Oregon Files Suit Against Trump to Stop ‘Unlawful’ National Guard Deployment

Spread the love

Original article by Jon Queally republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Protesters march on September 28, 2025 in Portland, Oregon. In a Truth Social post on September 27th, President Trump authorized the deployment of military troops to “protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists.”
 (Photo by Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images)

“We won’t be cowed, and we can’t let this president normalize military and armed federal policing in our country. This is not how a healthy democracy works.”

Calling a move by President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard soldiers to the city of Portland, Oregon, completely “unlawful,” state and city officials on Sunday filed a lawsuit to block the effort as they accused the Trump White House of overstepping its authority.

The 41-page federal lawsuit challenging the “unlawful deployment” order was filed in the US District Court of Oregon and names Trump as well as Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem.

A statement from the office of Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield says the lawsuit, backed by Gov. Tina Kotek and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson, argues that Trump “lacks authority” under Title 10 of the US code, which only permits federalization of National Guard troops, typically under the command of state governors, “only in circumstance of invasion, rebellion, or when federal laws cannot otherwise be executed. None of those circumstances exist in Oregon.”

The suit, which states that the “heavy-handed deployment of troops threatens to escalate tensions” and foment “new unrest” in the city, asks the court for immediate relief by declaring the Trump administration’s order unlawful and halting any such deployment.

“Oregon communities are stable, and our local officials have been clear: we have the capacity to manage public safety without federal interference,” said Rayfield. “Sending in 200 National Guard troops to guard a single building is not normal.”

“What we’re seeing is not about public safety,” he continued, “it’s about the President flexing political muscle under the guise of law and order, chasing a media hit at the expense of our community.”

The ACLU on Sunday characterized Trump’s claim that Portland was “war-ravaged” as false on its face and condemned the order as illegal and dangerous.

“This major escalation from the President and the federal government has no place in our politics or our communities,” said Sandy Chung, ACLU of Oregon’s executive director. “Oregonians have for months been exercising their constitutional right to criticize cruel federal policies. A forcible deployment of federal troops and armed law enforcement violates our right to govern ourselves and endangers our families and freedoms.”

In a news interview on Sunday, Rayfield denounced the numerous and “absurd” things Trump has both said and done in the name of “public safety” that are wholly counter to what’s needed.

“If you really wanted public safety, you wouldn’t threaten to send the United States military into any city. What you’d do is pick up the phone and work toward collaboration—finding out what resources a community actually needs,” Rayfield said.

“I know for a fact, from talking to cities across Oregon and across the country, that if you pick up the phone and ask, ‘What do you need? What could be helpful?’ The answer would not be the United States military.”

Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, put the situation in Portland in a broader context, as it’s not the first city where Trump has aimed National Guard soldiers, and it’s unlikely to be the last.

“Like for other cities, President Trump’s justification for deploying troops and armed federal agents to Portland is blatantly false and inflammatory, as well as jeopardizes residents’ fundamental liberties,” warned Shamsi.

“After a harrowing week for our First Amendment freedoms, we see the President’s strategy for what it is—an attempt to create conflict where there is none, sow fear in our communities, and intimidate people from exercising their constitutional rights,” she added. “But we won’t be cowed, and we can’t let this president normalize military and armed federal policing in our country. This is not how a healthy democracy works.”

Original article by Jon Queally republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn't bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Donald Fuhrump says that Amerikkka doesn’t bother with crimes or charges anymore, not being 100% Amerikkkan and opposing his real estate intentions is enough.
Orcas discuss how Trump was re-elected and him being an insane, xenophobic Fascist.
Orcas discuss how Trump was re-elected and him being an insane, xenophobic Fascist.
Continue ReadingOregon Files Suit Against Trump to Stop ‘Unlawful’ National Guard Deployment

Trump’s Gaza policy and the Vatican’s silence: A matter of moral consistency

Spread the love

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

United States President Donald Trump , and granddaughter Kai Trump walk on the South Lawn of the White House after arriving on Marine One in Washington, DC, on September 26, 2025 in Washington, DC, United States. [Yasin Öztürk – Anadolu Agency]

by Dr Saad Naji Jawad

President Trump’s re-election had established the analysts’ worst fears about his policy on Gaza and Palestinian rights. Despite campaign promises of a halt to the Gaza war in days, his policies have systematically protracted the conflict and invited Israeli escalation.

Breaking promises, escalating violence

Trump’s policy change began the moment he took up residence in the White House. Not only did he abandon his commitment to swift peace, but he went so far as to undercut his predecessor’s restraints by selling Israel forbidden advanced weapons. More troubling still, he openly encouraged Netanyahu to escalate military actions with the apparent goal of purging Gaza’s 2.2 million residents—accompanied by the absurd concept of turning the land into a luxury holiday resort destination.

The president’s confused rhetoric provided Netanyahu with repeated opportunities and additional time to stretch operations, rather than employing adequate pressure for humanitarian access to Gaza’s suffering population. The recent joint press conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in London revealed the harsh reality of his position.

The hostage-centric approach

When questioned regarding Gaza, Trump visibly bristled, calling Hamas’s 7 October  attacks “heinous and unforgivable crimes unprecedented in human history.” He emphasised that the top priority right now must be freeing all the hostages, both living and dead, “as quickly as possible.” Asked if hostage release would halt the war, his direct answer was simply: “Perhaps.”

This exchange exposed a chilling mathematics: Trump values 24 Israeli hostages’ lives utterly more than the lives of over two million Palestinians under constant bombardment that kills 70-100 individuals every day with American-supplied munitions. His utter devotion to population transfer, spurning Palestinian resistance to leave their homeland with “They will; we are in no hurry,” places the administration’s real motivations in relief.

