This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sami Hamdi,the Editor-in-Chief of the International Interest during the speech at 17th Annual Convention for Palestine, in Tinley Park village of Illinois, United States on November 30, 2024. [Photo by Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images]
The United States is “heading towards fascist dictatorship”, critics have warned, following the detention of British journalist Sami Hamdi by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Hamdi, a prominent political commentator and managing director of the London-based think tank The International Interest, was apprehended at San Francisco International Airport after addressing a Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) gala in Sacramento.
ICE has confirmed that Hamdi is being held in custody pending removal, with a Homeland Security spokesperson citing revoked visa status. In a post on X, DHS official Tricia McLaughlin wrote: “Under President Trump, those who support terrorism and undermine American national security will not be allowed to work or visit this country.”
Thanks to the work of @Sec_Noem and @SecRubio and the men and women of law enforcement, this individual’s visa was revoked and he is in ICE custody pending removal.
Under President Trump, those who support terrorism and undermine American national security will not be allowed… https://t.co/JByZdGznpb
Critics, however, say Hamdi’s only “crime” was condemning Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
CAIR condemned his detention, describing it as a politically motivated abduction driven by pressure from far-right pro-Israel figures. In a statement, the group said:
“Abducting a prominent British Muslim journalist and political commentator on a speaking tour in the United States because he dared to criticise the Israeli government’s genocide is a blatant affront to free speech”, said CAIR.
“Our nation must stop abducting critics of the Israeli government at the behest of unhinged Israel First bigots. This is an Israel First policy, not an America First policy, and it must end.”
CAIR added that anti-Muslim provocateur Laura Loomer, who has previously espoused conspiracy theories and Islamophobic rhetoric, claimed credit for orchestrating Hamdi’s detention, posting that ICE responded to her demands.
The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has urged the UK government to intervene. “Press freedom cannot be selective,” it said. “The Government must defend British citizens and the right to speak truth to power.” It called for “urgent diplomatic action to secure British journalist Sami Hamdi’s release from US ICE detention.”
Hamdi’s father also issued a plea via X, writing: ” Anyone who truly wants to understand #Sami_Hamdi and how he thinks should start with these words” said Dr. Mohamed Elhachmi Hamdi sharing his son’s tweet from May calling out anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.
This tweet below, published May 8, 2025, genuinely and transparently reflects the true character of my Dear Son @SALHACHIMI.
Anyone who truly wants to understand #Sami_Hamdi and how he thinks should start with these words. They are the guiding reference — the measure by which… https://t.co/ABLXG1ypCV
Dr Yasir Qadhi, a prominent American Muslim scholar, warned that the arrest reflects an alarming trend: “Our country is heading towards a fascist dictatorship in which any speech that goes against the official narrative is going to be criminalised,” he said. Qadhi described Hamdi’s arrest as part of a broader campaign of “anti-Muslim bigotry”, cautioning that this “inhumane evil will be directed against multiple minorities, not just Muslims.”
Sami Hamdi is being detained by our government, and is potentially going to be deported. Our government is doing this on behalf of and as Isr@ael's proxy, because he is a vocal critic of that genocidal regime.
Hamdi had been on a US speaking tour, with scheduled events in Florida following his appearance in California. He has appeared on UK broadcasters including Sky News and Channel 4 as a commentator on Middle East affairs.
The incident forms part of a broader pattern of repression against Palestinian advocacy and criticism of Israel in the US. Universities have revoked student group charters, political donors have blacklisted dissenting voices, and social media platforms have throttled pro-Palestinian content.
Rights groups have warned that these actions represent a coordinated campaign to silence opposition to Israeli war crimes and shield its leaders from accountability.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Elon Musk urges you to be a Fascist like him, says that you can ignore facts and reality then.Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn’t bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Palestinian children search for usable objects among piles of trash and rubble in Gaza City, Gaza on October 21, 2025. [Hamza Z. H. Qraiqea – Anadolu Agency]
The Gaza Municipality warned on Monday of an imminent environmental and health disaster in the city, with more than a quarter of a million tonnes of waste accumulating in various areas. The crisis is worsened by a severe shortage of drinking water and the leakage of sewage, posing a threat to the lives of hundreds of thousands of residents.
