Sub-lethal effects of pesticides on honeybees

Spread the love
image of black bees
Black bees

I am uncertain about the claim to be the first research “to demonstrate the sub-lethal effects of pesticide residue exposure on honey bees” – I believe that there may be a growing body of research that demonstrates this.

Research expands understanding of bee health

Recently published research is the first to demonstrate the sub-lethal effects of pesticide residue exposure on honey bees, which play a critical role in the production of one third of the food that human’s consume.

The pesticides involved in Wu’s study include those used by beekeepers, growers and homeowners. They include miticides, insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. The accumulation occurs because beekeepers reuse combs to save on the expense of replacement.

Some of the consequences to honey bees that Wu found were delayed larval development and a shortened adult lifespan, which can result indirectly in premature shifts in hive roles and foraging activity.

Shortened bee lifespans dramatically change the dynamic of a hive. According to Sheppard, foragers are the bees that provide pollination and bring food back to a hive.

“A bee’s life span as a forager is on average only the last eight days of its life,” he said. “This research shows that, if raised with pesticide residues in the brood comb, an individual’s foraging life span is shortened by four days, a 50 percent cut.”

If there are not sufficient foragers, the colony makes up the deficit by using younger bees that are not physiologically ready. The result is a negative cascade through the hive all the way down to the larval bees because individual nurse bees must prematurely move toward foraging behavior and stop feeding larvae, Sheppard said.

Continue ReadingSub-lethal effects of pesticides on honeybees

NHS news review

Spread the love

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has voted overwhelmingly that they have no confidence in Health Secretary Andrew Lansley’s proposed ‘reforms’ of the National Health Service.

Leader of the Opposition and Labour Party leader Ed Miliband has made a speech calling for the bill to destroy the NHS to be abandoned.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Nurses ‘no confidence’ in Andrew Lansley – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

Nurses today voted overwhelmingly in favour of a motion of “no confidence” in the Health Secretary Andrew Lansley and his management of NHS reforms.

Delegates at the Royal College of Nursing conference in Liverpool voted 99 per cent in favour of the motion, to 1 per cent against.

The RCN’s leadership had attempted to amend the motion to delay any no confidence vote until after the conclusion of the Government’s listening exercise.

But amid angry and passionate scenes on the conference floor the amendment was dropped when nurse after nurse took to the stage to condemn the Government.

Royal College of Nursing passes vote of no confidence in Andrew Lansley | Society | guardian.co.uk

Conference delegates vote 99% in favour of motion as health secretary struggles to persuade public of merits of NHS reforms

The Royal College of Nursing has overwhelmingly backed a motion of no confidence in Andrew Lansley’s handling of the NHS reforms.

Delegates at the RCN conference in Liverpool voted 99% in favour of the motion as the beleaguered health secretary struggles to persuade the public of the merits of his health reforms.

Nurses are angry that Lansley refused to deliver a keynote speech to the conference, opting instead to meet a group of around 60 nurses in Liverpool as part of the government’s “listening exercise” on the controversial reforms.

NHS reforms: Miliband urges government to scrap health bill | Society | guardian.co.uk

The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, has urged the government to “junk” its health bill, identifying five “largely concealed aspects” of the proposed reforms which he said undermined NHS principles.

“The answer to a bad bill is not to slow it down but it is to junk it,” Miliband said at a press conference on the NHS.

“He appears to believe that people don’t like his bill because his government haven’t explained it properly.

“But the opposite is true. The more people understand and hear about these proposals, the less they like them. It’s not a problem of public relations, it’s a problem of principle.

“The bill is actually a pandora’s box. The more people look at the detail, the more profound and worrying the implication appear to be for the NHS.

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

NHS privatisation

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

BBC News – Lansley faces confidence vote by nurses

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley is facing a confidence vote from nurses in reaction to his planned changes for the NHS in England.

After a “listening exercise” at Downing Street with the PM and voluntary sector representatives, Mr Lansley will go to the Royal College of Nursing Congress.

He will meet a group of 50 nurses – not the whole conference – which has prompted some to question his nerve.

Nurses accuse Lansley of ducking out of facing them – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

Nurses’ leaders will today debate a motion of no-confidence in the Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley – just hours before he arrives at their annual congress to take part in a “listening exercise”.

In a sign that ministerial attempts to reassure nurses about their plans for NHS reform are failing, members of the Royal College of Nursing voted overwhelmingly to debate the emergency motion shortly after being addressed by the Health minister Anne Milton. If passed it will be the first such no-confidence motion in 30 years.

