The Israeli professor that the BBC won’t interview
‘As much as the United States would wish otherwise, Cuba is not alone’
https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/much-united-states-would-wish-otherwise-cuba-not-alone
Activists wave Cuban and Palestinian flags from the vessel Maguro, arriving from Mexico with humanitarian aid as part of the “Nuestra America,” or Our America convoy, in Havana Bay, Cuba, March 24, 2026Over 100 MPs call on PM to oppose Trump’s oil blockade on Cuba
MORE than 100 MPs have voiced “grave concern” over Donald Trump’s Cuba oil blockade, calling on PM Sir Keir Starmer to oppose the US president’s “collective punishment” of its civilian population.
Ministers were urged to reject Washington’s threat to slap tariffs on any other country that ships fuel to the island after it kidnapped Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in January.
The US has blocked Venezuelan oil supplies to Cuba’s socialist government, which said last week that it had not received any fuel in three months.
Your Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, Labour, SNP, Plaid Cymru, Green, SDLP, and Lib Dem MPs have now signed an early day motion by Labour MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr Steve Witherden.
Mr Corbyn told the Morning Star: “The aim of the criminal and inhumane blockade by the US is clear: to starve the Cuban people into submission. They will not succeed.
“As much as the United States would wish otherwise, Cuba is not alone.”
They collectively called on the government to reject the “unjustifiable” sanctions and US claims that Cuba poses an “extraordinary” threat.
…
Socialist MP Richard Burgon, who was in Cuba this weekend delivering humanitarian aid with an international delegation, said: “In Cuba I saw the cruel consequences of Trump’s total ban on fuel entering the country, including its impact on the ability to provide healthcare to those in need.
“Cutting off fuel to an entire country is an inhumane attempt by Trump to strangle the Cuban people into submission. It is illegal and it’s putting lives at risk.
“The UK rightly votes against the US blockade at the UN each year, but that must now be matched with action. It should follow Spain’s example and provide emergency humanitarian aid.”
Green Party parliamentary leader Dr Ellie Chowns said: “Trump has intensified his threats against Cuba following the collapse of the island nation’s energy grid under a US-imposed oil blockade, declaring just yesterday that he believes he will ‘take’ the country and ‘could do anything [he] want[s] with it. This cannot continue.”
Cuba Solidarity Campaign director Rob Miller said his group is delighted with the number of MPs who have signed the motion, saying: “Together they represent over seven million UK constituents.
“We now hope the UK government will move quickly to send humanitarian support to Cuba, a country with which we have had full diplomatic and friendly relations for over 120 years.”
…
Original article at https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/much-united-states-would-wish-otherwise-cuba-not-alone
- Cuba Aid Flotilla Arrives in Havana
- 11,000 Children Among Tens of Thousands ‘Waiting for Surgery’ in Cuba Due to US Blockade
- ‘US Siege Is Warfare’: Cuba Faces Second Nationwide Blackout in Under a Week
- ‘We Must Stop Him’: Trump Advertises Desire to ‘Take’ Cuba as Oil Embargo Devastates Island
- ‘Economic Warfare’: Cuba Faces Island-Wide Blackout Amid Illegal Trump Blockade
- Trump Deportees ‘Sent to a Black Hole’ of Forced Disappearance in El Salvador
- Amnesty Condemns US ‘Murder’ of 6 More People After Latest Trump Boat Bombing
- Venezuelan Sent to CECOT by Trump Seeks $1.3 Million in US Legal Fight
As Trump Threatens to Escalate Further, Majority of Americans Say Iran War Has Already ‘Gone Too Far’: Poll
Original article by Stephen Prager republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
Trump is considering putting US troops on the ground in Iran. Only 12% of Americans want that to happen, according to a new Associated Press-NORC poll.
Nearly six in ten Americans say President Donald Trump’s war in Iran has gone too far, according to a poll out Wednesday from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
The war launched late last month by the US and Israel has led to the deaths of more than 1,400 Iranian civilians, according to the Human Rights Activist News Agency (HRANA), and the displacement of more than 3 million. It has spiraled out across the region while creating a global economic crisis that has caused gas prices to spike to nearly $4 per gallon in the US.
RECOMMENDED…
‘Cracks Are Beginning to Show’: Even 79% of Trump Voters Want Quick End to Iran War
Only 25% of Americans Support Trump Attack on Iran: Poll
Now, 59% of American adults say it’s “gone too far,” compared to just 26% who say it’s “been about right” and 13% who say it’s “not gone far enough,” according to the survey of 1,150 people.
