Original article by Sian Norris republished from Open Democracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence.

An 11-month investigation reveals culture of violence, criminality and sexual abuse at army training centre for teens

The British Army is the only military in Europe that still recruits 16-year-olds.

That’s how old Hamish* was when he joined last year. As is required of all 16- and 17-year-old sign-ups, who are legally still children but are given the titles of ‘junior soldiers’, he moved into the residential Army Foundation College Harrogate in the north of England to begin his military training.

“In the first couple of weeks, it’s brilliant,” he said of his early days in the army, explaining that most teenage recruits “see it as a brilliant way of earning money”, particularly “if you haven’t really got any GCSEs”.

“But then things start to break down,” he said. Hamish soon witnessed boys being repeatedly punched in the head during fights with their peers or whipped with belts during initiation rituals, as well as other physical violence, including extreme bullying. Junior members of staff, he said, told the teenage recruits they did not need to know about such incidents, even encouraging them to physically “fight it out”.

Hamish is far from alone in his experiences at AFC Harrogate. An exclusive investigation by openDemocracy and the Children Rights International Network (CRIN) has revealed the shocking extent of the bullying, harassment, self-harm, sexual offences and safeguarding failures that teenagers who join the British Army are subject to.

Over the past 11 months, we have submitted dozens of Freedom of Information requests, worked with peers in the House of Lords to ask parliamentary questions, reviewed publicly available documents and data, as well as video footage of instances of violence at AFC Harrogate, and spoken to sources and experts to uncover the reality of life at the college. Our investigation found that between 1 January 2018 and September 2025:

• The Ministry of Defence recorded 474 complaints of physical violence against junior soldiers at AFC Harrogate – an average of 62 a year
• Staff members were the alleged perpetrators in 41 of these incidents
• There were 176 complaints of “sexual allegations”, more than 30 of which were against college staff
• The MoD recorded 214 complaints of bullying at the college
• The college recorded an average of 20 incidents of self-harm every year
• North Yorkshire Police recorded 24 crimes at the college in the first six months of 2025 alone, including five sexual offences

openDemocracy shared the number of allegations of physical violence with a teacher who spent more than a decade working in a mainstream school with a sixth form in England, where the pupils are the same age as those at AFC Harrogate, to ask if this was a normal rate. A school receiving such a high number of complaints in any given year, she said, “would be fucking nuts”.

Teachers from English state schools also told us that the 176 allegations of sexual abuse at AFC Harrogate “seems phenomenally high”. One said that in more than a decade of teaching at a sixth form college, she could only think of one such complaint.

Our findings raise serious concerns about the welfare of teenagers at AFC Harrogate.

Like many other Western militaries, the British Army is finding it increasingly difficult to bring in new recruits. In 2010, the army boasted nearly 110,000 troops; now, it struggles to meet its target of 73,000. The Ministry of Defence plans to spend £18m on attracting new personnel to the army this financial year, twice as much as The Daily Express reported it spent in 2023/24. It is likely that much of this spend will target 16- and 17-year-olds, whom CRIN has previously found make up around third of the army’s annual intake – but our investigation has thrown into doubt the care that the British Army will provide to those who sign up.

The failures we have uncovered at AFC Harrogate are not without tragic real-world consequences. CRIN previously found that more than half the British soldiers who have killed themselves while in active service over the past two decades had signed up to the military before they turned 18, with those who joined aged 16 or 17 more than twice as likely to take their own lives than those who joined as adults.

“These recruits,” CRIN’s Jim Wyke warned, “coming from the most deprived backgrounds, join wanting to serve their country, to better themselves, to build something of themselves – and what do they get? An education that would be illegal anywhere else in the UK. A significant risk of being bullied or physically and sexually abused, including by their instructors. And worst of all, a welfare system that prioritises the reputation of the army above the children under their command.

“The truth is simple: the army is exposing children to abuse, and when confronted with this is refusing to act. This is a scandal. Those who’ve signed up so young deserve better.”

Life at AFC Harrogate

As the UK’s only initial army training unit for child recruits, the Army Foundation College in Harrogate receives all 16- and 17-year-olds who join the British Army each year. On average, this is around 2,370 teenagers annually, according to data obtained through FOI.

Many of these junior soldier recruits have specific vulnerabilities.

The majority come from disadvantaged backgrounds: recruitment to the army is 57% higher in deprived areas than the wealthiest parts of the country. Last year’s AFC Harrogate intake also included 39 registered care leavers – twice as many as you might expect based on the proportion of children in care in the UK – according to a parliamentary question submitted on our behalf by Labour peer Baroness Lister. And 182 junior soldiers had an initial assessment at the MoD’s department of community mental health between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2024, an FOI revealed.