Tomorrow they will vote on plans for industrial action if the Government pushes ahead with proposals to allow trusts to implement incremental pay freezes for some staff. Members are particularly incensed that Mr Lansley will only be speaking to a selection of around 60 members, split up into tables of eight, for 45 minutes, and accused him of not having the “guts” to address the conference as a whole.

The NHS braces itself for privatisation | Society | The Guardian

Andrew Lansley‘s recent announcement that the government is embarking on a two-month “period of listening” about its NHS reform plans has been seen by some as a U-turn over a deeply flawed policy.

There are, however, some areas where the government is not prepared to listen: the commitment to abolish primary care trusts, to transfer major powers to commission services to GPs, and the ambition to vastly increase the participation of the private and, in theory, voluntary sectors in providing health services. In future, the NHS will continue to be funded from taxation and (for the time being) will be free at the point of delivery, but the government will step back from running the service.

Private sector involvement in the NHS is not new. Dentistry, worth £2.1bn, opticians and pharmacies are already in the private sector. GPs themselves are effectively private contractors, accounting for £8bn, or almost 10% of the entire NHS budget. Under Labour, private involvement was extended via independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs), handling mainly non-emergency elective treatments, as a way to bring down waiting lists.

But the current proposals are much more bold. Plans are under way to further outsource central services, such as workforce development (total budget £5bn) and procurement management. Even NHS Direct (worth £146m) is in the firing line.

The shift to create more than 200 GP consortiums in England will generate further opportunities for private firms. Notably, this will be in the management of commissioning, worth £1bn. Firms such as Tribal, Humana, United Health and Aetna already offer referral management services that promise to help consortiums slash their costs by as much as 15% and turn savings into profits.

London Ambulance Service axing 890 jobs in bid to cut budget by £53m | Metro.co.uk

Some 560 ‘frontline’ paramedic and technician posts will go in the capital as the service looks to slash its budget by £53million over five years.

A further 330 posts are to be removed from management and support services.

The cuts represent almost a fifth of the service’s 5,000 staff but the government insisted any savings made would be reinvested in patient care.

Pulse – GPs face bans on high-cost drugs

Exclusive: GPs are being banned from prescribing high-cost drugs approved by NICE as NHS managers seek drastic savings on prescribing budgets.

More than half of primary care organisations have brought in new blacklists within the past year, a Pulse investigation reveals.

PCOs are redrawing formularies in changes they estimate will slice £250m from this year’s drug budget. Responses from 134 PCOs under the Freedom of Information Act show that more than half have blacklists of drugs – in some trusts of more than 100 – that GPs are banned from prescribing.

Some 73 PCOs said they had added drugs to blacklists or placed additional restrictions on prescribing in primary care in the past year, as they strive to make average estimated savings in 2011/12 of £1.9m each.

Four-hour A&E waits rise by 65% (From Your Local Guardian)

The number of people waiting more than four hours in A&E has jumped 65% since the Government scrapped a target, NHS figures show.

Department of Health data on four-hour waits shows thousands more people waiting in A&E, walk-in centres and minor injury units in 2010 than in 2009.

Last June, Health Secretary Andrew Lansley relaxed a four-hour A&E target which has since been scrapped and replaced with a new set of quality indicators.

The data shows that, in the six months from July to December 2009, 176,522 people waited more than four hours, but this rose to 292,052 people from July to December 2010, a 65% increase.

NHS funding pressures hitting frontline, says A&E chief | Society | The Guardian

Hospital casualty departments are struggling to cope with growing demand for emergency care because they have too few staff and not enough beds, Britain’s top accident and emergency doctor has warned.

As new figures pointed to a steep rise in A&E waiting times and 890 ambulance jobs were lost, John Heyworth, president of the College of Emergency Medicine, joined a growing chorus of doctors warning that the NHS funding pressures are already hitting frontline services.

“The emergency care system is struggling to cope at the moment,” he said. “Many departments spend their time firefighting because of the number of patients coming in, the limited number of emergency department staff and limited availability of beds.”

David Cameron and the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, have insisted that the NHS will not be affected by the deep cuts to public spending elsewhere and that frontline services will be protected during their shakeup of the health service.

But medical organisations, health charities and patients’ groups are increasingly sceptical that the pledge can be kept as health spending fails to keep pace with the rising cost of treating Britain’s ageing population.

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review