NHS news review

Spread the love

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

GPs will be forced to privatise NHS, GP leaders warn | GPonline.com

A DoH guidance document on the Any Qualified Provider policy, published this week, outlined that commissioners must offer a choice of three providers for a range of services.

But GPC chairman Dr Laurence Buckman warned that the ‘unavoidable implication’ of this drive is that commissioners will have to commission from private providers.

He said: ‘The government would say, “Well that’s alright because if they are providing NHS services at an NHS tariff, why does it matter?”.

‘Our answer is it does matter because services should be provided by the NHS or by people who are employed in the service.’

Dr Buckman also said it is now clear that clinical commissioning groups will have little freedom to make decisions and instead will be continually dictated to by a number of other bodies, including the NHS Commissioning Board.

He said: ‘The more documents come out the clearer it is that clinical commissioning groups are not going to be free to do whatever they like.

‘Clinical commissioning groups are going to end up being the fall guys, nominally in power but actually being told what to do and second guessed by a variety of other bodies.’

Patient, heal thyself: the new NHS mantra? – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent

NHS patients who smoke or are obese are being told they must “heal themselves” before being granted access to surgery, in a dramatic extension of NHS rationing as doctors struggle to find £20 billion of savings over the next four years.

Doctors from 50 GP practices in Hertfordshire providing care to 450,000 patients have agreed to block those who smoke or have a BMI of more than 30 from being referred for routine hip or knee replacement surgery, without first being referred to a weight management or smoking cessation scheme.

The restriction, introduced eight weeks ago, is to be extended to all routine surgery over the next few months. Similar moves to ration care are being debated by family doctors across the country, in fulfilment of Health Secretary Andrew Lansley’s plan to move the bulk of the NHS budget from managers, who don’t spend resources, to GPs, who do.

But critics of the move say GPs must act as advocates for their patients, not as rationers of NHS services, and that the confusion of the two roles under the NHS reforms will undermine patients’ trust. They say each patient must be treated according to their needs and a blanket restriction imposed on the basis of lifestyle is “unethical”.

Longer waits for cataract treatment – Main Section – Yorkshire Post

A fifth of GP practices have been affected by changes in criteria used to refer cataracts patients, with the average patient waiting an additional 15 weeks for NHS treatment, according to a new report.

Despite 85 per cent of GPs surveyed believing that postponing treatment has a detrimental effect on patients’ quality of life, more than a quarter (27 per cent) of practices admitted that their patients will now have to wait for their eyesight to deteriorate even further before they can be referred to the NHS.

In most cases, patients who previously had 20:20 vision will not be eligible for treatment until their vision has regressed to the minimum driving standard, the report said.

The most inconvenient factor is that the criteria must be reached for each eye, leaving many patients with only one eye treated for months while having to go through the referral process twice, it added.

For one in 10 practices, the time between diagnosing and referring patients is thought to have risen by an additional 15 weeks, with some GPs recording delays of up to 24 weeks for their patients.

NHS told to sell off disused land / Britain / Home – Morning Star

NHS managers are being asked to sell off disused land in order to raise urgent cash for a financially devastated health service, the government announced today.

Deputy NHS chief executive David Flory has asked trusts to earmark surplus land that could be used to build affordable homes.

The Department of Health said the money would be reinvested into front-line NHS services to benefit patients.

A spokesman said “financial accounting procedures” guarantee trusts reinvest the money in patient care.

But Royal College of Nursing’s chief executive Dr Peter Carter warned that the plans will not prevent short-term cuts being driven through and questioned whether “efficiency savings” will really be invested back into front-line services.

He said: “Unfortunately, some local trusts are taking a short-term approach, slashing jobs and services at an alarming rate.

“We have already identified 40,000 NHS posts that are earmarked to be lost across Britain and a study of 21 trusts found that more than half of job losses were front-line clinical posts.

“Nurses and patients want to see hard evidence that these efficiency savings are being reinvested back into frontline services. There is currently very little evidence to show this is actually happening.”

Unite questions government’s NHS land sell-off

There are big question marks over the government’s plans to sell off the NHS’ surplus land for affordable housing, Unite, the largest union in the country, said today (Friday 22 July).

