NHS news review

Spread the love

Dr. Clare Gerada was featured in yesterday’s NHS news review discussing the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill incentivising GPs to restrict treatment and the consequent pressures on the relationship between GPs and their patients. The RCGP Annual Conference at Liverpool is to discuss similar issues later today

http://www.rcgp.org.uk/PDF/Programme%20for%20web%20OCT.pdf

The moral maze: the affordability of future health care

Chair: Dr Richard Horton, Editor, Lancet

Panel of speaker to be confirmed:

Baroness Julia Cumberlege
Dr Clare Gerada, Chair of Council, RCGP
Sir Michael Rawlins, Chairman, NICE
Ben Page, Chief Executive, Ipsos MORI
Dr Hamish Meldrum, Chairman of Council, BMA

Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) accuses the ConDem coalition of destroying the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A recent news article about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

BBC News – SNP conference: UK government ‘breaking up NHS’

Scotland’s health secretary will accuse the UK government of trying to break up the NHS, in her speech to the SNP conference.

Nicola Sturgeon will tell delegates in Inverness that health service reforms in England amount to an experiment in privatisation.

Scottish ministers say they will protect NHS spending.

Deputy SNP leader Ms Sturgeon will also pledge to stop pensioners languishing in hospital beds.

The UK government’s controversial Health and Social Care Bill aims to increase competition and give clinicians control of budgets.

It says the changes are vital to help the NHS cope with the demands of an ageing population, the costs of new drugs and treatments and the impact of lifestyle factors, such as obesity.

But the legislation has already been substantially altered, following criticism from NHS staff and Liberal Democrat MPs.

Ms Sturgeon, who is also Scotland’s deputy first minister, will tell day two of the conference: “It now seems inevitable that the Tories, aided and abetted by their Liberal partners, will break up the NHS in England.

“Let me make this clear, the NHS in Scotland will remain a public service, paid for by the public and accountable to the public.

“There will be no privatisation of the NHS in Scotland.”

The health secretary will say: “I say that not out of blind ideology, though I have always thought that the ideology of a health service in public hands and free at the point of need is a rather fine one, I say it because I have no doubt that our NHS can and will outperform the privatised experiment south of the border.”

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Dr. Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of GPs is in the news today. She warns that the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill is damaging the relationship of trust between GPs and patients, warns of a two-tier health system run like a budget airline and suggests that GP practices should explore alternative models of organisation to GP partnerships.

NHS cuts

SMEs are concerned at the ConDem govenment’s destruction of the NHS and nasty changes to the welfare benefits system.

Private doctors treat healthier patients.

Medical students…

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS bill threatens trust in GPs, says doctors’ leader | Society | The Guardian

NHS bill will lead to situation where healthcare is like budget airline with limited seats, says chair of Royal College of GPs

The NHS shake-up risks wrecking GPs’ relationship with their patients by turning them into rationers of care who deny the sick the treatment they need, warns the chair of the Royal College of GPs.

Family doctors could be “compromised” by having to decide between providing sick patients with the best possible treatment or meeting financial targets, according to Dr Clare Gerada.

Giving GPs control of health budgets, the cornerstone of health secretary Andrew Lansley’s restructuring of the NHS in England, could diminish the trust between patients and family doctors, she will tell the college’s annual conference.

“We must not risk long-term benefits being sacrificed in favour of short-term savings,” Gerada will tell the audience of 1,500 GPs in Liverpool. “How soon will it be, for example, before we stop referring for cochlear implant? An expensive intervention but one that in the long term saves enormous amounts of public money. But not a saving from our budget.

“How long will it be before we find ourselves injecting a patient’s knee joint – at Injections-R-us PLC – instead of referring to an orthopaedic surgeon for a knee replacement?”

In a detailed critique of Lansley’s health and social care bill, she will warn that: “As doctors we risk being compromised. We’ll have to choose between the best interests of our patients and those of the commissioning group’s purse. And, to make matters worse, we’ll also be rewarded for staying in budget – and not spending the money on restoring the child’s hearing. Now that’s what I call a perverse incentive.”

Her warning reflects widespread concern among doctors that exercising their financial responsibilities will lead some patients to believe they have been refused treatment on grounds of cost.

