This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

by Dr Mustafa Fetouri MFetouri

For seven decades, Israel has functioned not within fixed borders, but through the calculated deployment of “fluid lines.” From the 1947 Partition Plan to modern military doctrines, its geography remains a moving target—a series of unilateral impositions designed to facilitate expansion while evading international law. Effectively, Israel recognizes no definitive borders for itself, nor does it respect the sovereign boundaries of its neighbors. From Iran to Egypt, international borders are treated as mere sketches on a map rather than inviolable markers. This refusal to define its own limits maintains a permanent “frontier status,” where expansion is the only constant and international law is merely an optional suggestion.

We must not lose sight of the factual reality: immediately upon its creation on stolen Palestinian land, Israel was ostensibly bound by UN Resolution 181. This 1947 Partition Plan was presented by the international community as a definitive blueprint for borders—borders that the Zionist leadership, in truth, never intended to inhabit. 

History records that while the Jewish Agency publicly accepted the plan to gain international legitimacy, its leaders privately viewed it as a mere “first step.” As David Ben-Gurion told the Zionist Executive at the time, statehood was a tool to “abolish partition and expand to the whole of Palestine.” 

Following the 1948 war and the catastrophic displacement of the Palestinian people, the 1949 Armistice Agreements established the “Green Line.” It is a crucial distinction that this was never a “border” in the legal sense; at the insistence of both sides at the time, it was defined strictly as a military demarcation line “without prejudice to future political settlements.” However, while the UN’s intention was for this line to serve as the baseline for a future two-state reality, the Israeli leadership envisioned it only as a temporary pause.

By refusing to formalize these lines into permanent, recognized borders, Israel ensured its strategic flexibility—allowing it to treat the map as a work in progress, to be redrawn by force whenever the political winds allowed. 

Today, the Green Line remains a strategic phantom. In the Zionist calculus, it is an optical illusion maintained for the consumption of the international community, while on the ground, it has been systematically erased by relentless settlement expansion. This “orthographic minimalism” applied to geography ensures the state remains in a permanent state of flux; it facilitates a “creeping annexation” that renders the logic of a two-state solution not only obsolete but self-defeating.

As the physical Green Line faded into geopolitical irrelevance, a new vocabulary emerged: the “Yellow Line.” This is no longer a fixed geographic marker, but a calibrated political-military tool used to project power across the region.

Unlike a border, the Yellow Line is an elastic boundary of “permissible” presence—a shifting gray zone that Israel expands or contracts to justify incursions, surveillance, and the gradual absorption of neighboring space under the guise of security necessity.

In Gaza and Lebanon, this strategy of fluid boundaries has transitioned into a violent re-mapping of the Levant. In Gaza, Israel has seized a significant portion of the devastated Strip under the perennial pretext of “security,” creating deep buffer zones that effectively shrink the territory. This occurs even as diplomatic overtures—such as Trump’s “Deal of the Century” and various “ceasefire” frameworks—theoretically dictate a full withdrawal. The reality on the ground mocks the paper promises; the “line” in Gaza is currently defined by the tread of a tank, not the ink of a treaty.

READ: Former US official: Iran war is direct extension of ‘Greater Israel’ project

In Lebanon, the encroachment is even more brazen. Despite the technical existence of a ceasefire, the Yellow Line—now functioning as an aggressive “Security Line”—has pushed far beyond the UN-recognized Blue Line. It appears to have reached northward to the Litani River, effectively encompassing the entirety of South Lebanon. This is a profound historical regression; this very land was only liberated from Israeli occupation in 2000 through the sustained efforts of the Lebanese Islamic Resistance and its allies.

By unilaterally redrawing this line at the Litani, Israel is attempting to undo decades of Lebanese sovereignty, treating the South once again as a “frontier” to be managed by force rather than a border to be respected.

In the case of Iran, the discourse surrounding its nuclear program serves as the ultimate expression of the “Red Line” doctrine. Here, the term is weaponized to claim a total monopoly on regional security and to safeguard Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge—a mandated policy ensuring that no regional rival can achieve military or technological parity. These lines are not fixed by international law, nor are they rooted in objective security requirements; rather, they are unilaterally redefined according to Israeli strategic desires and bolstered by unconditional American financial, diplomatic, and military support.The ultimate goal remains the realization of the “Greater Israel” project. While historically this was pursued through conventional warfare and territorial seizure, we are witnessing a new phase of this expansion. Today, the project is being advanced through normalization.

The ultimate realization of the “Greater Israel” project is no longer being pursued solely through conventional warfare; it is now being finalized through normalization. By bypassing the Palestinian issue and establishing diplomatic and economic “lines” across the Arab world, Israel seeks to validate its territorial gains without ever committing to a definitive map. This strategy has enabled it to cultivate a network of both open and secret allies, even among Arab nations, effectively turning regional neighbors into partners in its “frontier” logic.

This is the shift from physical conquest to systemic hegemony.

