Over 80% of All US Voters Support Ending Dark Money’s Grip on Democracy
Article by Brad Reed republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
“The public’s conception of what has gone wrong goes far deeper than super PACs or White House ballrooms or even slush funds. To them, it is a system that is fundamentally misfiring.”
The Brennan Center for Justice on Tuesday published a poll showing that American voters believe the country faces a serious corruption problem, and supermajorities support taking major action to end the role of dark money in US politics.
The poll, which surveyed 2,000 registered voters across the country, found 79% support “a constitutional amendment to restore limits on money in elections.” The proposal would essentially overturn the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, which opened the door to unlimited corporate spending in US elections.
RECOMMENDED…
72% of Americans Agree: There Is Too Much Money in US Politics
The Abolish Super PAC Act: Sanders and Lee Seek End to ‘Corrupting Influence’ of Dark Money
The poll further found that 85% of Americans support “mandatory disclosure for all federal campaign contributions and spending”; 81% support “the creation of a new federal ethics enforcer”; and 69% support “a constitutional amendment limiting the president’s pardon power.”
Support for these anti-corruption measures was widespread across both political parties, with 84% of Democrats and 75% of Republicans backing the amendment granting government the power to regulate and limit campaign spending. The proposed mandatory disclosure law drew even more widespread support, with 88% of Democrats and 85% Republicans registering approval.
The poll found Republican voters far less inclined to support proposals that would specifically limit presidential powers, but even in those instances, a majority of Republicans favored a law limiting presidential pardon powers and a law that would let the US Congress and state governments sue the president for alleged violations of the Constitution’s emoluments clause that bars presidents from receiving foreign gifts.
Michael Waldman, president and CEO of the Brennan Center for Justice, wrote that he was struck by Americans’ widespread support for the poll’s proposed reforms, noting that “it’s hard to find a set of proposals with a wider bipartisan appeal.”
Waldman also noted that voters see corruption as why the government has become unresponsive to key voter concerns about housing and affordability.
“Policymakers should understand that the public’s conception of what has gone wrong goes far deeper than super PACs or White House ballrooms or even slush funds,” he wrote. “To them, it is a system that is fundamentally misfiring. A government that is not performing. And there is a willingness to name names and assign blame.”
Article by Brad Reed republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
- In Tiny State of Maine, a Big Election Day Win Against Dark Money in Politics ›
- DNC Half-Measures Condemning Dark Money Won’t Cut It, Says Sanders as He Demands Total Ban ›
- 72% of Americans Agree: There Is Too Much Money in US Politics ›
- Montana Has an Ambitious Plan to End Dark Money in Elections | Truthout ›
- Watchdog Launches ‘War Room’ to Monitor Trump’s Corruption and Destruction ›
- ‘Americans Should Be Enraged’: Reports Expose Unprecedented Corruption at Trump DOJ ›
- ‘Crooked Cops’ Report Details Trump-Led Corruption of Justice Department ›
- CREW is tracking Trump’s unprecedented corruption (again) – CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ›