Tag: Donald Trump

  • ‘Concentration Camps’: Border Czar Says Trump to Detain Migrant Families

    Spread the love

    Original article by Jessica Corbett republished form Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

    Incoming White House ‘border czar’ Tom Homan speaks during Turning Point’s annual AmericaFest 2024 in Phoenix, Arizona, on December 22, 2024. (Photo: Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images)

    “Decent people all over the world will hate this country… and they should,” said one critic.

    Adding to alarm over U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s immigration plans, his “border czar” told The Washington Post in an interview published Thursday that the administration plans to return to detaining migrant families with children.

    Tom Homan, who served as acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement during Trump’s first term, said that ICE “will look to hold parents with children in ‘soft-sided’ tent structures similar to those used by U.S. border officials to handle immigration surges,” the Post summarized. “The government will not hesitate to deport parents who are in the country illegally, even if they have young U.S.-born children, he added, leaving it to those families to decide whether to exit together or be split up.”

    Since Trump beat Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris last month, migrant rights advocates have reiterated concerns about the Republican’s first-term policies—such as forced separation of families—and his 2024 campaign pledges, from mass deportations to attempting to end birthright citizenship, despite the guarantees of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Homan—who oversaw the so-called “zero tolerance” policy that separated thousands of migrant kids from their parents—said: “Here’s the issue… You knew you were in the country illegally and chose to have a child. So you put your family in that position.”

    Incoming "border czar" Tom Homan on shipping U.S.-born children out of the country with their undocumented parents: “You knew you were in the country illegally and chose to have a child.”"Chose"? That's an odd word choice. The right wants to force women to give birth, not give them a choice.

    Mark Jacob (@markjacob.bsky.social) 2024-12-26T14:30:08.168Z

    Harris and President Joe Biden have come under fire for various immigration policies, but their administration did stop family detention—and when it was reported last year that the White House was weighing a revival of the practice, 383 groups urged the president to keep the pledge he made when he took office “to pursue just, compassionate, and humane immigration policies.”

    Under Biden, the government ended mass worksite immigration raids and—eventually—the “Remain in Mexico” policy that stopped asylum-seekers from entering the United States. Homan told the Post that the next Trump administration should bring them back.

    Less than a month before Trump’s inauguration, Biden is now facing pressure to “use the power of the pen to protect those seeking sanctuary from the coming deportation machine that will crush the human rights of our immigrant neighbors and those who have dreams of finding refuge here,” as Amnesty International USA executive director Paul O’Brien put it earlier this month.

    The Post reported that “of all the border hard-liners in the incoming administration, Homan is perhaps the most cognizant of the limits of the government’s ability to deliver on promises of mass deportation—and the potential for a political backlash.”

    Those hard-liners include dog-killing Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Homeland Security; family separation architect Stephen Miller, the president-elect’s homeland security adviser and deputy chief of staff for policy; and Caleb Vitello, the next acting ICE director whom Miller previously tried to install at the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

    “We’re going to need to construct family facilities,” Homan told the newspaper. However, he also said: “We need to show the American people we can do this and not be inhumane about it… We can’t lose the faith of the American people.”

    Critics of the next administration have suggested that—although Trump won the Electoral College and the popular vote last month—pursuing the GOP immigration policies, including “concentration camps” for migrant families, will anger the public.

    Maximum cruelty is the goal https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/12/26/immigration-border-tom-homan-trump/

    Ric Steinberger (@ricst.bsky.social) 2024-12-26T14:29:05.618Z

    “Decent people all over the world will hate this country… and they should,” media columnist and Brooklyn College professor Eric Alterman said on social media in response to the Post‘s reporting.

    Author and New York University adjunct associate professor Helio Fred Garcia said: “Trump’s next border czar previews performative cruelty. In the first term it included kidnapping of children from their parents and returning the parents to their home countries, with no record of which kids came from which parents. A crime against humanity.”

    Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who has argued many major immigration cases, told the Post that “the incoming administration has refused to acknowledge the horrific damage it did to families and little children the first time around and seems determined to once again target families for gratuitous suffering.”

    “The public may have voted in the abstract for mass deportations,” he added, referring to the November election, “but I don’t think they voted for more family separation or unnecessary cruelty to children.”

    Original article by Jessica Corbett republished form Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

  • US business leaders set to break record on donations to Trump inaugural fund

    Spread the love

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/dec/25/us-business-leaders-trump-inaugural-fund

    Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg (left), and Amazon, led by Jeff Bezos, gave $1m each. Photograph: Getty Images

    Donations, not restricted by campaign finance laws, come as industries seek favor with incoming administration

    US business leaders are spending big on Donald Trump’s second inaugural fund, which is predicted to exceed even the record-setting $107m raised in 2017.

