NHS news review

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

The gathering storm of autumn cuts / Features / Home – Morning Star

We may be entering the summer silly season for news, with the NHS barely visible in the papers and forgotten by broadcasters.

But don’t be fooled – brace yourself for an autumn of massive cuts as NHS bosses draw up plans to slash each area on an unprecedented scale.

More than half of all senior NHS managers are worried that patients’ access to care will be cut back as a result of a tightening financial situation, which 42 per cent of them described as the “worst they had ever experienced,” according to a recent survey by the NHS Confederation.

Thirty-nine per cent of NHS chairs and chief executives expected financial pressures to increase over the next three years, while 75 per cent felt cuts in spending on social services by local councils would also impact on health services.

Analysts are now warning of a new ice age in NHS funding, with budgets growing little, if at all, even after 2015.

These findings came less than a month after David Cameron, seeking to smooth the way to push through Andrew Lansley’s microscopically modified Health and Social Care Bill, went on record with five pledges on the NHS, one of which was that “we will not cut spending on the NHS – we will increase it.”

Dave Prentis: Our National Health Service in Peril

Our National Health Service celebrated its 63rd birthday last week. I think it’s been one of the great success stories of the past century – an institution dedicated to treating the sick, relieving suffering, and saving lives, regardless of ability to pay.

Apart from the fact that the NHS is there for everyone when they need it, I have reason to be grateful to this fantastic service. It saved my life when I was diagnosed with advanced stomach cancer some years ago. And I want the NHS to be there for generations to come.

To mark the anniversary, I delivered a giant birthday card to the Department of Health, along with other trade union leaders. And later we lobbied Parliament to ask them to join us in wishing the NHS Many Happy Returns. This was not just a celebration of 63 years, but an impassioned plea to our politicians to make sure that the world’s largest and best publicly funded health service is not dismantled.

For that is what I fear will happen if the Frankenstein Health and Social Care Bill is passed into law. The LibDem arm of the coalition Government has made a great deal of noise, belatedly, about the changes it has wrung from its Tory partners to sweeten what will be a bitter pill. But, those changes are just not enough to prevent our NHS being dismantled or to save it from those who want to make a profit out of the sick.

Lansley ‘increasing NHS bureaucracy’: ePolitix.com

Labour has accused the government of increasing rather than cutting NHS bureaucracy.

Speaking in the Commons this afternoon shadow health secretary John Healey said: “In spite of the spin the truth is the prime minister’s personal promise to give NHS a real rise in funding is being broken.

“It’s not just how much it’s how well the money is spent, and today Mr Speaker is one year to the day the health secretary launched plans to ‘liberate’ the NHS.”

Healey said that rather than phasing out top down hierarchy and reducing the cost of NHS related quangos, Lansley had overseen the creation of a lot more bodies.

He questioned why Lansley was setting up the National Commissioning Board which was set to employ 3,500 people.

And he asked why the government was setting up 500 public bodies in the NHS when 161 “do the job now”.

“Why is govt wasting precious NHS funding on the biggest reorganisation in its history it should be spent on patient care,” he said.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

One wheel on his wagon, but Lansley’s still rolling / Features / Home – Morning Star Recommended.

HealthInvestor – Article: Ministers urged to allow hospitals to fail ahead of public services White Paper

Interesting that the Con-Dem Conservative Liberal-Democrat coalition government is applying the ideology of the abolition of the NHS to public services generally. “Please, sir, I want some more.”

Cuts to fire services mean that fire engines will not be routinely despatched to hospitals when alarms ring.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

One wheel on his wagon, but Lansley’s still rolling / Features / Home – Morning Star

It may have “paused” temporarily, and been cosmetically adjusted in a bid to defuse Lib Dem opposition, but Andrew Lansley’s Health Bill is far from dead.

Instead Lansley himself has now urged more rapid progress in implementing it, even before the delayed parliamentary process is complete.

David Cameron and Lansley are so fixated on carrying through their plan, which seeks to transform the NHS into a competitive market and slice off billions of the £100 billion NHS budgets to benefit private providers that they are ignoring even major setbacks like the high-profile resignation of national heart tsar Professor Roger Boyle.

Boyle, a highly respected doctor and author of the influential 2007 policy to reform stroke services, told the Health Service Journal he was opposed to the government laying waste to large parts of the NHS.

He opposed the closure of primary care trusts and strategic health authorities and ridiculed the idea that the NHS is “over-managed” to the extent claimed by ministers.

Boyle is not the only one expressing concerns.

