Trump White House Says Military Occupation of Nation’s Capital Set to Expand

Spread the love

Original article by Brett Wilkins republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

A National Guard member guides an armored vehicle in Washington, D.C. on August 12, 2025. (Photo: Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

One critic accused the president of “testing the limits of his power, hoping to intimidate other cities into submission to his every vengeful whim.”

The Trump administration’s military occupation of Washington, D.C. is expected to expand, a White House official said Wednesday, with President Donald Trump also saying he will ask Congress to approve a “long-term” extension of federal control over local police in the nation’s capital.

The unnamed Trump official told CNN that a “significantly higher” number of National Guard troops are expected on the ground in Washington later Wednesday to support law enforcement patrols in the city.

“The National Guard is not arresting people,” the official said, adding that troops are tasked with creating “a safe environment” for the hundreds of federal officers and agents from over a dozen agencies who are fanning out across the city over the strong objection of local officials.

Trump dubiously declared a public safety emergency Monday in order to take control of Washington police under Section 740 of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act. The president said Wednesday that he would ask the Republican-controlled Congress to authorize an extension of his federal takeover of local police beyond the 30 days allowed under Section 740.

“Already they’re saying, ‘He’s a dictator,'” Trump said of his critics during remarks at the Kennedy Center in Washington. “The place is going to hell. We’ve got to stop it. So instead of saying, ‘He’s a dictator,’ they should say, ‘We’re going to join him and make Washington safe.'”

According to official statistics, violent crime in Washington is down 26% from a year ago, when it was at its second-lowest level since 1966,

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) have both expressed support for Trump’s actions. However, any legislation authorizing an extension of federal control over local police would face an uphill battle in the Senate, where Democratic lawmakers can employ procedural rules to block the majority’s effort.

Trump also said any congressional authorization could open the door to targeting other cities in his crosshairs, including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and Oakland. Official statistics show violent crime trending downward in all of those cities—with some registering historically low levels.

While some critics have called Trump’s actions in Washington a distraction from his administration’s mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, others say his occupation of the nation’s capital is a test case to see what he can get away with in other cities.

Kat Abughazaleh, a Democratic candidate for Congress in Illinois, said Monday that the president’s D.C. takeover “is another telltale sign of his authoritarian ambitions.”

Some opponents also said Trump’s actions are intended to intimidate Democrat-controlled cities, pointing to his June order to deploy thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against his administration’s mass deportation campaign.

Testifying Wednesday at a San Francisco trial to determine whether Trump violated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878—which generally prohibits use of the military for domestic law enforcement—by sending troops to Los Angeles, California Deputy Attorney General Meghan Strong argued that the president wanted to “strike fear into the hearts of Californians.”

Roosevelt University political science professor and Newsweek contributor David Faris wrote Wednesday that “deploying the National Guard to Washington, D.C. is an unconscionable abuse of federal power and another worrisome signpost on our road to autocracy.”

“Using the military to bring big, blue cities to heel, exactly as ‘alarmists’ predicted during the 2024 campaign, isn’t about a crisis in D.C.—violent crime is actually at a 30-year low,” he added. “President Trump is, once again, testing the limits of his power, hoping to intimidate other cities into submission to his every vengeful whim by making the once unimaginable—an American tyrant ordering a military occupation of our own capital—a terrifying reality.”

Original article by Brett Wilkins republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Neo-Fascist Climate Science Denier Donald Trump says Burn, Baby, Burn.
Neo-Fascist Climate Science Denier Donald Trump says Burn, Baby, Burn.
Continue ReadingTrump White House Says Military Occupation of Nation’s Capital Set to Expand

Trump Plan to Deploy National Guard in DC Called ‘Giant, Red Trial Balloon’

Spread the love

Original article by Brad Reed republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Soldiers from the U.S. Army National Guard 42nd Infantry Division walk through streets in Washington, D.C. on June 13, 2025.
 (Photo: Bryan Dozier/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

“Trump’s move to mobilize the National Guard against Americans in D.C. is another telltale sign of his authoritarian ambitions,” said Democratic Illinois congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh.