Unite’s national officer for health, Rachael Maskell, said: ”There are a number of questions that need to be clarified about this announcement which we will be seeking answers to.

”We would be concerned if the land went to private health providers, where the private sector may be lining themselves up to deliver services. This would then be part of the government’s underlying NHS privatisation agenda, which we would oppose.

”However, if the land is for public sector use, then it would be beneficial for it go towards the building of much-needed social housing. The issue here is that with land prices at a low level, is this now the best time to sell the land, if the money is expected to cross-subsidise trusts’ debts?”

Brighton health campaigners call meeting to fight NHS reforms | Brighton and Hove News

Health workers, patients and community campaigners are holding a public meeting tomorrow evening (Monday 25 July) about health services.

The group behind the meeting, Keep Our NHS Public, said that it wants to discuss how to stop the government from privatising the NHS.

Speakers include Dr Ron Singer, president of the Medical Practitioners Union, Steve Bell, a member of the union Unison’s National Executive Council, and Bronwen Handyside, from Hackney Keep Our NHS Public.

Information about the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government’s plans will be outlined along with how these changes will affect health workers and patients.

The organisers said that the coalition had been trying to water down its NHS reforms under pressure from the huge weight of opposition from trade unions, health professionals and almost 500,000 public signatures on the 38 Degrees online petition.

But, the organisers said, the threat of privatisation was still embedded in the Health and Social Care Bill.

In the past week, the organisers said, the government announced that £1 billion of NHS services are to be opened up to competition from private companies and charities.

They said that this would place profits and bank balances ahead of patient needs and care.

The day they signed the death warrant for the NHS – Telegraph

You might think that historians will record last Tuesday as the day the Murdoch empire was brought to book by MPs. Yet I suspect that in years to come, they will realise the significance of that day, not for the phone-hacking scandal but for the health service.

While the nation’s attention was focused on the most powerful man in the media attempting to dodge questions and cream pies, this was a good day to bury bad news. And the Department of Health duly obliged.

Andrew Lansley explained that from April next year, eight NHS services worth £1 billion, including musculoskeletal services for back pain, wheelchair services for children and adult community psychological therapies, will be opened up to competitive bids from the private sector.

This means that in these areas, the NHS will no longer exist. Sure, the logo will still be there, but the NHS will no longer be national, any more than British Telecom is.

There is no doubt that this signals the first wave of privatising the NHS. Yet MPs of all persuasions continue to be deluded.

In a letter that has been passed to me, Stephen Williams, Liberal Democrat MP for Bristol West, assures a worried constituent that the NHS Reform Bill will “improve the NHS and therefore definitely not lead to the privatisation of services”.

Doubtless Mr Williams means this sincerely. But I wonder if he has actually read the Bill. I telephoned and asked him: no, he hadn’t. The problem is that the MPs who are voting on this assume that the Bill’s content reflects the Government’s White Paper on the NHS, published last summer. I have read both and it is clear to me that the White Paper bears little relation to the legislation that is being pushed through.

Welfare policy ‘turns public against disabled’ | Society | The Observer

The government’s flagship Welfare to Work policy is inciting hatred and violence towards the disabled by portraying them as cheats and benefits scroungers, an alliance of charities has warned.

A drip-feed of statistics about claimants who have been denied benefits by the Department for Work and Pensions because they are deemed fit to work threatens the safety and quality of life of its members, says an alliance of 50 charities. The government is feeding a negative attitude towards people with disabilities, which, the charities warn, will ultimately end in violence.

The alliance has written an open letter to Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, after complaining that private warnings on the issue have gone unheeded. The charities say the government should instead be promoting the talents of those who no longer need to claim benefits. Alice Maynard, the chair of Scope, who is a wheelchair user, said: “We just feel it is too much now. It is becoming such a frequent occurrence, it is likely to have some very serious negative effects. I think in the end it ends up in violence.”

She added that a hardening of attitudes meant she now “thought harder” about going out at night in London.

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

Waiting times rise.

Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians says that the National Health Service is “creaking at the seams. Our members are finding it difficult to cope.”

