‘Time for Them to Leave’: Charlotte Communities Rise Up Against ICE Invasion

Spread the love

Original article by Brett Wilkins republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Protesters march through uptown after gathering at First Ward Park for the “No Border Patrol In Charlotte” rally on November 15, 2025 in North Carolina’s largest city. (Photo by Grant Baldwin/Getty Images)

“I want to keep my neighbors protected because they deserve protection and they deserve to live in a world where they’re not scared,” said one woman patrolling the streets of Charlotte with a whistle.

Backlash against the Trump administration’s assault on immigrant communities—in which some US citizens are also getting caught up—is growing in Charlotte, North Carolina this week, as over 30,000 students staged walkouts to protest the federal invasion, people rallied to condemn the arrest of day laborers, and communities mobilized to protect their friends and neighbors targeted by federal agents.

Hundreds of people gathered outside the Home Depot on North Wendover Road Wednesday morning, lining both sides of the street, holding signs supporting immigrants and denouncing US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol agents, and cheering as motorists honked in support.

The protest came on the fifth—and reportedly penultimate—day of Operation Charlotte’s Web, which the Department of Homeland Security claimed targeted the “worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.” The Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office said Thursday that it has been informed by federal officials that Operation Charlotte’s Web has wrapped up.

The administration’s “worst of the worst” claim does not seem supported in the vast majority of the hundreds of arrests made in the Charlotte area, as ICE and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents have targeted locations including a church, grocery stores, construction sites, homes, and hardware store parking lots where day laborers gather every morning in search of work.

“From guns being drawn on pedestrians, windows broken at restaurants and US citizens being detained and later released, it is clear that CBP’s main mission is to disrupt public safety and everyday life in Charlotte,” Zamara Saldivar of the Carolina Migrant Network told WFAE at the Home Depot protest.

Protester Norm Perreault told the Charlotte Observer that “they say they’re deporting the worst of the worst, but day laborers are the best of the best.”

Former Charlotte Mayor Jennifer Roberts, a Democrat, was also at the Home Depot demonstration, where she declared: “We are here to support the immigrant community. We know they’re an integral part of our economy, education, culture, and growth.”

“It’s time for them to leave,” Roberts said of the federal invaders. “We need business to get back to normal. We need our schools to be able to educate our children.”

On Monday, an estimated 30,000 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools students walked out of their classrooms in protest of the crackdown. Students marched, held signs, and chanted messages including, “No borders, no nations, stop the deportations!”

“It’s stressful seeing my mom ‘cuz, like, she struggled with bills already going to work. I mean, even without her going to work, she’s struggling even more.” said one unidentified student protester from East Mecklenburg High School told WCNC, discussing his family’s fear of being targeted during the crackdown.

Another unidentified East Mecklenburg High student lamented “little kids losing their parents by ICE and getting taken, seeing them cry, and that, like, it breaks my heart seeing them like that.”

East Mecklenburg High multilingual teacher David Gillespie told WJBF that “a school should be a safe place for a child to come. They should be able to come here to get their education, they should be able to come here and spend time with their friends, socialize, they should feel secure.”

“I’m not sure which of my students I’m going to see again,” Gillespie said in a separate interview with WCNC. “Whether because their parents were involved in detainments or because their parents have to make that unfortunate safety calculus—Is it worth it to send my kids to school and put myself at risk?”

Parent Portia James told WBTV that she supports the walkout as an avenue for “students to be able to say something and voice their opinion in a positive way.”

“This is not the kind of behavior that we want in Charlotte going forward,” James said of the federal crackdown.

This week’s demonstrations followed Saturday’s “No Border Patrol in Charlotte” rally and march, which drew thousands of protesters to First Ward Park and the city’s streets.

Concern is also growing over federal agents arresting and terrorizing US citizens who legally follow, monitor, and record their activities. Vigilant residents have been confronting federal agents, shouting, blowing whistles, and recording them. Federal agents have also seized US citizens who’ve shown proof of their citizenship.

“Our country is facing a constant constitutional assault unlike we’ve experienced in many decades,” David Bier, director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, said on X Wednesday. “Don’t give an inch of your freedom.”

Undaunted, some democracy defenders have taken to mocking the invaders:

Others are mobilizing to resist the invasion and protect their immigrant relatives, friends, and neighbors. Residents have formed volunteer patrols, parents and educators have monitored schools and surrounding areas for agents, and church parishioners armed with whistles are alerting community members when “la migra esta aquí”—the immigration agents are here.