The symbolic and the religious are frequently invoked here; historical narratives and biblical references are weaponized to frame these strategic choices as a “divine right” rather than a flagrant violation of modern international norms.

By refusing to settle within fixed borders, Israel maintains a permanent “frontier mentality” that thrives on perpetual conflict and the constant outward push of its influence.

Today, “Greater Israel” is a fact on the ground—a strategic reality that stretches its shadow from the borders of Iran to the gates of Egypt. This is a state defined not by geography, but by the “Red Lines” it imposes on others and the “Yellow Lines” it erases for itself. The inherent danger of this strategy is that such boundaries are unstable by design. When a state’s security is predicated on the constant movement of its political and physical boundaries, peace becomes a secondary concern.

In this framework, the primary goal is not coexistence, but a regional hegemony that ensures no border in the Middle East is ever truly inviolable.

OPINION: After the ceasefire illusion: Why Gaza’s “Day After” still has no buyer?

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

• Israel conducts farthest-ever strike in long history of attacks on Gaza humanitarian aid flotillas
• UN says Israel blocks durable shelter materials from entering Gaza
• Flotilla Defiance, Zionist Terror, and the Cowardice of Muslim Regimes
• Greek main opposition questions government’s role in Israel’s interception of Gaza aid flotilla
• Israeli defence firm Rafael eyes takeover of VW’s Osnabruck factory, German lawmaker says
• When a ceasefire becomes an offensive system
• Over 180 activists detained in Israeli attack on Gaza aid flotilla in international waters, organizer says
• Israel bankrolls war crimes in occupied Syrian Golan with $334m settlement expansion plan
• Iran warns US of ‘prolonged, painful blows’ amid reports of potential strike plans
• 9 Palestinians injured in Israeli attacks in Gaza as ceasefire violations continue
• Iran’s supreme leader says Gulf future ‘without US,’ new Hormuz rules to boost stability, economy
• Tunisia’s Ennahda says its leader Rached Ghannouchi hospitalized after health deteriorates in prison
• The disaggregation of OPEC’s Gulf production coalition: UAE’s exit and the unravelling of the Arab oil order
• Netanyahu’s adviser fails to advance Israeli plans to relocate Palestinians from Gaza: Report
• ICC chief prosecutor says he is ‘exonerated’ in alleged misconduct probe
• Who truly faces an existential threat?
• Majority of Israelis believe Israel has lost all wars since October 7, survey finds
• Greater Israel: Coming soon to a neighbour near you; lines may change without notice
• Sudanese commander accuses UAE of leading war plan to divide country
• Israel warns US: Deterrence against Hezbollah is eroding
• Sudanese doctors warn of looming humanitarian crisis in Blue Nile as rains approach
• Israeli reports highlight rise of youth gang activity in Tel Aviv
• Saudi expert says UAE exit from OPEC to have limited impact on oil markets
• UAE reviews role in regional blocs amid speculation over further withdrawals
• Christian nun injured in settler attack in Jerusalem
• Lebanon says Israel must abide by ceasefire, understand talks are key to security
• 17 migrants found dead, 7 rescued off Libya coast after 8 days at sea
• Over 1.25 million in Lebanon at risk of food insecurity, UN report warns
• Trump renews pressure on Israel’s Herzog to pardon Netanyahu: Report
• ‘Apartheid without borders,’ says UN special rapporteur on Israel’s interception of Gaza-bound aid flotilla
• America as a war economy: Eisenhower’s warning that still runs Washington
• Qatar denies claims of backing ICC prosecutor over Netanyahu case
• Israeli navy intercepts Gaza aid flotilla amid reported interference near Greece
• UN experts warn Gaza reconstruction cannot succeed without ending occupation
• The pendulum swings: The slow death of Europe’s pro-Israel consensus
• European natural gas prices surge more than 8% amid Hormuz closure tensions
• Iran does not stand alone – China and Russia create restraint
• UN raises alarms over ‘intolerable’ situation in occupied West Bank
• Trump rejects Iranian proposal to open Strait of Hormuz until nuclear concerns met
• German foreign minister: Merz comment on US ‘humiliation’ was warning to Iran
• Bab el-Mandeb cannot become a gateway for recognition politics
• Turkish president urges unity, faith amid suffering in Muslim world
• Israeli foreign minister acknowledges differences with Trump over Iran
• Iran’s missile, drone stockpiles ‘sufficient for years of war,’ lawmaker says
• Israeli strike kills Lebanese soldier, brother in southern Lebanon despite ceasefire
• Israel approves 126 illegal settlement units in northern West Bank
• US spent $25B on Iran war as Pentagon seeks $1.5T budget
• 78 years on: what went wrong with Israel’s founding project? | Palestine This Week with Mouin Rabbani
• EU considers sanctions on Israel over stolen Ukrainian wheat
• How St. Petersburg became Tehran’s last strategic lifeline