Supporting a motion moved by GPs, the BMA has again, despite pleas from its leaders, voted overwhelmingly for the Bill to be withdrawn, branding it the biggest-ever threat to the NHS.

The BMA has also published a survey showing thousands of GPs are planning to retire rather than implement the Bill and that a large majority of GPs have major concerns about Lansley’s wholesale restructuring of the NHS.

These are the key people who are supposed to implement the changes and the only ones seeming to benefit from them.

Their hospital colleagues have now woken up to the fact that the Bill would largely exclude them from any voice, relegating them to the back of the NHS terraces while the GPs are dragged reluctantly into the directors’ box.

Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) president Clare Gerada has also challenged government attempts to “railroad” the Bill through.

The amendments to it do not address fundamental problems, but would mean that 163 NHS bodies being abolished would be replaced by more than three times as many new bodies to be involved in the decision-making process.

“The RCGP’s tally of new quangos includes 300 commissioning groups, 150 health and well-being boards, 50 PCT clusters, 15 clinical senates, four SHA clusters, the national commissioning board and the Department of Health,” she told the GP magazine Pulse.

HealthInvestor – Article: Ministers urged to allow hospitals to fail ahead of public services White Paper

The government has published its Open Public Services White Paper, which aims to enshrine the right to a choice of public service provider in law.

It comes as government documents come to light warning ministers that hospitals and schools must be allowed to fail if the transformation of public services is to be successful.

The public services white paper, published today, sets out a series of reforms to help drive competition and localism across the entire public service industry. The Any Willing Provider model is expected to be applied to every part of the public sector to allow charities, mutuals and private providers to flourish and give people a range of service providers to choose from. The Ombudsmans’ role will be changed to “an enforcer of choice” to ensure a plurality of providers are available to anyone accessing health, education and neighbourhood services.

Prime minister David Cameron, announcing the public service reforms, said it was “something very big and very different” and that the “old, closed, state monopoly is dead.” The white paper was originally due to be published last autumn, but has been repeatedly delayed. The drive towards a range of independent providers is likely to be seen by public sector unions as a move towards the privatisation of key public services.

Obesity and the NHS: ‘People here are in big trouble’ | Society | The Guardian

Uncomfortable conversations about rationed operations are likely to become a more regular part of doctors’ work in the next few years, as the squeeze on NHS funding becomes more intense. Although the coalition promised to ringfence NHS funding, government spending on healthcare will remain flat until 2015, at a time when demand on the service is rising. The NHS was already committed to finding £20bn worth of savings (or “productivity improvements”) by 2015 and, as a result, all parts of the NHS are under pressure to reduce costs. Imposing tighter limits on certain procedures, such as gastric bands, is one way money will be saved.

This week, the Guardian reported that waiting lists for tests and treatment are already beginning to rise all over the country, and staff at Heartlands know that they are entering a period of financial austerity. The Heart of England Trust, which embraces three hospitals across Birmingham (including Heartlands), has agreed to shave 4% from its £600m annual budget – equivalent to £24m – every year until 2015, and expects to cut 1,600 posts out of the total headcount of around 10,000.

For the moment the full force of the impending squeeze on costs has yet to be felt, erupting only occasionally in unexpected rationing. Dr Taheri says he describes himself as “a fairly mild-mannered, calm person”, but he is increasingly angry about the new restrictions on treatment. “About 30% of the patients need things that we’re not able to get them. This is going to be the challenge, to explain to patients that we can’t do things,” he says.

This is Hull and East Riding | Hull hospitals chief criticises Humberside Fire alarm cuts

PATIENTS’ lives will be put at risk by fire brigade cutbacks, the region’s hospitals chief has warned.

Under new plans, firefighters will no longer automatically turn out to the region’s main hospitals when an alarm sounds.

Humberside Fire And Rescue Service currently sends two fire engines to Hull Royal Infirmary and Castle Hill Hospital when an alarm goes off.

But now, fire officials are considering only dispatching crews if hospital staff confirm there is a blaze.

Phil Morley, chief executive of Hull And East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, said: “If the changes are made, I have told them they have to accept accountability for any patient death from a fire.

“It would be unbelievable, unacceptable and wholly inadequate.

“In the interests of patient safety, we should be a priority if an alarm goes off. It is acting quickly that saves lives.”

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) claimed the new system will be like “playing Russian Roulette with hospital staff, patients’ and firefighters’ lives”.