Lansley’s reforms also threaten to create a two-tier health service where the well-off can beat queues by paying for fast treatment as private patients in NHS hospitals, because of the proposed easing of the amount which foundation trust hospitals can earn from that source.

“I worry we’re heading towards a situation where healthcare will be like a budget airline. There will be two queues: one queue for those who can afford to pay, and another for those who can’t. Seats will be limited to those who muscle in first, and the rest will be left stranded on the tarmac.”

The British Medical Association, which represents hospital doctors as well as GPs, said it shared Gerada’s concerns.

“In general, we would agree with Clare Gerada’s comments about the impact of the health and social care bill. The BMA has concerns about the conflicts of interest inherent in the bill as well as the effects of the market on healthcare, and her comments fit with the views of most doctors,” said a spokeswoman for the BMA, which wants the bill withdrawn or substantially amended.

A Department of Health spokesperson said: “The NHS is not for sale and this government is committed to a real terms increase in funding for it. We want to give GPs the power and control to make the right decisions on behalf of their patients.

“Talk of budget airlines is nonsense pure and simple. In the new NHS, everyone will fly first class. Quality will improve as both patients and frontline staff are able to make choices.

NHS doctors are under pressure to replace caring with market values | Clare Gerada | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


When I come home from work and my son asks me what sort of day I’ve had, on a good day I want to be able to say “I saved a life”, not “I met a budget”.

Of course, it’s important that GPs are mindful of resources. We have a responsibility to spend the public’s money carefully and wisely. That goes without saying.

But we must never lose sight of the patient as a person, at the heart of our practice. Patients are not “commodities” to be bought and sold in the health marketplace.

In this brave new cost-driven, competitive, managed-care world, I worry about the effect the language of marketing is having on our clinical relationships.

It’s changing the precious relationship between clinician and patient into a crudely costed financial procedure. Turning our patients into aliquots of costed tariffs and us into financial managers of care.

We are already embracing the language of the market when we talk about, for example, care pathways, case management, demand management, productivity, clinical and financial alignment, risk stratification.

We’re already accused of making “inappropriate referrals” whenever we put what’s best for our patients above what’s best for saving money.

We’re being forced to comply with referral protocols and so-called rules-based medicine, in an effort to control medical care before it’s delivered.

Referral management systems – already widespread – place a hidden stranger in the consulting room. A hidden stranger who interferes with decisions that should be made by GPs in partnership with their patients.

Insulting terms, like “frequent flyers”, are being used to describe people who are sick and need our care and attention.

The archbishop of Canterbury attacked what he described as “the quiet resurgence of the seductive language of the deserving and undeserving poor”. If we don’t watch out, the deserving and undeserving poor could soon be joined by the deserving and undeserving sick.

I worry we’re heading towards a situation where healthcare will be like a budget airline. There’ll be two queues: one queue for those who can afford to pay, and another for those who can’t. Seats will be limited to those who muscle in first. And the rest will be left stranded on the tarmac.

This can’t be right. After all, no one chooses to be sick. We must hold fast to the principle that good healthcare should be available to all, regardless of wealth.

Gerada: We need to move on from GP partnerships – Pulse

GPs need to forget about the partnership model and look at new models of organising their practices, such as federations, says RCGP chair Dr Clare Gerada.

In a sometimes heated discussion over the lack of partnership opportunities for salaried GPs, Dr Gerada urged GPs to stop talking about the partner/salaried divide, saying that model belonged to the last century.

Delegates attending a ‘Partnership Debate’ at the RCGP annual conference backed a motion that the profession was doing new GPs ‘a disservice with a lack of partnership opportunities’, but RCGP leaders urged the profession to think more laterally about how the profession is organised.

Dr Gerada, a GP in Kennington whose practice employs around 100 salaried GPs, admitted the partnership debate was ‘complex’ but argued that a ‘new model’ of general practice was needed in the 21st Century.

She said: ‘I think we should stop talking about the salaried/partnership divide. I think we should start talking about federating – joining and collaborating across practices, sharing expertise and resources.’

‘While the partnership model may be the model for the 20th Century I think we need to move on and find a new model.’

Pontefract Hospital A&E will close overnight – Lifestyle – Pontefract Express

NIGHT time closure of Pontefract Hospital’s A&E department will start next month, it has been decided today (Thursday October 20).

