


Britain quietly approves $11.85m arms licence to Israel despite Gaza ban
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The UK Department for Business and Trade (DBT) has granted two new licences for the export of military equipment to Israel, including an £8.7 ($11.85) million licence covering “components and technology for targeting equipment”, the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) has revealed.
The licences were issued despite the British government’s September 2024 suspension of such exports over fears they would be used in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. CAAT’s analysis of UK export licensing statistics for the fourth quarter of 2025, published on 30 April, found that the UK issued export licences worth £20.5 ($27.9) million in total for transfers to Israel during the quarter.
The most significant of the new approvals was an Open Individual Export Licence for “components and technology for targeting equipment” — a category of export the UK government had publicly suspended eight months earlier, citing the risk of use in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. When questioned about the licence, DBT replied that it “covers items for re-export from Israel, and the Government of Israel is not an end-user or ultimate end-user. This is consistent with our suspension”.
CAAT said the defence rested on a legal fiction. The watchdog warned of the risk of “auto-diversion”: a process by which Israel can fail to retransfer military equipment to its declared destination and instead assign it to an unauthorised end-user, such as the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), for use in Gaza.
Such a move would constitute a breach of the export licence and a potential criminal offence under UK law. British ministers have previously said they would revoke any licence should “any evidence” emerge that exported equipment had not reached its declared destination, but CAAT noted that the UK government makes no known efforts to verify what happens to its military exports after they leave Britain.
The watchdog’s concerns are not theoretical. In March, an investigation revealed that an Elbit-owned subsidiary in the UK had shipped dozens of drone components, including Watchkeeper engines, to Israel over an 18-month period.
READ: UK Labour approved more weapons to Israel in three months than Tories did in four years
Israel had failed to retransfer the equipment to Romania as required by the licence, citing force majeure arising from its assault on Gaza. The contract with Romania has still not been fulfilled. Elbit announced it would start delivering the drones only two days after Romania threatened to cancel the contract.
A second new licence covers components for military training aircraft, and related technology, for transfer to France, Greece, Israel and Italy — likely supplied by the US aerospace firm Moog for the M-346 Lead-In Fighter Trainer produced by Italy’s Leonardo.
The M-346 is used in every phase of advanced and pre-operational training for Israeli pilots before they fly combat missions in Gaza, Iran and Lebanon using F-16 and F-35 jets. Israel has caused massive devastation with F-35 jets across Gaza, Iran and Lebanon. Similar components shipped by Moog from the UK were recently seized by authorities in Belgium, who have since opened a criminal investigation.
CAAT’s Research Coordinator Sam Perlo-Freeman said the new licences exposed the limits of the British government’s stated policy.
“These new export licenses show just how willing the UK is to continue enabling Israel’s genocidal assaults, while staying within the technical rule of a vastly insufficient and ineffective policy towards IDF war crimes,” he said.
“The targeting equipment for which DBT granted a license, for transfer to and re-export by Israel, could easily be used in Gaza. Given Israel’s history of weapons diversion and illicit transfers, and outstanding questions about Elbit drone components failing to arrive in Romania, there remains a grave risk that Israel will auto-divert the targeting equipment to the IDF for use in Palestine.”
Perlo-Freeman explained that the British government was leaning on a system of declarations it has no power to enforce. “DBT is relying on end-user undertakings that hold no legal force in Israel, which the UK government does not check up on and cannot enforce. The exporter is technically in-the-clear, so long as it can’t be shown they knew the end-user undertaking was false.”
READ: ‘Cowardly’ UK court ruling permits F-35 arms exports to Israel despite genocide in Gaza

