Media reaction: How climate change intensified Europe’s record-breaking June heat

Montage of newspapers by Kerry Cleaver for Carbon Brief

Article by Cecilia Keating, Ayesha Tandon, Giuliana Viglione, Robert McSweeney and Josh Gabbatiss republished from Carbon Brief under a CC license.

For the second time in two months, western and central Europe has been hit by a record-breaking heatwave.

Temperature records have toppled in multiple countries, with France seeing its “hottest day ever” for two days running and the UK, Spain and Switzerland breaking records for June.

A rapid-response attribution study has concluded that “climate change is unequivocally to blame”, noting that the scorching temperatures would have been “virtually impossible” 50 years ago.

The research also found that the sweltering overnight temperatures seen this week are “100 times” more likely today than they were in 2003 when Europe was hit by a deadly summer heatwave.

The extreme conditions come on the 50th anniversary of a historic 1976 heatwave in the UK, prompting many comparisons of the two events from scientists and the media. 

In this article, Carbon Brief looks at how the heatwave developed and the role climate change played.

How did the heatwave develop?

The “very intense and widespread” heat began to develop in the south of France as early as 13 June, reported Le Monde, before it began to “intensify and move northward” in the following days.

The heatwave was caused by a phenomenon known as an “omega block”, which is a “rare weather pattern” that can trap intense heat over a particular area “for extended periods”, said the Independent.

The Daily Telegraph explained the pattern’s development as a four-step process. 

First, it said, the jet stream moves across the Atlantic Ocean, creating a high pressure ridge to the south. The “omega” shape is created by low pressure systems on either side of the meander. This “stalls” the normal flow of weather systems from west to east and “pulls hot air from Africa northward over Europe”, creating a “lid” that traps the heat. This leads to the development of a heat dome, “driving temperatures higher”, it added.

This heat dome “originated in the hot and humid sub-tropics” and has been “centred” over France, said BBC News

Jeff Berardelli on bluesky (@weatherprof.bsky.social): "Not 2050. Today in France. Peak Temps. Every pink number is 40C+ (104F+) with many stations at 44C+ (111F+). A previously impossible heatwave, soon to be an annual tradition, only hotter. #heatwave #Europe"

France experienced its “hottest day ever” on two consecutive days, with its “national heat index” – an average of day- and night-time high temperatures from 30 weather stations across the country – reaching 30C on 24 June, according to Le Monde.

On 25 June, Méteo-France announced that 72 of France’s 96 mainland administrative districts had been placed under a red heatwave alert.

The heatwave “spread to other parts of western Europe” as the week progressed, said BBC News.

Spain recorded a daily average of 28.2C on 23 June – a record temperature for that month, the outlet reported. 

The UK surpassed its long-standing temperature record for June of 35.6C multiple times on 24, 25 and 26 June, with a new record set on 24 June at 36.1C in Gosport, Hampshire, which was subsequently exceeded on 25 June with 36.7C at Merryfield, Somerset and on 26 June with 37.3C at Santon Downham in Suffolk.

“Temperatures exceeding 40C” are predicted for the weekend of 27-28 June in Italy, while 16 cities have been placed under heat alerts, according to Corriere della Sera.

Germany also saw temperature records tumble, where the heatwave is the “longest-ever recorded” for June, said Deutsche Welle.

The Financial Times said Germany was bracing for 41C temperatures over the weekend of 27-28 June and reported that Austria’s weather agency has warned Vienna could hit a record 40C. 

Meanwhile, Switzerland’s national weather agency declared temperatures had exceeded 38C for the first time in June, breaking a record set in 1947, according to RTS.

(All of these new records are considered provisional until they have been validated and verified by each national met service.)

Scientists from the World Weather Attribution service analysed the wet-bulb globe temperature in 854 cities across 30 European countries and found that 45% have broken, or are expected to break, their June heat-stress record since 18 June.

(Wet-bulb globe temperature is a heat-stress index that combines temperature, humidity, wind speed and direct sunlight.)

These record-breaking cities are shown in pink on the map below.

Map of Europe showing its 'historic week of heat stress'
Cities that have broken (or are forecasted to break) their June heat-stress records over 18-30 June (pink) and those that have not broken records (grey). Source: World Weather Attribution (2026)

While temperatures are expected to “gradually decline” across western Europe from 26 June onwards, “countries in eastern Europe were bracing for a scorching weekend”, according to the New York Times.

A separate New York Times article noted that “local factors” – such as melting sea ice, lower air pollution and less snow cover – mean that “for the past three decades, Europe has been warming faster than any other continent”.

The outlet added that these factors can also impact atmospheric conditions “in ways that could be making searing heatwaves like the one this week more frequent”.

Back to top

What have the impacts been so far?

France

As temperatures climbed on Sunday 21 June, several cities and towns – including Paris – introduced restrictions for the nationwide “fête de la musique” celebration, reported the Guardian. This included bans on performances before 7pm and outdoor drinking, it said.

