In other news

Spread the love

Hands Off Our Land: two thirds of rural England at ‘mercy’ of developers, warns Sir Andrew Motion

Two thirds of rural England will be at the mercy of developers because of proposals to relax the planning laws, former poet laureate Sir Andrew Motion has warned.

 Sir Andrew was speaking as he was formally unveiled as the next president of the Campaign of Protect Rural England.

In his first public comments since accepting the role, the former poet laureate made clear his concerns about Government reforms to planning rules.

Ministers want to replace over 1,200 pages of planning guidance with a new 52 page document called the National Planning Policy Framework, which campaigners say will make it easier to build on parts of rural England.

The CPRE is worried that the draft NPPF includes a new “presumption in favour of sustainable development”, and puts communities at risk of large scale development. The Daily Telegraph is also urging ministers to rethink the reforms.

Earlier this month, the CPRE warned that an area in England which equates to an area almost three-and-a-half times the size of Wales was at risk from the reforms.

 

Oxbridge splits Coalition

IN Easington, in County Durham, there were five or fewer, and the number was only slightly higher in Middlesbrough (7), South Sunderland (9) and Redcar (11).Now those lowly figures are at the centre of the latest Coalition bust-up between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, which broke out into the open this week.

The statistics refer to the number of young people, from each parliamentary constituency, who applied to study at the great universities of Oxford and Cambridge last year.

A stark North-South divide was revealed, with the seat of Easington bringing up the rear. Applications were so low that officials refused to reveal the actual number, recording it as “five or fewer”. At the other end of the scale, several hundred applications came from leafy parts of the South such as Oxford West and Abingdon (232), Richmond Park (230) and Cambridge (208).

This divide was predictable, but that made it no less shocking. Remember, the top jobs in law, politics, business, medicine, academia and the media are grabbed by Oxbridge graduates.

Cameron’s ‘Families’ tsar steps down – Channel 4 News

Emma Harrison, the head of a welfare-to-work firm which is being investigated over fraud allegations, has resigned from her post as David Cameron’s ‘Families Champion’.

Ms Harrison, the boss of the welfare-to-work-company A4e, said she was standing aside from the voluntary role to avoid it becoming a distraction. “I do not want the current media environment to distract from the very important work with troubled families”, she said. “I remain passionate about helping troubled families and I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute in an area where I have been active for many years.”

A spokesman for Number 10 said the Prime Minister respected her decision, and thanked her for her work.

The Prime Minister asked Ms Harrison to lead the Working Families Everywhere campaign back in 2010, to help 120,000 problem families into work, calling her “inspirational”, and citing her “proven track record of turning lives around”. But she’s been coming under intense pressure to step aside, as it emerged that her multi-million pound firm had become the subject of a series of fraud allegations.

Thames police have already arrested and bailed four members of staff, and last night that probe widened: according to the Daily Telegraph, officers are focussing on the ‘business practices’ of the company as a whole. The Department for Work and Pensions said it had launched nine investigations into alleged fraud in recent years, and A4e was forced to pay back public money five times.

PM insults public with ‘snobs’ sneer

 

David Cameron swanned around a pro-market event with Prince Charles today to defend profit-hungry businesses against “snobbery.”

The Prime Minister and Prince of Wales attended the Business in the Community charity annual conference to hit back at “the snobbery that says business has no inherent moral worth like the state does.

“Frankly I’m sick of this anti-business snobbery,” wealthy Mr Cameron snorted.

“In recent months we’ve heard some dangerous rhetoric creep into our national debate, that wealth creation is somehow anti-social, that people in business are out for themselves.

“We have got to fight this mood with all we’ve got.”

He called on “those of us who believe in markets, business and enterprise” to come together and “prove the sceptics wrong”.

Mr Cameron’s speech follows massive criticism of the government’s work programme to force people on benefits into a month’s unpaid work.

It has been branded “slave labour” as benefits could be stopped if a participant leaves before completing a placement.

And Left Economics Advisory Panel co-ordinator Andrew Fisher said: “Big business has been rightly pilloried of late for dodging taxes, paying excessive bonuses, rampant profiteering, and now exploiting the unemployed through workfare.

“Cameron’s speech is a reaction to the inevitable public distrust and growing anger with his government handing over our schools, welfare system and the NHS to big business.

“Activists should be proud that we have forced the government on the defensive – and keep up the pressure!”