Upon arriving at AFC Harrogate, these teenagers are placed in the care of around 500 members of staff at the college, the vast majority of whom are themselves members of the army who have undertaken a two-week course at the army instructor training school at Pirbright, before receiving on-the-job training.

The new junior soldiers join one of two ‘Phase 1’ courses: a 49-week programme for recruits who intend to join combat roles, and a shorter 23-week course for those who plan to go on to roles such as military engineers, field doctors, or logistics specialists. Both courses, the army website says, teach aspects of military life including fieldcraft, skill at arms, fitness training, qualities of a soldier and battlefield casualty drills.

Trainees also receive some, albeit limited, education from civilian staff. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is not bound to the Education and Skills Act 2008, which requires 16- and 17-year-olds to be in education or training. As such, the college offers short ‘Functional Skills’ courses in English and Maths, which are below the level of GCSEs and do not offer an easy route to further qualifications.

AFC Harrogate’s promotional material often boasts that it has repeatedly been rated ‘outstanding’, the highest grade, by England’s education watchdog, Ofsted. Not mentioned is that the MoD has a bespoke commercial contract with Ofsted, with the government covering the costs of the inspections of AFC and other Initial Army Training Establishments. Under this memoriam of understanding, Ofsted inspects AFC on different criteria than it would a mainstream college.

In a glossy video on the army’s website, teenage recruits at AFC Harrogate extol the benefits of signing up to the military. One talks of the college’s “really good” facilities that include “pool tables and even a cinema, so you can always go down there and watch some films with your friends”. Another says the “wage here is mint”, boasting that “you’re 17 and earning like a grand a month”, and says it’s true that “the army is like a massive family” because she’s made “the strongest friends she’s ever had” in just five months.

But headlines from recent years reveal a darker side to the college.

Last year, former AFC Harrogate instructor Kerry-Anne Knight won her employment tribunal against the MoD over sexist and racist behaviour by her colleagues. And in February this year, an inquest into the suicide of 19-year-old royal artillery gunner Jaysley Beck heard that she had previously been in a relationship with an adult instructor at AFC Harrogate, which she attended from the age of 16 – an abuse of power that the military has since banned. The relationship officially started after she left the college. Another former Army sergeant major last month pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting Beck at Larkhill military base, which she went to after leaving Harrogate and where she took her own life.

Related story

Jaysley Beck is not alone. We’ve found systemic sexual abuse in UK military

27 February 2025 | Ethan Shone , Sian Norris

For over a year, openDemocracy has worked to reveal how military enables abuse then closes ranks around perpetrators

Our investigation proves that these cases were not one-offs. We found widespread incidents of physical violence and bullying among junior soldiers and staff, as well as reports of criminal behaviour and sexual abuse.

Responding to our findings, Harrogate MP Tom Gordon said: “Cultures of harassment, abuse and misogyny have no place in our society, least of all within our Armed Forces. The Armed Forces are already suffering from significant recruitment and retention challenges, and statistics like these only serve to discourage young people from joining. It is crucial that the Armed Forces take direct and decisive action to address these issues.” Gordon also confirmed he has arranged a meeting with AFC Harrogate, saying “I look forward to hearing directly from the College about the steps they are taking.”

Describing our findings as “worrying,” army veteran, campaigner and author Diane Allen told openDemocracy: “The MoD stated recently that their values were laid out clearly in written doctrine. But my response was that ‘paper values’ are useless, unless young recruits see their instructors and the wider leadership demonstrate those values day to day. We hear the MoD press trot out the same, standard message – that the issues in our recruit training establishments are historic and resolved. This investigation shows up the lie.”

Physical and criminal violence

The Ministry of Defence recorded 433 complaints of physical violence between junior soldiers at AFC Harrogate between January 2018 and September 2025, an average of 62 a year. There were a further 41 complaints of staff being violent towards young recruits.

To put this into perspective, openDemocracy asked three randomly chosen mainstream colleges across England that had also been rated ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted how many complaints of violence they received during this same seven-and-a-half-year period. Two had not received any such complaints, while the third college had received just one.

Hamish, who left the British Army last year after six months, has since become a whistleblower over the extreme violence he witnessed and himself suffered at AFC Harrogate. He told CRIN there were “many fights, beatings in the bathrooms” at the college. These include one fight in which he was punched in the face, and another in which he saw a recruit “get scratched on the neck and then kicked in the stomach” by fellow junior soldiers.