Le Parisien reported that the government announced that more than 845 schools would not open on Monday 22 June, while another 1,800 were rescheduling classes.

On 23 June, as average temperatures in France reached an all-time high, prime minister Sébastien Lecornu announced that more than 40 people had drowned as they sought relief from the heat, reported Libération.

Analysis from Agence France-Presse covered by the Guardian on 24 June showed that 54 of France’s administrative departments had recorded temperatures of 40C and higher since the heatwave began.

France24 reported that a power cut caused by the heat had left 68,000 households in Brittany, north-west France, without electricity. Meanwhile, Le Monde reported a jump of 15-20% in calls to the French emergency health services.

On 25 June, Ouest-France reported that 25 cardiac arrests had been reported over a 24-hour period in Paris – a significant increase on the typical number of “around 10”. 

The Financial Times said temperatures reached 41C in Paris on 25 June, noting that “heat-absorbing zinc rooftops” had caused temperatures in apartment buildings to “soar”.

It added that nighttime temperatures had been most extreme in France, with some areas enduring 30C heat.

Back to top

UK

The UK Met Office issued a “red warning” for extreme heat on 24 June, 25 June and 26 June – noting that this was the “first time in the history of the current weather warnings system” that it had issued red heat warnings on three consecutive days.

The UK Health Security Agency also issued red alerts – indicating that “severe impacts are expected across health and social care services due to the high temperatures” – for much of the country.

Schools, hospitals, transport networks and water companies were all left “struggling to cope” with the high temperatures, wrote the Guardian. Schools across southern England and Wales closed, while rail services were cut and speeds lowered, it said.

Temperatures on the London Underground’s Central line reached nearly 40C, according to the Independent, which took readings on several lines. It noted that “only around 40%” of the network’s trains are air-conditioned.

Several events at London Climate Action Week were cancelled or moved online, giving a “textbook example of how the world is being forced to adapt to increasingly extreme heat”, wrote Wired.

Grantham Research Institute at LSE on bluesky (@granthamlse.bsky.social): "We regret that our event on Extreme Heat: Improving governance and strengthening action around the world has been cancelled due to the red extreme heat warning issued by the UK Met Office. Our apologies to everyone who was planning to attend the event."

On 26 June, the i newspaper reported that 1,200 schools in the UK had been closed and six hospitals had declared “critical incidents”. 

BBC News said that the London Ambulance Service had responded to a record number of call outs for life-threatening emergencies”, while the Guardian detailed reports from doctors of “radiotherapy machines and MRI scanners failing, critical IT systems stalling and cooling units that serve entire hospitals breaking down”.

Back to top

Rest of Europe

The extreme heat has also swept through other European countries.

Euronews reported that 22 and 23 June were the hottest June days on record in mainland Spain since at least 1950. It added that “the current heatwave is bringing temperatures to between 5-10C above normal across much of the country”. 

Separately, Euronews reported that across Spain, many municipalities had called off their San Juan celebrations, which usually involve lighting bonfires.

France24 reported that extreme heat between 21 and 24 June had been linked to an estimated 212 excess deaths across Spain, according to the country’s “mortalidad y modelos” monitoring system. 

Reuters reported that “an extreme heat ⁠warning was in place across the Netherlands, where outdoor sports were cancelled, public transport was scaled down and schools shortened classes or closed as temperatures were expected to soar to 36C”.

It added that, in Switzerland, local authorities opened air-conditioned theatres for free daytime cinema screenings.

Meanwhile, Agence France-Presse reported that Belgium’s national train operator had removed “some” non-air-conditioned trains from service, while France’s SNCF had cancelled 10% of trains in the Paris region to avoid overheating the tracks.

Back to top

What role has climate change played?

The record-breaking temperatures recorded over Europe this week would have been “virtually impossible” 50 years ago, according to a rapid analysis from the World Weather Attribution service. 

The study, published on 26 June, found that “climate change is unequivocally to blame”.

To identify the fingerprint of human-caused climate change on the extreme heat, the study authors used climate models to compare the world as it is today to a cooler “counterfactual” world. This is called an attribution study. 

The analysis focuses on a large area of Europe encompassing Belgium, Denmark, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the UK, as well as parts of Italy, Norway, Spain and Sweden.

The authors simulated the three-day maximum June daytime temperatures and three-day minimum June night-time temperatures over the study area in today’s climate, which has already warmed by 1.4C due to human-caused climate change.

They then simulated the same June heatwave in a climate 1.1C and 0.6C cooler than today. These global warming levels approximate the average global temperatures in 1976 and 2003, respectively. 

