Ban on Palestine Action is repugnant and should be lifted, high court told
Co-founder’s lawyer says group is part of an ‘honourable tradition’ of direct action and civil disobedience
The proscription of Palestine Action is a repugnant, unprecedented and disproportionate interference with the right to protest, the high court has heard.
On the first day of a legal challenge to the ban brought by co-founder Huda Ammori, her lawyer said the group had been engaged in an “honourable tradition” of direct action and civil disobedience prior to proscription.
Raza Husain KC told the court in London on Wednesday: “There are reasons of profound importance as to why, in the 32 executive orders that have been made adding organisations to proscribed lists, no direct action civil disobedience organisation appears.
“Such proscription is repugnant to the tradition of the common law and contrary to the European convention on human rights.”
Husain said the home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, had alleged that some of Palestine Action’s activities crossed the threshold for terrorism but that these were few in number and were disputed.
…
The original article at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/26/ban-on-palestine-action-is-repugnant-and-should-be-lifted-high-court-told is recommended.