At a public meeting of the Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust all but one member of the board voted in favour of proposals which will see the unit shut from 10pm to 8am from November 1.

At the meeting at Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, the trust said the closure was due to staffing levels, adding if enough doctors at the right level could be recruited the opening hours would be reassessed.

SMEs fear cost of NHS and welfare reforms – IFAonline

More than half of SME employers fear the cost impact of the government’s health and welfare reforms, according to Jelf Group.

As a result it called for the House of Lords to help prevent potentially severe consequences and examine the effects on business of the new regimes.

The employee benefits intermediary conducted a poll of 169 SME businesses at a recent seminar and found 55% worried about the reform’s implications.

It suggested the main reasons that employers were fearful of increased financial pressures came from government overhauls of the NHS and welfare systems.

“Anecdotal evidence of increased waiting lists on the NHS may mean key employees take longer to return to the workplace,” it said.

“In the current economic climate this could be catastrophic for marginally profitable employers and even worse for fledgling business yet to make a return.

Management in Practice – Private sector ‘treats healthier patients’

Patients seen in independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs) tend to be younger, in better health and from “far more affluent areas” than those seen by NHS hospitals, research suggests.

The research, published in the British Medical Journal, also shows patients undergoing surgery in ISTCs had “slightly better outcomes” than patients treated in NHS centres.

However, the researchers claim such differences are “minor” and “unlikely to be clinically significant”.

The researchers, led by Professor Jan van der Meulen at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, claims the study proves ISTCs treat patients with a more “favourable mix case profile”.

Yet, they also claim the results of their research “lessons concerns that ISTCs are ‘cherry picking’ the healthiest patients.”

“Our findings support the idea that separating elective surgical care from emergency services could improve the quality of care,” said the researchers.

 

 

 

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

The government’s preferred candidate to head the NHS Commissioning Board has described the Health and Social Care / Destroy the NHS Bill as “unintelligable” despite being coached by the Department of Health.

Increasing waiting lists.

Frenchay Hospital in North Bristol to be ‘part-privatised’.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Health Bill ‘unintelligible’ says controversial new NCB chairman | GPonline.com

The new chairman of the NHS Commissioning Board (NCB) has been accused of lacking experience and understanding of the NHS and has described the Health Bill as ‘unintelligible’.

Members of the House of Commons health select committee were split along party lines over the appointment of Professor Malcolm Grant.

All three Labour committee members present at a hearing with Professor Grant voted against endorsing his candidacy for the role. But the two Conservative and one Liberal Democrat MPs present backed him, along with committee chairman Stephen Dorrell, also a Conservative.

An amendment backed by the Labour MPs warned that Professor Grant ‘demonstrated a lack of experience of NHS structures and processes’ and did not demonstrate a ‘robust understanding of the issues affecting the NHS’.

He had acknowledged being primed with answers by the DoH before facing the committee of MPs, was unclear about his role and about how the NCB would secure service changes locally, it said.

The amendment pointed out that he had referred to the Health Bill as ‘unintelligible’ and said that he had not convinced members of the committee that he would be ‘an effective counterbalance to executive members’ of the NCB.

Related: ‘Unintelligible’ health bill is chance to empower GPs, says prospective NHS Board Chief – Pulse

Waiting times on NHS show a 60pc jump « Express & Star

The number of NHS patients waiting longer than a year to be treated in the Black Country and Staffordshire has jumped by almost 60 per cent, new figures revealed today.

The only hospital to cut the number of patients waiting longer than a year was Stafford Hospital, where the numbers fell from 45 down to 18.

Nationally, thousands of people are being left to wait for longer than a year because hospitals prioritise those patients they can treat within Government targets and, therefore, avoid health authority penalties.

The NHS should treat every patient within 18 weeks of them being referred by their GP.

If hospitals miss the targets they can be penalised but there is no incentive to treat those waiting beyond the target times.

Cambridge News | Health-and-Beauty | Health-News | £14m cuts axe set to fall on mental health services

MENTAL health services will be slashed across Cambridgeshire in a bid to save £14 million, if proposals are given the go-ahead.

A 13-week public consultation has been launched as local health providers announced a host of proposed facility closures and mergers as part of a three-year cost-cutting measure.

The plans involve reducing eight inpatient wards to six, which will reduce the number of beds available from 28 to 16.