The study authors said they chose these two years because both saw record-breaking summer heatwaves hit Europe which were linked to devastating impacts including thousands of deaths

If the atmospheric conditions that drove this week’s heatwave had hit Europe in 1976 and 2003, the resulting heatwaves would have been 3.5C and 2C cooler, respectively, the researchers found. Meanwhile, night-time temperatures would have been 2.4C and 1.3C cooler in June 1976 and 2003, respectively.

The study added:

“The sweltering overnight temperatures keeping many people awake this week are about 100 times more likely today than they were just 23 years ago during the infamous 2003 European heatwave. The daytime peaks are about 10 times more likely.”

Study author Prof Fredi Otto, WWA co-founder and professor in climate science at Imperial College London, told a press briefing:

“It is in our hands…If we transition away rapidly from fossil fuels, this [heatwave] could still be an average summer and not a cool summer.”

Other experts have linked the intense heat to human-caused climate change. 

For example, Dr Akshay Deoras, a senior research scientist at the University of Reading, told the Science Media Centre:

“Human-driven climate change has provided the springboard for this event, loading the atmosphere with extra heat and making extreme temperatures far more intense than they would have been in the past”. 

Back to top

How does the UK heatwave compare to 1976?

This year’s June heatwave has fallen on the 50th anniversary of the UK’s summer of 1976, a historic heat and drought event that saw water restrictionscrop failures and thousands of deaths.

With an average temperature of 15.7C, the summer of 1976 was the hottest on record at the time. That record stood for more than 25 years, before being surpassed by the summer of 2003 and then also 2006, 2018, 2022 and 2025. 

The duration of the 1976 heatwave made the event extraordinary, including 15 consecutive days where temperatures of at least 32.2C were recorded somewhere in the country.

The heatwave arrived towards the end of a record-breaking drought that started the year before. The period from May 1975 to August 1976 holds the record for the lowest 16-month total rainfall in England and Wales.

This period also saw the lowest flows on record for the majority of UK rivers.

At the time, the 1976 heatwave tied the record – with 1957 – for the maximum June temperature in the UK. A temperature of 35.6C was recorded at Mayflower Park in Southampton on 28 June.

That record remained until it was beaten on three consecutive days this year, with 36.1C recorded in Gosport, Hampshire on 24 June, then 36.7C at Merryfield, Somerset on 25 June and 37.3C at Santon Downham, Suffolk on 26 June.

June 1976 also held the record for the UK’s highest minimum temperature – that is, how warm conditions remain overnight – of 22.7C in Ventnor Park on the Isle of Wight. That has now been surpassed with a recorded temperature of 23.5C in Bute Park in Cardiff. 

To mark the 50th anniversary of the 1976 heatwave, the Met Office and University of Reading analysed what a comparable event would look like in today’s climate.

Shown in the maps below, the findings show that a similar event to 1976 (left-hand map) would already be around 3C hotter today (right–hand map), with peak temperatures of 38C or 39C.

Maps showing UK maximum daily temperatures on 3 July 1976 (left) and for a comparable heatwave in today’s climate (right). Credit: Met Office and University of Reading
Maps showing UK maximum daily temperatures on 3 July 1976 (left) and for a comparable heatwave in today’s climate (right). Credit: Met Office and University of Reading

As climate change continues, “1976-style events will become increasingly common over the next two decades”, said Prof Ed Hawkins in a University of Reading press release:

“What felt like a freak weather event to grandparents in 1976 will become the new normal for their grandchildren.”

Hawkins also noted on social media that the heat in 1976 was “less humid”, with “much cooler nights”, adding that “peak night time temperatures were around 16C back then”.

The summer of 1976 became a benchmark for later periods of extreme heat and drought, both for contingency planning and in popular culture.

In recent days, for example, commentary in climate-sceptic newspapers has often referred back to 1976 as a time without “heatwave hysterics” and “nanny state warnings”, or when the heat was taken “in our stride”,. 

Much of this commentary has been critical of school closures – for example, arguing that it is “defeatist”.

Yet, although hundreds of schools have announced full or partial closures this week, the summer of 1976 also saw schools close early or allow parents to keep their children home.

Leo Hickman on bluesky (@leohickman.carbonbrief.org): "Seems to be a lot of selective memory in UK's right-wing newspapers about schools not closing during the 1976 heatwave. I just checked and, yes, many schools did close early as well as allow parents to "keep their children at home if they wish". This clipping from London Evening News, 29 June 1976"

Back to top

How has the media responded?

Many outlets in the UK and France have been dominated by news about the heatwave and temperature records being repeatedly broken.

The story appeared on various frontpages, including the Timesi newspaper and Daily Telegraph in the UK, and Le MondeLibération and Ouest-France in France. 

There was also prominent coverage in other countries that have seen extreme heat, such as on the frontpages of El País in Spain and Die Welt in Germany.

Some outlets were clear about the dangers of extreme heat, as well as the role of climate change in driving it. They led their coverage with public health warnings and details of how the heat was negatively impacting people’s lives.