U.S. President Donald Trump is planning to send up to 1,000 members of the National Guard to patrol the streets of Washington, D.C. this week in a move that critics are warning is another step toward authoritarian rule.

In a post on his Truth Social page on Monday morning, Trump framed the decision to deploy the National Guard as necessary to combat crime in the nation’s capital.

“Washington, D.C. will be LIBERATED today!” Trump claimed. “Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR. I will, MAKE OUR CAPITAL GREAT AGAIN! The days of ruthlessly killing, or hurting, innocent people, are OVER!”

However, the president’s claim that the National Guard is needed to protect Washington, D.C. residents from purportedly unprecedented criminal violence does not hold water given that the city has seen a dramatic fall in crime recently. As noted by CBS News reporter Scott MacFarlane, violent crime in Washington, D.C. has fallen by 26% over the last year, highlighted by total homicides declining by 12% year-over-year.

In analyzing the news, some legal analysts were quick to label Trump’s latest move a power grab that was wholly unjustified by the facts on the ground.

Joyce Vance, the former United States attorney for the Northern District of Alabama, argued on her Substack page that Trump’s decision to plow ahead with deploying the National Guard in Washington, D.C. shows he “is going full bore to push the power of the presidency, even if it means ignoring actual statistics on crime that contradict his stated justification for acting in the nation’s capital.”

Vance added that Trump’s actions in this instance also need to be understood as part of a broad sweep by the president to seize more power for the executive branch.

“In case you’re wondering, just six months into his second term, Trump holds a commanding lead in the number of executive orders issued,” she wrote. “These statistics from The American Presidency Project at the University of California at Santa Barbara show the totals for each president in light blue, so, in the first six months of his second term, Trump has signed 186 orders, compared to a four-year total of 162 for Joe Biden.”

Georgetown University law professor Steve Vladeck explained on his own Substack page that Trump does have some significant powers when it comes to deploying the D.C. National Guard in the nation’s capital, although he said that the law clearly prevents him from “federalizing” the city as he has threatened to do in the past.

“The president does have two important authorities when it comes to ‘local’ law enforcement in the District of Columbia: He can use the (small) D.C. National Guard in circumstances in which he probably couldn’t use any other military personnel; and he can require the use of [the Metropolitan Police Department] ‘for federal purposes’ for up to 30 days,” he wrote. “That’s not nothing, but it also isn’t anything close to some kind of federal takeover of the nation’s capital.”

To actually do a federal takeover of Washington, D.C., Vladeck continued, the president would need to get an act passed through Congress that would almost certainly be filibustered in the U.S. Senate.

Legal experts weren’t the only ones alarmed by the planned Trump National Guard deployment.

Karen Attiah, a columnist for The Washington Postwarned her Bluesky followers against writing off the deployment as an effort by the president to distract from his administration’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

“Threats of the militarization of cities—including D.C., which has been fighting for self determination for generations—isn’t a ‘distraction,'” she said. “It’s a massive, giant, red trial balloon for what an American president can do [in] YOUR city… I need people to wake up.”

Kat Abughazaleh, a Democratic candidate for Congress in Illinois, similarly warned that Trump’s National Guard deployment could be a blueprint for the rest of America.

“Trump’s move to mobilize the National Guard against Americans in D.C. is another telltale sign of his authoritarian ambitions,” she wrote on Bluesky. “But at some point signs of authoritarianism stop being signs and become symptoms of an autocratic regime. We’re far past that point now.”

Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.
Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Neo-Fascist Climate Science Denier Donald Trump says Burn, Baby, Burn.
Neo-Fascist Climate Science Denier Donald Trump says Burn, Baby, Burn.
Continue ReadingTrump Plan to Deploy National Guard in DC Called ‘Giant, Red Trial Balloon’

‘This Isn’t Normal!’ Secret Pentagon Plan for Troops to Put Down Local ‘Unrest’ Nationwide

Spread the love

Original article by Jon Queally republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

People participate in a rally against the Trump Administration’s federal takeover of the District of Columbia, outside of the AFL-CIO on August 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump announced he is placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control, and will deploy the National Guard to the District in order to assist in crime prevention in the nation’s capital. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

“If people aren’t allowed to peacefully protest and the elections are being rigged through gerrymandering and voter suppression, how are Americans supposed to respond when they figure out their lives are being actively destroyed by a corrupt, fascist government?”

Internal documents obtained by The Washington Post and reported on Tuesday reveal a secret Pentagon plan by the Trump administration to create a standing force of military personnel that could be rapidly deployed to U.S. cities or communities to quell public protests or any situation President Donald Trump deems “domestic civil unrest.”

The proposal to create what it dubs a “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force”—which evidence shows has been under serious consideration by the administration over recent months—would utilize existing statute, including invocation of Title 32, to authorize the deployment of specialized National Guard units anywhere in the country within hours, according to the documents.

According to the Post:

The plan calls for 600 troops to be on standby at all times so they can deploy in as little as one hour, the documents say. They would be split into two groups of 300 and stationed at military bases in Alabama and Arizona, with purview of regions east and west of the Mississippi River, respectively.

“This isn’t normal!!!” declared one social media user, a U.S. Navy veteran, in response to the reporting.

The leaked documents detailing the plan, which the Post noted “represents another potential expansion of [Trump’s] willingness to employ the armed forces on American soil,” comes just a day after the president sparked serious concerns (and local protests) by deploying National Guard troops in the city of Washington, D.C. and announcing a federal takeover of the D.C. police force.

Civil liberties advocates and critics of Trump’s growing authoritarianism warn the president is raising “a trial balloon” to see just how much he can get away with when it comes to deploying U.S. soldiers onto the nation’s streets.

Coupled with the D.C. takeover, Tuesday’s revelations about the Pentagon’s more expansive plan served to increase those fears, especially in the light of looming political battles regarding gerrymandered districts for next year’s congressional elections and growing disgust with the broader Trump policy agenda.

“If people aren’t allowed to peacefully protest and the elections are being rigged through gerrymandering and voter suppression, how are Americans supposed to respond when they figure out their lives are being actively destroyed by a corrupt, fascist government?” asked Wisconsin state Rep. Chris Larson, a Democrat.

“The U.S. military should never be used against peaceful civilians,” said Larson. “The criminal president who thinks it’s cool can f*ck all the way off.”

Joseph Nunn, an attorney at the Brennan Center for Justice specializing in the domestic use of the U.S. military, told the Post that the lawfulness of the proposal is far from clear and that the creation of such a force would be deeply troubling.

“You don’t want to normalize routine military participation in law enforcement,” Nunn warned. “You don’t want to normalize routine domestic deployment.”

“When you have this tool waiting at your fingertips, you’re going to want to use it,” he added. “It actually makes it more likely that you’re going to see domestic deployments—because why else have a task force?”

Continue Reading‘This Isn’t Normal!’ Secret Pentagon Plan for Troops to Put Down Local ‘Unrest’ Nationwide

US increases bounty on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to 50 million

Spread the love

Original article by Pablo Meriguet republished from peoples dispatch under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license.

Nicolás Maduro greets thousands of supporters outside of MIraflores Palace on July 28, 2024. Photo: Zoe Alexandra

The reaction came after the US Attorney General increased the reward to USD 50 million for information leading to the arrest of the Venezuelan president.

The Venezuelan government has said that the increase in the reward for the arrest of President Nicolás Maduro by US Attorney General Pam Bondi is “ridiculous” and that it is part of a “propaganda operation” and a “desperate distraction” from the internal problems facing the United States.

Bondi published a video on August 7, announcing that the US Department of Justice and Department of State are offering USD 50 million for “information leading to the arrest of Nicolás Maduro”.