The municipality’s spokesperson, Assem Al-Nabih, said in a recorded statement that “Gaza City is facing serious health and environmental crises, which are causing the spread of rodents and insects amid a shortage of water and massive piles of waste across different neighbourhoods.”
Al-Nabih explained that the municipality is unable to deal with the crisis, as more than 85 per cent of its heavy and medium machinery has been destroyed during the two-year-long Israeli war.
He also pointed out the lack of essential equipment and supplies needed to provide basic services.
Al-Nabih added that large amounts of sewage have leaked into city streets, worsening the health and environmental situation, and warned that epidemics could spread if the current conditions persist.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Daily struggle continues for Palestinians who returned to their homes after the ceasefire agreement, trying to build a new life in the city devastated by Israeli attacks, in Jabalia, Gaza on October 25, 2025. [Saeed M. M. T. Jaras – Anadolu Agency]
Senior Hamas official Moussa Abu Marzouk has reiterated that the movement remains morally and humanitarianly committed to returning the bodies of Israeli soldiers recovered in Gaza, while emphasising that no specific timeline has been set for the process.
In remarks released on Sunday, Abu Marzouk said Israel was seeking pretexts; including claims of delayed repatriations, to evade the current agreement and potentially resume military operations.
He accused Israel of continuing to violate the terms of the truce by targeting areas designated as safe zones and further damaging Gaza’s already devastated infrastructure.
Abu Marzouk also criticised US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, describing him as “the foreign minister of Israel” over his recent statements against the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). He stressed that UNRWA “represents the lifeblood of the Palestinian people in Gaza and is indispensable.”
The Hamas official argued that current US pressure on Israel is motivated not by sympathy for Hamas but by a desire to prevent Israel from deepening its own crisis, amid shifting global opinion and growing dissent among Jewish public figures over Israeli policies.
Abu Marzouk warned against any attempt to disarm Hamas or remove it from security control in Gaza, saying such measures would plunge the enclave into chaos and internal strife.
He also questioned the feasibility of deploying international forces in Gaza without a just and sustainable framework, citing past failures in Bosnia and Iraq.
“True stability will only be achieved through the presence of a dominant force on the ground that believes in agreements and can impose security,” Abu Marzouk concluded.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
IOF Spokesperson Daniel Hagari in the now infamous video where he attempts to show evidence of a “Hamas tunnel” underneath a hospital, as to justify the airstrikes against hospitals. Photo: Screenshot
For decades, the Zionist movement succeeded in depicting Israel as the victimized side in the Arab-Israeli conflict. However, the rise of alternative media and social media networks has exposed Israel’s crimes more than ever.
Since it emerged in the late 19th century, the Zionist movement has heavily relied on monopolizing the flow of information through its international power relations for promoting its ideology and related narrative, which contributed to making the establishment of its colonial state in Palestine, known as Israel today, a reality.
The term Hasbara, which has no equivalent in English and literally means “explanation”, was first introduced by Zionist journalist and political leader Nahum Sokolow in 1912. Sokolow was known for his endeavors in garnering international support for the Zionist project, particularly within European and Western circles through media influence.
The concept later became the cornerstone of the strategy of public diplomacy and public relations, which has been employed by Israel and its supporters to explain and promote the Israeli government’s actions, policies, and narrative worldwide.
Hasbara aims to shape public opinion by refuting and whitewashing counter-narratives that would expose Israel’s crimes and violations of human rights, providing misleading justifications.
The rise of Hasbara following Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 1982
It was not until 1982 that the Hasbara turned from being an oral tradition of the Zionist movement into a financed, supported, structured strategy, with a government office solely dedicated to achieving its goals.
This office, which is known as the national Hasbara headquarters within the office of the prime minister, has many arms in other Israeli governmental institutions and entities including the Foreign Ministry, the Ministry of Diplomacy and Diaspora Affairs, the Ministry of Tourism, the Jewish Agency for Israel, and the IDF Spokesperson’s Division.
