NHS news review

Spread the love

‘Health Secretary’ Andrew Lansley’s claims yesterday that 22 NHS trusts had contacted him saying that they had difficulties meeting PFI payments backfired. Lansley’s claims were exposed as misleading and factually incorrect. That Lansley makes misleading and factually incorrect statements is no surprise to those of us that have been watching progress of the Destroy the NHS Bill.

Campaign group UK Uncut intend to occupy Westminster bridge.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Hospitals furious at Lansley’s debt claim – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

Health Secretary ‘undermining stability’ for political ends

Hospitals across the country turned on the Health Secretary Andrew Lansley last night, accusing him of making misleading claims that parts of the NHS were “on the brink of financial collapse” for party political gain.

Senior NHS managers expressed anger that Mr Lansley had singled out 22 trusts, whose “clinical and financial stability” was being undermined by having to pay for prohibitively expensive private finance contracts – used to build their new hospitals.

Mr Lansley claimed the trusts had contacted him saying that they “cannot afford” to pay for their schemes which were agreed by the previous Labour government.

But when contacted by The Independent a number of NHS trusts on the list expressed bemusement and anger that they had been included, and said the first they knew of the supposed financial difficulties over PFI (private finance initiatives) was when they read about Mr Lansley’s comments.

Privately some accused the Health Secretary of attempting to blame PFI for the wider problem of cuts to hospital budgets, which will require the NHS to save £20bn over the next four years. They also expressed concern that Mr Lansley was unnecessarily worrying patients that their local hospital was in danger of going bankrupt. “To suggest that our financial problems are about PFI is nonsense,” said one trust executive. “And we certainly never contacted the Department to say that. The problems that we face are about having to cut our budgets by 4 per cent every year for the next four years.”

UK Uncut plan to block Westminster Bridge in protest against NHS reforms | UK news | guardian.co.uk

Thousands expected to join direct action on 9 October and block bridge leading to parliament

Anti-cuts campaigners are planning to close one of the busiest bridges in central London in protest against the government’s planned shake up of the NHS.

UK Uncut has announced an “act of mass civil disobedience” at Westminster Bridge in protest against the health and social care bill which is due before parliament next month.

Organisers say they are expecting thousands of people to block the bridge that links St Thomas’s hospital in the south to parliament to the north on 9 October.

“Yes, it will be disruptive. Yes, it will stop the traffic. But this is an emergency and if we want to save our NHS we need to shout as loud as we can,” the group said in a statement.

Activists say they have been talking to unions, NGOs and other direct action groups who all support the action.

UK Uncut supporter Samina Khan said: “A leading doctor has said that this bill will ‘produce an underclass of patients with chronic, debilitating illness’, which isn’t surprising when you invite private companies to exploit people’s sickness for profit. I’ll be on the bridge so that when my kids ask me what happened to the NHS, I can at least say ‘I tried’.”

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Cathy Warwick, General Secretary of the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) suggests abandoning the controversial Destroy the NHS / Health and Social Care Bill.

Falling ill at the weekend could literally cost you your life, according to a report on London hospitals.

The NHS and the Liberal Democrats may be heading for a “catastrophic train crash” by pressing ahead with the coalition Government’s controversial health reforms, an MP has warned.

£12.7bn computer scheme to create patient record system is to be scrapped after years of delays

22 trusts struggling to cope with growing burden of PFI contracts.

dizzy: The spin is turning towards the Labour Party causing the collapse of the NHS by bankrupting it through PFI ( & the IT initiative).

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Is the only future for NHS reforms to scrap the bill? – Royal College of Midwives

The general secretary of the RCM has questioned whether the only way forward for NHS reforms is to pull the controversial health bill.

Cathy Warwick told Midwives that all changes which the government wants could be achieved without the bill.

She added that it is hard to believe the bill isn’t just a move towards privatisation.

‘We are close to feeling that the only way forward for the bill is for it to be withdrawn,’ she said.

‘My feeling is quite strong that everything we are being told the government wants to achieve would be possible without this bill.

‘So it is hard to believe that the bill is about anything other than ideology and privatisation.’