Daily Express editorial urged readers to “stay safe” and to shelter indoors with fans, while Ouest-France had a frontpage story about how the heat “threatens our health”. A Guardian frontpage asked if such extremes, “driven by [the] climate crisis”, were “the new normal”.

Andrew Clifford on bluesky (@tscnewschannel.bsky.social): "The Guardian UK and France register record June temperatures amid extreme heatwave. Thursday 25 June 2026 A look at #TomorrowsPapersToday"

Noting the “muted response” from the UK government to recent warnings about the need for climate adaptation, a Guardian editorial said it hoped “this week’s heat will focus minds”. It added: 

“A strong adaptation plan – to run in parallel with the green transition – cannot wait.”

The Independent also argued via an editorial that climate change must be treated with “the urgency the moment demands”, given the “all-too-obvious need to increase resilience”.

Similarly, an editorial in Le Monde criticised the French government’s “flagrant unpreparedness” for heatwaves. It, too, stressed the need for adaptation and said:

“The fight against global warming must be seen as a new paradigm, within which a broad range of public policies must be considered. Simply reacting to events is no longer enough.”

Yet, even amid warnings of “killer heat” approaching 40C, much of the news coverage in UK media was relatively frivolous, often focusing on the positive aspects of the heat. 

The Times published stories about “what the fashion A-list are wearing in the heatwave” and “surprising positives to a British heatwave”. On the day after the UK reached its highest-ever June temperature, the Daily Mail featured a story about King Charles using an electric handheld fan on its frontpage.

Often, alongside warnings of “red alerts” and “meltdown”, news outlets illustrated their stories with photos of people relaxing on the beach and children playing in fountains.

Andrew Clifford on bluesky (@tscnewschannel.bsky.social): "The i Paper Britain is set to smash a 50-year heat record. Wednesday 24 June 2026 A look at #TomorrowsPapersToday"

As the news was filled with heat-related disruption at hospitalstrain cancellations and school closures, many outlets in the UK also criticised official responses to the heat.

Some writers misleadingly compared the heatwave to similar events in 1957 and 1976. In the Evening Standard, one writer said this year’s heat has “got nothing on the summer of 1976”. A Daily Mail article claimed that in 1957 “the sunshine was greeted by national rejoicing”.

In contrast, a comment piece in the Daily Express erroneously stated that the UK was facing “Covid-like shutdown” due to the heat and the Sun took aim at the “nannying, alarmist state”. A Daily Telegraph editorial said the government was “treat[ing] the public like children”. It said:

“It may well be that the country will have to learn to live with higher temperatures in future. Britain cannot close its schools, cancel its trains and shut down its offices every time the sun comes out.”

Back to top

Why has media coverage been criticised?

Media coverage of the heatwave in the UK has been criticised for failing to mention climate change and for using imagery that does not convey the health risks associated with the extreme weather.

On 23 June, a group of climate scientists wrote to senior editors at BBC News, ITV News, Channel 4 News, 5 News, Sky News and LBC owner Global, as well as to media regulators Ofcom and IPSO, to urge them to “use their power to inform public audiences of the scientific links between extreme weather, climate change and net-zero”.

In a letter, reproduced in the Press Gazette, the scientists said they wanted to express their concern about recent coverage of extreme heat. They argued that the UK public was “frequently not well served with clear information about the scientifically indisputable connection between greenhouse gas emissions and extreme heat”.

Leo Hickman on bluesky (@leohickman.carbonbrief.org): "++BREAKING++ Leading climate scientists in the UK have written to senior editors in broadcast media - and OFCOM and IPSO: "To express our concern about recent media coverage of extreme weather, climate change and net-zero and to urge you…to inform public audiences of the scientific links"

Prof Mark Hannon from the University of Strathclyde was among a number of academics on Bluesky to note how some parts of the UK media had failed to explain that climate change was causing the extreme heat. He said:

“Amazing how much coverage the heat – and the symptoms of climate change – is getting on outlets like the BBC, but how little coverage is typically given over to the causes of climate change.”

Others pointed to a disconnect between discussions around net-zero policies and the recent weather.

In a letter published in the TimesProf Brian Hoskins – the founding director of Imperial College London’s Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment – noted that “the discourse around net-zero is increasingly decoupled from that science and our changing weather”. 

Leo Hickman on bluesky (@leohickman.carbonbrief.org): "Letter in today's Times by climate scientist Sir Brian Hoskins: "The discourse around net-zero is increasingly decoupled from…science and our changing weather. "Net-zero is not an arbitrary slogan, rather it is dictated by the laws of physics."

Other researchers – including University College London’s Prof Bill McGuire and Cardiff University’s Prof Ian Hall – criticised national newspapers’ choice of beach photos to illustrate articles about the UK’s “red weather warning”.

