Money is stacked on top of an energy bill, February 3, 2025
ENERGY companies are still relying on closed magistrates’ court hearings to secure warrants against households with unpaid bills, more than three years after the pre-payment meter scandal.
Magistrates are still sitting in private to authorise forced entry, often approving hundreds of warrants at a time based on applications they have never personally reviewed, an investigation by the Standard newspaper revealed yesterday.
It was revealed in 2022 that magistrates’ courts across Britain were effectively rubber-stamping mass batches of warrants for debt agencies, acting on behalf of energy firms.
Many of those targeted were among the poorest households, already hit by the cost-of-living crisis, with agents breaking into homes to install expensive pre-payment meters.
…
A new court process for approving warrants was introduced in April 2024 following approval by Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring.
The revised system was intended to introduce safeguards, including a requirement for energy firms to give at least 10 days’ notice of an application, to attempt contact with a household at least 10 times and to wait at least a month after a missed bill before applying for a warrant.
But a year-long probe found that magistrates are now carrying out the work almost entirely in secret, sometimes from home.
Failures by debt agencies to comply with legal requirements were also found to be routinely brushed aside.
End Fuel Poverty Coalition co-ordinator Simon Francis said the findings exposed “a deeply troubling practice where people struggling with unaffordable energy bills are condemned through the courts out of sight and without a voice.”
He said: “It’s time to stop criminalising energy debt and allowing these cases to be pursued through a court system which is clearly unfit for the purpose.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Overview of the courtroom at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, Netherlands on 22 April, 2024 [Selman Aksünger/Anadolu Agency]
The international court of justice (ICJ) announced on Tuesday that Belgium has joined the legal case brought by South Africa against Israel, accusing it of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip.
Several countries had already joined the case before Belgium, including Brazil, Ireland, Bolivia, Colombia, Libya, Spain and Mexico, at the United Nations’ highest court.
In a ruling issued in January 2024, around four months after the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, the court called on Israel to refrain from any acts that could fall under genocide. The court warned of a “real and imminent risk” of “irreparable harm” to Palestinians.
The ICJ also issued provisional measures ordering Israel to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, prevent incitement to genocide and punish those responsible. Israel has so far failed to comply with these orders.
Meanwhile, Palestinian resistance factions in Gaza say they are continuing efforts to complete the first phase of the ceasefire agreement, which began on 10 October this year, by searching for the body of the last Israeli soldier in their possession. At the same time, Israel is accused of continuing to violate the agreement and failing to implement its terms, especially those related to the first phase.
Since the ceasefire took effect on 10 October, Israel has killed at least 406 Palestinians and injured 1,118 others in Gaza, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health in the territory.
The ministry added that, since the outbreak of the war on 7 October 2023, the death toll has reached at least 70,942 Palestinians, with 171,195 others wounded.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
US President Donald Trump greets the crowd at a Make America Great Again event at Gastonia Municipal Airport on October 21, 2020 in Gastonia, North Carolina, United States. [Peter Zay – Anadolu Agency]
The MAGA empire has turned inward. Its warriors no longer march shoulder to shoulder in lockstep but carve at one another like rival warlords. The movement that once roared in unison now splits along a single, explosive fault line: America First versus Israel First. Two convictions, two armies now face each other inside the same ideological fortress, each convinced it alone holds the mandate of destiny. On one side stands Steve Bannon — raw, furious, unapologetically nationalist. On the other stands Ben Shapiro — polished, venomous, the cultural enforcer of unyielding loyalty to Israel. The alliance that once dominated the American right is devouring itself at an increasing pace. What was once unfathomable is now undeniable: the eighty-year consensus that Israel dictates the boundaries of conservative politics is cracking apart, and the reverberating tremor is shaking the very columns of American power.
The explosion happened in public, not whispered in back rooms or podcasts, but detonated onstage at the first Turning Point USA conference after Charlie Kirk’s assassination. It should have been a sombre moment of unity. Instead, the air stiffened with accusations. Ben Shapiro, self-appointed guardian of ideological purity, initiated his scorched-earth tirade. Unabashedly, he fired the first salvo. He spat contempt at Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Steve Bannon himself. He called them “charlatans” and accused them of extremism. But beneath the theatrics lay the real crime he could not forgive; they dared even entertain the suggestion that American loyalty to Israel is not beyond question. The Israel First Rubicon had been crossed. And Shapiro — furious, brittle, panicked — declared ideological jihad.
Bannon’s deafening reply was not a rebuttal. It was a devastating indictment. He took the same stage and drove a sharp spike through the heart of the illusion that the American right still bows obediently and wholeheartedly before Israeli dictates. Shapiro, he roared, was “a cancer spreading through the body” of conservative politics — not simply wrong, but dangerous, parasitic, devouring the movement from within. This was not an improvised cable-show rhetoric. This was a declaration of civil war inside the American right. And Bannon knew precisely what he was doing and why. The skirmish is not about conference insults. It is about the 2028 presidential election, about power, about whether American nationalism means sovereignty… or subservience.