NHS London report says being ill at weekend could kill you – Health – London 24

Falling ill at the weekend could literally cost you your life, according to a report on London hospitals.

More than 500 people needlessly die every year in hospital because of too few doctors.

Patients are not seen promptly enough by a consultant on Saturdays and Sundays in accident and emergency, found NHS London.

“Reduced service provision at weekends is associated with this higher mortality rate,” it stated.

That lack of availability puts patients at risk of death.

“Stark” differences exist in the number of hours worked by consultants during weekends at hospitals in London, it found in Acute medicine and emergency general surgery – case for change.

Lib Dem warns of NHS ‘train crash’ – UK Politics, UK – The Independent

The NHS and the Liberal Democrats may be heading for a “catastrophic train crash” by pressing ahead with the coalition Government’s controversial health reforms, an MP has warned.

Lib Dem MP Andrew George, a vocal opponent of the Health and Social Care Bill, told members at the party’s autumn conference in Birmingham that the plans represented the “biggest upheaval” in the NHS’s history at precisely the time when it needed stability and certainty.

The St Ives MP said: “I want to do my best to save the NHS from what I believe may be a catastrophic train crash, which I fear may take the party with it.”

Mr George, who is a member of the Commons Health Select Committee, said the proposals raised the “very real risk” of producing an NHS driven more by private profit than concern with patient care.

He claimed the reforms represented “a major missed opportunity” to produce a service which was more accountable to communities and patients.

He said: “I think the future fate of both this party and this coalition Government needs to take heed of the concept that, actually,’it’s the NHS, stupid’.”

Charles West, from Shrewsbury and Atcham, who has been a prominent figure in the Lib Dem grassroots opposition to the reforms, compared the Bill to a “leaky ship”.

“If it sails at all it will go in the wrong direction,” he said. “I’m more worried that the ship will sink and that the NHS will sink with it, and if our name is on that ship we will go down as well.

“And, friends, we deserve to.”

NHS told to abandon delayed IT project | Society | The Guardian

£12.7bn computer scheme to create patient record system is to be scrapped after years of delays

An ambitious multibillion pound programme to create a computerised patient record system across the entire NHS is being scrapped, ministers have decided.

The £12.7bn National Programme for IT is being ended after years of delays, technical difficulties, contractual disputes and rising costs.

Health secretary Andrew Lansley, Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude and NHS chief executive Sir David Nicholson have decided it is better to discontinue the programme rather than put even more money into it. The axe may be wielded , with ministers likely to criticise the last Labour government for initiating the project but doing too little to ensure it delivered its objectives.

PFI schemes ‘taking NHS trusts to brink of financial collapse’ | Politics | guardian.co.uk

Health secretary says he has been contacted by 22 trusts struggling to cope with growing burden of private finance contracts

The rising costs of paying for hospitals under private finance initiative schemes is bringing NHS trusts to the “brink of financial collapse” and putting patient care at risk, the health secretary has warned.

Andrew Lansley said he had been contacted by 22 trusts that are struggling to cope with the growing burden of the PFI contracts, a policy of the former Labour government under which private capital is used to build hospitals and the NHS is left with an annual fee or “mortgage”. Between them, the trusts run more than 60 hospitals.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Lansley said: “We’re not going to let hospitals collapse financially.

“But if we were simply to carry on as the Labour party did in government, we would be seeing hundreds of millions of pounds every year being taken from what could provide improving services for patients in order to pay for PFI projects that roll forward for decades.”

He added that patient care could be jeopardised in the areas covered by the 22 trusts, saying: “We’re looking at a risk to services in their areas.”

Buckinghamshire, Oxford Radcliffe, North Bristol and Portsmouth are understood to be among the trusts in difficulty.

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Claims that NHS pay is too expensive. There is already anger amoung NHS staff and unions about changes to public sector pensions needing higher contributions for lower pensions.

Groups of commissioning GPs are concerned that they are required to be large groups and that they may inherit legacy debt.

Lib Dem health minister confirmed amendments to the Destroy the NHS / Health and Social Care Bill will be taken in the Lords.

Private firms offer GPs poor contracts.

Patients waiting weeks for GP appointments.