In 1982, Israel found itself for the first time in a position, where it had to deny its responsibility for one of the most horrendous massacres committed by the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) since the establishment of the colonial state.
This does not mean that Israel has not committed other massacres prior to that year. Israel has been responsible for numerous pogroms in occupied Palestine in the pre-estate era, through the creation of the state and beyond, but the difference in what Israel did in Sabra and Shatila, was the fact that the massacre was televised.
Two years after the Sabra and Shatila massacre, the American Jewish Congress sponsored a conference in Jerusalem to form Hasbara as an official public relations strategy.
Those involved in promoting Hasbara are public relations and advertising executives, media professionals, journalists and leaders of major Jewish groups.
The United States has been the main supporter of Israel since its founding in 1948, therefore, US public opinion has been a main target for Hasbara.
Nevertheless, Israel’s real face was unveiled after the Sabra and Shatila massacre, resulting in a shift not only in the narrative but also in the paradigm in terms of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
It was then, when the image of Israel turned from being the victim and the underdog, surrounded by hostile neighbors from all sides at all gates, to the aggressor that bullies neighboring countries.
As a result, Israel was forced to deny any responsibility for the heinous massacre and the aggression on Lebanon. The overused false pretense of “self-defense” was used as a pretext by Israel at that time, claiming that it was obliged to wage the assault to eliminate what it called as terrorists, referring to members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
That pretext was, however, untenable by American media outlets, which unprecedentedly portrayed Israel as an imperial state that seeks to solve its problems in someone else’s country.
Ronald Reagan was the US President at the time. Although Reagan was known for his strong support for Israel, he upbraided Israel for jeopardizing US interests in the West Asia region and imperilling regional peace. He even allowed the United Nations to condemn Israel for its behavior.
“I was horrified to learn this morning of the killing of Palestinians which has taken place in Beirut. All people of decency must share our outrage and revulsion over the murders, which included women and children. I express my deepest regrets and condolences to the families of the victims and the broader Palestinian community.” Reagan said in a statement, on September 18, 1982.
Silencing the truth, a primary Hasbara tactic
In the decades that followed the appalling massacre in Lebanon, Israel’s crimes and violations in occupied Palestine continued unrelenting. Whenever its crimes were obvious, Israel did not seek to refute them, but rather to silence those exposing them.
Israel has resorted to banning media outlets, threatening journalists and media workers, arresting them and most horrifically assassinating them.
In its all-out multi-front war in the West Asia region between 2023 and 2025, Israel killed over 292 journalists, including 247 in the Gaza strip, 10 in Lebanon, 32 in Yemen, and three in Iran. It has also blocked foreign media workers from entering Gaza for two years, in order to prevent them from documenting and exposing the genocide.
Using the Holocaust and religious narratives to promote the image of Israel
The Holocaust has been the mainstay for the Zionist movement to justify the establishment of a “Jewish homeland in Palestine”, which reinforced “antisemitism” as a victimization tool to procure solidarity and sympathy with Israel along the way, especially with European and Western audiences.
Israel has always attempted to depict the conflict as a clash between nations affiliated with different religions; Judaism and Islam, which is not the case.
To that end, the Hasbara has mobilized not only the citizens of Israel, but diasporic Jews in public diplomacy, emphasizing the battle against delegitimization.
Israel has long organized “birthright trips” to occupied Palestine for young Jews in diaspora, giving them the opportunity to “discover” their Jewish heritage by connecting it to Israel as the only safe resort for “persecuted” Jewish people.
It has further made a significant effort to distort the image of Palestinian resistance groups, freedom fighters, and their supporters, describing them as antisemitic terrorists, who adhere to extremist Islamist or radical political ideologies.
The development of technology and media tools has led to the decline of Hasbara
Even though Israel has spared no effort to whitewash its crimes through its misleading Hasbara, the last several years, particularly the last two years, marked a regression in its ability to influence public opinion over the globe.
The more technological tools have developed, the greater have Israel’s losses been in media battles. From satellite, to internet, to cellphones, the exposure of the IOF’s crimes and violations of human rights has become stronger day by day.
