Tag: democracy

  • Led by Elon Musk, 515 Superrich People Have Donated $4.2 Billion to Super PACs for 2026 Elections

    Spread the love

    Article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk attends the Golden Age of American Innovation Summit at the Institute of Peace on October 8, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    “Until something is done, like overturning the Citizens United US Supreme Court decision, the wealthy’s stranglehold on our political system will continue to tighten.

    The “almost cartoon-villain level of political spending” by SpaceX CEO and former Trump administration adviser Elon Musk has reached a fever pitch ahead of the midterm elections, with the right-wing billionaire’s donations of $445 million to super political action committees accounting for 10% of the $4.2 billion the PACs have brought in.

    As an analysis released Tuesday by the government watchdog Public Citizen found, Musk has led the way in contributing huge sums to super PACs. The PACs can raise unlimited amounts of money on behalf of candidates and causes and have increasingly influenced elections following the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, which said the government cannot restrict political spending by corporations.

    RECOMMENDED…

    Elon Musk Holds Town Hall Ahead Hotly Contested Wisconsin State Supreme Court Election

    Elon Musk’s ‘Absolutely Insane’ $276 Million Midterm Spending Exposed in New Report

    ‘Billionaires Aren’t Compatible With Democracy’: Elon Musk Tries to Boost Ken Paxton With $158 Million Donation

    ‘Billionaires Aren’t Compatible With Democracy’: Elon Musk Tries to Boost Ken Paxton With $158 Million Donation

    But excluding Musk, just 514 donors have contributed about $3.8 billion to super PACs this election cycle, as Republicans attempt to hold onto control of the US Senate and House of Representatives despite President Donald Trump’s plummeting approval rating and his record of raising the prices of gas and other essentials with his illegal war on Iran and his tariff policy.

    Altogether, the donations from the 515 contributors account for 73% of all super PAC funding from individuals, corporations, and nonprofits this election cycle, according to Public Citizen.

    “The figures add to a growing body of evidence that unlimited political spending has concentrated influence over elections among a tiny number of wealthy individuals and corporations,” said the organization, noting that Musk’s contributions come two years after he poured nearly $300 million into the 2024 elections, boosting Trump and other Republicans and spending close to $120 million more than the next closest donor.

    The report follows an earlier Public Citizen analysis that found more than 100 super PACs that have raised at least $1 million received the majority of the funding from just a single donor, collectively gathering more than $1 billion to boost the candidates of their choice.

    The Senate Leadership Fund has the most donors contributing at least $1 million each, with 61 people contributing $496 million.

    “When 500 donors account for more than 70% of super PAC contributions, we should be asking whose voices our political system is prioritizing.”

    MAGA Inc., the super PAC affiliated with Trump, has taken $405 million from 102 contributors ahead of the crucial midterms, while the Senate Majority PAC has received $244 million from 44 people or groups.

    Fifty-three donors have sent $231 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, while 31 donors have contributed $183 million to the House Majority PAC.

    “Super PACs have helped create a political system where a small number of wealthy interests can spend unlimited amounts to influence elections and shape the choices voters face,” said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen. “When 500 donors account for more than 70% of super PAC contributions, we should be asking whose voices our political system is prioritizing.”

    After Musk, GOP megadonors Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein have been the second-largest contributors to super PACs this year. The Uihleins own the packing company Uline, and have pushed for years for government deregulation and against labor unions.

    Other top contributors include multiple dark money groups, right-wing megadonor Jeffrey Yass—a longtime funder of anti-LGBTQ+, anti-choice, and anti-public school campaigns—and venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who said earlier this year that he would prefer to use artificial intelligence in his business rather than hire human workers.

    As The Washington Sun reported Tuesday, dark money groups, which don’t have to reveal the source of their contributions, have poured more than $392 million into the four congressional leadership PACs this year.

    The Public Citizen report stresses that the hundreds of top donors to super PACs this year gave amounts of money that “most Americans could not fathom donating to a political cause.”

    More than 85% of the money raised by super PACs ahead of the midterms came from donors who gave at least $20,000—“nearly a quarter of the median household income,” said Public Citizen.

    “Until something is done, like overturning the Citizens United US Supreme Court decision,” said the group, “the wealthy’s stranglehold on our political system will continue to tighten.”

    Article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
    Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.

