Nicola Sturgeon says lack of contact from Liz Truss ‘absurd’

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-63175102 Scotland's first minister has said she has still not had a phone call with Liz Truss more than a month after she became prime minister.Nicola Sturgeon told the BBC it was "absurd" and "unprecedented" that she had yet to hear from the new PM....She added: "I don't know whether that is arrogance, lack of respect or insecurity or whatever it is. It's not the right way to do government in a grown up way."So I hope we will see a change. I'll do my best to work with Liz Truss as constructively as possible or whoever comes after because we can't take anything for granted in UK politics these days."...

Continue ReadingNicola Sturgeon says lack of contact from Liz Truss ‘absurd’

Memo to the UK Conservative Party

SUBJECT: Your new leader HTF did she do PPE? HTF did she present a budget without consulting her cabinet over it? She's in the grip of the IEA and other insane Tufton Street think-tanks. You're on course for a serious clash. We need climate action immediately, we need no new oil and gas now. We don't have time to feck about, the World is burning. We can't tolerate you having a bonkers, insane totally divorced from reality leader who has the infantile approach that things will happen simply by wishing them to be true. Put reins on her.

Continue ReadingMemo to the UK Conservative Party

Liz Truss pursues bonkers economic theory

Liz Truss has replaced Boris Johnson as prime minister of UK. The first obvious step intended to show the direction the new government intends was a budget presented by new Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng on Friday. Kwarteng fired the Treasury's permanent secretary in the preperation of this budget. There is a cost of living crisis in UK driven by runaway inflation and massive increases in energy bills. Despite this, Truss and Kwarteng's budget benefitted the already stinking rich. The top rate of income tax of 45% for the highest earners was abolished so that the highest rate is now 40%. Clearly that's going to benefit the rich and the very rich most. Despite denials, this is trickle-down economics with the idea being that the economy will be stimulated by the highest earners and that benefits will trickle-down to all. There is a simple, logical argument against trickle-down economics. It is that the rich already have money that they can spend to stimulate the economy and they're not doing it, if they're already not spending their wealth, why should they now start? There is also an alternative, logical argument that to stimulate the economy it's best to instead help the poor. The argument is that the poor are desperate and that any money they receive to alleviate their wreched situations will be spent and therefore stimulate the economy. It appears that Liz Truss and her Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng are pursuing outdated, discredited and abandoned economic theories which are the exact opposite to what is needed. Markets responded poorly to the budget. https://youtu.be/dSCqqWhx044

Continue ReadingLiz Truss pursues bonkers economic theory

What nationalising energy companies would cost – and how to do it

UK could bring National Grid and retailers in-house and build public renewable energy, says ex-Labour policy chief Andrew Fisher 17 August 2022, 12.01am Image of banknotes and a prepayment meter key by Lydia, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Republished from OpenDemocracy under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence. When 62% of Conservative voters want energy run in the public sector, it’s fair to say the left has won the argument (75% of Labour voters agree, 68% of Lib Dems). Yet public ownership is opposed passionately by the Conservative government, while the leader of the opposition has said he is “not in favour” of it – despite his election on a platform that committed to “bring rail, mail, water and energy into public ownership to end the great privatisation rip-off and save you money on your fares and bills”. Public ownership is on the media’s radar, too. When Labour leader Keir Starmer announced his policy to freeze bills this week, he was asked why he wouldn’t also nationalise energy, replying that: “In a national emergency where people are struggling to pay their bills ... the right choice is for every single penny to go to reducing those bills.” But so long as energy remains privatised, every single penny won’t. Billions of pennies will keep going to shareholders instead. The energy market was fractured under the mass privatisations of the Thatcher governments in the 1980s. It contains three sectors: producers or suppliers (those that produce energy), retailers (those that sell you energy), and distribution or transmission (the infrastructure that transports energy to your home). It is important to bear this in mind when we’re talking about taking energy into public ownership. We need to be clear about what we want in public ownership and why. By 2019, Labour had a detailed plan on how to do this – worked up by the teams around then shadow business and energy secretary Rebecca Long Bailey and then shadow chancellor John McDonnell. The plan is not the only way, but it illustrates what exists and how one could go about re-establishing a public energy ecosystem, run for people not profit. The recent TUC report shows the cost of nationalising the ‘Big 5’ energy retailers – British Gas, E.ON, EDF, Scottish Power and Ovo – to be £2.8bn, which would go on buying all the companies’ shares. That’s a lot of money, equivalent to more than the annual budget of the Sure Start programme in 2009/10 (its peak year). But it’s a one-off cost, not an annual one. And it’s not like the current privatised system doesn’t have its costs: since June 2021, the UK government has spent £2.7bn bailing out 28 energy companies that collapsed because they put short-term profits ahead of long-term stability – companies like Bulb Energy. We have spent billions of pounds already to get nothing in return. So £2.8bn is not a large amount of money to pay to gain these assets, rather than just bailing them out. The big energy retail companies made £23bn in dividends between 2010 and 2020 according to Common Wealth,…

Continue ReadingWhat nationalising energy companies would cost – and how to do it