Business expert Professor Roger Seifert described Mr Cameron’s words as strangely Victorian.

Mr Seifert said: “Clearly in a capitalist society the profit motive and profit making are seen by its supporters and apologists as the engine and the steam of all things.

“We know that it does not actually function in that way: businesses, in order to secure profits, exploit workers and consumers alike, do not pay their way in terms of tax and costs they inflict through pollution and ill-health.

“They also distort the use of resources away from socially useful and economically needed to the useless and the wasteful,” he added.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue ReadingIn other news

Divorced from reality David Cameron talks ridiculous nonsense

Spread the love

In a pro-business speech today insane lunatic David Cameron said “Business is … the most powerful force for social progress the world has ever known”.

What transparently ridiculous nonsense. Why is a British Prime Minister talking such utter bullshit? This man has a first in PPE! That can’t be at all difficult if this is the standard of argument.

I look forward to hearing David Cameron explain how the PIP company that made substandard breast implants was such a powerful force for social progress. I was under the impression that this business was knocking out substandard shit and hiding the fact from inspectors to increase profits. We’re waiting for the explanation Cameron.

Then there’s the bankers that caused the global recession. Once again I will be very interested to hear David Cameron explain how greedy bankers lining their own pockets and causing a global recession are such an unequalled force for social progress.

He could perhaps explain how the UK’s privatised train service with huge public subsidies, ridiculously expensive ticket prices and useless standards of service is such a wonderful force for social progress.

I’m looking forward to hearing how fast food retailers McShit and Kentucky Fried Shit are such wonderful forces for social good. I’d like to hear what they’ve achieved in the way of social progress.

I wonder how EDO and other businesses building weapons of mass destruction are such an unequalled force for social progress. I can’t wait for Mr. Cameron to explain.

Then there’s the Bhopal disaster. There was me thinking that Union Carbide had cut costs to increase profits and consequently killed hundreds and ruined thousands of peoples’ lives. I’m waiting for Mr. Cameron’s explanation.

I don’t really expect to hear Mr.Cameron explain these events as examples of unequalled forces for social progress and to be quite honest I’m not expecting Mr. Cameron to provide any examples at all of businesses being such wonderful forces for social progress. That’s because he’s talking absolute, ridiculous crap. Businesses are about making profits. They have no interest in social progress.

edit: Cameron’s speech actually mentions McShit

 

Continue ReadingDivorced from reality David Cameron talks ridiculous nonsense

NHS news ~ People being drunk is a ‘scandal’ insists man dismantling the NHS

Spread the love

People being drunk is a ‘scandal’ insists man dismantling the NHS

David Cameron has announced plans to address the ‘national scandal’ of people drinking more than he’d like, just as soon as he’s finished his non-scandalous dismantling of the NHS.

Cameron will use a speech today to outline why everyone should be angry at people drinking exactly as much as they want to, instead if his team of shady operatives trying to break up just about the only thing this country should be proud of.

As one drinker explained, “Does the man not own a dictionary?”

“I mean, how is me drinking precisely what I want a ‘scandal’, yet forcing through the least popular NHS legislation in a generation which will change forever an institution that is the envy of the world, is not?”

Another said, “Look, I wasn’t very happy about the changes he’s making to the NHS, but let me be very clear – if he comes for my booze he’s a dead man.”

 

 

Continue ReadingNHS news ~ People being drunk is a ‘scandal’ insists man dismantling the NHS

Bank of England gives yet another £50B to bankers

Spread the love

“…quantitative easing – printing money by another name – is the last resort of desperate governments when all other policies have failed.”

George Osborne, speech January 9 2009

The Bank of England announced today that it intends to do a further £50billion round of Quantitative Easing. Quantitative Easing involves pumping money into the economy in an apparently futile – it hasn’t yet been shown to work – attempt to stimulate the economy. There is a problem that there is very little to show for so many billions after billions that have already been squandered on Q.E.

It appears that it’s austerity for the vast majority and rolling in lolly for the rich elite. No money for the NHS for the plebs, plenty of billions to stimulate the markets for rich multi-millionaire traders and bankers to get yet richer.

There is an argument that the poor would stimulate the economy far more – since they would have to spend the money.

 

 10/2/12:

Quantitative Easing is stimulating commodity trading, not the real economy

As the economy slides towards recession, the Bank of England today announced today it was creating a further £50bn worth of ‘quantitative easing’ (QE).