  • ‘They Are Terrorizing Us’: Video Shows ICE Agents Slashing Tires of Lawful Observers

    Spread the love

    Article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent is seen slashing a legal observer’s tires on October 7, 2026 in Hillsboro, Oregon. (Photo via ACLU)

    “We hope that sharing our story will bring attention to their reckless and unconstitutional attacks on our communities.”

    A video taken from the car of two legal observers in the Portland, Oregon area shows an unmarked vehicle with emergency lights flashing, following close behind their car on a street in the suburb of Hillsboro.

    About 15 seconds into the video, both cars stop and two masked people get out of the unmarked vehicle and approach the other car, with one carrying a sharp object that they use to puncture the back tire. They approach a second time a few seconds later, slashing the tire again.

    RECOMMENDED…

    People hold a "Stop ICE" banner in Providence, Rhode Islnd

    ‘Where Is Our Humanity?’: Anger After ICE Tried to Arrest Father Who Held Crying Toddlers

    ICE Agent Reportedly Shoots Person In The Bronx

    New Yorkers Rally Against ICE After Masked Officer Shoots, Injures Man With 5-Year-Old in Car

    Both of the masked people are wearing vests emblazoned with the name of their government agency: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

    The people who filmed the attack, identified as AP and MP in an administrative complaint filed with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Thursday, had been observing and filming the agents in a Safeway parking lot in Hillsboro, and had used whistles and honked their car horn to alert people about ICE’s presence, before the officers started following them.

    Filming ICE agents and other federal officers who have been deployed to carry out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation operation is legal under the First Amendment, as top DHS officials were forced to admit under oath last February.

    At the time, people across the nation were reeling from the killings by DHS agents of two legal observers, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, in Minneapolis.

    Numerous videos were posted on social media of federal agents threatening people and demanding that they stop exercising their constitutional right to film immigration enforcement operations, with one officer in Maine telling a woman her name would end up in a “nice little database” if she didn’t stop recording him and that she’d be considered a “domestic terrorist.”

    In the administrative filing, the legal observers in Hillsboro emphasized that “what happened to us is not unique, and that is what is so terrifying.”

    “We observe and record public ICE activity in order to shine a light on their abusive behavior and to create a record of what our government is up to,” they said. “Because of that, they are terrorizing us and anyone else who dares to exercise their First Amendment right to hold our government accountable. We hope that sharing our story will bring attention to their reckless and unconstitutional attacks on our communities.”

    In the administrative complaint, filed by the ACLU and the ACLU of Oregon, the legal observers and their attorneys demanded that the DHS investigate the October 7 incident and discipline the agents who slashed the tire.

    “In addition, we request that your offices undertake a comprehensive investigation of the pervasive pattern of ICE agents unlawfully retaliating against individuals who observe, gather information about, and record ICE agents performing their duties in public,” reads the complaint. “We urge you to make recommendations for institutional changes to ICE training, oversight, and accountability consistent with your findings in order to prevent further abuses by ICE personnel. More specifically, we strongly urge ICE to adopt policies and implement training and instruction consistent with the First Amendment right to observe, gather information about, and record law enforcement officers performing their duties in public.”

    The ACLU has represented several observers who have been surveilled, intimidated, and harassed by federal agents for filming enforcement operations. In Memphis, Tennessee, the group has represented observers who have recorded the operations of the Memphis Safe Task Force, which is made up of more than 30 federal, state, and local agents who have spent more than a year “carrying out mass traffic and street stops and breaking into homes.”

    “Task Force agents are systematically retaliating against those who record them, including threatening to arrest them, stopping and questioning them without reasonable suspicion of any crime, sitting outside their homes, and even using excessive force against and arresting them,” according to the ACLU.

    The Hillsboro incident took place as DHS was threatening to target so-called “sanctuary” cities like Portland, where local police are restricted from participating in immigration enforcement operations.

    “Masked federal officers have no business coming to Oregon to injure or intimidate people,” said Kelly Simon, legal director of the ACLU of Oregon. “Oregonians have the right to support their neighbors and communities by filming and documenting government abuses, and Oregonians should not have to fear retaliation when they exercise their right to record law enforcement.”

    Scarlet Kim, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said that “the right to record publicly visible law enforcement activity is fundamental to our democracy.”

    “Like many people across the country, our clients have been observing and recording ICE activity in their community,” she said. “These videos have proven critical to exposing ICE’s abuses. If we cannot see and document what our own government is doing on our streets, we cannot hold it accountable for running roughshod over our rights.”