Those opposed to continuing the president’s war of choice include 90% of Democrats and 63% of independents. Most Republicans, 52%, say the amount of force used by Trump has been “about right.” Just 20% want him to go further, while 26% say he’s gone too far.
In recent days, as Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz has wreaked havoc on global oil prices, Trump has sent thousands more servicemembers to the region and reportedly mulled deploying American ground troops in hopes of reopening the crucial waterway.
Experts have warned that a ground deployment could turn the war into an even greater quagmire. Already, 13 US soldiers have been killed since February 28.
An even larger share of Americans, 62%, said they oppose the idea of deploying US troops on the ground in Iran, while just 12% say they support it and 26% say they have no opinion.
While a minority says it is very important for the US to stop Iran from threatening Israel or to replace its government with one more favorable to the US, Americans are prioritizing issues at home.
Ninety-three percent said it was very or somewhat important for the US to keep oil and gas prices low, which has so far not happened—in less than a month, they have spiked by about a dollar and have not shown signs of coming down, even as Trump has deployed emergency fuel reserves and lifted sanctions on some Iranian oil to juice supply.
A majority of Americans, 65%, also said they felt that preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon—one of Trump’s stated objectives for the war—was a very important foreign policy goal.
However, as journalist and commentator Adam Johnson pointed out in a piece for The Real News on Tuesday, the US public is “grossly misinformed” about the subject—25% wrongly believe Iran already possesses a nuke while 45% believe they are working towards developing one, which has been refuted by US intelligence assessments and reporting based on the testimony of US officials.
The unpopularity of the war with Iran is in line with previous polls showing that the majority of Americans believe the war benefits Israel more than the US and want the war to end quickly.
With Trump having returned to office on the explicit pledge to avoid war with Iran and the cost of living already at the center of the president’s near-historic unpopularity, Republicans’ outlook for this year’s midterm elections looks as grim as ever.
Polling aggregators predict Democrats will easily flip the House, and the Senate is now a toss-up, though Republicans still hold a slight edge.
According to polls, Republicans’ midterm chances truly began to tank in January amid outrage over federal immigration agents’ killings of two US citizens in Minneapolis. Though surveys haven’t shown GOP numbers getting markedly worse since the war began, recent opinion polling suggests it is not a non-factor.
A poll last week from the Institute of Middle East Understanding found that 43% of voters said they’re less likely to support Republicans in the midterms as a result of the war, compared to 31% who said they’re more likely.
Original article by Stephen Prager republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
- Analysis of Major Polls Shows Trump’s War on Iran Is Historically Unpopular – News & Opinion – The Commons ›
- Majority of Americans Believe Waging War on Iran Benefits Israel More Than US ›
- ‘Apocalyptic Wasteland’ for GOP as Trump’s Iran War Sends Economy Spiraling: Polling Analyst ›
- Not Just Progressives: Over Half of Trump Voters Oppose US War on Iran ›
- Nearly 70% of US Voters Oppose Iran Ground Invasion as Trump Weighs Troop Surge ›
- Only 25% of Americans Support Trump Attack on Iran: Poll ›
- Analysis of Major Polls Shows Trump’s War on Iran Is Historically Unpopular ›
‘Damning’ New Evidence Suggests Trump Stole Classified Documents to Advance Business Interests
Original article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
“If the DOJ is so confident in Trump’s conduct, why are they desperate” to hide former special counsel Jack Smith’s report, wondered Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee.
Democrats on the US House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday demanded that President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice “stop the cover-up” of former special counsel Jack Smith’s full investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents following his first term, after new material sent to the panel revealed that some documents were stolen to advance the president’s business interests.
Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi about “cherry-picked documents” related to Smith’s investigations into Trump’s taking of classified documents, which he stored at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey.
RECOMMENDED…
Nearly Every House Republican Votes for Amendment That Would Slash Medicare, Social Security
‘A Revolting Moral Outrage’: Israeli Soldiers Reportedly Torture Gaza Toddler
The DOJ has regularly produced documents for the Judiciary Committee as Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) has sought to portray Smith as having a partisan vendetta against the president, said Raskin. Smith led investigations into Trump’s hoarding of classified documents and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results during the Biden administration. Last month US District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, permanently blocked the release of Smith’s final report on the documents case.