Concerns over plans to ‘part-privatise’ Frenchay Hospital (From Gazette Series)

Concerns over plans to ‘part-privatise’ Frenchay Hospital

CONCERNS have been raised over NHS plans to ‘part-privatise’ one of the region’s oldest hospitals.

Councillors in South Gloucestershire said they had been shocked at news the contract to run Frenchay Hospital would be outsourced to the private sector when it is downgraded to a health and social care unit.

Cllr Ian Scott (Labour, Filton), said: “This revelation came completely out of the blue.

“I don’t think anyone ever expected that the new community hospital at Frenchay would not stay entirely within the NHS.”

North Bristol Trust (NBT), which currently runs Frenchay, has announced that although doctors, therapists, staff operating diagnostic equipment and secretarial support will be NHS, the overall running of the community hospital will be operated privately when it opens in 2014. In addition, nurses in charge of 68 beds at a new rehabilitation centre will also be private. NBT chief executive Ruth Brunt said the move would make the project financially viable.

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

The Guardian reveals the extent of NHS cuts under the ConDem coalition government.

GPs are striking patients off their waiting lists. There will be an incentive for GPs to strike ill and consequently more expensive patients off their lists. While the vast majority of GPs are very good and concerned with the needs and welfare of patients, some are not.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

Revealed: how NHS cuts are really affecting the young, old and infirm | Society | The Guardian

Services slashed affect patients on frontline such as pregnant women and elderly despite assurances they would be protected

Birth centres are closing, patients are being denied pain-relieving drugs and leaflets advising parents how to prevent cot death have been scrapped because of NHS cuts which are increasingly restricting services to patients, evidence gathered by the Guardian reveals.

The NHS’s £20bn savings drive also means new mothers receive fewer visits from health visitors, support for problem drinkers is being reduced and families are no longer being given an NHS advice book on bringing up their baby.

People with diabetes and leg ulcers are seeing less of the district nurses who help them manage their condition; specialists delivering psychological therapies are under threat and a growing number of hospitals are reducing the number of nurses and midwives to balance their books.

The disclosure that the savings drive is affecting so many different areas of NHS care has prompted claims that pledges by the prime minister and the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, that the frontline would be protected despite the NHS’s tightening financial squeeze cannot be trusted. One of David Cameron’s election pledges was: “I’ll cut the deficit, not the NHS.”

Inquiries by the Guardian into the impact of the quest to deliver £20bn of “efficiency savings” in the NHS in England by 2015 also shows that walk-in centres are closing and anti-obesity programmes are being scaled back and hospitals reducing the number of nurses and midwives they employ, despite rising demand for healthcare and an ongoing baby boom.

Katherine Murphy, chief executive of the Patients Association, said: “Andrew Lansley promised the NHS cuts to save the £20bn would be in bureaucracy and waste and would not come at the expense of the frontline. But the evidence we are getting on a daily basis is that the impact is on the patient and frontline services.”

“Ministerial promises aren’t being kept. We are getting the complete opposite of what we were promised. We were promised no cuts to frontline services and no impact on the patient’s journey. Instead we are getting cuts in many, many services and the impact on the patient is huge.”

Related: £20bn NHS cuts are hitting patients, Guardian investigation reveals | Society | The Guardian

Thousands of patients struck off by their GPs – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

Family doctors are adopting a zero-tolerance approach to patients who displease them by striking them off practice lists, in breach of NHS regulations.

The tough “one strike and you’re out” approach led to a 6 per cent rise in complaints to the Health Service Ombudsman about patient removals last year, which accounted for more than one in five of all complaints about GPs.

In one particularly stark case, a terminally ill woman was struck off a GP practice’s list after her daughter changed the battery on a device delivering an anti-sickness drug instead of waiting for the district nurse to change it for her. The revelations come in a highly critical report which lambasts the NHS for its failure to deal adequately with patient complaints.

Overall, the NHS paid out £500,000 in compensation to patients for poor complaint handling by staff, following investigations by the Ombudsman, Ann Abraham. “The NHS is still not dealing adequately with the most straightforward matters. Minor disputes over unanswered telephones or mix-ups over appointments can end up with the Ombudsman because of knee-jerk responses by NHS staff and poor complaint handling,” Ms Abraham said.

GPs have always had the right to strike patients off their lists, which reciprocates the right of patients to switch GPs. But the rules require doctors to issue a warning and discuss matters with the patient before the axe falls, except in cases of aggression or abuse.

The finding that some doctors are acting precipitately highlights the vulnerability of patients at a time when GPs are set to acquire major new powers under the Health and Social Care Bill currently going through the Lords. Ms Abraham warned: “As GPs prepare to take on greater responsibility for commissioning patient services, some are failing to handle even the most basic complaints appropriately.”

In the case of the terminally ill woman, a district nurse reported the incident to the practice who discussed it with her daughter. The practice decided “the doctor-patient relationship with the family had broken down” and removed not only the daughter, but also her sister and their mother from the practice list. The family was given no warning of the practice’s intention, nor an opportunity to respond to it, as required by NHS regulations. The practice removed the women’s terminally ill mother even though she had played no part in the disagreement.

Following the Ombudsman’s inquiries, the practice apologised and drew up plans to avoid a repeat. Ms Abraham said: “In the cases we have seen, GPs have applied zero-tolerance policies without listening to and understanding their patients or considering individual circumstances. Decisions to remove a patient from their GP’s list can be unfair and disproportionate, and can leave entire families without access to primary healthcare.”

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Prime Minister David Cameron may become known as the man who destroyed the NHS.

NHS spending cuts put babies at risk

Private sector supports Clinical Commissioning Groups.

GPs concerned that they may lose maternity pay

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles about the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat (Conservative) coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

New Statesman – NHS reform is a never-ending nightmare for Cameron

The Prime Minister could end up with a reputation as the man who broke the NHS.

The NHS bill cleared a legislative hurdle in the Lords this week . But that doesn’t really solve any of the political problems facing the government’s reforms. Of those problems, one of the biggest is that the coalition doesn’t seem to have a clear grasp of why Andrew Lansley’s plans are causing so much difficulty.

The one thing everyone can agree on is that the plans have been appallingly presented. Lansley cooked them up in the Department of Health without much input or scrutiny from Downing Street. (So blindsided was the prime minister that the episode triggered a whole re-organisation of the Number 10 policy operation earlier this year.) According to one senior civil servant at the heart of the operation, when Cameron was first presented with Lansley’s plan he skimmed the introduction and then turned to his aides in shock and disbelief and said “have you read this stuff?!” He had, until then, had no idea of the scale of what was being planned.

There was a moment, towards the end of January, when a u-turn was still an option. But Cameron feared looking weak by abandoning such a huge public sector policy drive – and, reasonably enough, worried that dropping the reforms would implicitly confirm voters’ suspicions that the Tories had some hidden agenda on health. A u-turn would make it look as if they had been rumbled. The way senior figures in government tell the story, Cameron’s foot hovered between the brake and the accelerator, finally choosing the latter. That now looks like a huge mistake.

The essential miscalculation was the PM’s assumption that if he personally threw some weight behind the cause – deploying the powers of persuasion in which he has considerable confidence – the public mood might shift. Of course, the Conservatives did not count on a Lib Dem backlash, sanctioned from the top of the party as a device to “differentiate” the junior coalition partner (fearful of losing its identity) over an issue of famous toxicity to the Tories. Some of the Lib Dem turbulence around the NHS earlier this year was principled objection to the reforms but some is retaliation for the Tories’ personal attacks on Nick Clegg during the referendum campaign on the alternative vote. The compromise package that ended up before the Lords this week was therefore a mangled monster consisting of the original Lansley plan with heaps of ad hoc Lib Dem caveats, brakes, disruptions and supposed safeguards.

And there lies the government’s problem. The reform it is now trying to sell is the expression of Westminster political choreography and not a coherent response to the needs of the health service. Everyone in the NHS knows it and voters can sense it.

NHS cuts putting vulnerable babies at risk, says charity | Society | The Guardian

Special care baby charity Bliss warns about qualifications of some nurses and midwives in hospital neonatal units

More than half of England’s specialist baby care units do not meet the government’s minimum standards and are putting the most vulnerable babies at risk, a charity warned on Monday.

Bliss, a special care baby charity, said staff cuts in a third of England’s 172 neonatal units were “significantly affecting the care of premature and sick babies”.

