Is it a New World Order?
We have definitely derailed the World Order that was intended.
It was intended that US invaded many countries – four or more – simultaneously. [ed: it is published policy at that time.]
At the very least, we stopped that … and we stopped their World Order.
11/10/15 Later edit: I support Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders. We have to strive and work for a better World for ourselves and our descendants.
At least it’s accepted in certain quarters{!} that I have demonstrated it beyond reasonable doubt…
The context is an insane PM in charge of a Fascist regime – isn’t that what it is when there’s a dictatorial leader that cannot countenance any dissent and the police are inseparable from the government? Isn’t that what it is when the big, fat [4/10/15 edit: , totally ridiculous twat of a} policeman is a political appointee and so keen to kill people who oppose the glorious leader? [4/10/15 That absolute New Labour arse was promoted by Blunkett on a pretext]. Well c’mon there are lessons from history here. You have an authoritarian leader and any effective dissent must be crushed with that Fascist boot.
Was it not so in 2005? The glorious war leader was not so glorious. Wasn’t he actually unglorious? Didn’t they need that Fascist deed … that history tells us that they go for?
ed: There is a key
[4/10/15 and isn’t that key so obvious? Weren’t so many people aware then? There are contemporary accounts. Things like – paraphrased – you are such an absolute useless New Labour Fascist ****. ] You won’t get it all, but there’s enough in the public domain. He was on a nasty mission of persecuting a particular political activist for being an effective political activist attacking the un/glorious leader.]
Terrorism is used to scare people to conform. It is about governments controlling people through fear and paranoia. Aren’t governments the real terrorists – the ones that control people through fear?
How many people, what proportion do they need to be scared ****less? Watch more television, you’ll get scared, stay indoors and get obese and controlled. That’s allright security services just need far more resources to keep you scared indoors fight terrrism.
Do you really believe or accept that 911 was not made for television? That it was not a spectacle directed and produced in the way that movies are produced? that it was not a blockbuster? Wasn’t it a cable-TV extravaganza?
I’m glad that I don’t watch television or movies BS. Is that reality for you? Is that all it takes? So you watch television and it makes you credulous / incredulous / stupid / moranic? (yes I know I saw a photo }
Actually so many people know that it’s total BS. So many people know that it’s total BS in the same way that they have had no other way to express themselves …
It’s people who have not even had any exposure to the argument. They just know it’s carp. They’re used to the television and the corporate media. They know that it can’t be trusted. They know that it is fiction and that television news is entertainment just like movies. I may be wrong (mistaken) but … praps I’m not.
It’s actually very refreshing. I decided long ago that I wasn’t interested in convincing people. It’s really great that there are all these people who are anyway unbelieving.
If people accept everything that they see on television then there’s no helping them. There is a very non-PC term for these people which I suppose was very prevalent in the 70s and 80s.
If people have a functioning brain then they probably don’t watch television.