Some thinks …

Spread the love

Thinks to be ammended, changed

Thing(k)s have moved on now since I was politically active.

I think (consider) that it was well out of order that I was (am) considered a suspected terrrist through legitimate political activism. edit: the point here is that legitimate political activists are (were?) labelled and persecuted as terrorists – and consequently subject to arbitary execution – instead of being recognised and respected as participants as should be the case in any democratic society.

It’s outrageous that totally innocent, unsuspecting people were killed for the Neo-Con New Labour project. It lead to the absolute fallacy of UK suicide bombers. The governments of that era are the terrorists and there is evidence of that. Almost a decade ago now and look what they have created … edit: The governments are still the terrrists – Charlie Hebdo BS.

It’s also outrageous that none of them have been held to account for their not only outrageous but clearly so illegal actions. Rendition, state-sponsored terrorism, just plainly covering-up for a blatant murder at Stockwell tube station. edit: I could call it a state-sponsored execution and I know what state did it.

,,,

TBC

3.50 13/6/15 And now we have these incompetent upper-class twats who appear to be lacking in legitimacy (elections). edit: The problem is that if they were not legitimately elected then … are any laws passed legitimate? if they’re not a legitimate government, what of attempts to displace them?

They’re very keen on blaming poor people instead of bankers and their rich mates. Iain Duncan Smith seems very keen on killing people.

edit; They like killing foxes and badgers.

3am 14/6/15

It’s very dark isn’t it? Has it always been this dark and disgusting?

I regarded Tonee as totally insane and installed into his position. Is this continuing? Are leaders of the Labour Party installed by a greater power? and it follows according to their agenda?

Maybe we should ask those labour party members that attend bilderberg meetings? They won’t tell you actually.

They do plan decades ahead. I’m pleased and proud that I played my part in knocking those plans off course. US official policy as prescribed by PNAC was to fight many wars on many fronts. That didn’t work did it?

PNAC policy appears to be total domination of everything. I oppose that.

4.08 14/6/15 PNAC policy is also fake manufactured terrorism. I oppose that too.

Continue ReadingSome thinks …

Boris Johnson insults gays and bisexuals with onanism and porn remarks

Spread the love

Bullingdon Tory idiot Boris JohnsonThis article considers Boris Johnson’s remarks about terrorist onanism and proposes two alternative terrorist profiles – one of terrorists and one of their agents.

Privilidged Mayor of London Boris ‘Bullingdon idiot’ Johnson claims that ‘If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn. They are literally w***ers.’ Johnson’s comments – like Johnson himself – don’t contribute much of anything to anything.

Firstly, a[ed:o}nonists and watchers of porn are accepting of and uninhibited in their sexuality. The most accepting of and uninhibited in their sexuality are gays and bisexuals. The intended slur is actually an insult to gay and bisexual sexuality.

Secondly, this issue of psychological profiles is equally BS. Psyschological profiles are of little use and little used because terrorists are so diverse. Later media stories cited psychological profiles by MI5 after I did some searches. That’s useful for rich ass Boris because researchers don’t have access to mythical psychological profiles by MI5.

Terrorism follows patterns. For example, there’s usually an exercise ongoing, it occurs at politically salient times and employs number symbolism. It is also often facilitated by local authorities – lucky there wasn’t any traffic, cops with radios or cars or motorcycles or helicopters in Paris, eh? We have police cars with lights and sirens and full of technology in the UK and they keep big guns in the back.

Once you accept that the actual terrorists are state actors and that terrorism serves political purposes for the rich elite, you can understand that MI5 itself serves these interests and that any profiles are profiles of political opponents labelled as terrorists.

To help, I’ve prepared two simple profiles – one of the terrorists and one of their servants, assistants or foot-soldiers.

Terrorist profile

  • Priviledged wealth. I mean in the top 1% of the wealthy. Born into it.
  • Privilidged position e.g. Mayor or former Mayor of London or New York, Prime Minister, former President, Home Secretary, Minister of Defence, etc.
  • Priviledged education. Notice that I’m not saying well-educated. public school, Cambridge, Oxford, Yale, etc
  • Neo-Con political orientation. I’m coming to realise that Neo-Con is not at all distant from Fascist or Neo-Fascist. Neo-Cons are using the same methods of terrorism, misdirection and victimisation as the Nazis that they financed.
  • Member of a privilidged fraternal organisation e.g. Bullingdon Club, Skull & Bones (formerly the Brotherhood of Death), Bavaria Grove, etc
  • Temporally and spatially local to Benjemin Netenyahu or Rudolph Giuliani.

 

Terrorist foot-soldiers profile

  • Employeed by a three-letter acronym e.g. CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, SAS, FIU, SRR, MPS, Sad, Bet. (and the exception QinetiQ on 7/7, QiQ?).
  • Promoted for failure e.g. Ian Blair, Cressida Dick, Tony Blair?
  • Temporally and spatially local to Benjemin Netenyahu or Rudolph Giuliani.

 

With thanks to Webster Tarpley for the promoted for failure item. He discusses Hurricane Katrina and the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center facilitated by the FBI here.

I’ve had a book by Webster Tarpley infiltrated and confiscated by terrorist agents just recently. I guess – though I’ll admit that I’m uncertain – that it would be my local police. I ordered 911 SYNTHETIC TERROR through amazon.uk two weeks ago on 19 January. The terrorists don’t want me to read it.

8/8/15: I did intend to clarify that Johnson’s remarks are regarded as an attack on alt soc. but then that should be clear.

Continue ReadingBoris Johnson insults gays and bisexuals with onanism and porn remarks