Wolfgang Blau, co-founder of the Oxford Climate Journalism Network, wrote on Bluesky

“Your happy and clickable ‘kids in lido’‚ ‘dogs playing in fountain’‚ ‘family eats ice cream’ photos to illustrate news reports about the heatwave are journalistic malpractice.”

Update: This article was updated on 26 June to include further new record-high June temperatures for the UK.

Back to top

Article by Cecilia Keating, Ayesha Tandon, Giuliana Viglione, Robert McSweeney and Josh Gabbatiss republished from Carbon Brief under a CC license.

Power-mad orange gasbag Donald Trump says Burn, Baby, Burn.
Power-mad orange gasbag Donald Trump says Burn, Baby, Burn.
Nigel Farage urges you to ignore facts and reality and be a climate science denier like him and his Deputy Richard Tice. He says that Reform UK has received £Millions and £Millions from the fossil fuel industry to promote climate denial and destroy the planet.
Nigel Farage urges you to ignore facts and reality and be a climate science denier like him and his Deputy Richard Tice. He says that Reform UK has received £Millions and £Millions from the fossil fuel industry to promote climate denial and destroy the planet.
Orcas discuss rotting brain, front Orca says Sundown Syndrome is a dead givaway and he wishes someone would Lock Him Up
Orcas discuss rotting brain, front Orca says Sundown Syndrome is a dead givaway and he wishes someone would Lock Him Up

Continue ReadingMedia reaction: How climate change intensified Europe’s record-breaking June heat

Experiencing issues with this image not appearing. I suspect because it's so critical of Zionist Keir Starmer's support of and complicity in Israel's genocides.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpA
Keir Starmer explains that UK is actively supporting Israel's genocidal expansion and repeats his previous quotation that he supports Zionism "without qualification". Keir Starmer said “I said it loud and clear – and meant it – that I support Zionism without qualification.” here: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/keir-starmer-interview-i-will-work-to-eradicate-antisemitism-from-day-one/
Keir Starmer explains that UK is actively supporting Israel’s genocidal expansion and repeats his previous quotation that he supports Zionism “without qualification”. Keir Starmer said “I said it loud and clear – and meant it – that I support Zionism without qualification.” here: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/keir-starmer-interview-i-will-work-to-eradicate-antisemitism-from-day-one/
Continue Reading

Palestine activist jailed as ‘terrorist’ speaks out

https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-activist-jailed-as-terrorist-speaks-out/

Ellie Kamio and her mother Emma. (Photo: Supplied)

Exclusive: We spoke to Ellie Kamio, one of the first people in British history to be sentenced as a terrorist for property damage

“Other than hexing the man, I really wasn’t surprised”.

This is how Leona Kamio, known as Ellie, describes what was going through her mind when a judge announced she would be sentenced as a terrorist alongside three co-defendants earlier this month.

Kamio, a 30-year-old nursery teacher, had been convicted of criminal damage in connection with a Palestine Action raid on an Israeli arms firm in Filton, Bristol, in August 2024.

The jury that tried her had not been informed that any convictions could later carry a “terrorism connection”, she tells Declassified from Bronzefield prison in her first interview since being convicted.

During that trial, the defendants were also not allowed to explain why they targeted Elbit Systems or even say the word “genocide”, stripping the action of all context.

Kamio and her three co-defendants, Charlotte Head, Fatema Zainab Rajwani, and Samuel Corner, have now been sentenced to a combined total of more than 25 years in prison. Two others, Zoe Rogers and Jordan Devlin, were found not guilty.

In the morning before the sentencing hearing, Kamio felt that the judge, Mr Justice Johnson, already “had pre-written a crazy sentence”. 

The “terrorism connection”, says Kamio, means the activists will serve at least two-thirds of their prison sentences, though it is “likely we’ll have to sit out the whole five-year term”.

Continues at https://www.declassifieduk.org/palestine-activist-jailed-as-terrorist-speaks-out/

Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza's hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer explains that UK is actively supporting Israel's genocidal expansion and repeats his previous quotation that he supports Zionism "without qualification". Keir Starmer said “I said it loud and clear – and meant it – that I support Zionism without qualification.” here: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/keir-starmer-interview-i-will-work-to-eradicate-antisemitism-from-day-one/
Keir Starmer explains that UK is actively supporting Israel’s genocidal expansion and repeats his previous quotation that he supports Zionism “without qualification”. Keir Starmer said “I said it loud and clear – and meant it – that I support Zionism without qualification.” here: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/keir-starmer-interview-i-will-work-to-eradicate-antisemitism-from-day-one/
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
Continue ReadingPalestine activist jailed as ‘terrorist’ speaks out

OpenDemocracy Exclusive: How Palantir harvested millions in UK tax breaks

Article by Aman Sethi and Jade-Ruyu Yan republished from OpenDemocracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence

Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir Technologies and PLTR stock price | Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images / composition by James Battershill

In 2024, Palantir’s effective tax rate was just 8%, far less than the usual 25%, despite £25.3m of pre-tax profits

By Aman Sethi and Jade-Ruyu Yan

Palantir is benefiting from millions of pounds of tax deductions that allow it to pay very little corporate tax in the United Kingdom despite soaring profits, an investigation by openDemocracy reveals.

