England could have built 22% more social homes last year with Rwanda budget

Spread the love

Original article by Adam Bychawski republished from Open Democracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence

Government criticised for spending £400m on Rwanda scheme while more than 1.2m wait for social housing

A housing charity accused the government of “pandering to dog-whistle politics” with the deal.  Getty Images

The government could have increased the number of social homes built across England last year by more than a fifth using the money it has committed to its Rwanda asylum scheme.

Home secretary James Cleverly confirmed on Wednesday that the government’s agreement to deport asylum seekers who enter the UK irregularly to the African country will have cost almost £400m by 2027.

The total sum would be enough to completely fund an estimated 2,131 new social homes, which is more than 22% of the 9,561 completed in England in the year to April 2023. The average government grant required to build a new home for social rent in England is £183,000, according to estimates by the National Housing Federation.

More than 1.2 million households were waiting for social housing in England as of March 2023, statistics published by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) show.

The figures also show 7,620 social homes were completed in the year to April 2022, but a much higher number, 27,849, either sold or demolished – a net loss of more than 20,000. No figures have yet been published for social homes lost in the most recent year.

The government gave £140m to Rwanda in 2022 as part of its deal with the county and last week the Home Office’s most senior civil servant confirmed that a further £100m was given to the country in 2023. They added that a further payment of £50m is “anticipated” in 2024.

Cleverly, this week, told Parliament that the UK plans to give a further £50m to Rwanda annually in 2026 and 2027.

The overall costs of the Rwanda scheme could reach far higher that the £390m already committed by the government. An earlier economic impact assessment of the Illegal Migration Bill said that it would cost £63,000 more to remove a person to a third country, such as Rwanda, than having their asylum claim processed in the UK.

Rishi Sunak claimed in November that the policy “will literally save us billions in the long run”, but has not provided any figures to back this up.

On Tuesday, the National Audit Office confirmed that it would publish a report assessing the costs of the Rwanda scheme in 2024.

The inquiry was prompted by criticism from Labour MPs Meg Hillier and Diana Johnson, the chairs of the Public Accounts Committee and the Home Office Select Committee respectively, who said that there has been a “lack of clarity around value for money”.

Robina Qureshi, the CEO of Positive Action in Housing, said openDemocracy’s findings show that the government has put “pandering to dog-whistle politics” and “giving asylum contractors huge profits” over people’s futures.

“They haven’t been providing for society,” she said. “Instead they are sitting on their social media accounts trying to promote their own careers, and giving multi-million-pound contracts to asylum contractors. But nothing’s been done to help anyone that really needs it.

“When you build social homes, it increases the pool of houses that are available for anyone who’s in need.”

Original article by Adam Bychawski republished from Open Democracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence

Continue ReadingEngland could have built 22% more social homes last year with Rwanda budget

UK ministers asked to explain fourth delay to Covid wine cellar report

Spread the love

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/dec/29/uk-ministers-asked-to-explain-fourth-delay-to-covid-wine-cellar-report

Labour accuses government of holding back data on use of official alcohol stock between March 2020 and 2022

Crates of wine being delivered to No 10 in January 2020. The last official statement on the ‘usage, value, costs and stock levels of the wine cellar’ was made in July 2021. Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty Images

Ministers have been asked to explain why a report on the UK government’s consumption of wine during the Covid pandemic has been delayed four times over the last year.

Labour said the Foreign Office, which holds the government’s wine collection, should publish the data on its stocks for 2020 to 2022 immediately, as the delay was causing suspicion about how much had been used.

The stock list was originally meant to be published in “early 2023”, was subsequently scheduled for July and then ministers later said it would appear in the autumn.

The last update was from Andrew Mitchell, a Foreign Office minister, who answered a parliamentary question saying it would be published “before the Christmas recess” – but it never materialised by the end of the parliamentary term.

The delays mean it is now two and a half years since the last official statement on the “usage, value, costs and stock levels of the wine cellar” was made in July 2021.

