TBC: I should write about cryptography …

Spread the love

TBC: I should write about cryptography …


I should write about crap stenography because the point of steganography is that it’s supposed to be hidden and secret.

Crap steganography is totally different. You shouldn’t really be able to do a web search and find the key …

But you can do it because that’s what I did. Crap steganography is supposedly secret but not

Steganography is about not even realising that there is a hidden message. Nobody is supposed to notice that a hidden message is being passed.

For example, your local friendly drug dealer could close her curtain a certain extent or leave a light on or off. You being the recipient of the message would realise what a certain curtain position or light on or off would mean. That’s what steganography is about: a secret message where nobody even realises there is a message.

Oh dear, looks like I’ve woked them up again ;) Well you shouldn’t have been so crap.

Well anyway, if you’re doing hidden messages it shouldn’t be available to anyone who does a search on the internet …

because that’s very crap

The best secret codes are one-time pads. These are a secret code agreed between the sender and receiver for once only. The problem here is that the once-only code has to be known to sender and receiver.

This is totally different to a nonsense code that is used by a certain class or secretive society to promote a particular ideology and widely published –  and therefore decipherable. It must have been widely known for decades. The code exposes so much. Windy city lottery for example.

It exposes how absolutely corrupt and debased the ruling elite is and how absolutely depraved and amoral they are.

Once you recognise and understand their not at all secret code you are suddenly very wise and knowledgable.

[3/1/14 Reflecting on this, my analysis was always consistently correct and spot-on. This aspect was only confirmation and my analysis was correct before then.

I’ve lost my way over the last few years and the last year particularly. I’m better that than that and here.

1/1/14 edit: Steganography is about not even realising there is a hidden message. When – btw paedo – politicians make so ridiculous phrases …

It is totally obvious that they mean something other than their crap

That’s what got me on to it

Once again I reiterate that I have not taken any vows (and will never)

[1/1/14 Apologies. Im trying to explain that these politicians used so ridiculously contrived phrases that it was obvious that they meant something totally different to the normal understanding. The point is that it was so contrived and out of place. It struck me as weird. Politicians were talking weird shit and I noticed. It was obvious that they were meaning something totally different than the words.

I knew that they were talking in code. Because what they were saying was so ridiculous and so contrived. The point about Steganography is that it’s supposed to be a hidden message. If you make ridiculous statements that obviously have a different meaning then it is not hidden.

later: Ridiculous out of place phrases. You think are these politicians insane? Are they mad? They are mad and totally divorced from reality but there’s more to it …

Did  they

I’m trying to find it.

It seems to me that they were desperate and announced their secret code

Didn’t the butler try to make it so clear?

OK Let’s get some context

Crap politician members of a secretive society (SS)

Were sponsored by SS nomination

Was a twat with twat advisor (Mandy and AC)

Carried on …


It:s so clear that he was sponsored by … Well search for yourselves

Was there more than that sponsorship / nomination? Was it from a foreign country? US / ISR ? Should that be IRL?

The rules are the game are changing

reports of my demise are exaggearted

Just FO


I cast a curse on the two Blairs

It is powerful because it is deserved. It is just.

Continue ReadingTBC: I should write about cryptography …


Spread the love

RUMF: SW (later edit: IAI)





How to say? IP WWIS:

Later, later edit: C’N YSBC!

Later, later, later edit: Well this is fun isn’t it? I have been trying to avoid these late posts but then I’m sure and I hope that I’m wasting loads of personhours on it.

Anyway – since this is a blog – I’m hoping to get a small boat or dinghy soon to go sailing soon. TYAGN

Later, later, later, later edit: IBTWT IDNITWME

LLLLL edit: I’m strong

Continue ReadingTMF

Commentary on recent UK political events

Spread the love

Hey Ho, Hey Ho …


How the Orange Bookers took over the Lib Dems

What Britain now has is a blueorange coalition, with the little-known Orange Book forming the core of current Lib Dem political thinking. To understand how this disreputable arrangement has come about, we need to examine the philosophy laid out in The Orange Book: Reclaiming Liberalism, edited by David Laws (now the Chief Secretary to the Treasury) and Paul Marshall. Particularly interesting are the contributions of the Lib Dems’ present leadership.

Published in 2004, the Orange Book marked the start of the slow decline of progressive values in the Lib Dems and the gradual abandonment of social market values. It also provided the ideological standpoint around which the party’s right wing was able to coalesce and begin their march to power in the Lib Dems. What is remarkable is the failure of former SDP and Labour elements to sound warning bells about the direction the party was taking. Former Labour ministers such as Shirley Williams and Tom McNally should be ashamed of their inaction.

Clegg and his Lib Dem supporters have much in common with David Cameron and his allies in their philosophical approach and with their social liberal solutions to society’s perceived ills. The Orange Book is predicated on an abiding belief in the free market’s ability to address issues such as public healthcare, pensions, environment, globalisation, social and agricultural policy, local government and prisons.