The controversial tech firm has won at least £670m in UK public contracts in recent years, which have helped to make the country its second-largest market by revenue after the United States, where it is headquartered. Yet despite accounting for 10% of the company’s global revenue last year, its tax payments in the UK amounted to less than 5% of its total global cash tax spend, according to US filings.

The filings suggest Palantir’s UK subsidiary paid less than $1.08m (£820,000) in cash tax in the UK in 2025 – less than it paid in Korea, Japan, France and Germany – after accumulating tax deductions due to stock prices. Palantir’s stock has surged since the company went public in 2020, peaking in 2025 before paring back gains this year.

In 2024, Palantir’s UK subsidiary reported pre-tax profits of £25.3m, but assessed its local corporate tax requirement as only around £2m, according to the latest accounts filed with Companies House. This puts its annual corporate tax rate at roughly 8% – far lower than the 25% usually paid by businesses with profits over £250,000 in the UK. 

In 2023, the company’s tax rate was lower still, at 4.7% on pre-tax profits of approximately £19.1m, and in 2022 it was 4.2% on pre-tax profits of around £19.9m. Its UK accounts are not yet available for 2025 onwards. Taken together, that’s just £3.7m of tax on £63.4m in cumulative pre-tax profits over three years.

openDemocracy analysed hundreds of pages of Palantir’s filings in the US and the UK from 2020 to 2025, a period when the company recorded extraordinary growth in revenue and profits. We found the company’s low tax exposure was down to two factors: A structured arrangement that limits the profits recognised in the UK, and a provision in the UK tax code that rewards companies with significant tax breaks in return for compensating their employees with stock rather than in cash. 

This strategy, experts say, is legal and very effective. In 2020, the company had already accumulated £32m in tax breaks in the UK, according to Companies House, of which about £26m were due to what the company called “employee share acquisition relief”. Two years later, the total size of the UK tax break had ballooned sevenfold to $303.4m (approximately £230m) in net operating losses in the UK, which its parent company said “can be carried forward indefinitely” in its 2022 annual filings in the US. 

The nature of annual filings makes it hard to assess the current size of Palantir’s accumulated tax deductions, but it is clear that the company’s tax deductions in the UK have grown much faster than its profits. The most recent Companies House accounts suggest the company gained about £92m in tax deductions in 2024 alone, of which it used a small portion to reduce its tax assessment for the year from £6.3m at the standard rate of 25% to only about £2m on pre-tax profits of £25.3m. 

“When profitable companies are paying very little tax, especially when much of their revenues derive from taxpayers’ money itself, then it’s important to ask why,” said Mike Lewis, the director of TaxWatch. “Is it because tax incentives and tax breaks are poorly targeted? Or is it because companies are shifting profits in ways that our tax system is supposed to counteract?”

In Palantir’s case, the company’s surging stock price created deductions at a scale that would lower its tax burden even if the company recognised more profits in the UK. 

The company is far from the only tech firm to have reduced its UK tax burden in this way. Fair-tax proponents have called for the UK to do a better job of taxing tech companies since Meta (then known as Facebook) provoked outrage for paying only £4,327 in corporate taxes in 2014, after paying more than £35m to staff in a share bonus scheme. 

“It’s a consistent pattern,” said Nathan Goldman, professor of accounting at North Carolina State University, whose work focuses on corporate taxation. “All of these companies are following the same pattern. They’re not doing anything illegal.”

Goldman said that while there are “lots of knobs you can turn” to get deductions, share-based compensation for employees is the one that can yield significant gains in cases where stock prices rise sharply in a short period of time.

Yet, Palantir’s critics say its case stands out because much of its revenue derives from public sector contracts, including the cash-strapped National Health Service. As openDemocracy revealed back in 2020, Palantir’s work with the NHS went from a £1 contract to £1m. The company’s current NHS contract is worth at least £330M.

“If these findings are accurate, they expose the staggering extent to which Palantir is taking from our country while giving back as little as possible,” said Green Party Deputy Leader Mothin Ali. 

“It has pocketed hundreds of millions of pounds in public contracts, yet appears to have paid an effective tax rate that is a fraction of that paid by the doctors, nurses and other public sector workers who keep our services going. Greens have said before that Palantir should pack its bags and get the hell out of our NHS. What will it take for this Labour government to finally show them the door?”

“At a time we are asking for more scrutiny into the Federated Data Platform contract, it is mindboggling that Palantir are siphoning millions of pounds out of the UK,” said Liberal Democrat MP Martin Wrigley, who has been a vocal opponent of the UK government’s work with Palantir. “Our NHS needs to be working with trusted suppliers, and Palantir seem to be consistently undermining that trust. It’s time the government gets serious and builds the offramp.”