Private medical companies are trying to profit from the ConDem’s attack on the NHS.

There are also a few articles on Lib-Dem peer Baroness Williams demanding further changes. I find it rather hypocritical that Baroness Williams is demanding changes to a bill that was produced and supported by her own Tory party.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS leaders say salary bill is unsustainable | Society | The Guardian

Leaders of 1.5 million NHS staff are poised for confrontation with health service employers and ministers over proposed pay and pensions changes that unions claim would seriously damage their incomes.

The NHS already faces the prospect of more than 500,000 staff taking industrial action on 30 November as part of the national day of action against government plans to overhaul public sector pensions. A series of ballots in coming weeks is expected to see paramedics, radiographers, physiotherapists, chiropodists and a host of non-clinical staff such as cooks and cleaners participating in as yet unspecified action.

NHS staff, most of whom are experiencing a two-year freeze on their pay, are furious that ministers are seeking to compel them to work longer and contribute more for ultimately smaller pensions. Unions such as Unison, Unite and the GMB have pledged to ballot their members, although the British Medical Association, Royal College of Nursing and Royal College of Midwives are reluctant to do so.

But the organisation NHS Employers has increased the prospect of another money wrangle by declaring that the NHS salary bill is unsustainable and that local pay deals are needed to bring down costs. It claims that, despite the pay freeze for all NHS staff earning over £21,000, the cost to its members “ such as hospital and mental health trusts “ of employing staff is rising by 2.4% a year.

BBC News – Commissioning groups ‘concerned’ about size and budgets

A survey of the groups due to take over commissioning NHS care is highlighting fears about their size and budgets.

The questions were answered by 131 leaders, out of 253 new Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs).

A third said they felt under pressure to become larger, and two-thirds expressed fears that they might inherit debt.

The Department of Health said it expected parts of the NHS to work together to resolve any deficits.

The survey was organised by NHS Alliance and the National Association of Primary Care, which have joined forces to represent CCGs, who will take over buying and organising NHS services.

36% of GPs and other leaders who responded to the survey said they were under pressure from NHS managers to become bigger, so they could pass a viability test next month.

And 67% suspect they will have to deal with some legacy debt from former primary care trusts (PCTs) when the new system begins in England in April 2013.

Health bill changes in Lords will be accepted, says Lib Dem minister | Politics | guardian.co.uk

The government is to accept further changes to its health plans after Lady Williams, the veteran Liberal Democrat, warned that peers are prepared to hold up the health and social care bill in the House of Lords.

As a leading Lib Dem rebel in the Commons condemned the bill as a “huge strategic mistake”, the health minister Paul Burstow admitted that peers would improve the bill next month.

Peers are to consider the bill after more than 1,000 amendments were rushed through the House of Commons earlier this month in the wake of the government’s “listening exercise”.

Burstow, the Lib Dem health minister, said the government was still open to change. “We didn’t stop listening when the listening exercise ended,” he told the Lib Dem conference in a question and answer session on health.

Private firm offers GPs just two weeks’ sick pay – newsarticle-content – Pulse

Exclusive The company behind the UK’s largest network of privately run GP practices is offering its doctors less than half the paid sick leave they would receive under the BMA’s model contract.

Wait weeks to see a GP: Some patients face delays of more than a fortnight for appointment with family doctor | Mail Online

Many patients are having to wait up to three weeks or more to see their GP, a survey has revealed.

A poll of more than 2,000 patients has found that well over two-thirds are not able to see their family doctor within two days.

More than a quarter cannot get an appointment within a week, including some who are made to wait longer than a fortnight or even three weeks.

Aggressive marketing blitz by private firms seeking to gain from NHS cuts – mirror.co.uk

PRIVATE firms have launched an aggressive marketing blitz as they aim to profit from the cuts made to the NHS.

They are trying to lure patients away by highlighting rising waiting lists and the chaotic reorganisation.

One, BMI Healthcare, has placed adverts in local papers and put a waiting times map on its website to encourage NHS patients to go private.

Shadow Health Secretary John Healey said: “Firms are clearly lining up to cash in on damaging policies. It’s the same old Tory choice, wait longer or pay to go private.”