The Lib Dem leadership seems to sit very easily in the Tory-led coalition. This is an arranged marriage between partners of a similar background and belief. Even the Tory-Whig coalition of early 1780s, although its members were from the same class, at least had fundamental political differences. Now we see a Government made up of a single elite that has previously manifested itself as two separate political parties and which is divided more by subtle shades of opinion than any profound ideological difference.


Continue ReadingCommentary on recent UK political events

On a quiet day I can hear her breathing

Spread the love

I recommend a Socialist Campaign – not these New Labour shites. I recommend that unions and associated bodies drop the Neo-Liberal shits.

What are you about then?

Nationalised electricity , a nationalised rail system just like British Rail was

That worked well

British Telecom – the Post Office – worked well

Didn’t it work better when the infrastructure was nationalised?

The NHS.

Continue ReadingOn a quiet day I can hear her breathing

It’s a bit carp, isn’t it?

Spread the love

That I just do all this political shite.

It pisses me off as well actually. but then someone got to do it

Today, the Gruniad were all about people are not interested in politics. Well it is pretty crap isn’t it?

I can totally understand people not not being interested in politics.

It can hardly be called a democracy can it? If most people are estranged from it? No government can claim a mandate – this one can’t claim a mandate for anything.


Continue ReadingIt’s a bit carp, isn’t it?

Commentary on and analysis of recent political events

Spread the love

Merry Christmas.

The New Statesman reports on Britain’s new Victorianism whereby the filthy rich get filthier rich and that the poor get poorer. Just in case you haven’t realised, we are most definitely not all in this together.

We are re-living a traditional Victorian Christmas – of excess for the few and struggle for the many

Like the Victorian poor, Britons on low and middle incomes are often treated as a different caste of people to those which in the nineteenth century were called the “upper ten thousand” and are now the “super rich” 0.1%. The practice of sacrificing workers’ need for reliable incomes to the desire of employers to have flexibility is spreading – through zero-hours contracts and false self-employment – up the income scale. This is reflected in how our incomes are described: too often, the business pages of refer to the pay of the 0.1% as “reward” (they are valuable creatures to be nurtured and thanked) whereas the rest of us are “labour costs”.

At the other end of the scale, the rich are getting richer. The UK’s 1,000 wealthiest people last year got richer by £35bn: they now have assets, on average, of £450m each. London now boasts the world’s most expensive home, and we are seeing the return of the butler. The share of national income that the top 1% get fell throughout most of the 20th century, but is again heading towards Victorian levels.

And this new gentry are not, for the most part, talented hard-working who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps. As in the Victorian era, the rich are the privileged offspring of privileged parents. The UK has one of the lowest levels of social mobility in the developed world. A child whose parents send them to private school is 11 times more likely to go on to run a major company than his state-school equivalent, and 30 times more likely to become a high-court judge.

Martin Robbins reports on Cameron and the illiberal Con-Dem coalition government’s progress in censoring the internet. He asks what the porn filter is all about? I think that you can see what was intended by looking at the consequences: it was intended to censor huge swathes of the internet and allow only a prudish flaccid anodyne vacuity and it was intended to disempower individuals so that using the internet should be passive like watching television.

Cameron’s internet filter goes far beyond porn – and that was always the plan

As Wired reported back in July, Cameron’s ambitions extended far beyond porn. Working through secretive negotiations with ISPs, the coalition has put in place a set of filters and restrictions as ambitious as anything this side of China, dividing the internet into ‘acceptable’ and ‘unacceptable’ categories, and cutting people off from huge swathes of it at the stroke of a key.

“As well as pornography, users may automatically be opted in to blocks on “violent material”, “extremist related content”, “anorexia and eating disorder websites” and “suicide related websites”, “alcohol” and “smoking”. But the list doesn’t stop there. It even extends to blocking “web forums” and “esoteric material”, whatever that is. “Web blocking circumvention tools” is also included, of course.”

And the restrictions go further still. Over the weekend, people were appalled to discover that BT filters supported homophobia, with a category blocking, “sites where the main purpose is to provide information on subjects such as respect for a partner, abortion, gay and lesbian lifestyle, contraceptive, sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy.”

It was never really clear what the so-called porn filter was supposed to achieve; what problem it was trying to prevent. Filtering seems to have become a crutch for inept parents looking for an easy way to avoid having real conversations with their kids about sex, porn and the world outside their comfortable little cul-de-sacs. If their first sight of a vagina traumatizes your teenage child, then you have brought them up wrong – but of course the problem here is often the parent more than the child; the embarrassed mother of father – projecting their own feelings of discomfort and embarrassment around the topic of sex onto their child. There remains, despite a wave of public hysteria, no good evidence that porn has any detrimental effect on children.