The yet-to-be-published data should cover the period March 2020 to March 2022 – the whole course of the pandemic. Given the cellar is supposed to be used only “to provide guests of the government, from home and overseas, with wines of appropriate quality at reasonable cost”, the report would be expected to show a decline in consumption, given the curbs on indoor gatherings and international travel caused by the Covid pandemic.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/dec/29/uk-ministers-asked-to-explain-fourth-delay-to-covid-wine-cellar-report

dizzy: It’s tempting to imagine a cover-up of that pisshead Boris raiding the wine cellar.

Continue ReadingUK ministers asked to explain fourth delay to Covid wine cellar report

Rishi Sunak Meets Murdochs More than NHS Figures in Latest Lobbying Revelations

Spread the love

Rishi Sunak met media representatives more than any other sector of the UK economy between July and September, analysis by Byline Times shows. 

The Prime Minister met senior executives from Rupert Murdoch’s media empire alone four times in the space of three months, compared to just once for NHS representatives. 

Sunak met Daily Mail editors twice in that time, while meeting housing sector figures once. Several of the meetings were listed as “social”, meaning they are unlikely to have been minuted. That includes meetings with the departing News Corporation CEO Rupert Murdoch, and separately, his son Lachlan who is taking over at the helm. 

Every single one of the PM’s eight media meetings in that time is with right-leaning media outlets. 

Journalism professor and Byline Times contributor Brian Cathcart said: “These depressing figures reveal just how close the connection is between the right-wing billionaire press and our multi-millionaire prime minister.

“Forget democracy and forget parliament: this is where the real power in this country resides, and worse still, what we see is just the tip of the iceberg. Contacts of this kind are maintained at every level of Government and are so intensive it’s impossible to say where press influence ends and Government begins.”

https://bylinetimes.com/2023/12/20/rishi-sunak-meets-murdochs-more-than-nhs-figures-in-latest-lobbying-revelations/

Image of an iceberg
The tip of the iceberg
Continue ReadingRishi Sunak Meets Murdochs More than NHS Figures in Latest Lobbying Revelations

Coming soon … What does it mean to be a climate denier?

Spread the love
Image of UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak reads 1% RICHEST 100% CLIMATE DENIER
Image of UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak reads 1% RICHEST 100% CLIMATE DENIER

Hopefully soon an article looking at what it means to be a climate denier. There aren’t any real climate deniers anymore – the science is so clear and easy to understand. It’s a simple message, humans create climate-destroying gases, mostly Carbon Dioxide CO2 through burning (using) fossil-fuels that destroy the planet. There’s also the alternative that using renewable energy resources – the Sun, Wind, water and tidal, etc does not create the climate-destroying gases and so does not destroy the planet. That’s so simple and straightforward that even Nigel Farage can understand it.

So if there’s no problem understanding that, how and why do we still have climate deniers and what does it mean to be a climate denier? What does it mean for Rishi Sunak to say that he’ll take every last drop of oil from the North Sea?

Why does the government, newspapers and Tory TV attack climate activists? It’s because they’re climate deniers which raises the further question why are they climate deniers intent on damaging the planet?

Continue ReadingComing soon … What does it mean to be a climate denier?

National Trust warns of climate change ‘chaos’ for UK wildlife  

Spread the love

https://leftfootforward.org/2023/12/national-trust-warns-of-climate-change-chaos-for-uk-wildlife/

Changes in climate and unpredictable weather patterns are causing “chaos” for nature, the National Trust has warned, as it calls on politicians to prioritise tackling the climate and nature crisis ahead of the elections.

At the end of what is predicted to be the warmest year on record, the governing body of protected sites is “sounding the alarm” for UK wildlife in its audit report which has laid out an extensive list of species affected by climate change in 2023.

Warmer year-round temperatures have affected the traditional seasonal shifts, which has had a serious knock-on effect for flora and fauna across the country, the National Trust has highlighted.

From low rainfall causing the river Derwent in the supposedly wettest area of England to dry out for the third consecutive summer, to storm Babet and storm Ciaran battering parts of the country with flooding, the extremes in weather are having serious consequences on habitat and wildlife.

https://leftfootforward.org/2023/12/national-trust-warns-of-climate-change-chaos-for-uk-wildlife/

Continue ReadingNational Trust warns of climate change ‘chaos’ for UK wildlife