    Article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Climate science denier Donald Trump confirms that he knows nothing about democracy and that more liquid gold is being secured according to his policy of global privateering.
    Climate science denier Donald Trump confirms that he knows nothing about democracy and that more liquid gold is being secured according to his policy of global privateering.
  • Navi Pillay Punctured Trump’s Overblown Ego in Six Words

    Spread the love

    Article by Steve Kaagan republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Chair of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, South African judge Navanethem “Navi” Pillay, gestures after a press conference in Geneva on September 16, 2025.
    (Photo by Fabrice Coffrini/ AFP via Getty Images)

    With one seemingly off-hand comment, Pillay framed a comparison between a cause she has fought for her whole life on behalf of her fellow human beings and the smallness of a man who is doing his best to unravel that work.

    Asked for her thoughts, after learning that the Nobel Committee had awarded her the 2026 Peace Prize, Navi Pillay added a one-liner to an appreciative response, “I’ll share the award with Trump.” The seemingly off-hand comment was anything but. Rather, it showed power and depth in its pointedness, irony, sarcasm, humor, wisdom, and humanity. Here, within the context in which it was made, is what I gleaned from the comment.

    The Nobel Committee’s rationale for awarding Pillay the prize included her dedicated efforts to defend international institutions and protect human rights. As a justice on the International Criminal Court, she had secured the indictment of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for crimes against humanity committed against the people of Gaza, which amounted to genocide.

    RECOMMENDED…

    US-POLITICS-TRUMP

    ‘By Annihilating Iran, We’ve Created Peace’: Trump’s Genocidal Rhetoric Takes Orwellian Turn in Time Interview

    Navi Pillay wins Nobel Peace Prize

    ‘Why Would You Need Courage to Speak the Truth?’: Navi Pillay, Who Led UN Report on Gaza Genocide, Wins Nobel Peace Prize

    Perhaps the most obvious connection she was making with the comment was the futile gesture of Maria Corina Machado, 2025 Peace Prize winner. Machado attempted to leverage Trump’s support for her movement’s claim to the presidency of Venezuela, by sharing her Peace Prize with him—a move the Nobel Committee prohibits. In effect, Pillay was saying, “Look what that got her, nothing.” The implication is that it is wrongheaded to believe that pandering to petty, aspiring dictators will yield anything positive for a righteous cause.

    Her use of humor highlighted its essential role in dressing down bullies who blatantly seek to dominate other human beings and trample on their inherent rights.

    At the same time, with her sarcastic jibe, she added emphasis to the cause for which she was awarded the prize, the defense of international institutions and protection of human rights. In citing Trump by name she implied that he is the “poster boy” for the very assault she has dedicated her life to countering, particularly through her work at the International Criminal Court and the United Nations Human Rights Commission.

    Additionally, her use of humor highlighted its essential role in dressing down bullies who blatantly seek to dominate other human beings and trample on their inherent rights. Through implicit ridicule she deftly punctured an overblown ego. Whether the target of the jibe gathered the intent or not was immaterial. Others would get the gist.

    Navi’s use of sarcasm also served another purpose. It eviscerated Trump’s assertions of power, making a distinction between real power that derives from righteous cause and mutual respect, and the semblance of power that comes from the fawning of sycophants. It also reinforced the absence of Trump’s moral standing as world leader and portrayed him appropriately as one for whom “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” is his most notable achievement.

    With one seemingly off-hand comment, Navi Pillay framed a comparison between a cause she has fought for her whole life on behalf of her fellow human beings and the smallness of a man who is doing his best to unravel an endeavor which, for a quarter of a millennium, has served as a beacon to the world for the ennoblement of humanity. More power to her!

    Article by Steve Kaagan republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Climate science denier Donald Trump confirms that he knows nothing about democracy and that more liquid gold is being secured according to his policy of global privateering.
    Climate science denier Donald Trump confirms that he knows nothing about democracy and that more liquid gold is being secured according to his policy of global privateering.
    Donald Trump warns against following the Onaquietday.org blog, says that he's heard that she's a which with a black cat and a dangerous kitchen.
    Donald Trump warns against following the Onaquietday.org blog, says that he’s heard that she’s a which with a black cat and a dangerous kitchen.

  • ‘Malicious Use’ of AI, Nuclear War Pose Extinction Threat to Humanity This Century: Lancet Study

    Spread the love

    Article by Jake Johnson republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Protesters gather outside an OpenAI developers conference at Fort Mason on September 29, 2026 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    “Although the likelihood of both dangers remains low, the scale of harm, should they be realized, would inflict an apocalypse on humanity.”