These fights were often encouraged by AFC Harrogate’s lower-ranking staff, Hamish said, explaining that rather than attempting to stop physical violence, infantry corporals would encourage junior soldiers who were arguing to put on boxing gloves and fight it out in a ‘sanctioned fight’. Their attitude was “more or less, fuck it, fight it out. I’m not bothered [if you] do it behind closed doors, and I won’t need to know about it,” Hamish said.

openDemocracy has reviewed footage of one sanctioned fight, which Hamish filmed in 2024 and shared with the CRIN. The fight ends with one boy being repeatedly punched in the head after the instructor leaves the room. Hamish also shared a video of an initiation ceremony, known as a “hazing”, in which a boy doing press-ups is repeatedly whipped with a belt by a fellow junior soldier.

These altercations can spill into criminal behaviour. The Royal Military Police opened 105 investigations into physically violent crimes by soldiers at AFC Harrogate between 2018 and 2025, including 58 reports of battery and 22 reports of actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum prison sentence of five years, or seven where an attack was racially or religiously motivated. The outcomes of these investigations are not known.

While a soldier making a complaint against another member of the armed forces would likely be directed by their superiors to the military police in the first instance, any person alleging a soldier has done something that would be a crime in the civilian courts can instead choose to report it to civilian police force. AFC’s local force, North Yorkshire Police, recorded 13 incidents of “violence against the person” – a broad category of crimes that could range from common assault to more serious crimes such as grievous bodily harm – at the barracks in the first six months of 2025.

Bullying is also a serious problem at AFC, with the Ministry of Defence receiving 214 bullying complaints about the college between 2018 and 2025. The data, which was obtained under FOI, does not show whether the complaints relate to peer-on-peer bullying or staff-on-student bullying.

Hamish said that while senior staff would likely take action to stop bullying if they became aware of it, junior staff members’ attitude would again be, “if you’ve got a problem with somebody, fight it out, sort it out.” That approach might be okay for adults, he added, but “it shouldn’t come down like that at AFC.”

David* saw first-hand the impact that bullying at AFC had on his son, John*, who signed up to the British Army in September 2024, when he was 16. John had wanted a fresh start away from a group of friends who were getting into trouble, and David described his son’s first six weeks as “brilliant”, but said things soon took a darker turn.

“One of the corporals – an instructor – had it in for him,” said David. “He was singled out, made to do essays until early morning. It was just him.”

John’s parents turned to social media for advice. They contacted the college and the corporal was moved on from Harrogate, but worse was to come. “When he started phase one of training, the other boys in his room were bullying him,” David said. “He got hit, he got assaulted. When my wife FaceTimed him, he had a mark on his face.”

David and his wife complained to the Officer Commanding, the most senior position at AFC Harrogate – a difficult decision as they were worried it could lead to further bullying. The OC told the pair that it was being dealt with, but ultimately John chose to leave the army.

“My son has totally changed since he came back,” said David. “He’s a totally different boy than when he went away and not in a good way. He’s now got a referral to see a mental health nurse. It’s affected our family as my wife and I have been worried sick.

Bullying can leave recruits suicidal. In 2023, a teenager at AFC Harrogate attempted to take his own life with a gun, after experiencing severe bullying. A whistleblower told The Times that the man’s injuries were so severe he had to be air-lifted to help on a stretcher.

AFC Harrogate recorded 103 incidents of self harm between in the five years to 31 March 2024, an average of 20 a year, according to data that the MoD disclosed to Labour Peer Lord Coaker, the minister of state for defence, following a parliamentary question. openDemocracy and CRIN asked the MOD how many suicide attempts there had been, but was told it does not record this data.

We also asked the Yorkshire Ambulance Service how many call-outs it had received to AFC Harrogate since 2020. The total number was 86, of which 11 were category one, which are deemed to be the most urgent, life-threatening emergencies. Fifty were category two – “not life-threatening but require rapid response” – while the remainder were category three and four, the lowest two tiers of call-outs.

In contrast, three randomly selected Ofsted-rated ‘outstanding’ colleges received a total of 34 ambulance call outs in the same time period.

We put these figures to Rachel De Souza, the Children’s Commissioner for England, whose website says she has a legal duty to promote and protect the rights of children, especially “children who are living away from home”. Her office said it was aware of the issues at AFC Harrogate but did not respond to repeated requests for comment before our publication deadline.

Sexual abuse

The MoD has been dogged by repeated sexual abuse scandals in recent years, and AFC Harrogate is no exception.

In 2023, CRIN revealed that North Yorkshire Police had recorded nine rapes at the college between July 2022 and August 2023, as well as four lesser sexual offences.

Updated data shows the situation has not improved. The force told us it had recorded ten sexual offences at the college in the 18 months to July 2025, including rape of a male aged 16 and over, sexual assault on a female aged 13 and over, and sexual assault on a male aged 13 and over. There were also reports of harassment, stalking and assaults with and without injury. The data does not show how many of each of these assaults were recorded.