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

GP magazine returns to the often recurring theme of NHS changes driving away GPs.

The Royal College of Nursing repeat their opposition to the Destroy the NHS / Health and Social Care Bill and say that MPs are not listening.

Health workers consider non-cooperation.

Health unions warn that a toxic combination of increasing demand, shrinking resources and the pay freeze, are putting staff under severe pressure.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

GPC update: NHS reforms are driving GPs away | GPonline.com

GP leaders have hit out at the government over its handling of the implementation of NHS reforms and warned even enthusiastic GPs were now being driven away.

GPC chairman Dr Laurence Buckman condemned the government’s failure to scrap plans to offer successful clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) a ‘quality premium’ bonus payment.

‘We are not going to have one. It is in the Bill still – it should not be, it is an inappropriate use of public money.’

Dr Buckman said the quality premium was ‘ethically dubious’ and not acceptable, suggesting that if the government had spare cash to hand out, it should ‘give it to the poor’.

‘We think it is utterly immoral to take some of the money out of patient care and give it to GPs.’

GPC negotiators questioned the logic behind growing pressure on CCGs not to form around small population sizes, and warned that the government was rapidly pushing the NHS back into structures similar to the ones it had just spent billions of pounds to dismantle.

In addition, many experienced managers ‘who know how to run an NHS’ had been expensively laid off and lost to the health service.

He pointed out that the government had initially had a ‘laissez-faire’ approach to the establishment of CCGs but had now performed a volte-face and was dictating how they should look.

RCN monitoring Health and Social Care Bill – Health News – News – ChronicleLive

AT the Royal College of Nursing, we have been keeping a close eye on the Health and Social Care Bill, as it works its way through Parliament.

And despite reforms to the Bill, in response to a public outcry, it seems politicians still haven’t listened.

While MPs say the new Health Bill will reform the NHS and provide considerable efficiency savings, we fear these promises could prove hollow, and it will be the quality of care in the North East that suffers as a result.

Hospital Trusts throughout the North East are already struggling to make unprecedented budget cuts, after NHS CEO Sir David Nicholson demanded the NHS in the North East save £800m over four years, as part of a £20b national cost efficiency drive.

At the same time, we are facing the dissolution of our Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authority, which are being replaced by a large number of untested Clinical Commissioning Groups.

Ironically, the administration costs of running this new system of CCGs is forecast to be more expensive, and more complicated, than the one it is replacing. And if we get the commissioning of NHS services wrong, the delivery of care will not happen efficiently.

What this will mean for patients is a worryingly uncertain future for healthcare provision.

At the RCN, we’ve already identified the Government’s efficiency savings will result in 40,000 frontline NHS jobs being cut. This will result in understaffed and overstretched wards and practice centres across the country.

On top of this, the new Health Bill would remove the income cap for private patients, meaning there will no longer be a limit on the amount of money hospitals can make from private patients.

As a consequence, the access NHS patients have to services could become more limited.

The Government also hope by allowing ‘any qualified provider’ to supply healthcare services, they will drive up quality through competition.

However, this new policy could end up being a race to the bottom, with private sector companies undercutting the approved service tariffs of NHS providers.

At the RCN, we believe it is vitally important the new Health Bill puts safety guards in place to ensure the quality of patient care is not harmed by forced price competition.

Unions may call on members to resist reforms through ‘non-cooperation’ | News | Nursing Times

Unions may consider non-cooperation action against the government’s NHS reforms, a midwife leader has said.

Royal College of Midwives general secretary Cathy Warwick was asked about the prospect of action at a fringe event hosted by the Trades Union Congress at the Liberal Democrat autumn conference in Birmingham yesterday.

She said the organisation was still consulting with members about non-cooperation, although it was more likely to be in response to planned changes to pensions.

But she said: “It [non-cooperation] is something I think we maybe should be thinking about.”

Professor Warwick said the RCM was “close to thinking the only way forward is to ask for this [Health] Bill to be withdrawn”.

Her concerns include fragmentation of services and privatisation.