On Saturday, Manolo’s Latin Bakery, which has operated in Charlotte for 28 years, was rocked as federal agents in tactical gear chased, tackled, and arrested people outside the business.

“I have seen these people in SUVs, cars that are not marked with their faces covered… throwing immigrants to the floor and taking them away,” owner Manolo Betancur told Queen City News on Saturday, saying he would temporarily shut down his business.

“I’m going to close the door right now,” he said. “Yeah, I’m not going to risk my customers… I don’t want to risk myself even though I am an American citizen. Because the way they look, because they’re way that my accent, because the way that I talk, they’re just going to throw me down to the floor.”

Local resident Beth Clements told CNN Thursday that she’s been outside the bakery for three days wearing a yellow vest and whistle.

“I’m going to walk the streets with my whistle,” she said, “and I want to keep my neighbors protected because they deserve protection and they deserve to live in a world where they’re not scared.”

Original article by Brett Wilkins republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes' concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country's economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Orcas discuss Donald Trump and the killer apes’ concept of democracy. Front Orca warns that Trump is crashing his country’s economy and that everything he does he does for the fantastically wealthy.
Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn't bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn’t bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.

Continue Reading‘Time for Them to Leave’: Charlotte Communities Rise Up Against ICE Invasion

Cover-Up Feared as Epstein Files Law Lets DOJ Redact Info Sensitive to ‘National Security’

Spread the love

Original article by Stephen Prager republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

A billboard in Times Square calls for the release of the Epstein Files on July 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Adam Gray/Getty Images)

“Not national security that has anything to do with the national defense or harm to the nation,” said independent journalist Ken Klippenstein. “But the self-serving kind that protects the system from the people.”

After its near-unanimous approval in Congress and following months of sustained public pressure, President Donald Trump signed a law on Wednesday releasing the files from the FBI’s investigation into the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

The law is called the “Epstein Files Transparency Act,” but critics fear that a key provision could allow the US Department of Justice to keep critical information from coming to light.

The law requires Attorney General Pam Bondi to “make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” related to the investigations into Epstein and his partner and coconspirator Ghislaine Maxwell within the next 30 days.

But critically, it gives Bondi expansive power to redact large amounts of information, potentially burying material that may be incriminating to the president, whose relationship with the disgraced financier has become the subject of greater speculation with each new set of documents released.

One provision allows Bondi to redact documents to strike information that “would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution.” Last week, Trump ordered Bondi to open investigations into Epstein’s connections with several prominent Democrats: Among them are former President Bill Clinton, former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, and Democratic donor Reid Hoffman.

Lawmakers have raised fears that these investigations were enacted to give Bondi greater leeway to scrub information from the record. On Monday, Rep. Thomas Massie (Ky.), the law’s Republican cosponsor, warned that the DOJ “may be trying to use those investigations as a predicate for not releasing the files.”

But another largely overlooked section may give her even more sweeping authority. The law states that information may also be redacted “if the attorney general makes a determination that covered information may not be declassified and made available in a manner that protects the national security of the United States, including methods or sources related to national security.” It also allows her to redact information deemed “to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.”

While the law requires Bondi to issue a written justification for each piece of redacted information and also clarifies that no file shall be “withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary,” it does not define the criteria Bondi must use to determine whether something is in the interest of America’s “national security,” “national defense,” or “foreign policy.”

“One glaring loophole will prevent full transparency: It’s called national security,” wrote independent journalist Ken Klippenstein Monday, as the House moved toward a vote on the files. “Not national security that has anything to do with the national defense or harm to the nation, but the self-serving kind that protects the system from the people by depriving them of information.”

There are many cases in recent memory of the US using national security as a justification to withhold information from the public. Earlier this year, the Trump administration used its “state secrets” privilege to deny a judge’s request to turn over information related to its extrajudicial deportation flights to El Salvador, arguing that it would compromise its diplomatic relations with that country. Meanwhile, past administrations have used national security to justify keeping the public in the dark about everything from the military’s use of torture to the government’s mass surveillance of American citizens.

While the primary interest in Epstein surrounds his alleged role in facilitating a sex trafficking ring for the political and economic elite, there are clear cases where the government could attempt to use national security as a justification to keep information hidden.