Fears private firms will ‘cherry pick’ profitable council services in shake-up – Liverpool News – News – Liverpool Daily Post

PRIVATE firms and charities will be able to demand the right to run almost every public service – from schools and day centres, to libraries and leisure centres – under radical government plans unveiled yesterday.

An Ombudsman will rule on whether companies and voluntary groups have been

“unfairly precluded” from tendering for contracts currently held by local authorities, for example.

The idea is modelled on the plans to allow “any willing provider” to run NHS services, in legislation that triggered a storm of protest that forced David Cameron to retreat.

Unveiling the flagship “Open Public Services” White Paper, David Cameron vowed the Government was “releasing the grip of state control and putting power in people’s hands”.

But ministers were put on the back foot by confidential documents that showed civil servants had warned the plans would only work if existing, unsuccessful services – such as schools and hospitals – were allowed to collapse.

BBC News – Long hospital waits ‘on the increase’

The number of people facing “long waits” for hospital treatment in England is rising, NHS figures show.

Under the NHS Constitution, patients have a right to be seen in 18 weeks.

But there are currently 236,155 on the waiting list who have waited longer than that – a rise of 8.5% in a year, according to official data. Nearly half have waited more than six months.

The government said there could be valid medical or personal reasons for long waits.

However, doctors blamed the rise on the squeeze in budgets that is increasingly being seen in the health service.

The most common treatments people are facing long waits for is in orthopaedics, which includes operations such as knee and hip replacements.

Peter Kay, president of the British Orthopaedic Association and a former adviser to the Department of Health, said the sheer numbers waiting longer than 18 weeks meant it was unlikely to be solely for personal or medical reasons.

He said the focus of hospitals was now slipping and patients were being left waiting for too long.

And he added: “One of the issues with 18 weeks is that once you have missed the boat there is less incentive to get the patient treated. They get left on the list for longer than they otherwise would.”

BBC News – Leicester NHS staff worried over missing payments

About 200 staff at a Leicester hospital say they are concerned missing overtime payments are due to their NHS trust’s troubled financial position.

Union Unison said 200 staff at the Leicester Royal Infirmary had not received pay for extra shifts and overtime this month.

The University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust has an overspend of £7m, three months into the financial year.

In a statement, the trust said payments would be processed in a week’s time.

“All staff have received their basic pay for June, but additional payments are dealt with separately, and a small number of those payments go through a supplementary run which occurs in the week following payday,” the statement said.

But Adrian Morgan, area organiser for Unison in Leicestershire, said staff had been told different things when querying the missing payments.

“A couple of people have phoned payroll and asked why they haven’t got their enhanced payments and they were told the signature on the overtime sheet isn’t legible or acceptable any more but these are from managers that have signed forms for years and years.

“It is very conflicting information,” he said.

Mr Morgan said staff were beginning to suspect the trust was hanging on to payments “to try to garner some interest”.

Can the NHS exist without managers? – Views – OnMedica

NHS managers have accused Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, of failing to support them in their efforts to save money and lead the reform of the health service.

After a 20-minute speech to the NHS Confederation’s annual conference in Manchester last Thursday, Lansley was asked to be more vocal in his support for NHS leaders, helping to raise their profile in the media.

A young man in the audience, who only started working in NHS management two years ago, said: “I have quickly recognised the role that leaders play and the absolute benefits they bring. I do not, therefore, understand why I have to go home and convince my friends and family of the pivotal role we all play. Can you not do more to make clear the difference between bureaucracy and essential leadership – in the public arena and through the press – so that I do not have to go home and convince people myself?”

Continue ReadingNHS news review

Coming soon

Spread the love

I will be looking at one of the victims of  7/7

Helena Katherine Jones

Almost as if she was a chosen victim, isn’t it? … a successful human rights lawyer … active in opposition to Blair & Co’s Iraq war

… but how is that possible … if they were attacks by suicide bombers?

 

 

Continue ReadingComing soon

Some dots to join

Spread the love

Join the dots …

 

Ian Blair (when he was actually Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police;) said “to paraphrase another great American, Mark Twain, on reading his obituary, accounts of my demise are premature.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/5101180.stm 

 

If London can survive the Blitz It can survive four miserable bombers”

Ian Blair 8 July 2005

 

The Death card from Crowley's Thoth TarotThoth Tarot’s Death card, the letter Nun, value 50.

 

 

 

Continue ReadingSome dots to join

NHS news review

Spread the love

The Guardian reports that waiting times are increasing.

