Militant vegetarian Ibizzans Futuro Vegetal attack conspicuous consumption

Spread the love

https://youtu.be/aP_VLbzr9AY

The Ibizzan group Futuro Vegetal attacks the filthy rich’s conspicuous planet-killing consumption.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/yacht-kaos-vandalized-climate-activists/

In a report published in September 2020, the Stockholm Environment Institute estimated that the richest 10% of people, globally, contributed to roughly 50% of worldwide carbon emissions in the years 1995 and 2015 — the timeframe in which the institute conducted its study. By comparison, the poorest 50% were responsible for 7% or 8% of emissions. 

Citing portions of that study in its own report on greenhouse gases and climate change, the International Energy Agency noted that the world’s richest 0.1% contribute more to global carbon emissions each year than the rest of the wealthiest 10% combined, with the richest 1% polluting roughly 1,000 times more than the poorest 1%. Another report by Oxfam last November suggested that just 125 of the world’s wealthiest billionaires emit 3 million tons of carbon dioxide per person, on average, each year, which is about a million times higher than the average annual emissions of the bottom 90%.

Continue ReadingMilitant vegetarian Ibizzans Futuro Vegetal attack conspicuous consumption

Shadowy think tanks are a risk to the UK’s democratic integrity

Spread the love

https://leftfootforward.org/2023/07/shadowy-think-tanks-are-a-risk-to-the-uks-democratic-integrity/

Tom Brake is the Director of Unlock Democracy which campaigns for real democracy in the UK, protected by a written constitution.

The connection between Truss and the IEA goes back a long way: according to Tim Montgomerie, the founder of Conservative Home, the IEA had “incubated” Truss – and her key ally, former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng – when they were junior MPs. With their assumption of high office, Britain was to become a “laboratory” for the IEA’s ideas, he said.

Although Truss’ relationship with the IEA is remarkable for its extreme proximity, politicians being close to particular institutions is nothing new. Politicians often find themselves drawn to particular interests and ideas, and so will gravitate toward institutions that reinforce or augment their thinking.

There is no requirement, either, for think tanks to be transparent about the sources of their funding. In fact, for some, it is impossible to find out who their big donors are. A comparative assessment of the transparency ratings of various think tanks can be viewed here: Unlock Democracy has the highest rating of openness; the IEA, meanwhile, has the lowest rating.

Without being able to follow the money, we cannot hope to understand the interests (commercial or national) that may underpin donations to think tanks, or determine whether those giving money are based in the UK. While it is expected that any foreign funds are most likely to come from rich donors or corporations rather than foreign governments, these donors may still have very close links with a foreign government and seek to shape UK policy in line with the interests of those Governments. Without the data, we just don’t know.

If a think tank advocates for a more relaxed attitude to climate change, the public, the media and Ministers are likely to scrutinise their proposals more carefully if they can see that an oil company is one of its major donors. The same can be said for a think tank that opposes measures to cut smoking when a tobacco manufacturer contributes a significant sum to its budget. Without full transparency of funding – something which the Government has already committed to ensure for the tobacco industry but has not yet delivered – this scrutiny cannot be guaranteed.

https://leftfootforward.org/2023/07/shadowy-think-tanks-are-a-risk-to-the-uks-democratic-integrity/

Continue ReadingShadowy think tanks are a risk to the UK’s democratic integrity

Extinction Rebellion Co-Founder Goes on Trial for Breaking Window

Spread the love
Gail Bradbrook damaging a very expensive window. Image: Extinction Rebellion UK
Gail Bradbrook damaging a very expensive window. Image: Extinction Rebellion UK

Original article by Matthew Green republished from DeSmog

Gail Bradbrook could face a custodial sentence if convicted.

Gail Bradbrook, a co-founder of Extinction Rebellion, went on trial in west London on Monday for breaking a window at the Department of Transport in October, 2019.

Bradbrook has previously pleaded not guilty to a charge of criminal damage for using a hammer and woodworking tool to crack the building’s glass frontage, which the prosecution valued at £27,500.

Bradbrook could face a prison sentence if convicted. Judges can also impose community service and fines.

Extinction Rebellion emerged in 2018, aiming to use civil disobedience to force governments to take rapid action to prevent climate breakdown and ecosystem collapse.

The group has since mobilised protests in the UK and around the world, including in April this year, when it linked up with other environmental and social justice organisations to mobilise tens of thousands of people in central London.

The trial at Isleworth Crown Court is due to conclude on Friday.

Original article by Matthew Green republished from DeSmog

Continue ReadingExtinction Rebellion Co-Founder Goes on Trial for Breaking Window

Campaigners demand stronger tax on private jets as luxury travel in UK soars

Spread the love
Image of a dirty jet passenger aircraft

https://leftfootforward.org/2023/07/campaigners-demand-stronger-tax-on-private-jets-as-luxury-travel-in-uk-soars/

While government refuses to reveal details of Prime Minister’s private jet use at taxpayer expense

Campaigners have announced that private jets ‘are even worse than we thought’ after new research presents their high carbon footprint and low rate of taxation in the UK as post-pandemic luxury travel grows.

One in ten flights from UK airports are now from private jets, research by the climate action campaign group Possible found. Pre-pandemic, 7.5% of flights were private, which peaked at 20% during the pandemic and now sits at 10%.

Emissions from private jets are 30 times higher than normal flights, yet activists have stressed that the taxation is not proportionate. Half of private jet passengers pay the same rate of tax as passengers on standard flights, whilst one in five private jets pay no tax at all.

Possible are calling for a ban on private jets by 2030, with a proper tax system in place until then. The group’s report ‘jetting away with it’ found that, the more polluting an individual’s flight is, the lower the effective rate of tax per tonne of emissions.

https://leftfootforward.org/2023/07/campaigners-demand-stronger-tax-on-private-jets-as-luxury-travel-in-uk-soars/

Continue ReadingCampaigners demand stronger tax on private jets as luxury travel in UK soars