For example, recent documents have revealed the extent of his involvement with foreign intelligence and dealmaking. Drop Site Newshas reported extensively on Epstein’s long history working as an informal fixer for former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak to secure deals with several foreign nations that benefited Israel and attempted to shape global politics, including in the United States, to its interests.

Klippenstein has also raised concerns about the inclusion of the word “unclassified” in the bill, which he noted “is an official word that in theory only exists when it comes to national security matters; that is, that the release of such information could cause ‘harm’ to national security.”

He said he asked Massie and the law’s Democratic cosponsor, Ro Khanna (Calif.), for comment on why that word was included at all since the law does not relate to national security. Neither responded.

But Massie told journalist Michael Tracey back in September that a similar provision to redact info related to “national defense” was included because, “You have to put that in there if you’re going to get them to sign it.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who fought against the release of the files until the bitter end but ultimately voted for the bill along with all but one member of the House, invoked what he called “national security concerns” in a last-ditch effort to stop the discharge petition that brought the Epstein bill to the House floor.

It echoed what Bondi herself said back in March when asked on Fox News why any information besides victims’ names would need to be stricken from the record: “Of course, national security.”

“If large sections of the files remain redacted or withheld, the public may face a truncated version of ‘transparency,’ one that protects many of the powerful rather than exposes them,” wrote independent journalist Brian Allen. “This is not just a story about Epstein. It is a stress test of our system of accountability.”

Original article by Stephen Prager republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Donald Trump and his paedophile friend Jeffrey Epstein.
Donald Trump and his paedophile friend Jeffrey Epstein.
Donald Trump and his paedophile friend Jeffrey Epstein.
Donald Trump and his paedophile friend Jeffrey Epstein.
Donald Trump picture with one of his wives, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Donald Trump picture with one of his wives, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Continue ReadingCover-Up Feared as Epstein Files Law Lets DOJ Redact Info Sensitive to ‘National Security’

Between invasion and diplomacy: Trump’s options with Venezuela

Spread the love

Original article by Pablo Meriguet republished from peoples dispatch under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license.

US President Donald Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the Oval Office. Photo: The White House

While Trump increases military pressure in the Caribbean Sea, he hasn’t ruled out the possibility of resuming talks with Caracas. Meanwhile, Maduro supports the diplomatic route and rejects the possibility of war

At a press conference on November 17, US President Donald Trump stated that he does not rule out using his armed forces in Venezuela. This military buildup has involved the Pentagon deploying thousands of soldiers to the Caribbean Sea and to countries collaborating with Washington in the so-called Southern Spear military operation. Most recently, the USS Gerald R. Ford, the largest aircraft carrier in the United States, arrived in the Caribbean to, according to the Pentagon, “combat transnational threats”.

The Trump administration claims that a large amount of the drugs entering the United States comes from Venezuela, whose government is allegedly part of a criminal structure called the “Cartel of the Suns”.

Caracas has flatly denied these accusations and claimed that they are part of a justification to overthrow the Venezuelan government (which controls the world’s largest oil reserves) and thus force a change of direction in the country that is aligned with Washington’s economic and geopolitical interests.

Washington insists on its accusations

On November 16, the US State Department announced that it will designate the Cartel of the Suns (Cartel de los Soles) a foreign terrorist organization. Defense Secretary Marco Rubio stated: “The Cartel of the Suns, along with other designated foreign terrorist organizations, including the Aragua Train and the Sinaloa Cartel, are responsible for terrorist violence throughout the hemisphere, as well as drug trafficking to the United States and Europe.”

According to US authorities, this designation gives the US military carte blanche to attack the assets and infrastructure of what they consider to be part of the Cartel de los Soles, despite the fact that a large number of international law experts argue that this is not sufficient to legally justify an attack outside its borders.

Despite these warnings, the Trump administration has already launched attacks on small boats in the Caribbean Sea that, according to Washington, were carrying drugs to the United States, although no reliable evidence has yet been presented to prove this. Dozens of deaths have been reported so far.

Read More: From Palestine to Venezuela: The US is behind the door

The big question arising from the recent military and administrative maneuvers by the United States is whether Washington will dare to attack Venezuelan territory on the grounds that it is an attack to destroy a terrorist organization. For the moment, Trump has moved forward with these measures, although he has been cautious in stating that the attack will take place.

Trump says he will speak with Maduro soon

While the Trump administration increases pressure on Venezuela, even authorizing covert actions in the Caribbean country according to the New York Times, it also claims that there may be an open channel of communication with Caracas.

