NHS news review

Spread the love

The third (final) reading of the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill is due in the coming week with a vote on Wednesday.

There are protests this weekend expressing opposition to the privatisation of the NHS.

Many professional medical associations – including the British Medical Association, the Royal College of General Practicioners, the Royal College of Nursing and the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists – have restated their opposition to the plans.

These organisations are clearly knowledgable and authoritative on the issues and should be trusted in preference to dodgy, lying politicians that claim to love the NHS, that the NHS is safe in their hands and that there will be no more top-down reorganisations.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

UK must not follow US model of healthcare, RCGP warns | GPonline.com By Susie Sell

The UK must not follow the US model of healthcare as it would risk widening health inequalities, increasing costs and fragmenting care, the RCGP chairwoman has warned

RCGP chairwoman Dr Clare Gerada said her recent study trip to the USA to look at how the ‘biggest market in the world affects the deliver of healthcare’ has made her ‘nervous’ about the direction of the NHS reforms to increase competition in the NHS.

She said it also bolstered her view that the NHS is the ‘most remarkable system of healthcare’.

She said: ‘Where as in the past I thought some aspects were quite reasonable, I came away with the view that actually it is not a system at all.

‘It’s a series of providers that aren’t linked to any shape or form, with resources not necessarily going into patient contacts and instead spent on administering this bureaucratic system.’

She warned that moving to a US-style system would lead to a fragmented and more costly system, where accountants, lawyers and actuaries are ‘as common as hospital managers and GPs’.

She said the US system also creates huge health inequalities, where the ‘rich have choice’ but 70 million people have no access to healthcare or are uninsured.

She said: ‘I am convinced the NHS should be improved, but we should always strike to improve what matters cost: continuity of care, co-ordination of services and quality.

‘But if people think that the market will deliver that, I urge them to see what I saw, which is that the market fails.’

NHS plans will mean putting wealthy first, says doctors’ leader | Society | The Guardian Randeep Ramesh

Hospitals will be forced to treat wealthy foreigners to raise cash, rather than treat poor patients, says BMA’s Hamish Meldrum


Meldrum said David Cameron had been mistaken when in a speech in Cornwall last month the prime minister claimed that his plans to change the NHS beyond recognition had “the whole health profession on board”.

“I don’t know where the prime minister gets his information from to make that statement. I can only imagine he must be taking to a completely unrepresentative group of clinicians,” said Meldrum.

The BMA says it “acknowledges the efforts of government to listen” but that the government’s changes either do not alter the fundamental problems with the bill or they make it worse. Meldrum pointed out that a new NHS bureaucracy was springing up with five different bodies able to buy care for patients. He also argued that the choice and competition agenda of the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, remained intact.

The BMA chairman said he was especially concerned that surgeons’ pay would be related to medical outcomes and that family doctors would be paid on how well they commissioned care for patients. This would penalise GPs and hospitals in poorer areas where residents’ health was related to transport, housing and employment. “Doctors in well-off areas would benefit and those in poor areas would not.”

He also argued that articulate middle-class patients would be able to take advantage of the patient choice policy. “Those who are articulate and shout loudest will tend to get better care. The less well-off patient will not. This will see an increase in health inequality.”

John Healey, the shadow health secretary, said that despite the government’s claims to have listened, Meldrum’s comments showed that “the chorus of concern among health service professionals is as loud as ever”.

Healey said: “With doctors and nurses now hardening their position, it is clear that David Cameron is in denial and out of touch when he claims his NHS plans have widespread support. After a wasted year, during which time we’ve seen patient services starting to go backwards, the prime minister should scrap both the bill and his massive reorganisation plans.”

Campaign against NHS reforms continues | The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Sally Priestley

The CSP is among the health organisations continuing to campaign against the government’s plans for reform of the NHS as the Health and Social Care Bill continues its passage through parliament.

Ahead of the third reading of the bill in the Commons, which is due to start on 6 September, the British Medical Association (BMA) chairman Dr Hamish Meldrum called for the bill to be withdrawn or significantly amended as it posed an ‘unacceptably high risk to the NHS’.

In a letter sent to all MPs, Dr Meldrum said a key risk was the plan to widen patient choice to ‘Any Qualified Provider’ (AQP) across a larger range of services. It reflects a concern that the CSP’s chief executive, Phil Gray, has been raising for some time.
Member’s briefings

The CSP issued a briefing for MPs on members’ concerns in August, in time for the third reading. It is also working alongside the BMA in its opposition to the bill and has stepped up its campaign against the extension of AQP to include most NHS-funded services by 2013/14.

