… on a quiet day, I can hear her breathing

Category: Jean Charles de Menezes

  • Jean Charles de Menezes

    Spread the love

    Agrippa’s Code.

    masoncode

    billheidrick.com

    It’s very nasty that he was killed in my place.

  • Keep them there till they die … well we’re in charge, we’re the totally partisan police … let’s make look it look like a terrrist attack although we’ve had loads of tube incidents signed: Ian Blair

    Spread the love

    Let’s chose who’s going to live

    Ian Blair: We’ve got to get the numbers right. We’ve got to pretend that this is a terrrist attack instead of just another dust explosion on the tube. We’ve got to do it for my master Tonee (If you search you will find that I adore Tony and consider it my duty to perform ‘the intimate cleansing’).

    We’ll do that Oh it’s so awfull down there BS and just keep underisables to die  – int. revos, human rights lawyer, Beer, Brewer, etc

    Ian Blair: You can’t come down here yet, they’re still not dead. It’s all those lefties and gays and that. Stay out for a few days until they’re dead. FM, that human rights lawyer is still breathing, give me a day or two.

    IB: I’m only getting away with this because of Tonee and those other Neo-Con Labour Party Fascists – John Reid, that fat two-arsed Cunt. Anyone should know that we can clear the tube in no time – but we’ve said it’s terrrrrrist and we’ve got to leave all them to die to make up the nummbers. The numbers are important – better the Devil you know! We’ve got to leave those who we’ve decided to die to die. Better really, they don’t agree with us.

    Were there problems with getting down to tube explosions before? No, there was no problems.

    Tony Blair & Ian Blair

    Labour Party: This was your shit Ian Blair being Tonee’s butler

    ed: There have been many explosions on the London tube. They are dust explosions. I think that I am correct in saying that there was never a fatality. It’s clear that this incident was manipulated for political purposes – by those shits Ian Blain and Tony Blair. They let people die and they decided who should die

    for political purposes

    Don’t be stupid ignorant. You’re identified by your mobile phone.

    Ian Blair and Tonee decided who were going to die. By the numbers.

    By the numbers …

    for JcM

    sorry,

    J d M

    The Labour Party,

    So what are you going to do to make it right?

    Are you going to hold people to account?

    Most likely no

    Then, I am your enemy because you can be such evil bs and not have any regard that this poor guy was killed for your BS

    It could be easy EdMb: You do IB and TB when you’re elected. They’re gone all of a sudden. Isn’t that fair? A deal with someone-or-other. Taking me to the pub would be a start. You’ve got to clean the s**t. Didn’t they teach you at PPE?. I have no concerns when I go sailing.

    Is not necessary to go to the pub. Until I get a commitment …

     

    ed: Look the point is that tube stations are really close to each other and the tube only travels about 4 or 5 miles an hour. Have you researched the tube cleaning train? It was a vacuum cleaning train that was discontinued – so more dust

    [1/10/14 There are claims that the underground travels at about 20 mph average including stops. I think that is hugely exaggerated. ]

    ed: Tube stations might be only a mile or two from each other -is no problem for rescue services firemen

     

    Let’s get back to Ian Blair and Tony Blair. Can they be suicided please?

    or other, I don’t care

    Is it too much to ask that their families are also suicided?

    Yes it probably is

    These cnuts like John Reid, Charles Clarke, Jack Straw. Isn’t it shit when they call for someone to be killed while they’re hiding. I’m not hiding. Don’t they deserve it?

    later edit: I forgot the blind cnut. Him too.

    [The Labour Clarke, not the Tory]

    I think that it’s fair, when these cnuts had power …

    They did it, I do it back

    Like I said, I have a mirror

    C’mon Jonothan, I want to move on. I wanna go sailing and earn my earrings

    1/10/14 There’s a section missing from this post. I’m sure that I mentioned the bus, about BMA doctors being able to recognise dead people.

    About the number 30 bus on 7/7/2005 7/7/7 . The point about the bus is how were there 2 dead on the bus on 7 July and 13 dead on the bus on 8 July? That’s a difficult one to answer unless of course having a major incident like 7/7 provides the perfect excuse to go out and murder a few people. It’s then easier to put them on the bus than to take them down to the carriages.

    2/10/14

    Hasib Mir Hussain

    Kingstar van

    Wisdom, William Wise

    leads to

    Jean Charles de Menezes

     

  • It’s obvious

    Spread the love

    that I’m going to have to publish a leaflet saying that I am regarded as a potential terrrist

    because I am a totally legitimite and legal political activist

    I will deliver it locally

    to all these people who fully appreciate

    that I am only a terrrist because I oppose

    the official total bullshit

    ed: I expect that it will be easily undertood

    edit: I mean that I will deliver it locally to make people aware of political oppression

    Since my neighbours obviously know that I am not an **** terrrist

    edit: No the idea is

    That I am a political activist engaging in totally legitimite political activity. Get it?

    ed: I should have said

    The reality is

    ed: Shall we have a draft?

    I am your neighbour. Because of my totally legal and legitimite political activities

    I can be shot without any warning

    Authorities have decided that they can kill me because I oppose them

    They will call me a potential terrrist

    because I argue against terrrism bullshit

    ed: I have been aware for many years that I am regarded as a potential terrorist – the imaginary self-exploding type

    It is so unreasonable and anti-democratic that reasoned critiscm of the bullshit terrorism narrative results in this. Don’t you see that everyone who opposes Neo-Con bullshit is called a terrrist?

    I Call it Neo-Con bullshit.

    ed: Fascsim does not and cannot allow critisism (dissent)

    Democracy does and can

    ed: It’s not the blog post I intended for today but then it is what I feel.

  • About 7/7

    Spread the love

    7 July 2005, the day of the London murders.

    Image of Kingstar van at Tavistoc Sq 7 July 2005

    Central to understanding the London bombings is the bus at Tavistoc Sq. Why is there a Kingstar van in front of the bvs? What does that mean?

     

  • Conspiracy Theory Unofficial Narrative Fake Manufactured Terrorism The story of the London Bombings 7 July 2005 7/7 Jean Charles de Menezes Ian Blair Tony Blair

    Spread the love

    I’m not sure about this and I’d like some feedback.

    THIS ARTICLE IS TO BE REPEATEDLY UPDATED AND AMENDED. While I have a lot, I don’t have the whole story so I would appreciate help with the uncertain parts. Thanks.

    [23/11/13 One of the problems I encounter is that people helping don’t realise what I’ve already got. For example, I got the ’empty’ lead years ago when I was ignoring it as it was repeatedly raised.]

    It’s a good day (to start).

    Context, Terrorism, 2005 election, Inquiries Act, Bristol Indymedia, G8 & Privy Council ruling, Dust explosions, London Bombings, Cobra meeting for G8 not 7/7, Jerusalem Post articles, Ian Blair, murder of Jean Charles de Menezes

    START:

    Terrorism is a godsend for governments. It provides a wonderful excuse for dodgy newly-developed airplanes falling out of the sky when their doors open at 30 thousand feet and it provides a wonderful excuse for dust explosions on the London Underground. It provides a ready excuse for shitty old Jeeps with documented faults crashing off motorways and bursting into flames. It provides for massive made for television sacrificial rituals to start already planned wars.

    7/1/14 The magick is working, I’m making fine progress – it’s almost as if it was hidden in plain sight all along. It was.

    Just a tiny piece today. On 7/7/2005 – the day of explosions on the London underground and the strange bombing of a double-decker bus an hour later – the boss of the Metropolitan police Ian Blair said “The most important message though however is just that it, while it is a confused situation it must be a confused situation in multiple sites like this, a co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos.”

    There are two issues about this statement. Firstly try finding it using a search engine. It’s almost as if I made it up. I didn’t of course but the web has been scrubbed. That takes the sort of power that only governments have.

    Secondly, what is meant by the phrase ‘order out of (the) chaos’ which is explained very well here

    The need to deter democracy by alienating public opinion from public policy, is one that has been long understood. Back in 1921, the highly influential political columnist and media analyst Walter Lippmann, wrote the book “Public Opinion”,where he discussed the need for the “manufacture of consent”; given the inherent pitfalls and barriers to an accurate and effective public opinion (democracy, essentially), it is necessary that this opinion is crafted by a higher sphere of influence. This was understood very well by Edward Bernays, who was the founder of Public Relations (he indeed coined the term), and the formulator of not just corporate, but also political PR. He sketches out his views on this in his 1928 work, “Propaganda where he states that “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society”, suggesting like Lippmann, that democracy is a “chaos” that needs regulation from above. This “above” is a small section of elites: “We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.” These are the people who will ensure that the masses are sedated, and free to run their daily lives, without participating in the broader picture of public policy, given the dangers that this would pose to the influence of said elites, and thus the smooth functioning of society. To paraphrase Bernays, a leader must serve by leading, not lead by serving.   Read more: http://u2r2h.blogspot.co.uk/2007/08/911-and-propaganda-model.html#ixzz2pkrbXafu

    As explained in the quoted section above, bringing order out of chaos can be understood to be ‘manufacturing of consent’,  “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses …”

    Well-educated people – better educated than myself – politicians and the like, people who … for whatever reason … have come to realise the meaning of the term would, er … recognise the term and know what it means. That there was a manipulation of events to manufacture consent going on.

    8/1/14 Just for fun since we shouldn’t take ourselves too seriously, … he know’s I’m right. I’ve seen the light, it’s been revealed to Me, etc.

    Enjoy