Blindness fears for diabetics as a drug is refused on the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

More patients waiting too long for NHS treatment | Society | guardian.co.uk

Number of cases missing waiting time target of 18 weeks since GP referral soars by a third

The number of patients not being treated within recommended NHS waiting times has soared by a third since the coalition came to power, new official figures revealed.

A total of 27,834 patients in England who received inpatient treatment in May 2011 had waited more than 18 weeks for it since being referred by their GP, compared to 20,504 in May 2010 – a year-on-year rise of 33.5%.

That is higher than the year-on-year rise between April 2010 and April 2011, when it was 24%.

The Department of Health (DH) admitted that while 1.8% of outpatients in May 2010 were not treated within 18 weeks, that had risen to 2.3% in May 2011. Similarly, the proportion of inpatients who had to wait longer than expected to undergo surgery or some other treatment also rose over the same period, from 7.1% to 9.2%.

The deterioration in this measure of NHS performance casts further doubt on David Cameron’s repeated pledges to keep NHS waiting times low, especially the 18-week Referral To Treatment (RTT) target. He last month made that one of his five personal pledges to voters on the NHS.

BBC News – Waits rise ‘leaves NHS struggling to cope’


Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said: “The apparent rise in waiting lists is both worrying for patients and evidence of an underlying cause – the increasing pressures on the NHS in general.

“The NHS is now creaking at the seams. Our members are finding it difficult to cope.”

And shadow health secretary John Healey added: “The NHS is starting to go backwards again under the Tories.”

But Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said waiting times were a priority for the government and still remained “low and stable”. [?]

Related Rise in long waits for treatment shows you can’t trust Cameron to keep NHS promises – Healey | The Labour Party NHS figures show system is ailing under pressure of cuts, warns chief medic – Health News, Health & Families – The Independent NHS ‘creaking at the seams’ as waiting lists rise – Telegraph RCP President: NHS creaking at the seams | Royal College of Physicians

Blindness fear as diabetics denied drug by NHS rationing watchdog | Mail Online

Hundreds of diabetes patients could lose their sight after the NHS rationing watchdog said it was too expensive to give them a treatment for an eye condition from which many suffer.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence acknowledged that the drug Lucentis was effective in treating diabetic macular oedema, which affects 50,000 Britons.

But in final draft guidance on the drug yesterday, it refused to make Lucentis available on the NHS, saying it was not ‘cost-effective’ compared with laser treatment.

Diabetes UK said Lucentis was the first licensed treatment to improve vision – and therefore quality of life – in those with sight loss due to DMO. It was also more effective than the laser treatment favoured by Nice.

‘This decision means more people will needlessly lose their sight,’ said a spokesman. ‘We pressed hard to make this treatment available on the NHS and we will campaign for Nice to reconsider its decision.

Related Charity fears more blindness after NHS drug ban – Main Section – Yorkshire Post

 

27/11/13 Having received a takedown notice from the Independent newspaper for a different posting, I have reviewed this article which links to an article at the Independent’s website in order to attempt to ensure conformance with copyright laws.

I consider this posting to comply with copyright laws since
a. Only a small portion of the original article has been quoted satisfying the fair use criteria, and / or
b. This posting satisfies the requirements of a derivative work.

Please be assured that this blog is a non-commercial blog (weblog) which does not feature advertising and has not ever produced any income.

dizzy

Continue ReadingNHS news review

NHS news review

Spread the love

The Guardian reports that waiting times are increasing.

Mary Salisbury says that when she needed the NHS “it wasn’t there for me”. This is likely to be how most people will experience the Con-Dems brutal attack on the NHS. They are unaware that the Conservatives and the Liberal-Democrats are destroying the NHS. One day when they really need it, it simply won’t be there for them.

The Guardian has an editorial urging Lib-Dem MPs to wake up on the NHS.

Conservative election poster 2010

A few recent news articles concerning the UK’s Conservative and Liberal-Democrat coalition government – the ConDem’s – brutal attack on the National Health Service.

