‘Not in Our Name’: Hundreds Arrested at Jewish-Led Protest Ahead of Netanyahu Speech

Spread the love

Original article by JAKE JOHNSON republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Hundreds of Jewish demonstrators and allies protest Israel’s assault on Gaza on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on July 23, 2024.
 (Photo: Astrid Riecken/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

“The Israeli government is using U.S funding and weapons to slaughter and starve Palestinians in Gaza,” said one peace advocate. “Americans—including Jewish Americans—are disgusted by our own government’s complicity in this genocide.”

Hundreds of demonstrators were arrested inside a U.S. House building on Tuesday while protesting the American government’s continued support for Israel’s assault on Gaza and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s forthcoming speech to Congress.

The protest was led by Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and joined by members of several other organizations, including IfNotNow, Democratic Socialists of America, and Shoresh, a group of anti-Zionist Israelis based in the U.S.

JVP said 400 protesters—including more than a dozen rabbis—were arrested at the peaceful sit-in at the Cannon House Office Building rotunda. Protesters wore shirts that read “Not in Our Name” and “Jews Say Stop Arming Israel.”

“For nine months, we’ve watched in horror as the Israeli government has carried out a genocide, armed and funded by the U.S.,” said Stefanie Fox, JVP’s executive director. “Congress and the Biden administration have the power to end this horror today. Instead, our president is preparing to meet with Netanyahu and congressional leadership has honored him with an invitation to address Congress. Enough is enough.”

President Joe Biden and Congress “must listen to the people,” Fox added. “We need an arms embargo now to save lives.”

Jane Hirschmann, a daughter of Holocaust survivors and member of JVP, said that “the Israeli government is using U.S. funding and weapons to slaughter and starve Palestinians in Gaza.”

“Americans—including Jewish Americans—are disgusted by our own government’s complicity in this genocide,” said Hirschmann. “The only way to reach a cease-fire and build a just future is for the U.S. to stop sending weapons to Israel now.”

“Instead of platforming a war criminal, Congress should be imposing an arms embargo and using its leverage to force Netanyahu to end the bombing and bloodshed.”

Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, D.C. comes as the death toll from Israel’s large-scale assault on Gaza nears 40,000 after almost 10 months of relentless bombing that has decimated much of the enclave’s infrastructure and displaced 90% of its population. Earlier this week, Israel’s military ordered the evacuation of another area previously designated as a safe zone and killed dozens of Palestinians in a fresh round of attacks.

Netanyahu has addressed Congress more than any other world leader. As The Washington Post‘s Ishaan Tharoor noted Wednesday, “The first time Netanyahu addressed Congress was nearly three decades ago in 1996, when he and his right-wing allies had just come to power in the wake of the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, whose efforts toward forging peace with the Palestinians that Netanyahu had opposed.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) formally invited Netanyahu to speak to a joint meeting of Congress in late May, just days after it became clear that Israeli forces used U.S.-made bombs in a devastating attack on a camp of displaced Palestinians.

“It is utterly shameful that U.S. lawmakers would invite war criminal Netanyahu to address Congress,” JVP communications director Sonya Meyerson-Knox said in a statement after Tuesday’s protest. “We are hundreds of American Jews calling on our elected leaders to stop funding and fueling this genocide.”

In addition to grassroots protests against Netanyahu’s visit—which are set to continue ahead of and during his speech—dozens of Democratic lawmakers are planning to boycott the prime minister’s address, which is scheduled to begin at 2:00 pm ET. Following his speech to Congress, Netanyahu is planning to meet with President Joe Biden at the White House on Thursday before traveling to Mar-a-Lago to meet with Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who is expected to become the Democratic presidential nominee following Biden’s exit from the 2024 race, has opted to attend a previously scheduled event in Indianapolis instead of presiding over Netanyahu’s remarks.

Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.), one of the progressive lawmakers boycotting Netanyahu’s speech, said in a statement Tuesday that “by bestowing Prime Minister Netanyahu with a joint address, Congress is not only continuing to green-light genocide; it is actively celebrating the man at the forefront of that genocide.”

“Instead of platforming a war criminal, Congress should be imposing an arms embargo and using its leverage to force Netanyahu to end the bombing and bloodshed that has already killed over 39,000 Palestinians and failed to ensure the safe release of the vast majority of hostages, all while decimating schools, hospitals, homes, and humanitarian convoys,” Bush added.

In remarks on the floor of the U.S. Senate on Tuesday, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) also called Netanyahu a war criminal and said it is a “disgrace” that he was invited to speak to Congress.