    The donations, which are not restricted by campaign finance laws, come as industries and business leaders seek to curry favor with the incoming administration after the president-elect decisively won a second, non-consecutive term in November.

    Some of the planned donations reportedly include $1m each from Jeff Bezos’s Amazon, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Facebook parent company Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg.

    Hedge-fund manager Ken Griffin has said he plans to donate $1m, Bloomberg reported; Uber and its CEO Dara Khosrowshahi are reported to be chipping in $1m each; and Toyota, Ford and General Motors are each peeling off $1m. Ford is also reportedly coupling its donation with a fleet of vehicles.

    “EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Thursday.

    Many senior executives in US industries and finance have already made the trip to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s transition team headquarters, or are planning to, according to reports, as they seek to gain influence and access to the incoming administration that’s threatening to shake up international trading norms.

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/dec/25/us-business-leaders-trump-inaugural-fund

  • ‘Make Polio Great Again’: Alarm Over RFK Jr. Lawyer Who Targeted Vaccine

    Spread the love

    Original article by Jessica Corbett republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the stage at a campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on October 23, 2024 in Duluth, Georgia. (Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    “So if you’re wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is,” said one critic.

    Public health advocates, federal lawmakers, and other critics responded with alarm to The New York Times reporting on Friday that an attorney helping Robert F. Kennedy Jr. select officials for the next Trump administration tried to get the U.S. regulators to revoke approval of the polio vaccine in 2022.

    “The United States has been a leader in the global fight to eradicate polio, which is poised to become only the second disease in history to be eliminated from the face of the earth after smallpox,” said Liza Barrie, Public Citizen’s campaign director for global vaccines access. “Undermining polio vaccination efforts now risks reversing decades of progress and unraveling one of the greatest public health achievements of all time.”

    Public Citizen is among various organizations that have criticized President-elect Donald Trump’s choice of Kennedy to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, with the watchdog’s co-president, Robert Weissman, saying that “he shouldn’t be allowed in the building… let alone be placed in charge of the nation’s public health agency.”

    Although Kennedy’s nomination requires Senate confirmation, he is already speaking with candidates for top health positions, with help from Aaron Siri, an attorney who represented RFK Jr. during his own presidential campaign, the Times reported. Siri also represents the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) in petitions asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “to withdraw or suspend approval of vaccines not only for polio, but also for hepatitis B.”

    According to the newspaper:

    Mr. Siri is also representing ICAN in petitioning the FDA to “pause distribution” of 13 other vaccines, including combination products that cover tetanus, diphtheria, polio, and hepatitis A, until their makers disclose details about aluminum, an ingredient researchers have associated with a small increase in asthma cases.

    Mr. Siri declined to be interviewed, but said all of his petitions were filed on behalf of clients. Katie Miller, a spokeswoman for Mr. Kennedy, said Mr. Siri has been advising Mr. Kennedy but has not discussed his petitions with any of the health nominees. She added, “Mr. Kennedy has long said that he wants transparency in vaccines and to give people choice.”

    After the article was published, Siri called it a “typical NYT hit piece plainly written by those lacking basic reading and thinking skills,” and posted a series of responses on social media. He wrote in part that “ICAN’s petition to the FDA seeks to revoke a particular polio vaccine, IPOL, and only for infants and children and only until a proper trial is conducted, because IPOL was licensed in 1990 by Sanofi based on pediatric trials that, according to FDA, reviewed safety for only three days after injection.”

    The Times pointed out that experts consider placebo-controlled trials that would deny some children polio shots unethical, because “you’re substituting a theoretical risk for a real risk,” as Dr. Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, explained. “The real risks are the diseases.”

    Ayman Chit, head of vaccines for North America at Sanofi, told the newspaper that development of the vaccine began in 1977, over 280 million people worldwide have received it, and there have been more than 300 studies, some with up to six months of follow-up.

    https://twitter.com/greenhousemd/status/1867639259567731149?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1867639259567731149%7Ctwgr%5E7e48f49e770c41569c1cc4056fd12b7ed80473b6%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10

    Sorry, this content could not be embedded.
    X

    Trump, who is less than six weeks out from returning to office, has sent mixed messages on vaccines in recent interviews.

    Asked about RFK Jr.’s anti-vaccine record during a Time “Person of the Year” interview published Thursday, the president-elect said that “we’re going to be able to do very serious testing” and certain vaccines could be made unavailable “if I think it’s dangerous.”

    Trump told NBC News last weekend: “Hey, look, I’m not against vaccines. The polio vaccine is the greatest thing. If somebody told me to get rid of the polio vaccine, they’re going to have to work real hard to convince me. I think vaccines are—certain vaccines—are incredible. But maybe some aren’t. And if they aren’t, we have to find out.”