- UN experts demand release of Gaza aid flotilla activists detained by Israel
- 25 women killed, 109 injured in Lebanon since April 17 ceasefire, UN Women says
- Hamas’ al-Hayya says Israel using force to impose terms after son killed in strike
- China’s Legal Shield Against U.S. Sanctions on Iranian Oil
- US says it is blocking more than 70 tankers from Iranian ports
- Britain quietly approves $11.85m arms licence to Israel despite Gaza ban
- Iran says still reviewing US proposal to end war
- Lebanon committed to full ceasefire before talks with Israel: President
- US secretary of state says Washington expects response from Iran today on negotiations
- Turkiye becomes UAE’s 5th largest non-oil trading partner, Emirati trade minister says
- Understanding the EU Blocking Statute: Spain’s legal strategy to shield the ICC from US sanctions
- Israeli fundraising platform ‘rebranding as American’ to dodge boycotts over genocide
- Emergency declared at Libya’s Zawiya refinery amid clashes near facility
- Lebanon says farmland area roughly size of Chicago destroyed in Israeli offensive
- US opts for ‘reckless military adventure’ over diplomacy: Iran’s top diplomat
- ‘It’s all just bullsh*t!’: Kamala Harris takes aim at Trump over Iran war
- Israeli occupiers torch Palestinian vehicle, spray racist graffiti near northeast Ramallah
- UAE Gulf Marine Services profit falls 24% after Gulf war disrupts vessel operations
- The prospect of peace remains murky
- Man pleads guilty to assaulting US Representative Ilhan Omar
- Palestine marathon kicks off after 2-year pause due to Gaza war
- Epic nonsense: Trump shelves Project Freedom
- Egyptian fighter jets stationed in UAE, WAM reports
- Germany’s moral reckoning in Lebanon
- Committee to Protect Journalists calls on Washington to reopen probe into Shireen Abu Akleh killing
- Iran’s Revolutionary Guard says it attacked US destroyers with missiles, drones
- Meshaal: Gaza to remain at forefront of resilience following historic sacrifices
- Iran accuses US of violating ceasefire by attacking tanker in Strait of Hormuz
- Saudi source denies report Riyadh blocked US Strait of Hormuz operation
- Jerusalem governorate warns over Israeli plan for settlement centre at Qalandiya airport
- Hamas urges US to stop Israeli attacks on Gaza following deadly strikes
- RSF commander affirms readiness to fight Sudanese army for decades
- Khamenei adviser says Iran has ended policy of “strategic patience”
- Families’ committee accuses Palestinian Authority forces of torture in al-Junaid prison
- Lebanon-Israel talks to resume in Washington next week: State Department
- Saudi Arabia, Kuwait lift restrictions on US military access to bases, airspace: Report
- UN warns foot, mouth disease increasing in occupied West Bank amid Israeli restrictions
- Poland voices outrage over Israeli soldier’s ‘disrespect’ of Virgin Mary statue
- Iran urges UN members not to support ‘provocative’ US draft resolution on Hormuz
- German finance minister says Trump’s ‘irresponsible war’ on Iran is hurting economy
- Iran says no final decision yet on US proposal conveyed through Pakistan
- Hotel bookings in Israel’s Eilat canceled to accommodate US troops: Reports
- Several Palestinian students suffer suffocation in Israeli military raid in occupied West Bank
- Israel to build Jewish heritage center at abandoned Palestinian airport in occupied East Jerusalem: Report
- EU lawmakers urge bloc to pressure Israel for media access to Gaza
- French lawmakers slam Eurovision over Israel’s participation
- Egypt’s president visits UAE to show support after Iranian attacks
- Israeli occupiers storm Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque amid tensions
- Iranian president urges unity, warns against attempts to weaken national cohesion
- Hamas leader’s son dies of injuries from Israeli strike in Gaza
‘Zionism above all’: Telegraph takeover sparks fears over Israel loyalty test
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Support for Israel is set to become a virtual purity test for Telegraph journalists after the newspaper’s takeover by German media giant Axel Springer, whose chief executive, Mathias Döpfner, has reportedly described his political credo as “Zionism above all”.
The acquisition, cleared by UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, puts one of Britain’s most influential newspapers under the control of a company that formally lists support for Israel as one of its core institutional values.
According to details published by Owen Jones, Döpfner wrote to Telegraph staff to say they would operate within Axel Springer’s “Essentials”, a set of principles that the company presents as its editorial compass.
Among them is a commitment to support “the right of existence of the State of Israel” and to oppose “all forms of antisemitism”, placing Israel second only to freedom, free speech, the rule of law and democracy in the company’s hierarchy of values.
The singling out of Israel for special protection out of 193 UN member states has raised concern. Israel alone is explicitly granted this level of institutional protection in Axel Springer’s declared values, raising immediate questions about how far editorial independence can really extend under the new ownership.
READ: MEMO Monitoring: Exposing the German media’s pro-Israel bias
Axel Springer insists its “Essentials” create the conditions for “maximum journalistic freedom and intellectual independence”, but critics argue that requiring adherence to a fixed political position on a specific foreign state undermines any claim to neutrality.
Döpfner’s outspoken support for Israel is also likely to deepen concern about whether the Telegraph can cover Palestine fairly under its new owners. The Guardian reported that leaked messages attributed to him using the phrase “Zionism above all”.
Döpfner’s public remarks have also repeatedly blurred the line between support for Palestinians and support for Hamas. In an internal Axel Springer transcript published by the company, he described more than four million social media posts under “Free Palestine” and similar hashtags as “pro-Hamas topics”.
That framing is likely to deepen concern among journalists and readers alike about how criticism of Israel may be treated at the Telegraph under its new owners.
A Telegraph journalist told Owen Jones that being informed by the incoming owner’s chief executive that support for Israel was effectively a core principle was “more than a little concerning”, adding that it raised questions about “how any reporting from the paper can be considered factual if that is our core principle”.
READ: Anti-Palestinianism is the modern day McCarthyism
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


