Er
Er, did I accuse the Israelis of murdering Jean Charles de Menezes?
Bliar invited everyone in – fucking useless insane twat controlled by his butler
I’m getting locked out of my own blog here …
Er, did I accuse the Israelis of murdering Jean Charles de Menezes?
Bliar invited everyone in – fucking useless insane twat controlled by his butler
I’m getting locked out of my own blog here …
I’m flying early next week to view a boat.
I’m going and coming back late the same day. That’s what I’m doing.
ed: I would prefer not to see FO machine guns
ed: because that’s over the top & not necessary. I can accept that it may be necessary in certain circumstances but you can keep them out of sight just like you do with your cars
ed: The problem is that police openly carrying weapons – even a handgun on the waist – is that it <I’m having trouble expressing myself> is not consistent with / abbrades, it’s rough / with a democratic society.
ed: The point is that police quite openly holding machine guns is appropriate only to repressive regimes. It is making the statement that you will be killed.
ed: and disagreement is not tolerated.
while it is a democratic right to disagree and express that disagreement.
ed: Let’s clarify this.
Police with machine guns means that police with machine guns can kill lots of people – that’s what machine guns do – they kill lots of people.
It should be recognised that UK police have machine guns but they are normally locked out of sight in the back of the police car. Get rid of this idea that UK police are not armed – it’s just a fallacy. Loads of diplomatic protection police have vulnerably accessible handguns (on their motorcycles)[ed: I could have done it, no problem]. UK police are armed.
I think that the issue is that overt heavy armament i.e. machine guns signify an oppressive authoritarian regime which I hope that the UK is not.
ed: Anyway I’m going to see a boat
ed: We’re going to have to take the piss:
You’ve got a biggun
Don’t know if I can get that in my mouth …
It’s notworking . I need bigguns pund
ed: Hollow Point – that’s not funny. D’you imagine that the DCdM [ed: murderers ] were Israeli?
ed: No need to imagine
Let us – democratic Socialists – make quite clear that as democratic Socialists we respect and abide by human rights and international conventions and agreements.
ed: Please do it.
It’s important to understand Israel, Palestine, Gaza, UN, war crimes, etc
It’s a shame that I have to point it out
ed: Shall we start?
Zionists are about supporting Israel. Zionists are hugely powerful having huge influence in the media and politics.
It is important to distinguish i.e. discern, Zionists from Jews. Judaism is a religion. Zionism is a racist ideology.
That’s a start
ed: Zionist terrorists and genocidalists were instrumental in the creation of the ‘state’ of Israel
Do your own research – don’t take my word for it.
Zionism is about establishing the state of Israel.
Zionistm is a racist ideology because it maintains that Jews are a separate race in the same way that Nazis claimed that Germans were a separate race. Both are racist ideologies.
Zionists are not representative of Jews although they try to be. The reality is that there are Jews everywhere as they have always been – just as there are all sorts of people everywhere.
Israel is a Fascist racist state just as Nazi Germany was. Israel has engaged in ethnic cleansing just as Nazi Germany did.
ed: Racism is a totally outdated concept from Colonialism. It was about regarding black people being an inferior race so that slave traders could profit from their evil trade. There is one race, the human race. Differences are simply beautiful and wonderful.
ed: And science suggest that we’re all from Africa.