Mary Salisbury says that when she needed the NHS “it wasn’t there for me”. This is likely to be how most people will experience the Con-Dems brutal attack on the NHS. They are unaware that the Conservatives and the Liberal-Democrats are destroying the NHS. One day when they really need it, it simply won’t be there for them.

The Guardian has an editorial urging Lib-Dem MPs to wake up on the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS waiting time increases may cost lives, doctors warn | Society | The Guardian

Delays could mean illnesses reach stage where surgery or drugs cannot treat them, chair of BMA’s consultants committee says

Patients could die because of rising NHS waiting lists for tests and treatment, the leader of Britain’s hospital doctors has warned. Delays in identifying conditions such as cancer may mean that a patient’s illness reaches the stage where surgery or drugs cannot save them, Dr Mark Porter told the Guardian.

Porter, chairman of the British Medical Association’s consultants committee, said the growing delays were “inhumane” because the ensuing uncertainty added to patients’ fear and suffering.

His remarks will add to the pressure on David Cameron, who has offered several recent personal guarantees that patients will not have to endure long waits to be treated.

A Guardian analysis of official NHS data on England’s six main waiting time targets shows that five are increasingly being breached. The number of patients waiting more than six weeks for a diagnostic test such as an MRI scan has quadrupled in the last year, an extra 2,400 people a month are not being treated within 18 weeks, and 200,000 patients waited longer than four hours in A&E this year compared with the same period in 2010, the data reveals.

The growing number not being tested or treated within the required time limits was of particular concern, Porter said. “If patients are now exceeding those times, then those patients’ treatment options are being limited, and if that happens then there’s a potential for patients suffering harm.

“It may be that someone’s disease progresses beyond the point where surgery might usually give a cancer patient a potential cure, but the patient then receives palliative care only,” he said.

NHS waiting times: one women’s agonising delay | Society | The Guardian

A special needs teacher says the wait she endured for surgery on her back problem was inhumane and unspeakable

Mary Salisbury, a retired special needs teacher, was advised to have back surgery in June 2010. But the operation did not happen until March 2011, even though NHS rules say it should have been carried out within 18 weeks.

“My back trouble began in 2009. I had an MRI scan in February 2010 at St Mary’s hospital in Newport on the Isle of Wight, where I live. But I then had to wait until early June to see the consultant, as he only visits the island once a month from Southampton. He immediately recommended an operation called a laminectomy to relieve the pressure on the nerve between my fourth and fifth vertebrae, which was being crushed and causing me severe pain, a condition called a lumbar stenosis.

“The consultant said the waiting time was about 12 weeks. First, I was told the surgery should be in September or October, and then November or December. But I was never given a definite date. Every time I rang Southampton General hospital the operation receded further and further into the distance. Just before Christmas, I was told it would be 31 January, but that was cancelled. So were three subsequent operations, two of them on the day after I’d stayed in Southampton the night before and arrived as instructed at 7.30am.

“The surgery finally happened on 23 March this year – 42 weeks after I’d first seen the consultant, but a year and six weeks after I’d had the MRI scan. I’ve been sorted now, happily. But the wait I had to endure for treatment was inhumane and unspeakable. I was in a lot of pain, but I wasn’t being treated. They said priority cases were being treated. Why wasn’t I a priority? I was in serious pain and distress, couldn’t sleep properly and became depressed. I’d always been a healthy person and never needed the NHS beforehand. Yet when I needed it, it wasn’t there for me.

Health warning – Our view – Yorkshire Post

NO Government policy is enjoying a smooth passage at present, not least David Cameron’s NHS changes that face renewed scrutiny. The news that GPs could earn premium rates of up to £100 an hour to take on additional budgetary duties perpetuates the belief that health spending is being recycled rather than redirected to patients.

As even more demands are placed on taxpayers, many will be uncomfortable at the prospect of GPs earning more money than well-remunerated NHS chief executives. The rate will vary dramatically depending on the area they work in, another cause for concern.

There also remains confusion over how much of the money will go direct to the GPs, and how much will fund the costs of locum cover. These vital details need to be established quickly.

The rates are being negotiated locally and the apparent lack of guidance from Westminster will do little to allay fears that the NHS reforms have been ill-conceived.

Such lucrative hourly rates will raise concerns that shielding the NHS from cuts was a backward step, allowing significant funds to remain at the top of the organisation rather than filtering down to patients.

That the figures only came to light following an investigation by this newspaper is further indicative of the lack of clarity surrounding Mr Cameron’s reforms, even in their revised format, and why further changes are likely to be necessary.

Continue ReadingNHS news review