This was seemingly confirmed at the November 17 press conference, when, in response to questions from reporters about possible communication with Maduro, Trump said, “At some point, I will talk to him.”

Maduro’s response

In response to these statements, the Venezuelan president reacted by saying that the conversation should take place: “Only through diplomacy can differences be resolved … Anyone who wants to talk to Venezuela will talk face to face, but the Venezuelan people cannot be allowed to be massacred.”

Maduro warned that one of the consequences of a possible military invasion of Venezuela would be the loss of legitimacy of the Trump administration: “A war against Venezuela would be the political end of his leadership and his name. [Some people are trying to push Trump to] make the most serious mistake of his entire life.” He also said that public opinion in the United States is increasingly rejecting a possible military intervention in South America.

For now, Washington wants to maintain all options available when negotiating with Maduro’s government, whether through military or diplomatic means. Thus, Trump is deploying his military and intelligence assets in South America while keeping the lines of communication open with Maduro. For its part, the Venezuelan government is betting on diplomacy while preparing for a possible military invasion that would seek to end more than 25 years of Chavista rule, although such an operation could have unforeseen effects in the region, even for Washington.

Original article by Pablo Meriguet republished from peoples dispatch under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) license.

Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn't bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn’t bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Orcas discuss how Trump was re-elected and him being an obviously insane, xenophobic Fascist.
Orcas discuss how Trump was re-elected and him being an obviously insane, xenophobic Fascist.

Continue ReadingBetween invasion and diplomacy: Trump’s options with Venezuela

How the rich world is fortifying itself against climate migration

Spread the love
US Customs and Border Protection field officers during ICE deportation protests in Los Angeles, June 2025. Matt Gush / shutterstock

Andrea Rigon, UCL

The UK has announced much harsher rules for asylum seekers including the prospect of more deportations for those whose applications fail. The US is trebling the size of its deportation force. The EU is doubling its border budgets. And in the coming decades, hundreds of millions of people might be displaced by ecological changes.

In the face of this challenge, those countries which are most responsible for climate change have two options. Either they can share resources more equitably, and fund adaptation plans on a massive scale. Or they can prevent others from accessing resources and liveable land through physical and regulatory walls, enforced through mass deportation.

Recent events show that, faced with this choice, many governments are choosing not to share resources to anywhere near the extend needed, and are instead building higher walls.

Climate change is already making life unliveable in some parts of the world. According to a 2020 report from thinktank the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP), 2.6 billion people face high or extreme water stress. By 2040, this may jump to 5.4 billion. Droughts, heatwaves, floods, cyclones, food shortages and related conflicts will force millions from their homes.

The IEP warns that up to 1.2 billion people globally might be displaced by 2050, while even the more-cautious World Bank predicts 216 million climate migrants.

Most of these people will move internally within nations, but this too is likely to mean more walls and borders. In very unequal countries, internal migration has already triggered security-driven responses, with a rise in gated communities and other segregated living arrangements to keep the poorer away from the wealthy.

Many other climate migrants will be pushed to travel internationally. It’s likely their motivation will be characterised by many as economic rather than due to climate change. But it’s misleading to separate “economic” from “climate” migrants. When drought kills crops in Somalia or floods wash away farmland in Pakistan, the loss of income is inseparable from the climate shocks that caused it.

Even before the worst impacts hit, climate change is already woven into the economic pressures that push people to move – shrinking harvests, emptying wells and ruining livelihoods. The most severe climate-driven displacement is still ahead, but it has already begun.

Importantly, these pressures come with inequalities in causing climate change and bearing the costs. The richest 1% of the world’s population produces as much carbon as the poorest two-thirds, according to a study of global emissions in 2019 by Oxfam. Northern Europe and the US alone account for 92% of historical emissions.

Those who have contributed the least to climate change are the worst affected and often have the fewest resources to adapt, forcing many people to migrate.

More walls, more deportations

In this context, governments of wealthier countries are massively increasing spending on migration policing. In the US, proposed funding levels are extraordinary.

Recent legislation allocates nearly US$30 billion (£22 billion) to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice) for enforcement and deportation operations – roughly three times its current budget.

The US has also authorised US$45 billion for new detention centres – a 265% increase, more than the entire defence budget of Italy – and US$46.6 billion for additional border walls. Under this plan, Ice would become the largest US law enforcement agency, three times the size of the FBI.