This is not the first time the US government has tried to pressure the Bolivarian government in this way. In 2020, the US Department of Justice offered USD 15 million for Maduro’s arrest. The accusations were based on alleged acts of “narco-terrorism” by the Venezuelan government.

According to the US government, Maduro allegedly collaborated with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) “to use cocaine as a weapon to ‘flood’ the United States”.

During the Biden administration, this figure was increased to USD 25 million (the same amount offered for the capture of Osama Bin Laden after the attacks of September 11, 2011).

This time, Washington is doubling the “bet” to USD 50 million. According to the Trump administration, Maduro is one of the world’s most prominent drug traffickers, as he allegedly works closely with the criminal gangs the Sinaloa Cartel, the Tren de Aragua, and the Cartel de Los Soles. 

“Under President Trump’s leadership, Maduro will not escape justice, and he will be held accountable for his despicable crimes,” said US Attorney General Pamela Bondi in a video. Bondi accused Maduro of using Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) Tren de Aragua, Sinaloa Cartel, and the Cartel de Los Soles to “to bring deadly drugs and violence into our country”.

For his part, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil said the accusations are nothing more than a media show aimed at satisfying Trump’s most extremist supporters.

“Pamela Bondi’s pathetic ‘reward’ is the most ridiculous smokescreen we have ever seen. While we dismantle the terrorist plots orchestrated from your country, this lady comes out with a media circus to please Venezuela’s defeated far right,” Gil affirmed in response to Bondi’s statements.

According to Caracas, the accusations have no real basis and are part of a smear campaign against the Venezuelan government, in addition to the sanctions and economic and trade blockades imposed by the United States on Venezuela.

Maduro also reacted to Bondi’s accusations, describing them as part of a “fascist conspiracy” to destabilize his government: “Colombian drug trafficking linked to [ex-President Álvaro] Uribe, criminal gangs and recycled criminals that still exist in the country, and the fascist conspiracy financed by the United States, are a disastrous equation against Venezuela.”

The Cuban government also rejected the decision to increase the reward for Maduro’s “head”. The country’s Foreign Minister, Bruno Rodríguez, posted on X: “We condemn the fraudulent reward announced by the US government against the legitimate President of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, which constitutes a new act of aggression against that sister nation. The US government lacks the legal and moral authority to take such a measure.”

Original article by Pablo Meriguet republished from peoples dispatch under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license.

Continue ReadingUS increases bounty on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to 50 million

DC Protesters Rename Trump EPA Environmental Pollution Agency

Spread the love

Original article by Jessica Corbett republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Protesters renamed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency the Environmental Pollution Agency at its Washington, D.C. headquarters on August 7, 2025. (Photo: Extinction Rebellion D.C.)

“The days of shackling America’s oil, gas, and coal companies are over,” said spokesperson Melinda McFossilShill.

A renaming ceremony for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was held at its Washington, D.C. headquarters on Thursday to give the EPA a name that reflects its priorities under Administrator Lee Zeldin and Republican President Donald Trump.

On the heels of Zeldin’s visit to New England that spotlighted a push for the Constitution gas pipeline, a small group gathered outside the EPA building on Thursday to reintroduce it as the Environmental Pollution Agency and unveil its new logo.

“The days of shackling America’s oil, gas, and coal companies are over,” said Environmental Pollution Agency spokesperson Melinda McFossilShill. “The Trump administration stands for freedom, and that includes the freedom to pollute.”

McFossilShill is not a real representative of the agency, but rather a critic of what it’s become. Thursday’s “Make Pollution Great Again!” event was a protest, led by groups including Shut Down D.C. and the local arm of Extinction Rebellion.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNDqdA3x9Q5/

In addition to McFossilShill, protesters took on the personas of fossil fuel executives and backers, including Joe Gasfracker, vice president for corporate capture of government (a false name and position) at the (real) American Petroleum Institute.