MSK services for back and neck pain have been highlighted by the Department of Health as a priority for the scheme. The society has published a members’ briefing outlining how physios can get involved in influencing the decisions currently being made locally on AQP.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

CONservative Prime Minister David Cameron claimed, last Thursday, in a factually incorrect, untrue and misleading way that “the whole health profession is on board for what is now being done”.

http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/story-13207410-detail/story.html
The Prime Minister yesterday issued a passionate broadside in response to St Ives Liberal Democrat MP and Health Select Committee member Andrew George, who this week called on opponents to dig their heels in and derail service changes over concerns the NHS would become a profit-making machine at the expense of patient care.

And this is what St Ives Liberal Democrat MP and Health Select Committee member Andrew George has to say

BBC News – St Ives MP Andrew George rejects government health bill

St Ives Liberal Democrat MP Andrew George said he was concerned about the “potential risks” surrounding government policy on the NHS.

Mr George said he feared the health service would be “driven more by profit than by concern about patient care”.

Mr George said he would refuse to support the bill.

“This is a view not just of my own but of the British Medical Association, the Royal College of GPs, Royal College of Nursing and many others,” he said.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

BBC News – St Ives MP Andrew George rejects government health bill

An MP from Cornwall has called on fellow MPs and the public to speak out over government health reform plans.

St Ives Liberal Democrat MP Andrew George said he was concerned about the “potential risks” surrounding government policy on the NHS.

Mr George said he feared the health service would be “driven more by profit than by concern about patient care”.

Related: Lib Dems hint at rebellion on health bill vote | Politics | guardian.co.uk

Trust is ‘fined’ £400k after missing treatment targets | Wilmslow Express – menmedia.co.uk

[Part of the NHS is fined for not having enough money …]

Macclesfield’s NHS Trust has lost out on £400,000 for missing targets and treating readmitted patients and its chairman has admitted that there is ‘serious work to be done’.

East Cheshire NHS Trust, which runs Macclesfield’s hospital, must spend less money than it gets every year.

The trust has £167m to spend and planned a small surplus of £250,000 for this financial year.

But at the end of June the trust reported a surplus of only £7,000 – which it had hoped to be £283,000 for this quarter.

The trust is off-target because it was penalised for failing to treat enough patients within 18 weeks of referral.

Taxpayers losing out on PFI – MPs « Shropshire Star

Investors in firms providing public services could be making “excessive profits” by selling on shares in the schemes, a critical report by MPs has revealed.

The powerful cross-party Public Accounts Committee, which scrutinises Government spending, said taxpayers should get a “much better deal” from private finance initiative (PFI) schemes than they currently do.

The MPs found PFI investors were using off-shore arrangements to minimise tax, adding further cost to the projects. Almost three-quarters of the shares in Innisfree, one of the leading PFI investment firms, are held off-shore, the committee heard.

The report said: “Tax planning and the use of tax havens as a way of avoiding UK tax are not uncommon. We heard that 72% of Innisfree’s shares are held by shareholders based in Guernsey.”

The UK has 700 PFI contracts, with a further 61 in procurement and many more being considered. But the MPs said: “Some of Government’s case for using PFI has not been based on robust analysis, but on ill founded comparisons and invalid assumptions.”

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

 

Andrew Lansley and the Con-Dems to wash their hands of the NHS.

 

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Lansley will ‘wash his hands’ of NHS if Health Bill passed, lawyers warn | GPonline.com by Susie Sell

The health secretary will be able to ‘wash his hands’ of the NHS if the Health Bill becomes law, legal experts have warned.

Legal advice funded by campaign group 38 Degrees found that the Health Bill will take away the health secretary’s duty to provide a national health service through a ‘hands-off clause’.

This will ‘severely curtail’ the health secretary’s ability to influence the delivery of NHS care and to ensure everyone receives the best healthcare possible, it warned.

It said: ‘The Bill will make it impossible for the secretary of state to direct that certain services are available and difficult for the secretary of state to step in if these groups deliver poor healthcare to the local community.’

Related: Who wants responsibility for NHS delivery? Not Andrew Lansley | Alan Maynard | Comment is free | The Guardian

Labour attacks NHS bill amendments | Society | guardian.co.uk Randeep Ramesh

More than three quarters of the 1,000 ministerial amendments to the government’s flagship NHS bill involve changing the name of the new GP bodies to purchase treatment on behalf of the patients, it emerged on Tuesday.

