This article is republished from the Skwawkbox because they say it so well.

As expected, Keir Starmer has announced his resignation as the worst prime minister in modern British history.

One whose only ‘successes’ have been on behalf of billionaires and the genocidal colony. Who waged war on our rights and helped spill the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocents. All to serve the interests of Israel and a club of billionaires who want each of us at their mercy.

We come to bury Starmer’s legacy, not to praise it, because it deserves no praise. Meanwhile, the state-corporate media is now busy nauseatingly whitewashing it.

Starmer’s ‘achievement’ of worst-ever comes after a decade in which each prime minister was awful and worse than his or her predecessor. Starmer was worse than the comically dire Liz Truss and more dishonest than toxic, murderous buffoon, Boris Johnson. That takes some doing and Starmer only had to be his awful self to manage it.

Starmer’s ‘success’

Starmer announced his departure still boasting that he had “changed our party” and ripped out the “poison of antisemitism”. That he had rescued Labour’s credibility.

In fact he has destroyed it, undoing two successive general elections under Corbyn where Labour exceeded Starmer’s vote share, one of them achieving Labour’s best result since the second world war. He also boasted of his eagerness for war.

But Starmer’s real focus has been to destroy hard-won and deeply-cherished British rights: freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, the right to speak out against the worst crimes of imperialism. Those rights are now constrained more tightly than an animal awaiting slaughter.

Resisting mass murder is ‘terrorism‘. Not just that, but holding a sign opposing the terror classification is ‘terrorism’ too.

Our judicial system, which is always biased to support the rich and powerful, has been utterly corrupted. If the state doesn’t get the result it wants, it demands another trial. It replaces judges with stooges prepared to destroy their own reputations to support the state’s oppression.

Starmer has made the UK an authoritarian plague island in which doing right is punished and doing wrong is rewarded or ignored.

And even on the ‘bread and butter’ of power — protecting vulnerable people and the nation — Starmer has done nothing but ill.

He wanted to keep poor children in poverty and hunger. He waged war on disabled people and those with poor mental health. He promoted bigotry and hate despite knowing it would win him no fascist votes and would lose him those of sentient human beings. A disease left by a noxious, poisonous figure.

Now, will his likely replacement be any better or is Andy Burnham also too weak, compromised or corrupted?

This article is republished from the Skwawkbox because they say it so well.