Let’s have some music ;)
Apologies that I’ve been neglecting tormenting you with my taste in music dear readers …
While there’s a rough theme to tonight’s music it’s intended to be more anti-Fascist than anti-monarchy
Proud to be an eco-zealot, we need to call the apocalypse-zealot cnuts names too
I can only speak for myself only. I am proud to be concerned for the environment, nature and the future of the planet – to be an eco-zealot.
Tory assole apocalypse-zealot Esther McVey goes in for name-calling with a total absence of rational argument. eco-zealots, pampered overprivileged nitwits, publicity-hungry anarchists, more ego-warriors than eco-warriors, need bringing down a peg or two by both the police and the courts, probably living off their family trust fund, eco-loons, eco-extremists, terrorists [with] nutty ideas. Terrorists? Nutty ideas like preventing apocalypse? The science is clear, it’s Esther McVey who is the unhinged zealot. She’s some kind of psychopath campaigning for climate destruction.
[22/4/23: Having paid some attention to McVey, I suspect that she may be insane.]
The Sun attacks activists for driving, eating fruit and veg and being a mother. Shopping at Waitrose while being a member of Extinction Rebellion, What disgusting, shameful activities will they do next?
A gammony man-child and Farage anger? They’re the mad fekkers …
[Full disclosure: I’m not at the Big One because I’m hopefully only temporarily ill but def there in spirit.]
Fekk, disrupt, protest
We have every right to protest. It’s our fucking World as much as anyone else, especially rich cnuts.
ed: What you want a reasoned argument?
In that case, rich cnuts are trashing our beautiful world.
Recognise that?
What’s needed?
Are you going to do nothing while Capitalists destroy our World?
Starmer asked judge to hide paedophile’s identity and ‘leniency of sentence’
Original article republished from the Skwawkbox for non-Commercial use.
More hypocrisy
Keir Starmer has rightly been under fire since Labour last week exploited abused children by publishing a Twitter post claiming Rishi Sunak doesn’t care about protecting children from paedophiles. Sunak is abysmal, but he has no role in the sentencing of offenders – and Starmer himself, as then-Director of Public Prosecutions, played a key role in creating the sentencing guidelines that courts still follow, including specific recommendations on sentencing sex offenders.
Starmer’s anonymity request was not his only controversy regarding sex offenders
And further hypocrisy in Labour’s current stance has come to light thanks to Gil O’Teane, who pointed out that – as a barrister acting on behalf of a convicted paedophile – Starmer asked a judge to keep secret both the offender’s identity and the leniency of the sentence he had received:
There is no suggestion that Starmer was acting improperly in representing his client in 2002 – but there is every suggestion that a man who understood the nuances of sentencing in 2002 is profoundly hypocritical and reckless to disregard his own history in order to make a vile, misleading and inflammatory smear against a political opponent. Especially one who was running the CPS when it chose not to prosecute Jimmy Savile.
Original article republished from the Skwawkbox for non-Commercial use.