neo-con

Cameron & his Tory shits attack the disabled

Spread the love

I apologise that I’m still trying to get up to speed on this. ILF. Is it The Independent Living Fund that has been abolished?

I’m sorry. I know that this **** ********* (Tory Government – well you can make up your own) has abolished the support that allows disabled people to have a life.

ed: Cameron and Osborne have abolished the support that disabled people need to live independently.

ed: What it means is that they will be denied their independence and will be institutionalised and much more actually. It will mean that disabled people are imprisoned.

ed: It’s happening. Independent Living Fund has been abolished. Disabled people are being institutionalised i.e. imprisoned.

Imprisoned for being disabled?

I want to say that Hitler went for the disabled first but did he? I’m going to say it regardless. There were homos, communist and socialists too. Am I missing something? Well that’s history for you.

08:10ed: Ok I lost the plot there. The point is that the independent living benefit for disabled people has been abolished. What this means for disabled people is that they are institutionalised i.e. imprisoned for being disabled. That’s thanks to Cameron and Osborne who are ever so willing to provide huge benefits for crap bankers.

 

Continue ReadingCameron & his Tory shits attack the disabled

A decade on …

Spread the love

A decade on I’m starting to feel very much like I did a decade ago – that the state is out to get me personally. Actually, it’s more than just a feeling. It’s the language used about Fascists (individual Fascists?) and Big Cons.

It all seems totally out of proportion as it was a decade ago. Hardly necessary or proportionate for name-calling a couple of Bully-boys and making a probably unfulfilled commitment to get up to speed. I said that I was trying to move on. The trouble is that it should by now be well appreciated that I do defend myself.

I can’t help thinking that perhaps this post would be better made tomorrow.

11.30 edit: I’m going to let this go for a short time to see if there’s confirmation or not.

20.35 edit: Having reviewed things I think that I was prob mistaken and that it’s not directed at myself. It’s taken me a long time to get a handle on Cameron and I think that it’s simply that he’s a big fan of Tonee’s for unknown reasons and – despite achieving good grades – he’s not that bright. For example the (Eton) mess that he made about censoring search engines and now he wants to ban alternative narratives (conspiracy theories) and start a Cameron Youth.

2332596

Continue ReadingA decade on …

Some thinks …

Spread the love

Thinks to be ammended, changed

Thing(k)s have moved on now since I was politically active.

I think (consider) that it was well out of order that I was (am) considered a suspected terrrist through legitimate political activism. edit: the point here is that legitimate political activists are (were?) labelled and persecuted as terrorists – and consequently subject to arbitary execution – instead of being recognised and respected as participants as should be the case in any democratic society.

It’s outrageous that totally innocent, unsuspecting people were killed for the Neo-Con New Labour project. It lead to the absolute fallacy of UK suicide bombers. The governments of that era are the terrorists and there is evidence of that. Almost a decade ago now and look what they have created … edit: The governments are still the terrrists – Charlie Hebdo BS.

It’s also outrageous that none of them have been held to account for their not only outrageous but clearly so illegal actions. Rendition, state-sponsored terrorism, just plainly covering-up for a blatant murder at Stockwell tube station. edit: I could call it a state-sponsored execution and I know what state did it.

,,,

TBC

3.50 13/6/15 And now we have these incompetent upper-class twats who appear to be lacking in legitimacy (elections). edit: The problem is that if they were not legitimately elected then … are any laws passed legitimate? if they’re not a legitimate government, what of attempts to displace them?

They’re very keen on blaming poor people instead of bankers and their rich mates. Iain Duncan Smith seems very keen on killing people.

edit; They like killing foxes and badgers.

…

3am 14/6/15

It’s very dark isn’t it? Has it always been this dark and disgusting?

I regarded Tonee as totally insane and installed into his position. Is this continuing? Are leaders of the Labour Party installed by a greater power? and it follows according to their agenda?

Maybe we should ask those labour party members that attend bilderberg meetings? They won’t tell you actually.

They do plan decades ahead. I’m pleased and proud that I played my part in knocking those plans off course. US official policy as prescribed by PNAC was to fight many wars on many fronts. That didn’t work did it?