“Multinationals like Palantir are able to exploit the defects in current international tax rules to pay lower effective tax rates overall,” said Sol Picciotto, an emeritus professor at Lancaster University and senior adviser with the Tax Justice Network. “This is particularly problematic for those providing services which can be delivered globally, giving them great freedom to decide where and how to declare taxable profits.” 

🔎

We are continuing to investigate Palantir. If you have any information you feel might be relevant, please send it to jaderuyu.08 on Signal or jade-ruyu.yan@opendemocracy.net. We protect our sources.

“Palantir is paying little or no corporate income tax in both the US and the UK, despite its bread and butter being government contracts,” said Paul Monaghan, chief executive of the Fair Tax Foundation. He called the strategy “textbook Silicon Valley profit-shifting” and added that the “generous corporate tax treatment” of these types of share-based payments is “in play on both sides of the Atlantic”. 

“Whilst Palantir’s share price grows, these are likely to continue to depress the company’s effective tax rate.”

“It is therefore re-assuring to see an indication in the US parent’s financial statements that they are the subject of a live inquiry by HMRC that encompasses the last two years,” he said, referring to a note in the company’s US annual filing for 2025, which reads that the “Company is subject to potential examination by tax authorities” in “the UK for tax years 2024 through 2025.”

“We do not comment on the tax affairs of individual taxpayers,” said a spokesperson for HMRC, the government department responsible for the collection of taxes. “These are long‑standing rules set by Parliament, and we enforce them rigorously to make sure every company pays the tax that is due under UK law.”

openDemocracy has reached out to Palantir for comment, but had not heard back at time of publication. This story will be updated if the company responds.

Behind the shield

Business leaders insist that the UK’s corporate tax regime stifles investment and cripples economic growth. In 2021, when then-chancellor Rishi Sunak announced that corporate taxes would rise from 19% to 25%, The Times carried an article headlined “Companies ‘will quit UK’ over Sunak’s corporation tax rise”.

Yet an examination of Palantir’s accounts reveals that the UK’s corporate tax regime allows fast-growing technology companies to harvest millions of pounds in tax breaks by richly remunerating their employees with stock options.

Compensating employees in this manner, said Goldman the accounting professor, creates “incentive alignment”, where employees have a stake in the success of the company – improving employee retention rates – as well as allowing companies to preserve cash (as offering stock options doesn’t impact cash flows), and generating future tax deductions if, and only if, the company succeeds.

But if a company succeeds like Palantir, he added, the tax deductions generated in this manner are very large.

The key to this mechanism lies in Part 12 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009, which allows a company to claim a tax deduction relief equivalent to the difference between the market price of the stock at the point at which they are acquired by the employee and the original strike price paid by the employee. 

“UK tax policy allows qualifying companies these kinds of deductions,” said Dr Federica Casano, lecturer in business and tax law at the University of Leeds. “The relief under Part 12 of CTA 2009 is broadly neutral as to the type of instrument – restricted or unrestricted shares, options or RSUs [Restricted Stock Units].”

In Palantir’s case, the stock has soared by over 1,000% since the company went public in September 2020, thereby creating hundreds of millions of pounds of tax deductions in the UK as the company’s employees have cashed in.

In 2024, the company’s stock price closed the year at about $77. That year, the accounts reveal, the company generated about £92m in tax deductions. The following year, the stock peaked at $207.52 in November 2025, before paring back its gains, suggesting the company would have harvested a fresh round of multi-million-pound tax deductions for that year. At the time of publishing, the stock is priced at about $107.

“The corporation tax deduction available in the UK is among the more generous. Stock-based compensation is supposed to reduce payroll pressure on cash flow, especially for start-ups,” said Lewis from Tax Watch. 

“The fact that it is also available to established, profit-making companies means that it can effectively wipe out very profitable companies’ tax bills for years if share values significantly increase. In an era of almost historically unprecedented tech stock valuations, it may be time to look at restricting the deduction.”

Wittgenstein’s tax rules

Around the world, governments have long struggled to get corporations to pay more tax in their respective countries. Raise taxes in one jurisdiction, the argument goes, and companies will simply restructure to recognise profits elsewhere. 

In 2021, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) sought to prevent a race to the bottom by establishing a global minimum tax rate of 15%, often referred to as a ‘top-up’ tax. In January 2025, as these rules were being rolled out across the world, the Trump administration not only withdrew from the agreement, but announced it would sanction countries that sought to tax US companies under the framework. Since then, the G7 has struck an uneasy carve-out for the US, the implications of which are still unclear.

Even so, the UK remains an outlier, both in how it taxes multinational Big Tech companies and also in its willingness to contract out vital public services to these companies. 

