Strong Support Among Europeans for Banning Fossil Fuel Ads, Study Finds

Spread the love

Original article by TJ Jordan published by DeSmog.

An advertisement for U.S. oil major ExxonMobil in the Netherlands. Credit: Reclame Fossielvrij

Survey data shows almost double the number of people would back restrictions than those who oppose them.

Almost half of people surveyed across the European Union are in favour of banning fossil fuel advertising — nearly twice as many who oppose such a move, according to a new study.

Climate campaigners are urging governments to impose tobacco-style restrictions on advertising for oil and gas companies and high-carbon goods and services such as flights, cruises and SUVs.

Authors of the study, published in Nature Climate Change, said their findings suggested that laws modelled on a first-of-its kind fossil fuel ad ban introduced in The Hague in the Netherlands in January could be popular elsewhere in Europe.

“A fossil ad ban sends out a powerful message, showing that fossil-fuel products and services should not be promoted,” said study co-author Thijs Bouman of the University of Groningen. “It compels others to implement similar measures, which ultimately lead to carbon emission reductions.”

The study was based on responses from more than 19,000 citizens in 13 EU countries — with 46.6 percent of respondents in favour of a ban, and 24.9 percent opposed.

Support for a ban was highest in Greece, France, Spain, and Italy, running at between 56 and 59 percent of respondents. The highest level of opposition (32 percent) was in the Czech Republic, but this was still lower than the level of support in the country (34 percent).

The law passed in The Hague prevents advertising for fossil energy contracts, petrol, diesel, aviation, cruise ships, and non-electric cars in publicly accessible places.

Robert Barker, deputy mayor of The Hague and a key supporter of the fossil fuel ad ban in the city, said the study showed that more municipalities should follow suit.

“Allowing fossil fuel ads while at the same time trying to reduce CO2 emissions is counterproductive,” said Barker. “Advertising normalises behaviour we need to discourage, like frequent flying or reliance on fossil fuels.”

A growing number of city councils around the world have pledged to ban fossil fuel advertising in public spaces owned or managed by the local government, including Scotland’s capital city Edinburgh. However, The Hague’s new rules go further by also banning fossil ads from privately owned ad spaces.

In London, Mayor Sadiq Khan has faced calls from politicians to address concerns about fossil fuel advertising after a DeSmog investigation found that more than 200 advertising campaigns by oil and gas producers had been placed on the city’s public transport network since his pledge to make London “carbon zero” by 2030.

Complaints Upheld

The advertising industry defends its work for polluters by arguing that ad agencies can help their clients move towards more sustainable products and services.

Legal and regulatory complaints brought against polluting companies for deceptive advertising practices have spiked in recent years, however. Companies including oil major Shell and car manufacturer Toyota have had to withdraw ads after rulings by UK regulator the Advertising Standards Authority, while a Dutch court ruled that airline KLM had broken national advertising laws for making unsubstantiated claims about “sustainable” flying.

U.S. congressional investigators concluded in a report published last year that some of the world’s biggest oil companies, including Shell, BP, and ExxonMobil, had for decades used advertising and public relations to present themselves as good faith actors in the fight against the climate crisis. At the same time, the report found, these companies had been actively lobbying against climate action and regulation and were promoting climate solutions they knew were not genuinely green or feasible.

“Given the denial, delay, greenwashing and other deceptions in fossil fuel ads, it’s no surprise Europeans want an end to the fossil fuel advertisements — no one likes being lied to,” said Philip Newell, communications co-chair of the Climate Action Against Disinformation coalition.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres has urged governments to ban fossil fuel ads and called upon advertising and PR agencies to “stop acting as enablers to planetary destruction” by working with fossil fuel clients.

In February, campaigners filed a complaint with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), arguing that UK-based WPP — one of the world’s largest communications companies by revenue — had violated the OECD’s corporate guidelines on climate and human rights through its work for major polluters.

WPP responded by saying that it “adhere[s] to the highest regulatory standards in [its] work for clients” and that advertising was crucial to economic growth.

To visit DeSmog’s database profiling dozens of advertising and PR companies with ties to the fossil fuel industry, click here.

Original article by TJ Jordan published by DeSmog.

Orcas comment on killer apes destroying the planet by continuing to burn fossil fuels.
Orcas comment on killer apes destroying the planet by continuing to burn fossil fuels.

Continue ReadingStrong Support Among Europeans for Banning Fossil Fuel Ads, Study Finds

A Third of the Arctic’s Landmass is Now a Source of Carbon: Study

Spread the love

Original article by Eloise Goldsmith republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

The study was published as President Donald Trump was blasted for an executive order that one critic said shows he wants to turn the Alaskan Arctic into the “the world’s largest gas station.”

For thousands of years, the land areas of the Arctic have served as a “carbon sink,” storing potential carbon emissions in the permafrost. But according to a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change Tuesday, more than 34% of the Arctic is now a source of carbon to the atmosphere, as permafrost melts and the Arctic becomes greener.

“When emissions from fire were added, the percentage grew to 40%,” according to the Woodwell Climate Research Center, which led the international team that conducted the research.

The study, which was first reported on by The Guardian, was released the day after President Donald Trump issued multiple presidential actions influencing the United States’ ability to confront the climate crisis, which is primarily caused by fossil fuel emissions, including one directly impacting resource extraction in Alaska, a section of which is within the Arctic Circle.

Sue Natali, one of the researchers who worked on the study published in Nature Climate Change, told NPR in December (in reference to similar research) that the Arctic’s warming “is not an issue of what party you support.”

“This is something that impacts everyone,” she said.

As the permafrost—ground that remains frozen for two or more years—holds less carbon, it releases CO2 into the atmosphere that could “considerably exacerbate climate change,” according to the study.

“There is a load of carbon in the Arctic soils. It’s close to half of the Earth’s soil carbon pool. That’s much more than there is in the atmosphere. There’s a huge potential reservoir that should ideally stay in the ground,” said Anna Virkkala, the lead author of the study, in an interview with The Guardian.

The dire warning was released on the heels of Trump’s executive order titled “Unleashing the Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential” that calls for expedited “permitting and leasing of energy and natural resource projects in Alaska,” as well as for the prioritization of “development of Alaska’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) potential, including the sale and transportation of Alaskan LNG to other regions of the United States and allied nations within the Pacific region.”

The order also rolls back a number of Biden-era restrictions on drilling and extraction in Alaska, which included protecting areas within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from oil and gas leasing.

“Alaska is warming four times faster than the rest of the planet, a trend that is wreaking havoc on communities, ecosystems, fish, wildlife, and ways of life that depend on healthy lands and waters,” said Carole Holley, managing attorney for the Alaska Office of the environmental group Earthjustice, in a statement Monday.

“Earthjustice and its clients will not stand idly by while Trump once again forces a harmful industry-driven agenda on our state for political gain and the benefit of a wealthy few,” she added.

Trump wants to turn the Alaskan Arctic into the “the world’s largest gas station,” said Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program, in a statement Monday. “Make no mistake, Trump’s rushed and sloppy actions today are an existential threat to these lands and waters, and the communities and wildlife that depend on them.”

Original article by Eloise Goldsmith republished from Common Dreams under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0).

Orcas comment on killer apes destroying the planet by continuing to burn fossil fuels.
Orcas comment on killer apes destroying the planet by continuing to burn fossil fuels.
Continue ReadingA Third of the Arctic’s Landmass is Now a Source of Carbon: Study