Raskin wrote Wednesday that even as Jordan has embarked on a “vindictive campaign” against Smith and has sought a narrow selection of material from the DOJ, Bondi had “quite amazingly missed the fact that some of the documents you provided include damning evidence about your boss’s conduct and may well violate the gag order your DOJ and Donald Trump demanded from Judge Aileen Cannon.”
Those documents include a January 13, 2023 memorandum from prosecutors who said the FBI had determined Trump retained documents that “would be pertinent to certain business interests.” The documents “established a motive for retaining them” that related to Trump’s businesses.
Trump and his family have garnered condemnation for profiting off the presidency, with the family raking in more than $5 billion in cryptocurrency profits since he took office for a second time, and Trump’s two eldest sons investing in a drone company that is vying for Pentagon contracts as the president wages war on Iran.
The prosecutors’ memo also says the retention of some of the documents represented “an aggravated potential harm to national security,” with one “particularly sensitive document” accessible only by an estimated six people in the US government, including the president, before he took it to his private property.
Additionally, the memo says prosecutors had “identified a classified map that we believe Trump may have shown to individuals on board” his private airplane in June 2022. Susie Wiles, the CEO of Trump’s super political action committee and now the White House chief of staff, “was aboard and witnessed this event. Raskin’s letter includes a flight manifest listing 14 people who were aboard Trump’s private plane when he allegedly showed the classified map, but all of the names were redacted.
Raskin emphasized that without access to the second volume of Smith’s final report, the Judiciary Committee cannot confirm what the classified map shows, the relationship between his business interest and the classified documents, or what the especially sensitive material is.
The congressman noted that some facts are known about Trump’s activities around the time that he allegedly showed the classified map:
We do know that around the time of this flight to Bedminster, President Trump was entering into partnerships with Saudi-backed LIV Golf and state-linked real estate firm Dar al Arkan. A month after this flight, in July 2022, President Trump played golf at Bedminster with Yasir al-Rumayyan, head of the sovereign wealth fund of Saudi Arabia—the same official who plied the Trump family with tens of millions of dollars as the family began to run out of money between terms… We also know that there are reports that Donald Trump, at one point while on the phone with his ghostwriter, “made a reference to having classified records relating to the bombing of Iran.” He also reportedly boasted that it was only the hawks who wanted to attack Iran, not him, and that he had Pentagon war plans “done by the military and given to me” about such a potential attack.
“If this map is related to our military posture in the Middle East, and it was in fact shown to any foreign official, Saudi or otherwise, that would amount to an unforgivable betrayal of our men and women in uniform who are currently valiantly fighting in President Trump’s disastrous war against Iran,” wrote Raskin.
“It is now clear that DOJ is in possession of evidence that President Trump has already endangered national security to further the interests of Trump family businesses,” he wrote. “It is time for you to stop the cover-up and allow the American people to know what secrets he betrayed and how he may have cashed in on them.”
Raskin demanded information from the DOJ regarding who accessed the classified materials, whether any foreign actors were given access, and what the documents contain.
“Every new detail that comes to light about the report Judge Cannon has gone to great lengths to keep hidden underscores the same basic truth: The public is being denied access to critical information about one of the most serious national security scandals in American history,” said Chioma Chukwu, executive director of the government watchdog American Oversight. “While fragments of the factual record have seen the light of day, the full report remains under seal because Judge Cannon has prioritized the president’s personal interests over transparency. The public has a right to see special counsel Smith’s findings in full. Blocking the report’s release only serves to protect those in power and prevent accountability.”
After Raskin’s letter was released, the DOJ took the social media to accuse him and Smith of being “blinded by hatred of President Trump” and pronounce the department “the most transparent in history.”
“This letter is nothing more than a cheap political stunt, almost as if taking cues from members of the corrupt Jack Smith prosecution team,” said the DOJ.
The House Judiciary Committee Democrats retorted that the administration “is doing legal gymnastics to prevent the American people from ever seeing special counsel Jack Smith’s full report on how Trump stole classified documents to advance his corrupt business interests.”
“If the DOJ is so confident in Trump’s conduct, why are they desperate to keep Smith’s report under lock and key?” they asked. “Stop the cover-up, release the evidence, and let the American people decide for ourselves.”
Original article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).