- How the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is reshaping global energy flows
- Is the Strait of Hormuz the key to resolving the crisis?
- Senate Democrats vote to block arms for Israel as base turns pro-Palestine
- Progress without justice: why Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi’s killing is unlikely to reach a courtroom
- Iran has ‘high’ incentive to maintain ceasefire, US forces remain ‘postured’: US defense chief
- Saudi Arabia extends $8B support to Pakistan amid UAE debt repayment
- France bars Palestinian rights group Al-Haq director from entry
- The “Third Gulf War” and the collapse of the oil-for-security bargain
- ‘Zionism above all’: Telegraph takeover sparks fears over Israel loyalty test
- When hegemony reaches its limits
- Iran supreme leader’s adviser threatens to sink US ships in Strait of Hormuz
- Bint Jbeil ablaze as close-range battles turn city into open military test ground
- The naval blockade of Iran and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz: Long-term implications for global energy security
- Individuals and organisations from 30 countries, including the UK-based Islamic Human Rights Commission, have put their name to a blistering open letter condemning the US/Israeli war on Iran
- Beyond rhetoric, is there political will to move away from the two-state paradigm?
- 378 crimes in 40 days: Surge in West Bank settler attacks occurring under government cover
- Widespread popular activities in support of prisoners in the occupation prisons on Palestinian Prisoner’s Day
- 26 million Iranians volunteer to defend country, including public figures
- Former European officials urge suspension of EU-Israel agreement
- White House signals military option remains on table against Iran
- Hope in the data: Can Palestine explain America’s moral shift?
- Hamas rejects US claims on Gaza aid as “misleading”
- Egypt-Cyprus gas deal signals strategic shift in regional energy balance
- Hezbollah bloc chief rejects Lebanon direct talks with Israel
- Jordan welcomes UNESCO decision on Jerusalem, rejects Israeli measures
- Arab League outlines five principles to resolve Sudan crisis
- Iran and US deny reports of preliminary ceasefire extension agreement
- Celebrating division as a success in Libya
- White House says next round of talks with Iran ‘very likely’ in Islamabad
- Strait of Hormuz should not be used as political, economic pressure tool: Gulf Cooperation Council chief
- China’s Xi assured Trump of no weapons support to Iran: White House
- Israel appoints 1st ambassador to Somalia’s breakaway region in controversial move
- Senate minority leader pushes 4th war powers vote as Iran war enters day 47
- China urges stable transit and respect for Iran’s rights in Strait of Hormuz
- Pakistan army chief in Tehran for talks with Iranian foreign minister ahead of expected fresh US talks
- Israel’s New Gospel of Perpetual War | Palestine This Week with Mouin Rabbani
- UN chief calls Sudan conflict world’s ‘largest humanitarian crisis’ 3 years on
- Israel launches operation to demolish homes in frontline villages in Lebanon: Report
- 8 more Gazans killed by Israeli fire despite ceasefire, death toll nears 72,350
- Washington yet to formally agree to Iran ceasefire extension: US official
- Most Italians view Trump’s handling of Iran war negatively
- US to deploy thousands more troops to Middle East to pressure Iran: Report
- Iran threatens to block exports, imports in Gulf if US blockade continues
- Europe promotes plan to reopen Strait of Hormuz without US: report
- Marwan Barghouti subjected to “brutal” assaults in Israeli jail
- European petition exceeds one million signatures to suspend EU-Israel agreement
- Israel arrested 1,700 Palestinian children in West Bank since October, 2023, rights group says
- Afghanistan delivers 530 tons of aid to Gaza
- Pakistani premier departs for Saudi Arabia on regional tour to discuss Middle East situation
- Iran interior minister dismisses impact of blockade threats

