I would much prefer if you did it, that’s what your job is after all
I’ll help you ever so much. The story is about 7/7 being ridculous nonsense. I will help a journo with this otherwise I’ll just have to carry on and stretch it out
XXX
Edit: They’re not going to touch it. They can’t. I would hope that they have some concern for me – it’s like that thing that cannot mention it’s name.
Further edit: The news that cannot be news – it’s so rude.
Questions will get straight past the spam filter – as long as you’re not spamming. You’ve probably got my email if you’re a journo and need it sooner. Anyway you’re welcome
Journos are welcome
It’s nice to have secrets, isn’t it?
I used to have the secret that I was growing dope in my attick (how is attick spelled?).
It wasn’t actually much of a secret actually because I’m sure that the police knew. I was growing really good dope at that time – White Rhino – stuff like that for my girlfriend at the time who was suffering huge pain from accidents sustained through her work. Looks like the truth game ;)
Back to the plot. White Rhino was the medicinal one at the time.
Of course, I used Hydrogen Pyroxide. Hydrogen Pyroxide was used in hydroponic home-grown gardening.
It’s absolute bullshit that it can be used in making bombs. That was done for me. I am saying that this absolute bullshit about liquid bombs is exactly that. Absolute bullshit.
Home-grown terrorists? C’mon think of it. They’re targeting people who are only growing a bit of dope. Home-grown terrorists. Home-grown
R.I.P. Jean Charles de Menezes murdered at Stockwell Tube Station 22 July 2005.
Jean Charles de Menezes was killed to send a message . The message was that another totally innocent person was to blame – somebody absolutely, completely not responsible – for the bombings. Ian Blair made many statements about how the murder of the innocent Brizzlian was so directly related to the ongoing terrorist investigation.
It is clear from the murder of Brizzlian Jean Charles de Menezes that there was absolutely no intention in pursuing those really responsible for the London bombings of 7 July, 2005.
I suggest that you look at all the shit Ian Blair did from the very start -libertines, cocaine. he was never a copper, always pursuing a different agenda
Frank ly it’s Jean Charles de Menezes
https://bristol.indymedia.org/article/691701
Later edit: The point about the murder of JCd was that it was a message of who should be targeted for responsibility for the July 7 explosions. Get it?
directly related to the ongoing terrorist investigation – all that shit …
Get it?
Later: http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/691701
7 October 2013
To clarify: Jean Charles de Menezes was killed 911 days after the introduction of the shoot-to-kill policy known as Operation Kratos. To clarify – I am saying 911 days after the introduction of Operation Kratos. If you do the math there is a difference of 912 days but it is still 911 days after. There is a similarity here that the event known as the Madrid Bombings or 3/11 occurred 911 days after the event known as 9/11 in New York. 911 is not a coincidence. It is the beginning of killing people under Operation Kratos.
I have shown that Jean Charles de Menezes’ name can be interpreted using Agrippa’s code. It produces a description that can be taken to indicate me and my location.
Jean Charles de Menezes was Brizzle-ian.
Ian Blair on the day described the police murder of Jean Charles de Menezes as directly linked to the ongoing terrorist investigation. JCd was deliberately murdered to send a message.
I’ve been wondering what it takes to start an investigation by the police into a crime. I would expect that it would just be reasonableness that a crime has been committed. I wouldn’t expect much interest in trivial crimes like shoplifting or minor criminal damage but I would expect more interest in more serious issues like murder, incitement to murder, terrorism, etc.
and the problem is that it’s not normal criminals that are doing this. Instead it’s governments, police chiefs and international criminals protected by privy council above-governmental dictat according to some above-law divine protocol.
Don’t look at this the protocol says … this is above justice …
Instead the privy council dictat says everyone invited to G8 2005 are above UK laws. They can’t even be arrested or questioned. They are above the law. These Neo-Con cnuts can do what they like without any legal recourse …
They can’t even be arrested or questioned
They can commit murder or mass-murder without even being arrested or questioned
If these b’stards did the 7 July 2005 bombings they could not be arrested or even questioned because of a privy council dictat made by Tony Blair
Later edit: I’m very pleased that at least some journalists are better informed now. I’m not really sure that that makes any difference since I’ve been warned of journalists being carp.
I wonder if journalists were so carp that they weren’t even aware of this coded bs
Isn’t it there every day on the sun?