NHS waiting time increases may cost lives, doctors warn | Society | The Guardian

Delays could mean illnesses reach stage where surgery or drugs cannot treat them, chair of BMA’s consultants committee says

Patients could die because of rising NHS waiting lists for tests and treatment, the leader of Britain’s hospital doctors has warned. Delays in identifying conditions such as cancer may mean that a patient’s illness reaches the stage where surgery or drugs cannot save them, Dr Mark Porter told the Guardian.

Porter, chairman of the British Medical Association’s consultants committee, said the growing delays were “inhumane” because the ensuing uncertainty added to patients’ fear and suffering.

His remarks will add to the pressure on David Cameron, who has offered several recent personal guarantees that patients will not have to endure long waits to be treated.

A Guardian analysis of official NHS data on England’s six main waiting time targets shows that five are increasingly being breached. The number of patients waiting more than six weeks for a diagnostic test such as an MRI scan has quadrupled in the last year, an extra 2,400 people a month are not being treated within 18 weeks, and 200,000 patients waited longer than four hours in A&E this year compared with the same period in 2010, the data reveals.

The growing number not being tested or treated within the required time limits was of particular concern, Porter said. “If patients are now exceeding those times, then those patients’ treatment options are being limited, and if that happens then there’s a potential for patients suffering harm.

“It may be that someone’s disease progresses beyond the point where surgery might usually give a cancer patient a potential cure, but the patient then receives palliative care only,” he said.

NHS waiting times: one women’s agonising delay | Society | The Guardian

A special needs teacher says the wait she endured for surgery on her back problem was inhumane and unspeakable

Mary Salisbury, a retired special needs teacher, was advised to have back surgery in June 2010. But the operation did not happen until March 2011, even though NHS rules say it should have been carried out within 18 weeks.

“My back trouble began in 2009. I had an MRI scan in February 2010 at St Mary’s hospital in Newport on the Isle of Wight, where I live. But I then had to wait until early June to see the consultant, as he only visits the island once a month from Southampton. He immediately recommended an operation called a laminectomy to relieve the pressure on the nerve between my fourth and fifth vertebrae, which was being crushed and causing me severe pain, a condition called a lumbar stenosis.

“The consultant said the waiting time was about 12 weeks. First, I was told the surgery should be in September or October, and then November or December. But I was never given a definite date. Every time I rang Southampton General hospital the operation receded further and further into the distance. Just before Christmas, I was told it would be 31 January, but that was cancelled. So were three subsequent operations, two of them on the day after I’d stayed in Southampton the night before and arrived as instructed at 7.30am.

“The surgery finally happened on 23 March this year – 42 weeks after I’d first seen the consultant, but a year and six weeks after I’d had the MRI scan. I’ve been sorted now, happily. But the wait I had to endure for treatment was inhumane and unspeakable. I was in a lot of pain, but I wasn’t being treated. They said priority cases were being treated. Why wasn’t I a priority? I was in serious pain and distress, couldn’t sleep properly and became depressed. I’d always been a healthy person and never needed the NHS beforehand. Yet when I needed it, it wasn’t there for me.

Health warning – Our view – Yorkshire Post

NO Government policy is enjoying a smooth passage at present, not least David Cameron’s NHS changes that face renewed scrutiny. The news that GPs could earn premium rates of up to £100 an hour to take on additional budgetary duties perpetuates the belief that health spending is being recycled rather than redirected to patients.

As even more demands are placed on taxpayers, many will be uncomfortable at the prospect of GPs earning more money than well-remunerated NHS chief executives. The rate will vary dramatically depending on the area they work in, another cause for concern.

There also remains confusion over how much of the money will go direct to the GPs, and how much will fund the costs of locum cover. These vital details need to be established quickly.

The rates are being negotiated locally and the apparent lack of guidance from Westminster will do little to allay fears that the NHS reforms have been ill-conceived.

Such lucrative hourly rates will raise concerns that shielding the NHS from cuts was a backward step, allowing significant funds to remain at the top of the organisation rather than filtering down to patients.

That the figures only came to light following an investigation by this newspaper is further indicative of the lack of clarity surrounding Mr Cameron’s reforms, even in their revised format, and why further changes are likely to be necessary.

Continue ReadingNHS news review