PNAC policy appears to be total domination of everything. I oppose that.

4.08 14/6/15 PNAC policy is also fake manufactured terrorism. I oppose that too.

Continue ReadingSome thinks …

Psst, don’t say it too loudly. What’s wrong with UK politics. Shall we start and how the so-called ‘Labour’ party is going so wrong? To continue and continue …

Spread the love

Well if the so-called Labour party’s not going to do it, someone’s got to do it.

Stop being such Neo-Con shits. How on Earth can you claim to represent ordinary people when you are such Neo-Con shits?

TBC

ed: The point is that if you’re such Neo-Con shits then you are Neo-Con shits. There is no difference because you are Neo-Con shits … who care nothing for people – never mind ordinary people. Neo-Con Labour shits care nothing except Neo-Conism. You evil, careless b’stards.

Neo-Con Labour have nothing to offer ordinary people. Well, they can offer you ridiculous, irrational shitless scaredness. That’s what Neo_Conism is. Be afraid. Be far more afraid of a ridiculous nothingness threat. Hey be afraid of walking on the pavement – that’s far more dangerous. Be afraid of going out. Stay in. It’s so dangerous – far more dangerous than food poisoning or falling down. Wouldn’t that be awful if you fell over? Terrible, That’s life.

Anyway, back to the Neo-Con Labour Party. They’ve accepted fully the Neo-Con skit. You know what it is – be skitless afraid. C’off Neo-Con Labour Party. Just C’off.

Be afraid to catch a bus. Be afraid, be so afraid. Be afraid. These b’stards make up terrorism shit to control you through fear. I suggest that we need a backlash. How dare they? How dare they manipulate people through fear? How dare they? Cnuts

How dare they manipulate people through fake manufactured terrorism?

Payback?

And such ridiculous, transparent terrrism nonsense. Can we hold thib to account?

It’s unfortunate that I will never have the same importunities – hey that may be it. No, I’d like similar opportunities to do TB and IB as they had. FM I was lucky but thanks also to everyone that I did not acknowledge before.

Isn’t it like an eye for an Ii? Isn’t it quite clear?

6?

I find it really weird that this IB cnut is still tolerated. I suppose that’s their siht siht. Shall we call it total siht? IB such a siht, it is so transparent that he was such a political tool. How on earth can anyone suggest that there is anything near democracy with absolute New-Labour murdering and more police cnuts like this? Oh Fcuk off.

New Labour Ian Blair. It’s so ridiculous. IB – actually – covering for murdering bastards on the tube. Jean Charles de-Menezes. de-Menezes is the surname. JCD.

ed: What can be done about this then? I have suggested 6
Is there another resolution?

Well of course there are other resolutions …
It’s difficult to accuse dead people. Be good if they died soon not from old age

Ed: The trouble is that this all seems outside any judicial process e.g. former Boss of the Metropolitan Police with assistance from a foreign paramilitary force calling for the murder of a UK citizen. If it’s outside any judicial process then I have suggested a resolution.

ed: Probably military rather than paramilitary. Yes, employed and financed directly. I don’t suppose they were anything else. Perhaps paramilitary because they were pretending not to be foreign military in UK.

Not that different to(p) terrorists then if you think about it.

ed: Yes, they were foreign but pretending not to be. They invented terrrism.

Continue ReadingPsst, don’t say it too loudly. What’s wrong with UK politics. Shall we start and how the so-called ‘Labour’ party is going so wrong? To continue and continue …

Election campaign has nothing to say about synthetic make-it-up terrorism

Spread the love

Shall we have some?

Neo-Con Terrrism BS that is …

Cos I have an awful lot to say about that

ed: What happens is that there is not really any terrrism. What they do is call anyone who opposes them a terrrist.

Would you like some examples?

 

Why is this election BS not scaring you no end from fake manufactured terrorism?

Why are they not doing that?

 

We’ve had no mention of absolute nonsense terrrism for weeks. Is this BS no good for a UK election?

Is terrrism BS only good between elections to keep you scared?

Are you really so ignorant to believe everything on TV?

Hmm

Continue ReadingElection campaign has nothing to say about synthetic make-it-up terrorism