- ‘Utterly Unhinged’: Trump-Appointed Judge Dismisses Classified Docs Case ›
- Trump Tries to Permanently Stop DOJ From Releasing Jack Smith Report on Classified Documents Case ›
- Judge permanently blocks release of Jack Smith’s report on Trump classified documents case – CBS News ›
- Judge blocks release of Jack Smith report on Trump classified documents case ›
Trump prefers peace but ready to ‘unleash hell’ in Iran: White House
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
US President Donald Trump favors a peaceful resolution with Iran but is prepared to escalate sharply if Tehran fails to accept the “reality of the current moment,” the White House said Wednesday, Anadolu reports.
Washington postponed planned strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure after “productive conversations” in the last three days, spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters.
She said if Iran fails to accept that it has “been defeated militarily,” Trump will ensure the country is “hit harder than they have ever been hit before.” She added that the president “does not bluff and he is prepared to unleash hell.”
Leavitt also warned Tehran against “miscalculation,” claiming its last miscalculation had cost Iran its senior leadership, navy, air force and air defense system. Any further violence, she said, would be the result of Iran refusing to accept defeat and come to a deal.
She said the administration does not consider congressional authorization “necessary” for strikes against Iran, and acknowledged no specific timeline exists for the first oil tanker to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, though officials are working to realize it “as quickly as” possible.
Leavitt said the US has destroyed more than 140 Iranian naval vessels, including nearly 50 mine layers, in “the largest elimination of a Navy on the face of the planet in a three-week period since World War II.”
She added that during the weekend, the US dropped several 5,000-pound bombs on an underground facility used to store anti-ship cruise missiles and mobile missile launchers positioned along the Strait of Hormuz coastline.
Trump, Leavitt added, wants to see a Iranian leadership that is “much more favorable” to Washington, willing to cooperate with the US and no longer chanting “Death to America!”
READ: Strait of Hormuz situation ‘will not return to the past,’ Iran says amid escalating Mideast tensions
Talks continue despite Iran’s reported rejection
Asked about Iranian state television reports that Tehran rejected a US 15-point plan to end the war, Leavitt said talks have not broken down. “They have not. Talks continue. They are productive, as the president said on Monday, and they continue to be,” she said.
On the reported plan, Leavitt urged caution, saying she had seen a plan “floated in the media” but that the White House had never confirmed it. “There are elements of truth to it, but some of the stories I read were not entirely factual,” she added.
The US has reportedly sent Iran a 15-point plan, outlining steps on Tehran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, as well as maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran rejected the proposal, saying any ceasefire would occur on its terms and timeline, and outlined five conditions for ending the war, including a complete halt to “aggression and assassinations.”
On possible face-to-face talks, including reports of a potential meeting in Pakistan, Leavitt said nothing should be considered official until formally announced by the White House, cautioning against getting “ahead of our skis” on any talks planned for the weekend.
She also dismissed claims by former counterterrorism director Joe Kent, who alleged the US had shifted its red line from preventing a nuclear weapon to preventing nuclear enrichment to justify the war. She said Kent “resigned in disgrace,” calling his assertions “ridiculous and laughable,” and saying his accusations carry “zero credibility.”
The US and Israel have struck Iran since Feb. 28, killing more than 1,300 people, including then-Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, prompting Iranian retaliatory strikes across the region and a severe disruption to global oil flows.
READ: Hebrew media: Iran sets five conditions to end war with US and Israel
- Gulf countries, Jordan condemn Iranian attacks, affirm right to self-defense
- Trump prefers peace but ready to ‘unleash hell’ in Iran: White House
- Tehran says US, Israel planning to occupy one of Iran’s islands
- Strait of Hormuz situation ‘will not return to the past,’ Iran says amid escalating Mideast tensions
- Israeli parliament rejects bill to label Qatar as ‘enemy state’
- UN chief warns Iran war ‘out of control,’ world staring down barrel of wider conflict
- Al-Sudani deserves political pity
- Israel extends closure of Ben Gurion Airport until April 16 amid regional escalation
- Iran ‘more resilient’ in war with US than anyone expected: ex-British spy chief
- The Relentless War on Iraq
- After months of delay, British Government finally face Hamas in court
- Knesset committee approves bill legalising death penalty for Palestinian convicts
- Trump, Iran and Israel’s War Without End | Palestine This Week with Mouin Rabbani
- Geopolitical, economic and humanitarian implications of the 2026 US–Israel–Iran conflict
- Iran calls for regional “security union” independent of United States, Israel
- Iraqi factions announce carrying out 23 military operations targeting US bases
- Emirati security officer urges Arab Gulf to further strengthen ties with Israel
- Russian UN representative says “no signs” of implementation of Trump’s Gaza plan