Leftist Journalist Owen Jones Vindicated in Libel Case Over BBC’s Biased Coverage of Gaza Genocide
Original article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

The BBC has long been accused of centering Israel and dismissing the humanity of Palestinians in its coverage of Gaza.
British journalist Owen Jones on Thursday celebrated a UK High Court judge’s ruling in his favor in a libel lawsuit that a BBC editor brought against him—and said that should the editor choose to move forward with his case despite the decision, he was looking forward “to defending my article in court.”
The High Court ruled that Jones was expressing an opinion when he wrote an article for Drop Site News in December 2024 titled “The BBC’s Civil War Over Gaza,” in which he spoke to BBC staffers about Middle East online editor Raffi Berg’s influence over the news outlet’s coverage of Israel and Palestine.
RECOMMENDED…

‘Disgraceful Act of Complicity’: Indian Left Denounces Modi’s Israel Visit

‘Now Drop All the Charges!’ High Court Rules Palestine Action Was Illegally Banned by UK Government
The court also said Jones had expressed his opinion and that of his sources based on concrete examples of Berg’s editorial role and journalism.
Jones’ article described staffers’ allegations that “internal complaints about how the BBC covers Gaza have been repeatedly brushed aside” as Berg “sets the tone” for the outlet’s online coverage of Israel’s onslaught in the exclave, where more than 75,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023 in what’s been called a genocide by top Holocaust scholars and human rights groups.
It noted that the BBC failed to report on Amnesty International’s finding that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza and displayed an on-screen chyron reading, “Israel rejects ‘fabricated’ claims of genocide.’”
“Journalists expressed concerns over bias in the shaping of the Middle East index of the BBC news website,” wrote Jones. “Several allege that Berg ‘micromanages’ this section, ensuring that it fails to uphold impartiality.”
The BBC has long been criticized for centering Israel and “dehumanizing” Palestinians, as more than 1,000 artists said in a letter last year when they condemned the network for refusing to air a documentary about the impact of Israel’s attacks on children in Gaza, on the grounds that it featured the child of the exclave’s deputy minister of agriculture—suggesting “that Palestinians holding administrative roles are inherently complicit in violence.”
The article also pointed to Berg’s own history of pro-Israel coverage, including a 2002 story “that presented young [Israel Defense Forces] soldiers as courageous defenders of their country while failing to mention the occupation and settlement of Palestinian land or the widespread allegations of crimes” documented by human rights groups and the US government.
Berg also presented Israeli settlers in the West Bank as “victims seeking ‘a better quality of life’ and did not mention the fact that the settlements have been repeatedly deemed illegal,” and wrote about the Mossad “in glowing terms” in a book he wrote with extensive cooperation from the Israeli intelligence agency.
He also posted a photo on social media showing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a copy of Berg’s book on his bookshelf, Jones reported.
Berg’s lawyer said last year that Jones’ reporting attacked Berg’s “professional reputation as a journalist and editor,” and led to death threats.
In order for his case against Jones to proceed, Berg would now need to prove in court that “Jones did not genuinely hold the opinion he expressed in his reporting, or demonstrate that the opinion is not one an honest person could hold on the basis of any fact that existed at the time of its publication,” Middle East Eye reported.
“I am proud to stand by my journalism,” said Jones Thursday.
Original article by Julia Conley republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).