Until this summer, the government had been pushing the idea that family doctors would form “consortia” to buy care. However, David Cameron’s team of experts, the Future Forum, advocated a name change since “consortia” gave the impression that GPs would be too powerful in the coalition’s new look NHS.

Instead GP consortia are to be called “clinical commissioning groups” and will have governing bodies with at least one nurse and one specialist doctor.

The result, say critics, is a bureaucratic nightmare with a slew of meaningless amendments which could obscure some potentially disastrous changes to the NHS bill, already the longest and most complex in the NHS’s history. MPs are to vote on the final report stage in the Commons next week.

Since the government only allowed two weeks to vote on the new bill earlier this summer, many say detailed scrutiny will be needed in the Lords to unearth the full implications for patients. Labour believe only one in 10 changes will be “new” amendments.

NHS sheds 1500 jobs in just three months | Scotland | STV News

(Scotland) The NHS workforce shrunk by more than 1500 in three months, with further reductions expected over the year, according to new figures.

Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said any reduction, particularly involving nursing staff, will cause concern but good progress was being made to cut the number of high-earning managers.

The number of staff fell by 1589 to 155,312 between June and March, equal to 1%. The number of nursing and midwifery staff decreased by 569 to 65,856.

The SNP’s political opponents said the figures show cuts to nurses despite election pledges to protect health spending.

Unions campaign to save NHS – PCS Comment – PCS

The current health and social care bill talks about ‘liberating provision of NHS services’ – Tory code for allowing the market into the much-loved public service.

PCS’s policy-making annual conferences have regularly voted in support of the NHS and against privatisation – so the union urges members to take action to support the campaign against the bill.

The Trades Union Congress – the umbrella body for British unions – has set up a web page called All Together for the NHS.

The TUC wants people to do three things:

• Upload a picture to be used in a giant photo mosaic as part of an on-line vigil.

• Place a poster in your window in the run up to the third reading of the bill in early September.

• Lobby a random member of the House of Lords to defend the NHS when they discuss the bill. Use this link to find your Lord or Lady.

MPs Brace For Email Onslaught As 38 Degrees Target Health And Social Care BillDina Rickman

MPs are bracing for another onslaught of emails as online activist group 38 degrees launches its latest campaign, this time targeting the government’s controversial NHS reform proposals.

The group say despite changes to the Health and Social Care Bill the NHS could still be subject to European competition laws, following the advice of two lawyers.

38 Degrees say the advice shows “private health companies will be able to take new NHS commissioning groups to court if they don’t win contracts”.

They also claim Andrew Lansley will no longer have a legal duty to provide a health service. “We can expect increases in postcode lotteries – and less ways to hold the government to account if the service deteriorates.”

Now they are urging their supporters to email their MP – particularly if they will be supporting the health and social care bill.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Pressure Group 38degrees commissioned legal advice on the Liberal-Democrat – CONservative government’s Destroy the NHS Bill.

The legal advice confirms that the Bill will remove the duty on the Health Secretary to be responsible for providing a health service and that the NHS will be subject to competition law which, in turn, will promote private interests.

The proposed cut in legal aid to patients will cost the NHS very dearly.

CONservative Prime Minister David Cameron claims that “the whole health profession is on board for what is now being done”. It’s a deliberately misleading statement since much of the medical profession actively oppose his plans to destroy the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS bill ‘will let Andrew Lansley wash his hands of health service’ | Society | The Guardian

Legal opinion funded by campaigners suggests ‘hands-off’ clause will remove the health secretary’s accountability

The health secretary will be able to “wash his hands” of the NHS after forthcoming legislation which will take away his duty to provide a national health service, according to legal advice funded by campaigners.

The legal opinion, commissioned and paid for by members of the 38 Degrees website, justifies the widespread public concern about the government’s health reforms, in spite of Andrew Lansley‘s assurances that he has listened and responded to criticisms, they say.

The independent legal team says the health and social reform bill removes the health secretary’s responsibility for NHS provision through a “hands-off” clause designed to give autonomy to commissioning groups.

Now lawyers move in to make a killing off Lansley’s NHS reforms – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

The Health Secretary’s promise to prevent price competition in the NHS as part of the Government’s health reforms is meaningless and could be challenged in the courts, senior lawyers have warned.