“The case of Palantir clearly shows the defects of these rules, and also highlights the failure to resolve them over the past 13 years through the OECD,” said Lancaster professor Picciotto. “That’s why developing countries launched negotiations for a global tax treaty through the UN. The UK should strongly support this initiative to ensure that multinationals can be taxed where they have real activities, including revenues.”

“It’s notable that the UK government has just agreed, at the behest of the Trump administration, to exempt US-headquartered companies from one key defence against such profit-shifting: the global minimum ‘top-up’ tax,” Lewis said, adding that the Office of Budget Responsibility estimates that this will cost the UK at least £700m in tax revenues every year. 

Palantir’s UK subsidiary had to pay this ‘top-up’ tax last year on low-taxed profits within the group, in the most recent year, Lewis noted. “It may not have to in the future. That’s an example of how the UK’s acquiescence to the White House puts UK firms at a disadvantage compared to their US competitors, and costs us much-needed tax revenues.”

Governments in several of Palantir’s other key overseas markets – none of which is as large as the UK – are already distancing themselves from the company. France and Germany have announced they are moving away from Palantir’s products, while the company’s work in Korea remains largely commercial as part of an alliance with the Hyundai group.

Meanwhile, in the UK, Palantir continues to work with government bodies, causing public outcry. And the company’s leadership remains bullish on its  prospects and profitability. In a letter to investors in May this year, CEO Alex Karp noted the company had generated $871m in profits on $1.6bn in revenue in the first three months of 2026 alone. 

“Our quarterly profit – the largest in our company’s twenty-three-year history – has more than quadrupled in only twelve months,” Karp wrote. “What business in the world, at this scale, has ever accomplished anything of the sort?”

Karp began his letter to shareholders with an enigmatic quote from Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophische Untersuchungen: “And to think one is obeying a rule is not to obey a rule.”

– Ethan Shone contributed to this report

Article by Aman Sethi and Jade-Ruyu Yan republished from OpenDemocracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence

Continue ReadingOpenDemocracy Exclusive: How Palantir harvested millions in UK tax breaks

Iran urges US to set timeline for ‘unconditional’ Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Billboards featuring the late former Iranian leader Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba Khamenei, who were killed in U.S. and Israeli attacks against Iran on February 28, are displayed on the Rafic Hariri International Airport highway with the text reading “Thank you, loyal Iran” in Beirut, Lebanon on June 21, 2026.[Houssam Shbaro – Anadolu Agency]

Iran urged the US on Sunday to set a timetable for Israel’s “unconditional” withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territories under a war-ending memorandum of understanding signed between Tehran and Washington, Anadolu reports.

“Ending the war and military operations of the Zionist regime against Lebanon, as well as the withdrawal of occupiers from all occupied Lebanese territories, is a necessary condition for reaching a final and sustainable agreement to establish stability in the region,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Bagaei said in a news briefing carried by ISNA News Agency.

Bagaei said Tehran considers safeguarding Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as “the dignity and security of all Lebanese people,” as “essential” for the durability of any agreement related to ending the war with the US.

Iran has placed “ending the war and military operations of the Zionist regime in Lebanon alongside ending the war against Iran” at the top of its demands in both the April ceasefire understanding and the June 18 memorandum, he added.

Bagaei also said Iran expects Washington to fulfill its commitments under the memorandum and “take all necessary measures to force the Zionist regime to stop any aggression and military operations against all Lebanese regions.”

He added that Tehran is calling for “the swift determination of a timetable for unconditional withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territories.”

The call comes as Iran and the US continue efforts to implement a broader 14-point understanding reached following weeks of regional military escalation and diplomatic negotiations.

READ: Israeli officer killed, soldier injured in southern Lebanon, military says

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Keir Starmer explains that UK is participating defensively in Trump and Israel's criminal war for Israel's genocidal expansion in Iran and states that he supports Zionism "without qualification". Keir Starmer said "I said it loud and clear – and meant it – that I support Zionism without qualification.” here: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/keir-starmer-interview-i-will-work-to-eradicate-antisemitism-from-day-one/
Keir Starmer explains that UK is participating defensively in Trump and Israel’s criminal war for Israel’s genocidal expansion in Iran and states that he supports Zionism “without qualification”. Keir Starmer said “I said it loud and clear – and meant it – that I support Zionism without qualification.” here: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/keir-starmer-interview-i-will-work-to-eradicate-antisemitism-from-day-one/
Donald Trump sings and dances, says that it's fun to kill everyone ... unless he gets distracted or falls asleep.
Donald Trump sings and dances, says that it’s fun to kill everyone … unless he gets distracted or falls asleep.
Orcas discuss rotting brain, front Orca says Sundown Syndrome is a dead givaway and he wishes someone would Lock Him Up
Orcas discuss rotting brain, front Orca says Sundown Syndrome is a dead givaway and he wishes someone would Lock Him Up
Continue ReadingIran urges US to set timeline for ‘unconditional’ Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon