… on a quiet day, I can hear her breathing

Category: war on terrorism bullshit

  • Keep them there till they die … well we’re in charge, we’re the totally partisan police … let’s make look it look like a terrrist attack although we’ve had loads of tube incidents signed: Ian Blair

    Spread the love

    Let’s chose who’s going to live

    Ian Blair: We’ve got to get the numbers right. We’ve got to pretend that this is a terrrist attack instead of just another dust explosion on the tube. We’ve got to do it for my master Tonee (If you search you will find that I adore Tony and consider it my duty to perform ‘the intimate cleansing’).

    We’ll do that Oh it’s so awfull down there BS and just keep underisables to die  – int. revos, human rights lawyer, Beer, Brewer, etc

    Ian Blair: You can’t come down here yet, they’re still not dead. It’s all those lefties and gays and that. Stay out for a few days until they’re dead. FM, that human rights lawyer is still breathing, give me a day or two.

    IB: I’m only getting away with this because of Tonee and those other Neo-Con Labour Party Fascists – John Reid, that fat two-arsed Cunt. Anyone should know that we can clear the tube in no time – but we’ve said it’s terrrrrrist and we’ve got to leave all them to die to make up the nummbers. The numbers are important – better the Devil you know! We’ve got to leave those who we’ve decided to die to die. Better really, they don’t agree with us.

    Were there problems with getting down to tube explosions before? No, there was no problems.

    Tony Blair & Ian Blair

    Labour Party: This was your shit Ian Blair being Tonee’s butler

    ed: There have been many explosions on the London tube. They are dust explosions. I think that I am correct in saying that there was never a fatality. It’s clear that this incident was manipulated for political purposes – by those shits Ian Blain and Tony Blair. They let people die and they decided who should die

    for political purposes

    Don’t be stupid ignorant. You’re identified by your mobile phone.

    Ian Blair and Tonee decided who were going to die. By the numbers.

    By the numbers …

    for JcM

    sorry,

    J d M

    The Labour Party,

    So what are you going to do to make it right?

    Are you going to hold people to account?

    Most likely no

    Then, I am your enemy because you can be such evil bs and not have any regard that this poor guy was killed for your BS

    It could be easy EdMb: You do IB and TB when you’re elected. They’re gone all of a sudden. Isn’t that fair? A deal with someone-or-other. Taking me to the pub would be a start. You’ve got to clean the s**t. Didn’t they teach you at PPE?. I have no concerns when I go sailing.

    Is not necessary to go to the pub. Until I get a commitment …

     

    ed: Look the point is that tube stations are really close to each other and the tube only travels about 4 or 5 miles an hour. Have you researched the tube cleaning train? It was a vacuum cleaning train that was discontinued – so more dust

    [1/10/14 There are claims that the underground travels at about 20 mph average including stops. I think that is hugely exaggerated. ]

    ed: Tube stations might be only a mile or two from each other -is no problem for rescue services firemen

     

    Let’s get back to Ian Blair and Tony Blair. Can they be suicided please?

    or other, I don’t care

    Is it too much to ask that their families are also suicided?

    Yes it probably is

    These cnuts like John Reid, Charles Clarke, Jack Straw. Isn’t it shit when they call for someone to be killed while they’re hiding. I’m not hiding. Don’t they deserve it?

    later edit: I forgot the blind cnut. Him too.

    [The Labour Clarke, not the Tory]

    I think that it’s fair, when these cnuts had power …

    They did it, I do it back

    Like I said, I have a mirror

    C’mon Jonothan, I want to move on. I wanna go sailing and earn my earrings

    1/10/14 There’s a section missing from this post. I’m sure that I mentioned the bus, about BMA doctors being able to recognise dead people.

    About the number 30 bus on 7/7/2005 7/7/7 . The point about the bus is how were there 2 dead on the bus on 7 July and 13 dead on the bus on 8 July? That’s a difficult one to answer unless of course having a major incident like 7/7 provides the perfect excuse to go out and murder a few people. It’s then easier to put them on the bus than to take them down to the carriages.

    2/10/14

    Hasib Mir Hussain

    Kingstar van

    Wisdom, William Wise

    leads to

    Jean Charles de Menezes

     

  • Tony Blair, Terrorist (2)

    Spread the love

    The BBC reported Building 7 was demolished / fekked / collapsed 23 minuted before it did. I can’t understand this except that it was scripted and Building 7 was late in being collapsed / fekked / demolished. Can it be anything other than following a script? Please explain.

    edit: That there was a script to 9/11 that a section of BBC was actively participating in i.e. that would be according to UK government direction. That would be the UK government of Prime Minister Tony Blair.

    ed: Please explain. The BBC editors tried …

    ed: Just to make absolutely clear: The BBC reported that the Solomon Building also known as Building 7 collapsed. The BBC report was premature and the Soloman building collapsed 23 minutes later.

    The BBC reported the premature collapsuation of Building 7 a full 23 minutes before it collapsed – is that a record premature collapsuation?

    11/7/14. The purpose of this post is to suggest that the BBC and by extension Tony Blair’s UK government were complicit in the attacks in New York known as 911. I am suggesting that by prematurely announcing the collapse of Building 7, the BBC was following a pre-planned script and that Building 7’s collapse or destruction was delayed according to that script. How else is it explained.

    While the BBC is the UK’s state broadcasting corporation, I tend to understand it as comprising of 2 parts: the normal news reporting operation and another section concerned with state propaganda. I do think of these two parts as separate and distinct although the news reporting arm is sometimes biased and misleading.

     

  • It’s obvious

    Spread the love

    that I’m going to have to publish a leaflet saying that I am regarded as a potential terrrist

    because I am a totally legitimite and legal political activist

    I will deliver it locally

    to all these people who fully appreciate

    that I am only a terrrist because I oppose

    the official total bullshit

    ed: I expect that it will be easily undertood

    edit: I mean that I will deliver it locally to make people aware of political oppression

    Since my neighbours obviously know that I am not an **** terrrist

    edit: No the idea is

    That I am a political activist engaging in totally legitimite political activity. Get it?

    ed: I should have said

    The reality is

    ed: Shall we have a draft?

    I am your neighbour. Because of my totally legal and legitimite political activities

    I can be shot without any warning

    Authorities have decided that they can kill me because I oppose them

    They will call me a potential terrrist

    because I argue against terrrism bullshit

    ed: I have been aware for many years that I am regarded as a potential terrorist – the imaginary self-exploding type

    It is so unreasonable and anti-democratic that reasoned critiscm of the bullshit terrorism narrative results in this. Don’t you see that everyone who opposes Neo-Con bullshit is called a terrrist?

    I Call it Neo-Con bullshit.

    ed: Fascsim does not and cannot allow critisism (dissent)

    Democracy does and can

    ed: It’s not the blog post I intended for today but then it is what I feel.