Under the reformed Health and Social Care Bill, being put through Parliament by Andrew Lansley, regulators will no longer have a duty to promote price competition between public and private health providers.

But yesterday lawyers suggested that the concession would have no practical effect as EU competition and procurement law will force trusts to consider the price and value of services when commissioning or face challenges in the courts.

This could lead to significant fines or the cancelling of contracts – with a knock-on effect on patient care – if challenged by companies that lose out on contracts. It will also, the advice suggests, cost the new GP consortiums, set up to replace primary care trusts, millions of pounds in lawyers’ fees to ensure that their commissioning decisions are legally sustainable.

“The Government has simply failed to grapple with the frontline issues in procurement [and] has wholly underestimated the increasing rather than diminishing complexity in the area and has had no or perhaps little regard to the administrative and financial burdens arising from the regime,” the legal opinion concludes.

“The fact, however, that the Government has amended the Bill to remove… the duty to promote competition as an end in itself is arguably futile since the very fact that domestic and European competition law applies to the NHS arguably itself results in the promotion of competition since that is its aim.”

The opinion was commissioned by the campaign group 38 Degrees from lawyers at the Doughty Street and Monckton Chambers. It will be passed on to MPs debating the Bill, which is currently going through the House of Commons.

Its conclusions are likely to concern senior Liberal Democrats ahead of the party’s conference next month – as the removal of the competition clause was trumpeted by the party as a key concession won from the Conservatives.

Any suggestion that it is meaningless will anger activists and lead to calls for further reform to the legislation.

The report also concludes that if the Bill becomes law the duty of the Government to provide a “national” health service will have been diluted and it will reduce what is currently the “unfettered power” of the Health Secretary to impose his or her will on the NHS.

The legal advice adds that in the “clear intention of the Bill to give consortia autonomy from the Secretary of State, there is a real risk of an increase in the ‘postcode lottery’ nature of the delivery of some services, depending on the decisions made by consortia in relation to these subsections. And the intention of the Bill is that there will be very little that the Secretary of State can do about this in practice.”

Patients’ legal aid cuts will cost NHS tens of millions – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

The Government’s plans to slash the soaring legal aid bill threaten to cost the NHS millions and exclude many victims of medical negligence from justice, the National Health Service’s own lawyers have warned.

The man in charge of managing an NHS negligence bill that last year topped £1bn for the first time, told the Justice Secretary, Kenneth Clarke, that his attempts to stop the state bankrolling medical cases would be counterproductive – and would “undoubtedly cause NHS legal costs to escalate massively”.

Steve Walker, chief executive of the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA), cautioned that the move would push alleged victims into the arms of lawyers offering “no win, no fee” deals, which would leave hospitals with hugely inflated bills every time they lost a case. The deals, also known as conditional fee agreements (CFAs), have been on the increase in recent years, with payments to claimant lawyers amounting to 76 per cent of the £257m outlay on legal costs for clinical negligence claims closed last year.

Mr Walker also suggested the move would lead to a conflict of interest between lawyers and clients seeking a fair settlement – amounting to “a danger that some very seriously injured and vulnerable claimants may be prejudiced by the desire of their lawyers to recover their costs”. Claimants in some of the most serious cases, including brain-damaged children and adults, could struggle to strike suitable CFAs – and face prohibitive charges including hefty “after the event” insurance premiums.

But the warnings, delivered in an official response to the Ministry of Justice, appear to have made little difference to the final Bill, which will be debated in Parliament when MPs return next month.

Pressure groups and the legal profession last night said the NHSLA’s comments revealed officials’ deep concerns over the dangers posed by Mr Clarke’s proposals, and they condemned his failure to amend the Bill to take account of the warnings.

Peter Walsh, of the charity Action against Medical Accidents, said: “All that will happen here is that Ken Clarke will be able to say he has saved a few millions on the legal aid budget, but elsewhere in Whitehall the NHS will be paying tens of millions more. At the same time, dozens of people will be excluded from justice and the NHS will not be learning from its mistakes.”

This is Devon | Cameron defends health reforms during Cornwall visit

David Cameron has defended controversial proposals for a radical shake-up of the NHS, defiantly stating “the whole health profession is on board for what is now being done”.

The Prime Minister yesterday issued a passionate broadside in response to St Ives Liberal Democrat MP and Health Select Committee member Andrew George, who this week called on opponents to dig their heels in and derail service changes over concerns the NHS would become a profit-making machine at the expense of patient care.

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review