One recent example is the success of such technological tools in revealing the identity of IOF commanders and soldiers, who are accused of killing Palestinian six-year-old girl Hind Rajab.
Thanks to satellite imagery, and the ability to analyze available audio recordings of victims, the circumstances of the crime were demystified remotely without the need for investigators to be on the ground to collect evidence from the crime scene in war-torn Gaza.
Additionally, satellites and the internet helped in transmitting footage of Israeli crimes to a larger-scale world wide, more than the traditional television did.
Social media networks, alternative media outlets and international solidarity popular movements have considerably contributed to spreading the truth about the nature of the conflict in West Asia, specifically in occupied Palestine, as well.
The International Peoples’ Assembly (IPA), its partners and media platforms represent an effective model for such international socialist and labor movements, whose objective is to unite the struggle of the peoples all over the world against imperialism, capitalism and fascism, with an immense focus on the struggle of the Palestinian people.
Moreover, anti-Zionist Jewish groups, like the Jewish Voice for Peace, have helped in highlighting the invalidity and incredibility of Israel’s religious based mythical narratives.
“Because we’re Jews, it’s being done in our name. We have to stand up and yell. It’s not antisemitism to be against Zionism,” Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss from Neturei Karta, an international ultra-Orthodox Jewish anti-Zionist group said.
The “Al-Aqsa Flood Operation” was a game changer
The two-year genocidal aggression on the besieged Gaza Strip, which followed the October 7 attacks, has played a key role in making the Israeli narrative fall apart.
Despite the arduous and costly efforts of Israeli media and corporate media to delineate the attacks as unprovoked assault against Israel, alternative media was able to clarify the underlying reasons that triggered the operation.
The “Al-Aqsa Flood Operation” drew the attention of the entire world to decades of obfuscated struggle of the Palestinian people, during which the international community has remained unmoved by Israel’s appalling crimes.
Although the attacks were condemned by the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, he insisted that “they did not happen in a vacuum”.
Israel’s perpetuation of a brutal genocide as a response to the attacks laid bare the brutality of the IOF, which mercilessly massacred over 68,280 Palestinians for allegedly rescuing dozens of Israeli captives held in Gaza.
This atrocity has not only been inflicted on Palestinians, but also on Israeli captives, whose rescue became the excuse of Israel to wage the aggression. Many of these captives were killed by the IOF based on the controversial “Hannibal directive” on the day of the attacks, or during the non-stop indiscriminate airstrikes across the besieged enclave.
Despite pouring billions of dollars into Hasbara, it is clear that Israel has completely lost control over the narrative. Millions of people have participated in protest actions, mobilizations, and social media campaigns in support of the Palestinian people and their struggle for liberation, and can see clearly, past the manipulation, what the zionist project truly is.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz speaking at a UNSC session. Photo: Mike Waltz / X
Ahead of the UN vote on the US-imposed blockade on Cuba, the US once again spread lies about the nature and intent of its coercive policy on Cuba
The United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, told multiple lies during his speech in the debate on the resolution demanding an end to the blockade against Cuba.
His speech repeated – almost point by point – the repertoire of already debunked arguments that Washington typically uses to justify its sanctions regime that is condemned year after year by the international community.
Under the guise of “correcting misinformation,” Waltz repeated claims that do not stand up to confrontation with the facts nor with current US legislation itself, and which seek to shift the focus from the material responsibility of the blockade towards political accusations against Cuba.
“The Permanent Representative of the United States is not only lying, substantially straying from the topic, but he is also speaking rudely and, contrary to his president, against the dignity of the assembly and the member states. He is doing so in an uncivilized, crude, and rude manner. That is not acceptable in this democratic forum. Mr. Waltz, this is the United Nations General Assembly. It is not a Signal chat, nor is it the House of Representatives.”
The ten lies of the US Ambassador:
1. “The blockade does not exist.”