“I want to extend my deepest gratitude to Administrator Zeldin and President Trump for finally ending the charade of so-called ‘environmental protection’ and making government work for our patriotic fossil fuel corporations again,” he said.

“There are hundreds of people dying in floods, thousands dying in hurricanes, and millions being sickened by particulate matter pollution, wildfire smoke, and extreme heat, but we must balance that against the billions of dollars in profit that our members make,” Gasfracker continued. “Billions are more than millions, so obviously our profits must take precedence.”

Another protester—dubbed Pete Pollution, executive director of Energy Villains for Increased Leakage (EVIL)—declared that “the American Dream has always been about the freedom to pour toxic chemicals into every community.”

“If we don’t pollute America’s environment, who will?” added Pollution. Other participants held signs that called for making rivers burn, causing more asthma, and destroying human health.

protesters held signs that called for making rivers burn, causing more asthma, and destroying human health

Protesters renamed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency the Environmental Pollution Agency at its Washington, D.C. headquarters on August 7, 2025. (Photo: Extinction Rebellion D.C.)

During Trump’s second term, the EPA has faced intense criticism for a range of actions. Over the past month, the agency has put 144 employees on leave after they signed a letter criticizing the administration’s “harmful” policies, eliminated its scientific research arm in the “ultimate Friday night purge,” proposed reregistering a pesticide twice banned by federal courts, and moved to cancel $7 billion in solar grants for low- and middle-income households.

Perhaps most notably, the agency also unveiled a rule to rescind the 2009 “endangerment finding” that has enabled federal regulations aimed at the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency over the past 15 years.

Further, Trump last month signed a series of proclamations to provide what he called “regulatory relief” to over 100 coalchemical manufacturingiron ore processing, and sterile medical equipment facilities, with the White House claiming that rules imposed on them under former Democratic President Joe Biden’s EPA were “burdensome.”

At the time, John Walke, clean air director for the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, accused Trump of signing a “literal free pass for polluters,” and warned that “if your family lives downwind of these plants, this is going to mean more toxic chemicals in the air you breathe.”

Elected Democrats—who have minorities in both chambers of Congress—have joined climate, environmental, and public health advocates in calling out Trump and Zeldin for various moves.

Jay Inslee: Trump and Zeldin have turned EPA into ‘Environmental Pollution Agency’ by revoking essential climate rule www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/w…

Ali Velshi (@velshi.com) 2025-08-04T15:51:45.752Z

On Thursday, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Environment and Public Works Committee Ranking Member Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) led a letter to Zeldin about his proposal to gut power plant pollution standards.

“Climate change and toxic air pollution are serious issues,” dozens of Senate Democrats wrote to the EPA administrator. “We represent millions of constituents who risk poisoning from mercury and air toxics and who are facing the rising costs of the climate crisis.”

“Congress established the Clean Air Act to protect our constituents from these dangers. We urge EPA to follow its directive,” they added, urging Zeldin to withdraw two proposals on fossil fuel plant emissions.

In a Thursday statement, Schumer said that “the Trump administration is saying to hell with five decades worth of protection against deadly pollution and neurotoxins that has saved thousands of lives, made communities safer, and our economy stronger. Why? To appease Big Oil and fossil fuel billionaires.”

“The Trump administration’s obsession with gutting clean air protections and allowing more poison into the air is reckless, dangerous, and a clear reminder: Republicans care about their donors, not you,” he charged. “The EPA needs to stop ignoring the science and the facts and immediately reverse course and put the health and safety of Americans first.”

Original article by Jessica Corbett republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Donald Trump urges you to be a Climate Science denier like him. He says that he makes millions and millions for destroying the planet, Burn, Baby, Burn and Flood, Baby, Flood.
Donald Trump urges you to be a Climate Science denier like him. He says that he makes millions and millions for destroying the planet, Burn, Baby, Burn and Flood, Baby, Flood.
Continue ReadingDC Protesters Rename Trump EPA Environmental Pollution Agency