READ: Trump says ‘real chance for greatness in the Middle East’

Diplomatic isolation

Trump’s stance was made clear when the US used its sixth veto since 2003 on a UN Security Council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire, release of prisoners, and access to humanitarian assistance in Gaza. The resolution received a unanimous vote from all other permanent members (Britain, France, Russia, and China) and non-permanent members, leaving America isolated in the blockade.

US Representative Morgan Ortagus justified the veto with stale arguments of Israel’s “right to self-defence” and claims that the resolution “equated Israel with Hamas.” These hollow excuses resonated especially callously as the representative of Denmark spoke of mothers boiling leaves to feed their children and fathers sorting through rubble to find food.

Algeria’s delegate, Amar Ben Jamaa, delivered arguably the most powerful words, reciting a list of apologies to the Palestinians: for the inaction of the Council to avoid the killing of over 18,000 children, 12,000 women slain, 4,000 older men slaughtered, 1,400 medical staff targeted, 250 journalists assassinated, and 500 aid personnel killed. He articulated the moral failure of the international community: “Israel kills and starves an entire people daily, and no one does anything about it.”

The Vatican’s alarming silence

America’s consistent support of Israel is a tradition going back to Lyndon Johnson’s time, while the Vatican position is an alarming departure from Catholic social teaching. In his recent interview, Pope Leo XIV revealed a cryptic dovetailing with US policy, at odds with the moral clarity of his predecessor.

READ: Pope Leo XIV condemns Israel’s displacement of Gazans, renews ceasefire call

While expressing “great concern” over Gaza, the Pope dismissed genocide charges, claiming “there’s a very technical definition about what genocide might be” and deeming the Holy See “not ready” to characterise Israel’s operation as genocidal. This claim contradicts, in direct terms, Pope Francis’s November 2024 genocide investigations appeal and overruled a 16 September UN Human Rights Council report documenting Israeli genocide in Gaza.

The Vatican’s withdrawal from moral leadership raises troubling questions about outside influence on Catholic policy. Has the Church surrendered its humanitarian mandate to political considerations, either under American pressure or internal Zionist lobbies?

The alignment of American political and Vatican moral influence in the cause of Israeli impunity is a profound failure of global institutions. When the world’s biggest democracy and the world’s oldest moral institution abandon Palestinian lives to safeguard Israeli interests, the entire edifice of human rights and global law falls apart.

Trump’s presidency has revealed that American assistance to Israel is more than just strategic interest—it is an ideological allegiance for which some lives matter more than others. The complicity of the Vatican is evidence that this moral hierarchy has spread even to institutions that profess to believe in universal human dignity.

As Gaza’s suffering continues with superpower approval and papal silence, the world witnesses not only Palestinian tragedy, but also the deconstruction of the moral foundations upon which global order is based.

OPINION: Does President Trump really want to stop the war in Gaza? Why is the Vatican not investigating the genocide in Gaza?

Experiencing issues with this image not appearing. I suspect because it's so critical of Zionist Keir Starmer's support of and complicity in Israel's genocides.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpA
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza's hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Vote Labour for Genocide.
Vote Labour for Genocide.

Continue ReadingTrump’s Gaza policy and the Vatican’s silence: A matter of moral consistency

Hamas says no proposal received from mediators for Gaza ceasefire

Spread the love

This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Smoke rises from the area targeted by Israeli forces in Gaza City, Gaza on September 27, 2025. [Khames Alrefi  - Anadolu Agency]
Smoke rises from the area targeted by Israeli forces in Gaza City, Gaza on September 27, 2025. [Khames Alrefi – Anadolu Agency]

The Palestinian resistance group Hamas said Sunday that it has not received any new Gaza ceasefire proposal from mediators, stressing its readiness to discuss any proposals, Anadolu reports.

Media reports earlier said that Hamas had received a US proposal to reach a Gaza ceasefire and end the Israeli war in the enclave.

“Hamas confirms that it has not received any new proposals from mediators,” the group said in a statement.

It said the ceasefire negotiations have stalled since the Sept. 9 Israeli airstrike on Hamas leadership in the Qatari capital, Doha. Five Hamas members were killed in the attack.

“Hamas affirms its readiness to study any proposals it receives from mediators with positivity and responsibility, in a manner that preserves the national rights of our people,” the statement said.

READ: Saudi Arabia warns global inaction on Gaza war threatens regional, world stability

On Sept. 25, US President Donald Trump presented a 21-point peace plan to Arab leaders, which calls for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all Israeli hostages, governance of Gaza without Hamas, and a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from the enclave, according to some media reports.

Arab leaders endorsed large portions but sought additions, including guarantees against West Bank annexation, maintaining Jerusalem’s status quo, increased humanitarian aid, and addressing Israeli settlements, regional diplomats told CNN.

The Israeli army has killed nearly 66,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children, in Gaza since October 2023. The relentless bombardment has rendered the enclave uninhabitable and led to starvation and the spread of diseases.

OPINION: Two years of genocide: Why Gaza’s resistance will never surrender

Experiencing issues with this image not appearing. I suspect because it's so critical of Zionist Keir Starmer's support of and complicity in Israel's genocides.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpA
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza's hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Vote Labour for Genocide.
Vote Labour for Genocide.

Continue ReadingHamas says no proposal received from mediators for Gaza ceasefire

After denying involvement in Trump’s ‘Gaza riviera’ plan, Tony Blair is set to run it

Spread the love
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza's hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Keir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner are called evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner are called evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.

Continue ReadingAfter denying involvement in Trump’s ‘Gaza riviera’ plan, Tony Blair is set to run it