The US legislation that sustains the blockade – the Helms-Burton Act (including its Title III), the Torricelli Act, the “180-day rule,” sectoral and financial sanctions lists – exists and is in force. The Cuban Resolution against the blockade does not “invent” these rules: it documents them and shows their practical application. Furthermore, official US documents, such as the reissuance of Presidential Memorandum No. 5 (06/30/2025), confirm the continuity of the “maximum pressure” policy against Cuba.
2. “Cuba’s economic difficulties are the exclusive responsibility of the Havana government.”
The stated goal of US policy is to “strangle the economy” to provoke social unrest; this includes targeting fuel, finances, tourism, and medical cooperation. This siege impacts prices, investments, logistics, and liquidity, and explains a large part of the current economic tensions.
3. “The annual UN resolution is propaganda.”
The vote expresses a broad defense of international law and the UN Charter; the unusual deployment of US diplomatic pressures to alter votes underscores the isolation of this policy and the relevance of the multilateral pronouncement.
4. “The shortage of food and medicine is the fault of the Cuban government.”
There is a chain of bottlenecks caused by the US economic siege: in healthcare, the Basic Drug List (651 items) shows a 69% impact, with 364 drugs (56%) lacking due to payment obstacles, suppliers refusing to operate, and technological prohibitions blocking equipment or supplies with ≥10% US components. This prevents the acquisition or severely increases the cost of advanced medicines and critical devices (for example, percutaneous aortic valve prostheses or dialysis equipment), with a direct impact on care and health indicators.
Regarding food, the lack of financing and banking refusals forced the halt of imports of approximately 337,000 tons of corn and ~120,300 tons of soybeans (animal feed), leading to failures in the production of eggs for the Basic Food Basket. Even “authorized” purchases in the US are made under non-standard conditions: specific licenses, cash payment in advance (without credit), transport only on US ships and on one-way trips, which increases freight costs and delays deliveries. The lack of goods is due to lack of financing, limited access to credit, increased prices, high freight costs, and delays in arrivals, direct consequences of the blockade.
5. “The blockade allows for free export.”
There is no commercial “freedom”: the US legal framework establishes a policy of denial for exports/re-exports to Cuba (EAR) and prohibits subsidiaries of US companies in third countries from trading with Cuba; furthermore, the “180-day rule” is in effect, which discourages shipping companies from calling at Cuban ports, and permitted agricultural sales require cash payment in advance, without US financing. All this restricts and makes any operation more expensive, both for exporting and importing.
Added to this is extraterritorial financial persecution: fines and threats to banks and suppliers, refusals to open or maintain accounts, and blocked operations that cut off payment and collection flows. Cuba’s own report includes recent cases (OFAC fine to EFG; refusal to open an account for the EXPO Osaka; closures of embassy accounts) and quantifies widespread impacts on contracts, letters of credit, and transfers.
That is to say, far from “exporting freely,” Cuba trades under veto, licenses, and regulatory fear; in fact, the document lists measures that Washington could authorize – biomedicine, mining, tourism, easing of investment licenses, raising the 10% US component threshold, authorizing banking correspondents, removing Cuba from the SSOT list, and suspending Title III – and which it currently obstructs.
6. “Cuba has full freedom to trade with other countries.”
The US secondary (extraterritorial) measures deter and punish third parties (banks, shipping companies, insurers), increasing the costs and risks of operating with Cuba, which restricts real freedom of trade.
7. “The Cuban government traffics its medical personnel.”
Cuba maintains voluntary and widely recognized international cooperation; the US persecution seeks to cut off these revenues and deprive vulnerable populations of essential services, ignoring UN and PAHO standards.
8. “The Cuban government benefits from mercenarism.”
Cuba applies “zero tolerance” to mercenarism and has criminally prosecuted recruiters; it does not support or condone the participation of its nationals in external conflicts.
9. “Cuba destabilizes the hemisphere.”
What is destabilizing is the US military deployment and diplomatic blackmail in the Caribbean and the region; Cuba and CELAC uphold the principle of a “Zone of Peace”.
10. “Cuba contributes to the Russian ‘war machine’.”
Cuba does not participate in the war in Ukraine nor send troops; it has dismantled recruitment networks and sanctions mercenarism.