When the coloniser calls resistance terrorism
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
by Sayid Marcos Tenorio soupalestina
Throughout history, almost every national liberation struggle has been labelled “terrorism” by the powers exercising colonial rule or foreign occupation. This strategy is nothing new.
The British Empire branded IRA fighters in Ireland and EOKA guerrillas in Cyprus as terrorists. France portrayed Algeria’s National Liberation Front (FLN) as a criminal organisation. The same happened to the Mozambique Liberation Front (FRELIMO), the People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), the South West Africa People’s Organisation (SWAPO) in Namibia, and even Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress (ANC).
History, however, vindicated these movements and condemned the colonial regimes that sought to perpetuate their domination.
This pattern reveals a constant: those who occupy a territory seek to strip the occupied people of any legitimacy to resist.
The dehumanisation of resistance is a colonial strategy. By labelling every resistance fighter a “terrorist”, attention is shifted away from illegal occupation, apartheid and the denial of self-determination, and redirected towards the reaction of the occupied people.
This narrative, however, encounters clear limits within international law itself.
From the United Nations Charter to Resolution 1514 (XV) on decolonisation and Resolution 2625 (XXV), which reaffirms the principle of peoples’ self-determination, the understanding has been consolidated that peoples subjected to colonial domination, foreign occupation or racist regimes have the right to struggle for their liberation.
Several subsequent resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly recognised the legitimacy of national liberation movements and acknowledged that such resistance may take the form of armed struggle, provided that it remains subject to the rules of international humanitarian law.
READ: Israel cancels entry permits for US activists supporting Palestinians in West Bank
This is precisely why the international community has never automatically equated national liberation movements with terrorist organisations.
International humanitarian law regulates the manner in which armed conflicts must be conducted and imposes obligations on all belligerents, including resistance movements.
However, it does not eliminate the political and legal right of a people to resist occupation. Confusing these two dimensions serves only the interests of occupying powers, because it transforms a conflict of a political and legal nature into a mere policing matter.
The history of the so-called “State of Israel” itself exposes this contradiction.
Before 1948, Irgun and Lehi were regarded as terrorist organisations by the British government because of attacks such as the bombing of the King David Hotel and the assassination of UN mediator Folke Bernadotte.
Years later, their leaders reached the highest levels of government, and Menachem Begin received the Nobel Peace Prize. This demonstrates that the label “terrorist” often reflects political circumstances more than any permanent legal definition.
In the contemporary context, this debate remains highly relevant. Palestine continues to be recognised by the United Nations as a territory under occupation, while Western Sahara remains on the UN list of Non-Self-Governing Territories, awaiting the fulfilment of its people’s right to self-determination.
In this context, the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), which emerged during the First Intifada, and the Polisario Front, recognised by the United Nations as the representative of the Sahrawi people in the Western Sahara peace process, belong to the historical tradition of national liberation movements.
As with South Africa’s ANC, Algeria’s FLN, Namibia’s SWAPO, Mozambique’s FRELIMO and many other movements, both base their struggle on their peoples’ claim to the right of self-determination in the face of occupation or foreign domination.
This does not mean that every military action carried out by resistance organisations is automatically legitimate under international law.
The rules of international humanitarian law apply to all parties to a conflict and prohibit deliberate attacks against civilians, regardless of the cause being defended.
However, possible violations of these rules do not, in themselves, invalidate the legal legitimacy of the struggle for self-determination, nor do they automatically transform a national liberation movement into a terrorist organisation under international law. These are distinct questions, frequently conflated for political convenience.
There is no colonialism without resistance. There never has been.
The French Resistance against Nazi occupation, Vietnamese guerrillas, Algerian fighters, South Africans who confronted apartheid, African liberation movements, the Polisario Front and the Palestinian resistance all demonstrate that no people will indefinitely accept the loss of their land, sovereignty and dignity.
The real question, therefore, is not why resistance exists.
The question the world should be asking is why military occupations, colonial processes and regimes that deny entire peoples the right to determine their own destiny continue to exist.
As long as there is colonisation, apartheid, illegal annexation and denial of self-determination, there will be armed resistance movements.