Donald Trump’s policies can be easily labelled as the excess of one would-be autocrat, but this is a global trend across the political spectrum, albeit implemented with more acceptable language by the centre-left.

Introducing the UK Labour government’s new asylum and returns policy, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: “We need an approach with a stronger deterrent effect and rules that are robustly enforced.” But previously-supportive MPs from his own party have warned this will mean “Ice-style raids” to deport asylum seekers.

The European Commission’s 2028–34 budget proposal earmarks €25.2 billion (£21.7 billion) for border management and €12 billion for migration, plus €11.9 billion for the Frontex border agency – more than double its current resources.

All this effectively triples current migration and border spending. In 2024, the EU ordered 453,000 non-EU nationals to leave, and actually deported 110,000 of them.

This is part of a much wider pattern, with borders today being far more militarised than at the end of the cold war. After decades of globalisation, states are now reterritorialising, building armoured fortifications against unwanted flows.

In the past two decades, more than 70 new international barriers have gone up, including Poland’s barbed-wire fence with Belarus, Greece’s steel wall on the Turkish border, Turkey’s stone wall on its Iranian border, and the new sections of the infamous wall between the US and Mexico.

Israel has built an “iron wall” around Gaza and border fences through much of the West Bank. Supposedly built to prevent Palestinians moving into Israel, these barriers have become a clear example of migration control tied to power grabs for land and resources.

A crossroads for human rights

Resource-driven migration pressures are rising just as the world is hardening its borders. In July 2025, the International Court of Justice declared that countries have a legal responsibility to address and compensate for climate change – and can be held accountable for their emissions. It is another signal that as humanity, we are at a crossroads.

The world can either prioritise universal human rights by sharing resources. Or it can attempt to protect a small, wealthy minority through walls, mass deportations and border violence on an unprecedented scale.

Andrea Rigon, Professor, Politecnico di Milano, and, UCL

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Keir Starmer refuses to be outcnuted by Nigel Farage's chasing the racist bigot vote.
Keir Starmer refuses to be outcnuted by Nigel Farage’s chasing the racist bigot vote.
Climate science denier Nigel Farage explains that it's simple to blame asylum-seekers or Muslims for everything.
Climate science denier Nigel Farage explains that it’s simple to blame asylum-seekers or Muslims for everything.
Continue ReadingHow the rich world is fortifying itself against climate migration

Gaza reveals how Britain is run, and why we must change it

Spread the love

https://www.declassifieduk.org/gaza-reveals-how-britain-is-run-and-why-we-must-change-it

Keir Starmer welcomed Israel’s president to Downing Street in September (Photo: Guy Bell / Alamy)

The horror of Israel’s genocide exposes the UK’s oligarchic governance system, and implores us to transform our political system

This should be a pivotal moment in British history. Our political system has utterly failed to confront a genocide. 

Rather, that system has allowed the British establishment to be complicit in one of the worst horrors of our time — Israel’s two-year offensive against Palestinians, complete with ethnic cleansing, systematic attacks on schools and hospitals, and crimes against humanity. 

Now, under a current supposed ceasefire, Israel is still killing Palestinians and their plight in Gaza remains dire, as the world sees the extent of the mass destruction visited on them. 

Throughout the attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, British leaders have actively cooperated with Israel in their military, trade and diplomatic policies. 

Still now, significant sanctions on Israel are completely off the government’s agenda – a striking contrast to Russia – because the establishment chooses to back Israel even in its criminality. 

There is little morality in British political and economic decision-making. But this doesn’t mean the system is “broken”; it’s working as it’s intended to. 

What we’re witnessing is the pinnacle of ministerial impunity for complicity in crimes overseas, and the utter irrelevance of human rights and international law to UK policy-making. More important to the establishment than these has been protecting Israel, and the British and Israeli arms industries. 

Gaza illustrates many deep problems in British governance and exposes the illusion that the UK is a democracy. A mass movement is needed to address ten major issues.

Upholding human rights

Most obviously, Gaza shows how Whitehall’s foreign policy-making doesn’t prioritise human life, or even take it seriously. 

From the outset in October 2023, UK ministers put their strategic alliance with Israel above the lives of dehumanised Palestinians, even as the death toll mounted in the tens of thousands. Ministers in both Conservative and Labour governments overtly apologised for obvious Israeli breaches of international law and human rights.