Ron Singer, a GP and Unite representative on the British Medical Association GP’s committee, said GPs were very unlikely to take action but it was becoming more likely in other health professions.

UNISON Press | Press Releases Front Page

Health unions* are warning today (20 September) that a toxic combination of increasing demand, shrinking resources and the pay freeze, are putting staff under severe pressure. The impact of the proposed pension changes and the massive programme of NHS reforms in the Health and Social Care Bill, are adding even more to the stress felt by staff.

In their joint evidence to the NHS Pay Review Body, the unions, which represent staff including nurses, midwives, paramedics, therapists, porters, cooks and cleaners, highlight increasing concerns about how they can maintain the quality of patient care.

High inflation and the Government’s pay freeze have resulted in a big drop in the value of NHS pay over the last few years. Many NHS staff are suffering financial hardship and the £250 given to the lowest paid has been soaked up by the impact of changes to tax credits, childcare fees and the rising cost of basic essentials such as food and fuel.

Christina McAnea, UNISON, NHS Staff-Side Chair said:

“Stability is vital in any workforce – more so during a period of change. The current turmoil in the NHS is undermining staff morale and threatening the delivery of high quality patient care. On top of job cuts and ward closures, growing waiting lists and an attack on their pension, staff face a reorganisation on an unprecedented scale.

“By imposing a pay freeze for the second year running, the Government is adding insult to injury. Pay has never been generous in the NHS and, with inflation rising, many families are struggling to cover the costs of even basic essentials.

Josie Irwin, RCN, Staff-Side Secretary said:

“Coalition policy means that nurses face suffering a second year of pay cuts. This comes on top of unprecedented change and upheaval in the NHS – leading to low morale, uncertainty and insecurity. The RCN calls on the pay review body to recognise that further attacks on pay will only do more damage to recruitment and retention in the NHS.”

Stephen Austin, Head of Employment Relations for the BDA Trade Union said:

“For years the public have supported the workers in the NHS to get a fair rate of pay for the caring and committed work that they do and this was achieved by the last government, but the current government under the disguise of necessary cuts are returning health workers back into the position of being poorly paid”.

Rehana Azam GMB National Officer, Head of NHS said

“At a time when working people are dealing with their own deficits as the cost of living increases including the essentials like childcare, fuel and food. Wage stagnation and the position directed from Government to Pay Review Bodies is unhelpful and unfair.

“Public Sector workers are being attacked on a daily basis by this Government and the propaganda distributed about public sector workers with the attempts to put private sector workers against public sector workers will reveal that this Government’s only agenda is to undermine the hard working people of this country by making them pay for a deficit which was not their making. All employers in this country are expected to negotiate, consult and agree changes to employment terms and conditions and the bullying tactics applied by this Government in imposing changes to public sector workers terms and conditions will be challenged and stopped”.

Rachael Maskell, Head of Health, Unite, said:

” The Pay Review Body continues to play an important role in providing independent and robust evidence on the remuneration of NHS employees. The NHS workforce are facing unprecedented challenges to their pay, in the midst of mass re-organisation and cuts, in some cases losing 25% in pay as a result. These cuts to services and employment terms are causing morale in the NHS to fall significantly. We are hopeful that this year’s Pay Review Body will ensure that NHS staff are remunerated fairly to ensure that they stop falling behind other sections of the workforce and economy. Unite further hopes that the Pay Review Body will address the recruitment and retention challenges for pharmacists, and estates and maintenance workers in this year’s review.”

*British Association of Occupational Therapists, British Dietetic Association, British Orthoptic Society, Chartered Society of Physiotherpists, Federation of Clinical Scientists, GMB, Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Nursing, Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, Society of Radiographers, UCATT, UNISON, Unite.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

Voting Lib-Dem and police issues

Spread the love
Cleggeron

The Liberal-Democrats are engaging in allsorts of illiberal and anti-democratic gymnastics to avoid a vote on abolishing the NHS.