What clearly does have an impact on children though is denying them sex education, suppressing their sexual identity, and shutting off access to child protection or mental health charities. In all this talk of porn filters, the rights of the children campaigners supposedly want to protect have been ignored or trampled. Children should have a right to good quality sex education, access to support hotlines and websites, and information about their sexuality.

Chris Grayling and the illiberal Con-Dem Conservative coalition government are accused of being petty and killjoys for banning prisoners from receiving gifts from friends and families.


Prisoners Won’t Receive Parcels This Christmas

Convicted prisoners will not be able to receive parcels from their loved ones this Christmas under new rules introduced by the Government.

The rules forbid prisoners from receiving any items in the post unless there are “exceptional circumstances”.

The new measures were introduced in November, meaning this is the first Christmas for which the new rules will be in effect.

A Prison Service spokesperson confirmed the rule change, saying it was part of a raft of Government reforms.

But Juliet Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said: “These new mean and petty prison rules just add stress and strain while doing nothing to promote rehabilitation and personal responsibility.”

OurNHS in 2013 – some highlights

OurNHS is on a publishing break until the New Year. Why not check out some of our stories you may have missed?

Dr Clare Gerada, outgoing Chair of the Royal College of GPs, asks ‘What do we want – a good doctor, or “patient choice”?’ 

How did we get here? Marcus Chown explains in The great NHS robbery.

Could young doctors have done more to fight NHS ‘reforms’, asks Guddi Singh in Asleep on the job – young doctors and the NHS reforms.

Dr Jacky Davis questions the media presentation of hospital deaths.

Dr David Zigmond challenges the poor quality of decision making in the new NHS structures in ‘NHS decisions, Eurovision-style’. Richard Grimes wonders whether the Deregulation Bill is even more worrying than the Lobbying Bill in ‘A Bonfire of Citizens’ Rights’.

OurNHS editor Caroline Molloy investigates the rising threat of NHS charges in Zombie policies walking into Downing Street, the scandal of Peterborough Hospital and the PFI racket and asks ’What is G4S doing in England’s NHS’? She also exposes how predictions of compulsory tendering are coming true, and how the NHS pays millions to end contracts which have put patient lives at risk.

In The Race to Privatise England’s NHS Paul Evans of the NHS Supporters Federation lays bare just how many contracts are going out to the private sector.

In ‘The NHS and dog whistle politics’, Dr Kamliz Boomla highlights the problems of charging migrants for the NHS, and Shibley Rahman asks whether we should be worried about personal budgets in ‘Shop til you drop’.

The sale of personal medical data to private interests is exposed in “Your medical data – on sale for a pound” by Phil Booth of MedConfidential.

Green Party leader Natalie Bennett speaks out on the sell-off of NHS land.

Clive Peedell (National Health Action Party Leader) tells us how David Cameron has lied about his intention to privatise the NHS.

Rachael Maskell, Unite National Officer for health, highlights the scandal of low pay in the NHS & the NHS’s electoral impact.

Ex-Children’s Commissioner Sir Al Aynsley-Green sets out how the health and welfare ‘reforms’ are failing children.

Professor Dexter Whitfield asks should we turn the NHS into mutual and co-ops?, Professor Rosemary Mander questions whether charities are losing their way in healthcareand Andrew Robertson of Social Investigations exposed how the charity sector has lobbied for NHS privatisation.

Professor Marianna Fotaki of the Centre for Health & the Public Interest suggests the NHS learn from how privatisation has damaged social care.

Dr Kailash Chand OBE urges Labour to ‘Shout from the rooftops’ to save the NHS, Grahame Morris MP of the Health Select Committee) exposes how privatisation is harming Freedom of Information and Roger Kline asks if private sector secrecy will stop the NHS becoming more open.

In 2013 OurNHS was the first to highlight and promote campaigns including the privatisation (Section 75) regulations, the EU/US Free Trade Treatyand the Hospital Closure clause.  

We recently launched an up-to-date resource guide, the most comprehensive collection of the best NHS campaigning resources on the Web, and hope to build on our work supporting grassroots campaigners.

2014 will be a big year for NHS campaigning. There are big questions to address on healthcare funding, charging, cuts and privatisation, and democratic accountability. OurNHS wants to continue to ensure a range of progressive and sometimes challenging voices are heard in the debate.

OurNHS continues to campaign hard for an ‘NHS restoration bill’ to restore the Secretary of State’s duty to secure a comprehensive health service, abolished by the 2012 Health & Social Care Act.

See you in 2014!

Donate to OurNHS

Continue ReadingCommentary on and analysis of recent political events

A clean heart …

Spread the love

I’m not asking (for) a luxurious lifestyle, the world’s gold or it’s fine gems

What I’m asking for is a happy heart, an honest heart, a clean heart

A heart that is full of goodness


Only a clean heart can sing

Sing the day and sing the night

Continue ReadingA clean heart …