If you read articles on the topic in the media, you will see statements like “the Bank is ‘printing’ money” or the Bank  will “pump a further £50 billion in to the economy”.  Both these statements are misleading.

QE actually involves the Bank of England buying financial assets – usually government bonds – belonging to institutional investors and sitting in Banks. The Bank buys these assets with newly created central bank reserves.  These reserves can only be held by banks – they do not and cannot go to businesses the real economy.

As explained in nef’s Where Does Money Come From?, central bank reserves are used by commercial banks to settle payments with each other.

By ‘pumping’ more reserves in to the intra-bank clearing system the idea is that banks will feel more confident about making loans to the real economy because they will know that other banks are in a stronger position to settle with them.

In addition, by buying up ultra-safe government bonds in vast quantities and thus pushing down the yield (the interest received on holding) on these assets, the central bank hopes to encourage investors to buy higher yielding corporate bonds – which again provides money for real businesses.

QE may reduce long-term interest rates, but there is little evidence it has stimulated commercial banks to start lending more to businesses, in particular small businesses, or soften the conditions banks are attaching to loans.

In fact the most recent figures published by the Bank show that net lending – the amount of loans minus the amount repaid – to small businesses has contracted by six per cent in the year to November 2011. And this despite the banks being given small business lending targets by the government through ‘Project Merlin’.  Not much wizardry there then.

The hard truth is that commercial banks are still in a process of ‘de-leveraging’, more keen on getting their loans repaid and building up their capital base than making new loans to productive businesses in what is perceived to be a risky real economy.

Evidence suggests the additional funds provided by QE are more likely to be used by banks to create more speculative credit, not least commodity speculation,  that provides shorter term returns.  As a result, the money supply in the real economy is contracting just at the point where new investment is most needed.

 

 

Continue ReadingBank of England gives yet another £50B to bankers

NHS news review

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

The debate on the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill descended into tastelessness yesterday and today with an attack on a prominent doctor for being a successful, accomplished GP and mention of David Cameron’s sadly deceased son.

 

The Health and Social Care Bill is expected to receive a rough ride when it returns to the House of Lords today amid an ongoing row over the coalition’s planned reforms.

Prime Minister David Cameron has been forced to declare his “full support” of Health Secretary Andrew Lansley as criticism of the changes continues.

Downing Street tried to end speculation about Mr Lansley’s future after claims there had been discussions about bringing back Labour health secretary Alan Milburn to replace him.

A spokesman said on Tuesday: “The Prime Minister backs Andrew Lansley and he backs the reforms we are pushing through Parliament in order to deliver a better health service for the future.”

The Bill is back in the Lords less than a week after the Royal College of GPs wrote to Mr Cameron calling for it to be scrapped.

A new poll has shown more than 90% of readers of the British Medical Journal believe the Bill should be withdrawn.

 

CAMPAIGNERS and health bosses were facing each other in the High Court today.

Retired railwayman Michael Lloyd’s bid for a judicial review of the transfer of county NHS services to a community interest company could be granted.

If it is, a judge in London’s High Court will make a ruling tomorrow on whether NHS Gloucestershire can go ahead or be forced to backtrack.

Campaign group Stroud Against the Cuts fears the transfer of nine Gloucestershire community hospitals, 10 health clinics and 3,000 staff to a community interest company could lead to the privat-isation of the National Health Service.

“I’m worried that if local health services leave the NHS they will be more vulnerable to cuts, more fragmented, more bureaucratic and less accountable,” said Mr Lloyd, 75.

NHS Gloucestershire has said it wants timely resolution of outstanding legal matters and that concluding the arrangements for the transfer is in the interests of patients and staff and will ensure service continuity and stability.

 

Is reform of the NHS doomed to fail?

Andrew Lansley’s shakeup of the NHS won’t work, says Randeep Ramesh, because you can’t downsize healthcare

When Nigel Lawson, the former Conservative chancellor, remarked that the NHS was the closest thing to a national religion that the English have, he encapsulated an inconvenient truth: that challenging belief in the good of a state-financed, state-run health service could end in, as the editors of three medical journals put it last week, an “unholy mess”. The English are simply too heavily invested emotionally in the NHS to change it too much, too quickly.

This is the politics that has led Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, to proclaim that there are three months to save the health service from Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, and his radical shakeup.

