I like Sci-Fi because it’s pretend, not real and escapism. Then you uber-onatists spoil it all with your Taliban, OBL wanling.
Shall we be afraid of …
crossing the road,
boiling a kettle,
smoking a cigarette,
because that’s much more likely to kill you than any imaginary terrrist
that is imagined to keep you scared
Dwy’i eisiau codi hwyl a dysgi bod yn meistr go iawn (trac-cyflym i fod yn meistr). Rwy’n bwriadu hwylio’r byd cyn bo hi’n rhy hwyr.
Does dim anffawd mewn ailenwi os mae dyna ei – beth yw’r syniad yma? fod rhyw llwybr wedi ei benderfynu?
Beth am yr enw Codi Hwyl? Fy nghwch i?
Rwy’n barod ei ailenwi hi. Mae eisiau enw newydd arno hi (Rhywbeth fel bedyddiaeth). Bydd hi’n edrych ar fy ol fi. Byddaf fi’n edrych ar ei ol hi.
I do tend to think that these people who tried to have me killed as a suspected terrorist deserve to have the mirror turned on them. I did have a mirror held high.
Er, I’d better not forget Alastair Campbell. Named
I curse you all. Not forgetting that later Home Secretary. I curse you. I curse you to tormented lives.
It would be good if the Blairs couldn’t live with themselves. It would be good if they ‘suicided’ themselves.
Actually, I am so pissed off that Jean Charles de Menezes has been killed in my place.
JC dM points at me. Oh stick it up your arse pretend secrecy.
Oh Fuck Off pretend tube expolosions 7 July 2005
edit: OK I’m fed up with this – it’s got to change
They are going to be held responsible
Anthony Charles Lynton Blair. Named
John Reid. Named
Jaqui Smith. Named
Charles Clarke. Named
David Blunkett. Named
[22/3/15: I can make this easy. The cabinet shares responsibility – they are all jointly and severally responsible. Shall we say all cabinet members from Sept 2002 to the end of Brown’s government? Blunkett, Reid, Straw particularly piss me off though]
Who are these paedos going to be? I reckon it’s going to be all of Bliar’s cabinet.
One of Blair’s minister’s in Lambeth. Blair? Falconer? Who?
[22/3/15: I know of one paedo from Blair’s cabinet for certain. I also strongly suspect Blair himself based on his history. Having said that I really would not be surprised if they all were. This story of one of Blair’s minister’s supporting a
Lambeth Southwark paedo childrens’ care home worker’s (manager / caretaker?) attempts to adopt children sounds like the sort of blatant total disregard for the law and untouchable air of Blair himself. ]
Please appreciate that it’s all total nonsense (BS)
It is continuing tonight,
Jean Charles de Menezes
I jumped over barriers, I wore a jacket too warm …
Doesn’t he have My Name?
How can you not be your name?
They kill this poor person pointing at me.
Tony Blair, Ian Blair, Charles Clarke, Jack Straw, all those New Labour SHITS
That threat moves about.
It needs to be personified – OBL – perhaps not so much recently since he’s been killed about ten years after he died … He been killed ten years before he died and ten years after he died.
There’s people who oppose your way of life. Isn’t that awful? People who don’t agree with you? Don’t they deserve to be killed? Like, massively killed? Just because they’re not into killing people? So … people who ain’t into killing people should be killed? Is that it?
What I’m suggesting is, like, if they’re living in Pakistan and are having a wedding party. Don’t they deserve to be killed by a US drone from Virginia? Well they’re obviously foreign and that …
Sort it outo
ed: This has to stop. Killing people has to stop in 21st century. The people who had power no longer have power – now we negotiate and reach consensus.
This is 21st century. It is a new century. It is a new reality.
edit: Do you people in the US think that it’s acceptable to indiscriminately kill by drone in Pakistan? Well, do you?
They’re having a wedding party and a US done kills them all. I’ll give you some dots …
Climate change, global warming, irrefutable facts about, climate change, global warming
Looking into the eye of a Whale is very special.
I am not suggesting that saving whales is any real response to climate change, although of course Whales should be protected and adored. What I am suggesting is that we should hugely reduce our – i.e. human – adverse effect on this beautiful planet that is our World. We need to make huge changes to stop destroying our World.
It’s not about personal issues like riding a bike and doing away with cars (although it may have a minimal affect edit: doing away with cars would have a huge effect, aeroplanes too). Yes, we need to act local – avoid travelling excessive distances. Get a job closer to home.
The real issue is much bigger and needs to be addressed by politicians. We have to stop destroying this World. 2014 was the warmest year on record. Climate change is real and must be addressed.
People are travelling hundreds or thousands of miles needlessly.
People are travelling hundreds of miles from A to B to do their thing …
people are travelling hundreds of miles from B to A to do their thing …
… that’s their A to B
Can we address that please? Aeroplanes are not buses. Let’s cut this ridiculous nonsense out.
edit: Please. Isn’t this obvious? Isn’t it so ridiculous unnecessary climate-killing travel? Can’t we do it local? Are these flights needed? I know the answer – get a local job so that you can cycle there, get a bus or a cab.
Doesn’t that make sense?
Let – us – go on a different tangent.
A sensible, realistic and worthwhile direction would perhaps [be] to appreciate the natural world, accept and attempt to address climate change, recognise and accept that we have to make real and fundamental changes to the way that we live because we are destroying our planet. We should also commit to be fair and support democracy.