Minimum standards set by the Department of Health require 70% of nurses and midwives in neonatal units to be qualified in specialist care, Bliss said, but more than half had failed to meet this target. Last year, the charity said 1,150 extra nurses would be needed to reach minimum standards, but a recent freedom of information request by the charity found 140 posts had been cut.

In addition, it said that while 450 nurses needed to receive extra training to meet the department’s standards, one in 10 units said they were struggling to release staff for training because of budget cuts.

Andy Cole, chief executive at Bliss, said: “The government’s assurances that frontline services would not be affected by changes in the NHS is not true for these most vulnerable patients. The government and the NHS must take responsibility now and ensure our tiniest and sickest babies receive the highest standard of care at this critical time in their lives.”

Bliss reported that about 20% of neonatal units were likely to make further cuts to their workforce in the next 12 months, through redundancies, vacancy freezes and down-banding posts.

Janet Davies, executive director of nursing at the Royal College of Nursing, said the findings were deeply shocking and called for a stronger strategy.

“At a time when extra nurses are needed to meet even the most basic standards of neonatal care, some [NHS] trusts are making reckless cuts to posts, which will undoubtedly have an impact on the care of premature and sick babies,” she said.

“Sadly, this is a reflection on what is happening throughout the NHS, where we know that 40,000 posts are earmarked to be lost. It is critical that hospitals have the right numbers of specialist nurses, who can provide one-to-one care to premature babies and support for families at an extremely stressful time in their lives. Equally, a properly funded strategy is now urgently needed to recruit and retain more of these specialist nurses.”

31 commissioning groups sign landmark deal with private firms to provide ‘organisational support’ – newsarticle-content – Pulse

Clinical commissioning groups representing several thousand GPs across London have signed a multi-million pound deal with private consultants handpicked by NHS bosses to help support the rollout of GP commissioning.

The £7m landmark deal has seen 31 CCGs sign contracts for a programme of ‘intensive organisational support’ for commissioning from the likes of KPMG, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Capita and McKinsey, which has formed a joint partnership with the RCGP’s Centre for Commissioning and consultancy Ashridge Alliancce to advise CCGs ahead of authorisation.

NHS London said all 38 of the capital’s pathfinders were expected to sign up to the ‘development framework’ within weeks, and that £3.7m had been allocated for ‘leadership training’ for managers and clinicians.

The list of approved commissioning partners, which also includes Ernst and Young, Capsticks Solictors, Binder Dijker Otte, and Entrusted Health Partnership, was drawn up by NHS London after a competitive tender designed to provide CCGs with assistance in organisational development, leadership training, strategy, finance and market analysis.

The consultants will offer CCGs coaching, leadership plans, resources and how-to guides, 360 degree feedback, self-assessment tools and organisational development plans to assess their readiness for authorisation.

The move significantly boosts the private sector’s stake in advising GP commissioners, after Pulse first revealed earlier this year that dozens of CCGs had enlisted the support of McKinsey and Pricewaterhouse Coopers with QIPP, budget holding and governance.

GPs fear maternity pay could ‘disappear’ under NHS reforms | GPonline.com

MWF president Dr Clarissa Fabre said funding for practices to cover the cost of locums for partners on maternity leave was under threat.

It was unclear whether clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) or the NHS Commissioning Board would be responsible for the payments once PCTs were abolished, she said.

‘At present, at least you know the PCT will pay a bit of the locum payments,’ Dr Fabre said. But she warned that in future CCG budgets could be so tight that they could no longer afford to pay them.

‘Locum payments are going to disappear,’ she said.

NHS Confederation acting deputy chief executive David Stout said he could not be sure who would be responsible for the payments once PCTs no longer existed.

But he suggested that because the NHS Commissioning Board (NCB) will hold GP contracts, it could take control of maternity payments as a part of this role.

Maternity locum payments are not mandatory under current rules, with some PCTs choosing not to pay.

Mr Stout said if the payments became the responsibility of the NCB, it would have a single national policy on maternity locum payments. ‘It’s unlikely that they’d do it inconsistently,’ he said.

GPC member Dr Helena McKeown said it was still unclear who would be responsible for the payments. She said a single policy would be welcome to eliminate the current postcode lottery.

Continue ReadingNHS news review