I hate paedos
later 3.10am edit: I’ve been doing some research on Paedos and it looks like it’s the higher cnuts of society – politicians are given awards by fellow politicians, paedo judges are promoted to the highest positions. That’s definitely the impression I get.
3:18 Paedo judges … am I repeating myself?
3.30 OK. Well there is a lot of research ongoing. Research is definitely identifying people & realising what’s happened with previous criminal investigations. Get involved.
UK Paedophilia & Jimmy Savile
A report will be published tomorrow by the Met Police and NSPCC about Jimmy Savile’s paedophilie sexual attacks, rapes of children.
It is three months since the story of Jimmy Savile’s paedophilia broke. Of the very few arrests made since then, most are celebrities. Some are also arrests concerning attacks on adults rather than children.
It should be recognised that Savile is just the tip of the iceberg and that there are attempts to contain and cover-up the extent of abuse. Search engines are certainly blocking certain sites and articles. There is much more than vile Savile outed as a paedo.
There is much research and fine analyses published online. As always it is far better than the corporate media. If you want to be informed, do some research online.
There is published evidence about that class of people that are typically beyond the law: politicians, barristers, policemen, members of a certain fellowship. I think that I know who Jim Davidson was referring to as the next one LoL (and I thought it meant Lord Oh Lord ;)
Evidence posted online suggests far more than the odd politician. Instead it suggests that paedophiles would do very well to pursue a career in politics and have been very close to prime minister after prime minister – even before Slaggy.
It’s a dangerous game. No prime minister would want to be seen to be protecting paedophiles.
I don’t like Mondays
About the spook and an earlier one on 7/7
On Christmas Eve, I claimed to have discovered a nasty spook. A spook is a term for a spy – somebody who presents a fake image for unsavoury purposes, usually to deceive.
I had had a few drinks so I could be mistaken … but it was wierd. We had been talking only briefly when I realised that I recognised him but I was unsure from where. I told him that I recognised him and then I realised from where. He presents himself totally differently elsewhere with totally different clothing and even a different nationality of accent.
As I say, I suppose that I could be mistaken but when you know somebody visually well, you can recognise them. I hadn’t seen this person for four months or so but I do believe that I recognised him and he didn’t deny it.
I know that this is one of spooks’ techniques because I’ve seen it before. At the bus bombing of 7 July, 2005 there is a white haired man with a strong Blackcountry accent giving statements to television reporters. I recognised him as a spook because he was one of UK’s biggest spooks, working for UK defence company Quinetic at the time. I know he’s a spook because we followed the same course at University.
It was a fake accent but he was exactly where one of UK’s highest spooks would be expected on 7 July, 2005. Spooks must practice the accents. His surname was correct while his first name was not. I’ve published his name elsewhere.
later edit: You may as well have the name. The name is Bryan/Brian Jones.
29/12/12: To be entirely correct: I am aware that he worked for Quinetic 1999-2000.