than just a feeling. It’s the language used about Fascists (individual Fascists?) and Big Cons.

    It all seems totally out of proportion as it was a decade ago. Hardly necessary or proportionate for name-calling a couple of Bully-boys and making a probably unfulfilled commitment to get up to speed. I said that I was trying to move on. The trouble is that it should by now be well appreciated that I do defend myself.

    I can’t help thinking that perhaps this post would be better made tomorrow.

    11.30 edit: I’m going to let this go for a short time to see if there’s confirmation or not.

    20.35 edit: Having reviewed things I think that I was prob mistaken and that it’s not directed at myself. It’s taken me a long time to get a handle on Cameron and I think that it’s simply that he’s a big fan of Tonee’s for unknown reasons and – despite achieving good grades – he’s not that bright. For example the (Eton) mess that he made about censoring search engines and now he wants to ban alternative narratives (conspiracy theories) and start a Cameron Youth.

    2332596

  • David Cameron to joke about Islamic extremism

    Spread the love
    image of David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks
    David Cameron, Rupert Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks

    This got me going:

    David Cameron launches 5 year-plan to tackle Islamic extremism in Britain

    Mr Cameron will argue that such a “warped world view” leads to conclusions that 9/11 was “actually inspired by Mossad to provoke the invasion of Afghanistan” and that the British security services knew about 7/7, but “didn’t do anything about it because they wanted to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash”.

    and Louise Casey is still about.

  • Psst, don’t say it too loudly. What’s wrong with UK politics. Shall we start and how the so-called ‘Labour’ party is going so wrong? To continue and continue …

    Spread the love

    Well if the so-called Labour party’s not going to do it, someone’s got to do it.

    Stop being such Neo-Con shits. How on Earth can you claim to represent ordinary people when you are such Neo-Con shits?

    TBC

    ed: The point is that if you’re such Neo-Con shits then you are Neo-Con shits. There is no difference because you are Neo-Con shits … who care nothing for people – never mind ordinary people. Neo-Con Labour shits care nothing except Neo-Conism. You evil, careless b’stards.

    Neo-Con Labour have nothing to offer ordinary people. Well, they can offer you ridiculous, irrational shitless scaredness. That’s what Neo_Conism is. Be afraid. Be far more afraid of a ridiculous nothingness threat. Hey be afraid of walking on the pavement – that’s far more dangerous. Be afraid of going out. Stay in. It’s so dangerous – far more dangerous than food poisoning or falling down. Wouldn’t that be awful if you fell over? Terrible, That’s life.

    Anyway, back to the Neo-Con Labour Party. They’ve accepted fully the Neo-Con skit. You know what it is – be skitless afraid. C’off Neo-Con Labour Party. Just C’off.

    Be afraid to catch a bus. Be afraid, be so afraid. Be afraid. These b’stards make up terrorism shit to control you through fear. I suggest that we need a backlash. How dare they? How dare they manipulate people through fear? How dare they? Cnuts

    How dare they manipulate people through fake manufactured terrorism?

    Payback?

    And such ridiculous, transparent terrrism nonsense. Can we hold thib to account?

    It’s unfortunate that I will never have the same importunities – hey that may be it. No, I’d like similar opportunities to do TB and IB as they had. FM I was lucky but thanks also to everyone that I did not acknowledge before.

    Isn’t it like an eye for an Ii? Isn’t it quite clear?

    6?

    I find it really weird that this IB cnut is still tolerated. I suppose that’s their siht siht. Shall we call it total siht? IB such a siht, it is so transparent that he was such a political tool. How on earth can anyone suggest that there is anything near democracy with absolute New-Labour murdering and more police cnuts like this? Oh Fcuk off.

    New Labour Ian Blair. It’s so ridiculous. IB – actually – covering for murdering bastards on the tube. Jean Charles de-Menezes. de-Menezes is the surname. JCD.

    ed: What can be done about this then? I have suggested 6
    Is there another resolution?

    Well of course there are other resolutions …
    It’s difficult to accuse dead people. Be good if they died soon not from old age

    Ed: The trouble is that this all seems outside any judicial process e.g. former Boss of the Metropolitan Police with assistance from a foreign paramilitary force calling for the murder of a UK citizen. If it’s outside any judicial process then I have suggested a resolution.

    ed: Probably military rather than paramilitary. Yes, employed and financed directly. I don’t suppose they were anything else. Perhaps paramilitary because they were pretending not to be foreign military in UK.

    Not that different to(p) terrorists then if you think about it.

    ed: Yes, they were foreign but pretending not to be. They invented terrrism.

  • Election campaign has nothing to say about synthetic make-it-up terrorism

    Spread the love

    Shall we have some?

    Neo-Con Terrrism BS that is …

    Cos I have an awful lot to say about that

    ed: What happens is that there is not really any terrrism. What they do is call anyone who opposes them a terrrist.

    Would you like some examples?

     

    Why is this election BS not scaring you no end from fake manufactured terrorism?

    Why are they not doing that?

     

    We’ve had no mention of absolute nonsense terrrism for weeks. Is this BS no good for a UK election?

    Is terrrism BS only good between elections to keep you scared?

    Are you really so ignorant to believe everything on TV?

    Hmm