    Both comments generated concern—like the Friday reporting in the Times, which University of Alabama law professor and MSNBC columnist Joyce White Vance called “absolutely terrifying.”

    She was far from alone. HuffPost senior front page editor Philip Lewis said that “this is just so dangerous and ridiculous” while Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan declared, “We are so—and I use this word advisedly—fucked.”

    Ryan Cooper, managing editor at The American Prospectwarned that “they want your kids dead.”

    Author and musician Mikel Jollett similarly said, “So if you’re wondering if Donald Trump is trying to kill your kids, yes, yes he is.”

    Multiple critics altered Trump’s campaign slogan to “Make Polio Great Again.”

    U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) responded with a video on social media:

    https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/1867576860571287653?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1867576860571287653%7Ctwgr%5E7e48f49e770c41569c1cc4056fd12b7ed80473b6%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commondreams.org%2Fnews%2Frfk-jr-polio-vaccine

    Sorry, this content could not be embedded.

    X

    Without naming anyone, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a polio survivor, put out a lengthy statement on Friday.

    “The polio vaccine has saved millions of lives and held out the promise of eradicating a terrible disease. Efforts to undermine public confidence in proven cures are not just uninformed—they’re dangerous,” he said in part. “Anyone seeking the Senate’s consent to serve in the incoming administration would do well to steer clear of even the appearance of association with such efforts.”

    Original article by Jessica Corbett republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

    Alarm Over Trump Choosing ‘Extreme, Conspiratorial’ RFK Jr. to Lead HHS

  • Tech Billionaires Get in Line to Support Trump Inauguration Fund

    Spread the love

    Original article by Eloise Goldsmith republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends a session of the World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos on January 18, 2024. (Photo by Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

    “President Trump will lead our country into the age of AI, and I am eager to support his efforts to ensure America stays ahead,” said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman became the latest tech titan to make an explicit overture to U.S. President-elect Donald Trump when he confirmed Friday that he intends to make a $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund.

    The news comes after Meta confirmed Wednesday that it has donated $1 million to the fund, and it was reported Thursday that Amazon intends to make a $1 million donation. The Washington Post characterized Altman’s move as “the latest attempt to gain favor from a leading technology executive in an industry that has long been a target of Trump’s vitriol.”

    Altman said in a statement that was sent to multiple outlets that “President Trump will lead our country into the age of AI, and I am eager to support his efforts to ensure America stays ahead.”

    The donation from Meta follows a trip by Meta CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg down to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club to meet with the president-elect last month. Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s executive chairman, is slated to head to Florida to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago next week, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    Zuckerberg and Trump have not always been on the best of terms—Meta temporarily booted Trump from Instagram and Facebook following his comments regarding the January 6 insurrection, and Trump threatened Zuckerberg with lifetime incarceration if Trump perceived that Zuckerberg was interfering in the 2024 election—but Zuckerberg made entreaties to the then-candidate this past summer when he described Trump’s response to his assassination attempt as “badass.”

    Zuckerberg and Meta refrained from donating to Trump’s inauguration fund in 2017, and to President Joe Biden’s inauguration fund in 2021, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    In response to the news that Meta donated to Trump’s inauguration fund this time, the watchdog group Public Citizen wrote: “Shocker! Another tech bro billionaire trying to buy his way into Trump’s good graces. Zuckerberg donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund. $1 million to the man who threatened Zuckerberg with life in prison. Grow a spine.”

    Journalists Mehdi Hasan described the move as “bending both knees to Trump.”

    https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/1867180307696549914?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1867180307696549914%7Ctwgr%5E58d4184d61198542016c7f701d22c2aa26d27a69%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commondreams.org%2Fnews%2Ftrump-tech-billionaires-donation

    Sorry, this content could not be embedded.
    X

    Bezos also chafed against Trump during his first presidency. Trump has repeatedly criticized The Washington Post, which is owned by Bezos, for its coverage of him. In legal proceedings, Amazon also accused Trump of swaying the bidding process when the Pentagon chose Microsoft over Amazon for a lucrative contract because of Trump’s disdain for Bezos. However, in a move that was viewed as a signal to Trump, Bezos blocked the Post from endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris just before last month’s election.

    Margaret O’Mara, a history professor at the University of Washington who focuses on the high-tech economy, said during an interview with NPR the fact that support for Trump isn’t happening quietly “is something new.”

    “It’s just a recognition that there’s not much to be gained in outspoken opposition, but perhaps there is something to be gained by being very clear about your support and hope that Trump does well,” she said.

    Original article by Eloise Goldsmith republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).