Upholding international law

Every UK government says it upholds international law but this is plainly untrue. Gaza highlights that ministers think they can behave like criminals, supporting the laws they like and ignoring those they don’t. 

Whitehall has repeatedly refused to acknowledge Israeli war crimes and given ‘special immunity’ for Israeli military leaders to visit Britain. It has done nothing to support the various international bodies demanding the UK fulfils its obligations to stop aiding Israel’s occupation policies and “prevent and punish” it, as the Genocide Convention demands. 

Holding ministers accountable

We have to face the fact there is currently little chance of holding British ministers to account for their complicity in Israel’s genocide. The UK’s governance system has been designed so this cannot happen. 

A mediaeval concept called ‘crown immunity’ makes ministers immune from prosecution for deaths overseas, as in Palestine, or at home due to Covid or austerity. 

The majority of the British public has opposed Israel’s attack on Gaza and sympathises with the Palestinians. 

Public pressure – including dozens of big national marches – eventually forced the government to pull back (at least rhetorically) from its initial unadulterated public support for Israel’s mass attacks.  

Britain has all the fancy trimmings of democracy but little of the real practice of it. UK foreign policy is in reality made by an elite few and routinely doesn’t promote the national public interest or real national security. 

Greater MP accountability

What is parliament for? If our elected MPs cannot collectively ensure the establishment is not complicit in genocide – the most heinous international crime – or that governments uphold international law – another basic duty – then frankly the power they have is fictitious and they’ve lost the right to represent the British people. 

MPs do not routinely hold ministers to account and have utterly failed to do so over Gaza. 

Barring a general election there are very few mechanisms at the disposal of UK citizens to formally hold their MP to account for their actions between elections. 

MPs failing to challenge British backing for Israel’s genocide should be booted out of office by the electorate.

Ending excessive government secrecy

The UK system thrives on official secrecy, the chief currency of Whitehall which has been described as the ‘English disease’. 

We put up with the extreme state of official secrecy only because we’ve so far had to, because there has been no serious attempt by a political party to open up the system and make it less secretive. 

We have to finally address this ‘national security’ bullshit which all governments hide behind. 

Supporting independent media

Gaza clearly shows the media routinely function as de facto assets of the state, amplifying its views and failing to adequately report independent or contradictory narratives. 

Compare Declassified’s numerous revelations about the extent to which the UK has been supporting Israel with Britain’s ‘mainstream’ national media, which regularly parrots Israeli propaganda. 

Public anger with the way the legacy media have reported on the genocide is palpable. 

But there’s little genuine media accountability in the UK and outlets routinely publish false information with no comeback. Stronger democratic regulation that promotes higher media standards, whilst of course preserving free speech, is needed.

Curbing the power of the Israel lobby

A foreign power wielding undue influence over UK politics is neither democratic nor acceptable – it’s why many people voted for Brexit. The government is rightly keen to prevent influence from states like Russia or China but actively welcomes it from Israel.

Ensuring independence from the US

Britain’s kow-towing to Israel is substantially due to Whitehall’s unwillingness to offend the US, for whom support for Israel is a cardinal feature of foreign policy. This again shows that Britain is not truly an independent state.

Perhaps few needed reminding of this, especially those who lived through Tony Blair’s defiance of the public to work alongside Washington in the illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Protecting civil liberties

The government’s willingness to shelve some of our democratic rights on the altar of backing a foreign state, and one engaged in genocide, is an alarming sign of establishment priorities. 

Faced with major opposition to its policies, the government has resorted to policing the opposition to them and in restricting civil liberties. The clampdown on the right to protest has included repeated attempts to restrict protest routes and the police questioning MPs under caution for breaching protest “conditions”. This shows elite contempt for free speech and reveals also the weakness of the establishment’s arguments. 

Building a movement against war, militarism and impunity

The establishment will not concede any of these changes willingly. It is obvious to say, but the UK needs an organised movement against war, militarism and impunity. 

UK complicity in the genocide endured. These last two years should cause a sober assessment of how the state responds to challenges and what is necessary to defeat the British war machine.

I am not able to republish the entire article. See the original at https://www.declassifieduk.org/gaza-reveals-how-britain-is-run-and-why-we-must-change-it

Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza's hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Experiencing issues with this image not appearing. I suspect because it's so critical of Zionist Keir Starmer's support of and complicity in Israel's genocides.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpA

Continue ReadingGaza reveals how Britain is run, and why we must change it