And international law, despite political pressure and attempts to criminalise liberation movements, continues to uphold the fundamental principle that the freedom of peoples is not an act of terrorism, but a fundamental right of humanity.
OPINION: Trump says Hamas has agreed to disarm. The negotiations tell a different story
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Israeli forces kill Palestinian in Gaza, wound 9 including 4 children
- Iran security chief says Strait of Hormuz to remain closed until US meets Tehran’s demands
- Pro-Palestinian protesters march through Berlin
- Iran’s president says now is ‘best time’ to reach agreement with US
- When the coloniser calls resistance terrorism
- US expects Iran to ensure safe oil flow through Strait of Hormuz: Vance
- Iraq’s premier says country rejects use of territory to threaten neighbours
- Israeli legal group Honenu funds, defends occupiers accused of violence in West Bank: PLO
- Oman says Strait of Hormuz talks progressing in ‘positive’ atmosphere
- The Gulf needs an energy non-aggression pact
- Adviser to Iran’s supreme leader says ‘foreign forces’ must leave region
- America can still strike. The hard part is what comes next
- Israel cancels entry permits for US activists supporting Palestinians in West Bank
- Yemeni army says Houthis fired missiles toward Red Sea
- Commercial diplomacy in Syria is not enough
- Syrian soldier killed, 2 others wounded in attack in eastern Deir ez-Zor
- 3 Palestinians injured by Israeli army fire in southern Gaza despite ceasefire
- Abu Dhabi National Oil Company says its vessel hit by missile in Strait of Hormuz
- Malaysia drew a line on Israel. Indonesia left Bali open
- OIC welcomes ‘historic’ Turkish-Saudi-Pakistani joint defense pact
- Colombia’s new government announces plans for Israel economic panel after rupture over Gaza genocide
- Yemen’s armed forces launch operation against Houthis
- Trump’s top general seeks path out of Iran war as military options narrow: Report
- Military families confront Navy leaders about USS Lincoln’s prolonged Iran deployment: Report
- Moroccan rights body says death toll from Ceuta mass crossing at 14
- The Mecca Pact: A new Sunni security architecture born of American doubt
- UN reports 33% increase in aid supplies entering Gaza, but major restrictions remain
- Israeli forces enter southwestern Syria, set up checkpoint
- From Manisa to Szeged: BYD’s shifting European investment strategy
- Regional countries welcome Saudi-Turkiye-Pakistan defense pact
- Iranian president says critics of memorandum with US echo Israel’s narrative
- UN warns Sudan war is robbing millions of children of education
- Houthi attacks kill civilians in Yemen’s Marib, target vessel in Red Sea: Report
- Iranian foreign minister calls on Muslim countries ‘to rely only on ourselves’
- Israel targets southern Lebanon with phosphorus bombs, state media reports
- Israeli raids, occupier attacks target 5 Palestinian communities across occupied West Bank
- UNICEF ‘taking appropriate action’ against staff accused of spying for Israel: UN
- US blockade stalls Iran’s oil exports: Report
- Gaza beekeepers turn damaged rooftops into apiaries after Israeli attacks destroy livelihoods
- 78 suspects detained in crackdown on Europe-Algeria smuggling network
- Trump says Iran wants deal with US, doesn’t want to be hit
- Russian, UAE presidents discuss Gulf tensions, Ukraine war in phone call
- Israeli occupiers intensify attacks on Bedouin community near Ramallah
- Malaysia, Indonesia reaffirm support for Palestine, holy sites of Jerusalem
- ‘Attack on one is attack on all’: Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan sign landmark Mecca defence pact
- Legal victory for scholar denied university post after calling Gaza a ‘textbook case of genocide’
- Lebanese soldier wounded after Israeli army targets military vehicle in southern Lebanon
- Migrant dies in paraglider attempt to enter Spain’s Ceuta
- Israeli ministers call for renewed Gaza attacks, rejection of Trump’s ceasefire roadmap
- Greece rescues dozens of migrants, majority Sudanese, Bangladeshis
An aerial view of water treatment ponds and solar panel farm at Thames Water’s Chertsey Water Works in Surrey