“Netanyahu is a right-wing extremist and a war criminal who has devoted his career to killing the prospects of a two-state solution and lasting peace in the region,” said Sanders. “He should not be welcomed to the United States Congress. On the contrary, his policies in Gaza and the West Bank should be roundly condemned and his right-wing extremist government should not receive another nickel from U.S. taxpayers.”

Original article by JAKE JOHNSON republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). 

Ben-Gvir Endorses Trump, Says He’s More Likely to Back War on Iran

Tlaib Says Netanyahu ‘Should Be Arrested’ in DC

Labor Unions Urge Biden to Halt Military Aid for Israel

Continue Reading‘Not in Our Name’: Hundreds Arrested at Jewish-Led Protest Ahead of Netanyahu Speech

What Project 2025 would mean for the fight against climate change

Spread the love
Canadian wildfire 2023
Canadian wildfire 2023

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4769252-project-2025-climate-change-energy-environment

Project 2025, a controversial conservative roadmap that aims to guide the next Republican administration, calls for the elimination of multiple energy- and environment-related offices and rules — moves that would restrict the government’s ability to combat climate change and pollution.

Policies promoted under the plan would place political personnel in positions to oversee science at major federal agencies and reduce such agencies’ limitations on polluting industries.

The project additionally proposes chopping up several agencies. It called for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the nation’s oceans, weather, climate and fisheries science agency, to be “dismantled.”

Project 2025 has sparked concerns among environmental advocates. Climate activist Jamie Henn said what alarms him about the project is not necessarily that it’s more extreme than Trump’s proposals, but that it’s more specific. 

“Trump would frack the National Mall if he thought it would make a couple of bucks for donors and Big Oil,” said Henn, director of Fossil Free Media, a nonprofit that supports ending fossil fuel use.

But he said “Trump tends to speak in slogans,” while “this is a plan that really gets into the details.”

“We’re not only going agency by agency, we’re going into every single agency program,” Henn said. “They’re coming in with sledgehammers and scalpels to try and dismantle any barriers to the fossil fuel industries.”

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4769252-project-2025-climate-change-energy-environment

Continue ReadingWhat Project 2025 would mean for the fight against climate change

123 House and Senate Republicans deny climate science: Analysis

Spread the love

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4778682-house-senate-republicans-deny-climate-science-analysis

In this Aug. 17, 2021, file photo, embers light up hillsides as the Dixie Fire burns near Milford in Lassen County, Calif. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)

A total of 123 members of the House and Senate deny the scientific consensus that climate change is occurring as a result of human activity, according to an analysis from the liberal Center for American Progress. 

In a new report, first shared with The Hill, analyzing public statements made by lawmakers, the think tank determined these climate deniers are all Republicans and include prominent members of House leadership. 

It defined climate deniers as lawmakers who say any of the following: climate change is not real, it is not primarily caused by humans, the science is not settled on climate change, extreme weather is not caused by climate change, or climate change is actually beneficial. 

The report does not consider lawmakers who acknowledge that climate change is real but oppose climate actions to be deniers. 

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4778682-house-senate-republicans-deny-climate-science-analysis

Continue Reading123 House and Senate Republicans deny climate science: Analysis

Labour suspends seven rebel MPs over two-child benefit cap

Spread the love
Image of Keir Starmer and a poor child.
Zionist Keir ‘Kid Starver’ Starmer. Image thanks to The Skwawkbox.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c978m6z3egno

Seven Labour MPs have had the whip suspended for six months after voting against the government on an amendment to scrap the two-child benefit cap.

Ex-shadow chancellor John McDonnell was among the Labour MPs who voted for an SNP motion calling for an end to the policy, which prevents almost all parents from claiming Universal Credit or child tax credit for more than two children.

Mr McDonnell backed the SNP motion alongside Richard Burgon, Ian Byrne, Rebecca Long-Bailey, Imran Hussain, Apsana Begum and Zarah Sultana.

MPs rejected the SNP amendment by 363 votes to 103, in the first major test of the new Labour government’s authority.

Losing the whip means the MPs are suspended from the parliamentary party and will now sit as independent MPs.

Nearly all of the rebels were allies of the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who now sits as an independent MP and put his name to the SNP motion.

In a statement on social media, Ms Sultana said she would “always stand up for the most vulnerable in our society”, adding that scrapping the cap would “lift 33,000 children out of poverty”.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c978m6z3egno

Continue ReadingLabour suspends seven rebel MPs over two-child benefit cap