    A comprehensive new assessment of worldwide health threats published in The Lancet concludes that nuclear war and “malicious use” of artificial intelligence pose existential risks to humanity over the remainder of the 21st century, a finding that comes amid mounting global concern about the implications of rapid AI advancements.

    The Lancet Commission on 21st Century Global Threats to Health, comprised of dozens of experts across a range of fields, identifies 17 leading threats to human health and society, from the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency and pandemics to childhood malnutrition, income inequality, conventional war, and air pollution. Two of the threats carry “extinction potential” this century, according to the commission: nuclear conflict and misuse of AI.

    RECOMMENDED…

    Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei

    Alarm as AI Leaders Privately Weigh Scenarios of Post-Catastrophe Public ‘Revolt’

    Rep. Khanna Speaks At The National Press Club On The Epstein Files

    Citing ‘Civilizational Extinction Risk,’ Khanna to Intro Bill to Ban Recursive AI

    “Although the likelihood of both dangers remains low, the scale of harm, should they be realized, would inflict an apocalypse on humanity,” The Lancet warned in an editorial accompanying the new analysis, which was presented Sunday at the World Health Summit in Berlin, Germany.

    The commission notes that AI’s “potential to advance health and wellbeing is enormous,” but “the risk of catastrophic harm is equally profound.” The authors of the analysis point to several ways in which AI could be “used maliciously,” including the design of bioweapons, autonomous nukes, and invasive ransomware targeting global healthcare and financial institutions.

    “The final pathway is loss of control through the emergence of agentic, unaligned artificial general intelligence,” the analysis states. “This loss of control includes AI systems creating subgoals that lead to the seeking of human disempowerment or elimination, particularly if such agents autonomously gain access to financial networks, key infrastructure, or physical tools in the real world.”

    Regarding the existential threat of nuclear conflict, the study authors note that a famine stemming from atomic warfare “would affect all regions of the world, including those far from the conflict itself, through reduced caloric availability and cascading food-system failures.”

    “The devastation that could result from nuclear war cannot be overstated,” the analysis argues. “The risk is not hypothetical: We found that between 1948 and 2010, 22 nuclear weapon accidents and 21 close calls were recorded. Future nuclear conflicts could occur due to multiple distinct mechanisms, including nuclear exchange arising from international crises between nuclear powers, accidental detonation of nuclear warheads, terrorist use of nuclear devices, and AI deployment of nuclear weapons.”

    To avert the most catastrophic possible outcomes and mitigate other threats, the commission calls for “collective action between nations and within nations,” emphasizing that risks posed by AI, nuclear war, the climate crisis, and future pandemics “cannot be solved by governments or other actors acting for their own national populations alone.”

    Christopher Murray, director of the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and co-chair of the new commission, said in a statement that “the striking finding is not only the scale of these threats, but that humanity still has the agency to act.”

    “Across all 17 catastrophic threats, the decisions made by leaders today will shape the health and wellbeing of the next generation,” said Murray. “But delaying action will only serve to shift and increase the costs into the future.”

    Article by Jake Johnson republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    dizzy: I’m surprised that ongoing climate destruction does not meet the measure of carrying “extinction potential” this century. I certainly believe that it does around 2060.

    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
  • Air Force Major Who Called for Trump’s Impeachment Is in Solitary Confinement 24 Hours a Day

    Spread the love

    Article by Stephen Prager republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Air Force Maj. Jason Watson stands on the steps of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, holding a sign calling for the impeachment and removal of US President Donald Trump on July 1, 2026.
    (Photo by The Removal Coalition)

    One law professor told Common Dreams the detention of Maj. Jason Watson was a “blatant case of illegal pretrial punishment.”

    Air Force Maj. Jason Watson was arrested July 1 on the steps of the US Capitol after calling for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. According to his lawyer, he’s now being held in solitary confinement 24 hours a day in what some legal experts say could amount to illegal pretrial punishment.

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) contains provisions barring officers from engaging in public political activities that are typically protected for civilians, including criticizing the president and other elected officials.

    RECOMMENDED…

    ICE agents and immigration activists face off outside Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey

    ‘Should Concern All Americans’: Records Show ICE Has Gathered 50 Million Voter Records Ahead of Midterms

    'It Was All Quid Pro Quo': GOP Donor Goes on the Record to Accuse Kimberly Guilfoyle of Corruption

    ‘It Was All Quid Pro Quo’: GOP Donor Goes on the Record to Accuse Kimberly Guilfoyle of Corruption

    Prosecutors have charged Watson with violating them when he participated in a news conference calling for Trump to be removed from office over his launching of military actions against Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela without congressional authorization.

