Experts Worldwide Agree: US-Israel Attack on Iran a Clear Violation of International Law

Spread the love

Original article by Brad Reed republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

An unidentified man shouts anti-US and anti-Israeli slogans while standing in front of a destroyed building near a police station in Tehran, Iran, on March 3, 2026. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

“Before more children are burned alive or buried under rubble, this lawless war must end.”

Experts on international law throughout the world have concluded that the unprovoked US-Israeli attack on Iran that began on Saturday is illegal.

Adil Ahmad Haque, a Rutgers Law School professor, wrote an analysis for Just Security published on Monday that called the attacks by the US and Israel a “manifest violation of the United Nations Charter,” which “prohibits the use of force against another State unless that use of force is authorized by the UN Security Council or is a necessary and proportionate act of individual or collective self-defense in response to an armed attack.”

RECOMMENDED…

War on Iran ticker

‘The Behavior of Rogue States’: Global Revulsion as US and Israel Launch War on Iran

New Yorkers Gather To Protest Against War On Iran

Rights Group Leads Push for UN to Declare US-Israeli Assault on Iran ‘War of Aggression’

Haque also argued that Iran, in responding to the attacks, violated the UN Charter by launching drone strikes against US allies throughout the Middle East, even though none of those nations had taken part in the US-Israeli operations.

“The United States, Israel, and Iran, have each violated international law,” Haque concluded. “Hundreds of civilians have paid the price. Before more children are burned alive or buried under rubble, this lawless war must end.”

Marko Milanovic, a University of Reading School of Law professor, wrote at the blog of the European Journal of International Law that the US-Israeli strikes are “manifestly illegal” and “as plain a violation of the prohibition on the use of force in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter as one could possibly have.”

Milanovic also said that, leaving legality aside, the war would likely create a humanitarian disaster.

“Maybe, maybe, something good will come out of this… although I very much doubt it,” he wrote. “It is far more likely that many innocent people are about to die, in Iran and possibly in Israel, and that their deaths will be for nothing.”

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) condemned the attacks on Iran as illegal under international law and dismissed any claims by US and Israel that they were necessary to liberate Iranians from a tyrannical government.

“Claims that launching an unprovoked and illegal attack is about defending human rights ring hollow,” CIEL wrote, “when military strikes have already killed hundreds of civilians and intensified suffering as violence escalates—particularly when those same human rights are flagrantly violated by the US and by Israel, both domestically and abroad. Bombs do not yield peace, democracyclimate justice, or human rights.”

Amnesty International secretary general Agnès Callamard described the US-Israeli attack as “a grave threat to multilateralism and to the integrity of the international legal order.”

Callamard also said the international community needed “to intensify diplomatic efforts to prevent further military escalation to avert additional civilian harm, and halt any further crimes under international law against populations who have already endured decades of repression.”

Human rights organization DAWN demanded that the UN General Assembly call an emergency session to declare the Iran attack a violation of the UN Charter.

Omar Shakir, executive director of DAWN, said that the war is also illegal under the US Constitution, which states that the US Congress has the power to declare war.

“This war is patently illegal,” Shakir said, “and it must be stopped.”

Original article by Brad Reed republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Donald Trump explains why he established his Bored of Peace
Donald Trump explains why he established his Bored of Peace
Orcas discuss rotting brain. Front Orca says "Wish someone would lock him up".
Orcas discuss rotting brain. Front Orca says “Wish someone would lock him up”.

Continue ReadingExperts Worldwide Agree: US-Israel Attack on Iran a Clear Violation of International Law