No matter how much Lansley gives up of his original vision of a market-driven, patient-centred NHS, the bill – which is back in the Lords with some 100 amendments – is politically toxic. No party wants to go into the local elections in May saying it has not done enough to temper the worst excesses of the founding white paper. The bill gives vent to some pretty crazy ideas: such as getting credit rating agencies to vet hospitals.

Andrew Lansley came under more fire today as the crisis deepened over the Government’s NHS reforms.

London GPs, MPs and peers urged David Cameron to consider pulling the plug on the reforms, which face a barrage of opposition from health professionals.

Even Downing Street insiders were said to be aghast at the Health Secretary’s handling of the reforms. A No 10 source was quoted in The Times saying: “Andrew Lansley should be taken out and shot. He’s messed up both the communication and the substance of the policy.”

The Health and Social Care Bill returns to the Lords tomorrow where it faces a mauling by peers despite the Government already making a string of concessions.

Today Michelle Drage, chief executive of the Londonwide Local Medical Committees which represents 6,000 GPs, said: “We want to see the chaos that has arisen from the Bill stopped and a return to the original principle of GP-led commissioning and the removal of all the aspects that relate to privatisation which have caused all of the worries among all groups in the NHS.”

 

Juggling financial cuts with patient needs threatens quality of care

The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy’s (CSP) Annual Representative Conference, which begins in Manchester tomorrow (Wednesday), will hear how the combined effect of Government reforms of the NHS and cost cutting measures are leaving physiotherapy staff in an impossible position where they have to implement financial cutbacks yet still meet patient’s clinical needs.

A number of motions for debate, raised by the CSP’s National Group of Regional Stewards, East of England Regional Network, South Central, London and Yorkshire Stewards, will discuss the range of impacts the NHS reforms and measures to cut costs are having on physiotherapy services for patients.

Commenting, Alex MacKenzie, Chair of the CSP’s National Group of Regional Stewards, said: “Physiotherapists are between a rock and a hard place, where they are being forced to act against their professional clinical judgment because money for the right treatment is not there.

“More and more we’re hearing about rationing of services. In some cases, patients are having to see their GP twice, many weeks apart, before even getting a referral to a physio – and then they’re often only getting an assessment and exercise prescription, with limited hands-on treatment. The ability to offer the best professional care is being stripped away.”

 

Andrew Lansley has prime minister’s ‘full support’ over NHS reforms

Health and social care bill continues to come in for fierce criticism, but No 10 says health secretary has full backing

Downing Street has said the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, has the prime minister’s “full support”, as pressure on the coalition government mounts over its NHS reforms.

Speculation over Lansley’s future in the cabinet was sparked by an unnamed No 10 insider quoted saying he should be “taken out and shot”.

The comment in the Times came as the health secretary faced another embarrassing blow when the Guardian reported that two doctors who had previously been prominent supporters of the proposed health service structure had turned against the reforms.

However, the prime minister’s spokeswoman dismissed the anonymous briefings, saying she “did not recognise” the name of Labour’s former health secretary Alan Milburn being floated as a possible successor.

“The prime minister backs Andrew Lansley and he backs the reforms we are pushing through parliament in order to deliver a better health service for the future,” she said.

Lansley’s health and social care bill enters the crucial report stage in the House of Lords from Wednesday, where Labour and crossbench peers are hoping to defeat the government on a number of key issues.

 

Coalition will force NHS bill on to statute book, says David Cameron

PM to get behind Andrew Lansley as No 10 suggests it may have taken eye off ball, allowing opposition to reforms to grow

David Cameron is to rally behind his health secretary Andrew Lansley on Wednesday and insist that the coalition will force its health and social care bill on to the statute book despite growing opposition within the NHS and the Conservative party.

Speculation over Lansley’s future in the cabinet was sparked by an unnamed No 10 insider being quoted saying he should be “taken out and shot”.

The briefing was described as unauthorised, but No 10 acknowledged it may have taken its eye off the ball, allowing opposition to the bill to re-emerge.

Cameron and Lansley have met within the last 48 hours to discuss tactics. There is widespread frustration inside Downing Street at the way in which the professions were brought on side, but then slipped from the coalition’s grasp over the past two months.

Cameron is to undertake a series of NHS events next week, and is said to be confident that opposition to the bill in the Lords will be overcome. He is determined to set up the battle as one between a bureaucrat-run NHS and a doctor-run NHS.

Continue ReadingNHS news review