    After the speech, Watson stood on the Capitol steps holding a sign that read “Impeach, Convict, Remove” and was arrested after he refused to move.

    Before he was charged, Watson gave a CNN interview on August 17 in which he continued to criticize Trump, accusing him of “flagrantly violating the Constitution” and “breaking the law.”

    He acknowledged that he could face severe consequences as a result of his speech: “We just have to be willing to accept that we can change what is happening in our country if we are just willing to pay a price for it,” he said.

    One day later, he was arrested while on duty and taken into pretrial confinement. He now faces a general court-martial, the military’s most severe trial, which is capable of imposing lengthy prison sentences.

    On Friday, Watson’s lawyer, Christopher Mutimer, told CNN that after nearly two months, Watson is “still in solitary confinement 24 hours a day,” which he said amounted to “cruel and unusual” punishment.

    “Even if he gets an hour to eat or to exercise, he is alone,” Mutimer said. “He is literally by himself, with his thoughts, in a room where the light never turns off all day.”

    In an essay published Sunday by writer Monte Mader, Watson himself acknowledged spending his days in isolation, revealing that his Bible had only recently been returned to him and that he had little access to news.

    Watson described the conditions of his confinement as the reality one must accept when choosing to engage in nonviolent resistance.

    “Walking this path,” he said, “means exposing oneself to violence while refusing to retaliate against it.”

    After his July 1 protest, Watson had been restricted to Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling in Washington. Though the base reportedly has a confinement facility, following his detention, he was instead moved to a county jail in Maryland.

    During Watson’s September 18 preliminary hearing, Maj. Joshua Wendell, the hearing officer, said Watson could not be confined with civilians and was therefore kept in solitary confinement.

    “He was placed in confinement because of the law, which puts him in solitary confinement,” Wendell said, according to Stars and Stripes.

    Article 13 of the UCMJ “forbids punishing a service member before trial and forbids pretrial restraint more rigorous than the circumstances require.”

    Mutimer has pointed out that solitary confinement is “usually reserved for individuals who are disobeying or are violent, and injuring other people,” and usually only for “a day or two, or a week.” Watson, he said, has “been in there for months now.”

    Rachel VanLandingham, a former Air Force judge advocate and professor of law at Southwestern Law School, told Common Dreams that this “seems to be a blatant case of illegal pretrial punishment given that the nature of his pretrial restraint does not seem necessary to either ensure his presence at trial or to prevent foreseeable serious criminal misconduct.”

    “Solitary confinement is rare, and must be justified,” she said. “What, is the administration so afraid of this major’s words that he cannot talk to anyone?”

    Military defense attorney Cody Harnish, who attended Watson’s preliminary hearing, has raised concerns that his detention could be unlawful and that his especially harsh treatment was political in nature.

    “I represent people at court-martial in the military, who are accused of doing some very bad things,” he said during an interview this weekend with Meidas Defense. “They are not in pretrial confinement.”

    Harnish noted other abnormal aspects of Watson’s preliminary hearing: He was denied the ability to wear his uniform and instead arrived handcuffed, unshaven, and wearing an undershirt, which pointed to the possibility that he was facing degrading treatment.

    He also pointed out that Watson had submitted a request to resign his commission in exchange for avoiding a court-martial, but that the request was denied in 24 hours.

    “Nothing gets processed in the military that fast,” he said, suggesting that this could indicate influence from senior Pentagon officials.

    During his second term, Trump has used members of the military for political purposes in ways that have challenged longstanding norms of political neutrality. This has included hosting overtly political rallies before uniformed troops, screening them for ideology, and purging senior military officers deemed disloyal.

    Harnish suggested that the Trump administration was seeking to make an example out of Watson for speaking out against the president.

    “When someone speaks out against this administration in the military,” he said, “they’re going to crush him to silence anyone else in the ranks from ever thinking about it.”

    Article by Stephen Prager republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

    Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
    Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
    Orcas discuss rotting brain, front Orca says he wishes someone would Lock Him Up, small Orca says he thinks that his meds have been changed.
    Orcas discuss rotting brain, front Orca says he wishes someone would Lock Him Up, small Orca says he thinks that his meds have been changed.