This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
President Trump has promised that the United States will not attack Iran before the 3rd November midterm elections. That statement sounds like restraint and at the same time also be read as a warning. By tying military restraint to election day, Trump has made the period after the vote more dangerous.
The Iran war is making the election harder for the Republican Party. As of now, prediction markets give Republicans roughly a one-in-ten chance of retaining both chambers of Congress.
An October AP-NORC poll found that 69 per cent of Americans believed the war was not worth fighting, while only 28 per cent approved of Trump’s handling of Iran. For many voters, the war is no longer a distant foreign-policy issue. They feel it through higher fuel prices, inflation, and the fear of another open-ended conflict.
A Republican defeat, however, would not remove Trump’s military power the next morning. He would remain Commander-in-Chief, and the outgoing Congress would remain in office until 3rd January 2027. This leaves a two-month gap between the election and the arrival of a new Congress. During that period, Trump would face less pressure to protect Republican candidates, but Democrats would not yet control the congressional machinery needed to challenge him.
That is the main danger. Americans may vote against the party that owns the war, but their votes would not immediately change who controls military decisions. The election could reject the war politically while leaving Trump free to expand it militarily.
Trump would not need a special executive order or advance approval from Congress to begin a limited operation. Like other presidents before him, he could rely on a broad interpretation of his Commander-in-Chief powers, claim that an attack was needed to protect American personnel or interests, and use forces and funds that Congress had already approved.
Congress would then be responding to a war that was already under way.
The War Powers Resolution offers some restraint, but not enough to prevent the opening attack. It requires the President to report the use of US forces in hostilities within 48 hours and sets a timetable for ending an operation that Congress has not authorised. In practice, this gives Congress a way to contest a campaign after it begins. It does not reliably stop the first missiles from being launched.
A further attack would also face serious questions under international law. Unless Washington could show Security Council authorisation or a genuine case of self-defence, the use of force against Iran would be difficult to justify under the UN Charter. Yet this is another example of the gap between law and action: a strike can take place before courts, international organisations or legislatures are able to respond.
READ: Axios: Netanyahu discussed joint strike on Iran with Trump before Israeli election
This does not mean that a Democratic victory would be meaningless. Democratic control of both chambers would make a prolonged war harder to sustain.
Congress could investigate the administration, subpoena officials, expose the real military and financial costs, and attach conditions to future funding. It could also demand the withdrawal of US forces and force the White House to defend its war aims in public.
But congressional power has limits. Trump could veto legislation restricting the campaign, and Democrats would need a two-thirds majority in both chambers to override him. The administration could also continue using previously approved funds while Congress debated what to do. The important distinction is simple: a Democratic Congress could make the continuation of war more difficult, but it might not prevent Trump from starting the next phase.
The Pentagon’s preparations make this risk more credible. Recent US reporting indicates that Central Command has been asked to prepare options for renewed operations against Iran. Military planning is not proof that Trump has decided to attack. It does mean that the machinery is being put in place so that he can act quickly if negotiations fail. After election day, the immediate political cost of such action will be lower.
The consequences would be felt far beyond Washington. Iran can retaliate against US forces and partners across the region and can disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. A new round of attacks could raise energy and insurance costs, expose countries around the Persian Gulf to retaliation and place even more pressure on governments trying to stay outside the conflict. American military superiority may win individual battles, but it has not produced a stable political settlement or removed Iran’s ability to impose regional costs.
The timing also matters for Palestine. Every new escalation with Iran allows Israel to present the region mainly as a security threat and draws diplomatic and media attention away from its actions in Occupied Palestine. A wider US-Iran war would therefore not only deepen regional instability. It would also give Israel more space to avoid pressure over Gaza and the continuing dispossession of Palestinians.
Regional governments should not wait for the American election to solve this crisis. An election can change the political price of war, but it cannot produce peace by itself. Pakistan and Qatar, which are facilitating indirect communication, should use the period before 3 November to press for an immediate and lasting ceasefire. Other regional states should support an agreement that protects navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, prevents further attacks and restores a credible diplomatic path on the nuclear issue.
The real question is therefore not only whether Democrats will win Congress. It is whether diplomacy can produce an agreement before the last electoral restraint on Trump disappears. If it cannot, the period after 3rd November may become more dangerous, not less.
OPINION: Can Trump restrain Israel?
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Israeli firm weaponized digital ad network for spyware attacks, research shows
- Lebanon presses US to push Israel for halt to attacks
- Sisi says he repeatedly told Netanyahu that Palestinian state would bring ‘lasting peace’
- UN says more than 230,000 displaced by fighting in Yemen since August
- UN official sounds alarm about Gaza, West Bank year after ceasefire
- Gaza government denies imposing fees on trucks, demands entry of 600 daily
- Iran reports another oil tanker fire in restricted area east of Strait of Hormuz
- 19 killed, 364 injured in Houthi attacks on Saudi airports: Saudi-led coalition
- The Gulf needs a security order that Washington cannot switch off
- 2nd week of Rafah crossing closure worsens crisis for patients: Gaza Health Ministry
- The international community does not object to permanent forced displacement
- Obama says Israel has ‘ceded moral ground’ in Middle East conflict
- London Protest to Oppose Hijab Restrictions in Azerbaijani Schools This Friday
- From underground wealth to diplomatic power: Azerbaijan’s energy strategy
- Trump could lose Congress and still expand the US war on Iran
- Secret meeting held between US ambassador, opposition leader ahead of Israeli elections: Report
- Gaza’s future is not Washington’s to decide, says rights chief
- Egypt, Qatar stress need to halt hostilities against Saudi Arabia
- US considering using ‘mother of all bombs’ against Iran: Report
- Don’t let Britain shelve Sally Rooney
- Trump says Qatar offered to gift 747 jet to US after he asked to ‘borrow’ it for Air Force One
- Israeli Spy Pollard stole the files, today’s it’s delivered through official channels
- Iran’s Revolutionary Guards warn US would ‘regret’ any new attack
- A protest against the detention of Tunisian activists from the Sumud Flotilla
- Second commercial vessel sinks near Strait of Hormuz within 24 hours
- Yemeni premier calls Houthi attacks, siege of Taiz ‘war crime’
- Former Shin Bet chief sues Netanyahu for defamation, says he warned him more than 20 times about Hamas
- Palestinian Prisoners’ Club says Israel has detained over 2,000 children since October 2023
- The policing of Muslim women’s bodies, from West Asia to Europe and beyond
- Egypt, Kuwait and Arab League condemn Colombian Embassy opening in Jerusalem
- Israeli airstrike kills Gaza mother as three-year-old daughter survives fire
- What does the Green Party’s historic anti-Zionist motion mean for Palestine?
- Podcast by Jasim Al-Azzawi with Kelley Beaucar Vlahos: Target Locked: Is Trump’s Iran Brinkmanship Psy-Op or a Trap?
- Sudanese army advances in West Darfur, recaptures areas from RSF
- Houthis renew attacks on King Khalid airport in Riyadh and Aramco facilities
- Israel arrests Palestinian man wanted for nearly 10 years in occupied West Bank
- Dutch parliament backs move to protect ICC from US sanctions
- Palestinian journalists’ union warns of systematic targeting in West Bank, Jerusalem
- The ceasefire that keeps killing children: Gaza one year on
- Egypt has ‘no hidden agendas,’ ambitions against anyone: President
- Saudi football league postpones 3 matches after Houthi attacks
- Indonesia slams Israel for discriminating against one of its pilots
- 4 Palestinians killed, several others injured in Israeli airstrikes in Gaza despite ceasefire
- Lebanese president, top Iranian diplomat stress diplomatic solutions to regional conflicts
- Yemeni army claims 1,250 Houthis ‘neutralized’ in ‘Dawn of Yemen’ operation
- Palestine says Colombia’s opening of embassy in West Jerusalem violates international law
- Pakistan reiterates ‘unwavering’ commitment to Saudi Arabia’s protection under Makkah defense pact
- Iran says container ship sank after striking naval mine in Strait of Hormuz
- Israel’s elections: Netanyahu wants more than victory; he wants to stop others from governing
- Israeli army opens fire on water tanker, drives away shepherds in southwestern Syria