These figures do not include cases dealt with by the military justice system, such as a court martial last year, where a junior soldier received a suspended sentence after being found guilty of assault by penetration committed against a 17-year-old colleague who was in the medical wing.

Related story

A war on two fronts: How the British military fails women who report rapes

13 June 2024 | Sian Norris

Exclusive: Pervasive misogyny means 77% of troops accused of rape are found not guilty in military courts

The Royal Military Police recorded 122 sexual crimes against under-18s in uniform from 2021 to 2024. The data does not show how many of the victims and perpetrators were at AFC Harrogate, as some could have been in the equivalent training colleges for the Royal Navy or Royal Air Force.

We submitted multiple FOI requests to the MoD to determine the extent of sexual complaints, abuse and violence at the training barracks. While most were refused, a question asked to Parliament on our behalf by Baroness Lister revealed there were 176 “sexual allegations” at AFC Harrogate between 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2025, of which 32 were made against staff – an average of five a year.

Court martial records also gave some insight into sexual violence committed by staff at AFC. In 2024, instructor Corporal Irwin was found to have had sex with a child while acting in a position of trust, and instructor Corporal Conway was convicted of raping an adult colleague in her room. In January 2023, instructor Corporal Bartram was convicted for the serial sexual exploitation of six female under-18 recruits over ten months from July 2021.

“Sexual trauma can cause setbacks and life-long disadvantages for young people, impacting their emotional, mental, and physical health,” said Mags Godderidge, CEO of Survive North Yorkshire, which supports survivors of sexual violence in the region. “Many survivors face PTSD symptoms and psychological distress, including panic attacks, anxiety, and depression.

“Given the long-term and sometimes lifelong impact, organisations and institutions should be doing all they can to protect children from sexual harm – whether that harm is caused by peers or people in positions of trust.”

A college or a military base?

Despite the clear safeguarding concerns raised in this investigation, Ofsted continues to rate AFC Harrogate as “outstanding” for welfare – including in its 2023/24 report, the inspection for which came three months after the bullied recruit tried to take his own life using a gun and nine months after Cpl Bartram was convicted of sex offences against recruits under his care.

“If you’re an Ofsted inspector, you look at the fact that they have a welfare [officer], they have the chaplain, they have the games room and everything,” said whistleblower and former junior soldier Hamish. “So that ticks boxes. But I think if they went round the college and asked some of the recruits: do you feel that the support that is there? Do you feel like you can go to it? I feel like they would get quite a couple of noes.”

We approached Ofsted for comment but it told us it does not comment on individual units. It referred us to its handbook which states: “The aim of inspection is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of arrangements to provide for the welfare of and care for trainees.” Inspections look at “quality of training and support; professional and personal development of trainees; quality of facilities, infrastructure and resources; and effectiveness of leadership and management.”

An Army spokesperson said that “unacceptable and criminal behaviour has absolutely no place in our Armed Forces”, but stood by the Ofsted report, saying it “highlighted that high standards of care, welfare, and safeguarding are deeply embedded in the Army Foundation College (Harrogate) training programmes”.

They added: “Robust procedures are in place to address any allegations, and we work hard to create an environment where personnel know any report will be met with action. This includes the Violence against Women and Girls Taskforce and our Victim and Witness Care Unit, which provides independent support to victims. The Defence Serious Crime Command assures all serving personnel that any reporting of a serious crime will be investigated independently from their chain of command.”

As well as Ofsted, wellbeing at AFC Harrogate is supported by a body known as the Independent Advisory Panel (IAP), set up in response to the Deepcut scandal in the 1990s, when four young soldiers at the barracks were found dead from gunshot wounds over a seven-year period.

In its terms of reference – obtained by openDemocracy and CRIN through FOI laws – the IAP described itself as “an independent, non-statutory source of advice, challenge, encouragement, and support.” But the document also states that “the IAP has no responsibility for and will not attempt to override the fundamental army principle of self-regulation vested in the Commanding Officer and the higher chain of command” and that it will “observe and record what they see without judgement.”

These terms raise questions over the panel’s effectiveness. As with Ofsted, the IAP has repeatedly failed to sanction AFC Harrogate during periods when our investigation has found distressing levels of sexual, physical and emotional violence within its ranks.

As for David, whose son John was so badly bullied at the college, his views on their failings are clear. “The college did not do enough to protect my son,” he said. “They’re 16-17-year-old boys, they are dumped in a room at night, they are left to their own devices, the corporals are not watching what’s happening. I’ve got twin boys aged 13 and I wouldn’t want them to go to Harrogate at all.”

*Names have been changed

Original article by Sian Norris republished from Open Democracy under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence.  

Open Demoocracy free Daily Email

Get one whole story, direct to your inbox every weekday.

Sign up now