I’m sorry to admit that I actually voted(1) Liberal-Democrat at the last general election. I could never vote Tory and I couldn’t bring myself to vote Labour even though it was no longer hijacked by Blair & Co. I’m going to have real problems ever voting Labour. They willingly allowed themselves to be hijacked by a Fascist, psychopathic nutter totally divorced from reality and any concept of truth who quite clearly pursued an alien agenda for so many years. Unison and Unite were so supportive of Him. Is it so important to remain in power that you prostitute all your values? Today, the Liberal Democrats may be following the same path.

Back to voting Liberal-Democat at the last general election. It was a tactical vote but I’m pleased to say that it had no effect since my constituency is certain to return a Labour MP.

As I’m sure that you’re aware – while there was no overall winning party at the General Election the Conservatives and the Liberal-Democrats formed a coalition government, the ConDems. I was pleased that New Labour was eventually defeated and out of power and initially hoped that the Liberal-Democrats would restrain the Tories. No such luck. It turns out that Clegg is a Tory in everything except political party. A European Tory, immensely rich and privilleged and – although exactly the type that are repeatedly appointed – entirely the wrong person to hold any political office. Why oh why did they listen to the press and dump Campbell?

The ConDem coalition – essentially a Tory government – shit on the electorate. Tuition fees, the Education Maintenance Allowance that was so important to poor families and now the NHS. “No top down reorganisation”. What a Blair-faced lie that one was. “We’re not privatisng the NHS”. Well, you’re not selling shares but in every other sense the NHS is getting privatised. Foreign and UK companies running hospitals, the profitable bits getting cherry-picked and a cash-starved shell of an NHS having to pick up the pieces. Health insurance, pay or go without – isn’t that privatisation?. Opposed by all major healthcare associations and yet they continue in destroying the NHS.

“No top-down reorganisation”. There is quite obviously no mandate for change.

The Lib-Dems will and are getting blamed for this. Without them it would not be happening. The toxic comments they get on newspaper articles are instructive. Will it be fatal for them? I expect to be campaigning against the Lib-Dems with anti-Blair vigour unless they change their ways pretty quickly.

(1) To be continued.

19/9/11

DRAFT: to be expanded – particularly murders by police, the role of ACPO.

There are many issues.

I am regarded by oppressive state authorities as an anarchist and potential violent terrorist. This is really quite strange since I consider it important to vote and participate in the democratic process. There is something quite clearly wrong here.

It is clear that I regularly vote as some simple searches will demonstrate. Why then am I regarded as an anarchist? How can the official assessment be so absurdly wrong? Similarly, it is clear that I participate in the democratic process and that I have always participated within the discourse of politics. Why then am I regarded as a potential terrorist – a potential violent extremist? Again, how can the official assessment be so absurdly wrong?

I consider that a huge proportion of it is to do with my perspective and activity. As somebody who rejects fake, manufactured terrorism I have been cast as the enemy. As somebody who recognises and is able to identify the real terrorists, I am the enemy of those terrorists.

Accusations of terrorism used to involve issues such as making bombs and using bombs and the threats of such things. We have seen – particularly over the last decade – that terrorism is used by strong vested interests to promote and pursue a particular agenda. Accusations of terrorism are now cheapened and directed at those that oppose such strong vested interests.

Oppressive state authorities promote the official ideology of fake, manufactured terrorism while the true anti-terrorist is cast as the terrorist. Accusations of terrorism have come to be directed at percieved opponents of some powerful interest group.

The official assessment is so absurdly wrong because the world has been turned on its head. Those that should be concerned with fighting terrorism are the terrorists and those that are accused of being terrorists are the anti-terrorists.

20/9/11 Still in Draft: may be altered and to be expanded

The question remains: Why is the official police assessment of me so absurdly wrong despite clear and obvious evidence to the contrary?

While it is accepted that the police are capable of staggering incompetence, there is more than that. I think that the answer is harassment – it is obvious that suspected terrorists can be violently killed by police with complete impunity at any time. This is a continuation of the harassment I endured from Ian Blair and John Reid. The same bullshit is involved – homegrown terrorists, liquid explosives, etc.

I think that many murders by police that are similar to me are intended to reinforce this point i.e. we can kill people similar to you so we can kill you. The police involved and their superiors are responsible for these murders by police and they are likely to continue until they are held to account.

 

Continue ReadingVoting Lib-Dem and police issues