The televised public fracture now bleeds into the rank and file. MAGA supporters are forced to choose: Is America sovereign, or is Israel sacred? For decades, that question, among the most critical questions of our time, was forbidden. To ask it was political suicide. To answer it honestly was exile. But history has a cruel habit of forcing buried truths to the surface. And Charlie Kirk — before his death — had already begun whispering those questions. The ghost of that defiance now stalks the movement that bears his name.
Bannon’s latest strident eruption tore the mask off entirely. With brutal clarity, he declared what Israeli leaders never believed they’d hear from their most powerful allies: Israel does not own American foreign policy anymore. He mocked Netanyahu’s protests of “partnership.” He described a protectorate, a client state, a vassal state, terrified of losing its grip instead. And Bannon claimed something far more astonishing — that Trump’s inner circle is already acting accordingly. He describes Kushner, Witkoff, Vance, Rubio negotiating with Qatar, Turkey, Egypt, the UAE — shaping Gaza’s future without asking Tel Aviv’s permission. Israel — long used to dictating American position — now finds itself abruptly sidelined, gripped by fear of being reduced to a secondary role.
Bannon pushed further still. He declared what Netanyahu and his supporters fear most: Israel’s Greater Israel fantasy has destroyed Israel. It overreached. It strangled itself by pursuing a repugnant occupation despised worldwide. The country now wails in rage as the leash slips. Israel is not ascendant. Israel is in the throes of death.
The break is not merely political. It is theological. Cultural. Civilizational.
Bannon predicts a tectonic reversal of a century of Middle Eastern geopolitical order. He claims the United States is unwinding, in months, what empires took decades to build. Turkey — once conquered, now returns. Regional states — Egypt, UAE, maybe even Saudi Arabia — are poised to define the future of Gaza. Hamas may fade into irrelevance. Israel screams in protest. And Washington shrugs and walks away.
His most explosive idea lands like a theological bombshell: a three-state solution that includes a Christian sovereign stake in Jerusalem. Not symbolism. Not rhetoric. Power. Security. Permanence. Something neither Israel nor Palestinians want even to imagine… but something Bannon argues the world will now impose.
The verdict is merciless: Israel no longer dictates terms. It receives them. Accept the regional future… or walk alone. No money. No arms. No shield. Israeli exceptionalism — once unquestioned gospel in Washington — now may become a relic with time.
The reaction from Israel’s defenders is predictable and frantic. Tucker Carlson is crowned “Antisemite of the Year” by StopAntisemitism, a desperate, brutal attempt to enforce obedience through public shaming. Once, this label would have destroyed a career. Now? It engenders laughter and ridicule. It is worn as a badge of defiance within the America First camp—a signal that a new right exists, a new era has begun—one that refuses to kneel.
This is not a policy debate. This is an ideological exorcism. The American right is purging something that has dominated it for generations. And the fight will be savage and relentless.
The MAGA movement now stands at an existential crossroads. One road leads back to submission — back to the politics of obligation, automatic military aid, unconditional diplomatic protection, the eternal promise that America’s destiny is forever chained to Tel Aviv’s agenda. The other road is brutal, nationalist, and unapologetically self-interested. America First, without disclaimers. America First, without foreign veto. America First, without fear.
The knives are drawn. The war has begun. And the world will watch a battle like no other.
And when the shouting ends, when the slogans fade, when the smoke clears over this ideological battlefield, one truth will remain: American conservatism will never return to what it was… and Israel will never again command what it once did.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz in Washington, United States on July 18, 2025. [Yasin Öztürk – Anadolu Agency]
Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz on Tuesday vowed that Tel Aviv will never fully withdraw from the Gaza Strip or occupied Syrian territories, the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported, Anadolu reports.
“We are located deep inside Gaza and we will never leave all of Gaza,” Katz told a press conference in the Beit El settlement near Ramallah in the central West Bank
He also pledged to establish new military bases in northern Gaza, instead of the settlements that were evacuated after the Israeli withdrawal in 2005.
“When the time comes, in northern Gaza … we will build Nahal units instead of the (Israeli) communities that were displaced,” he said, praising the incumbent Israeli cabinet as a “settlement” government.
Nahal sites are a military program in which groups of young Israelis volunteer together and later form civilian communities, according to the Israeli daily Haaretz.
According to the Times of Israel portal, Katz’s remarks about building settlements in northern Gaza pose a challenge to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Washington. The premier is expected to visit the US later this month for talks with US President Donald Trump.
Although the Israeli government has not issued clarification regarding Katz’s statements, settler leaders and opponents viewed it as a call for settlement building.
Katz’s office, however, clarified in a statement that the government does not intend to establish any settlements in the Gaza Strip.
It claimed that the defense minister’s reference to setting up Nahal outposts in northern Gaza “were made solely in a security context.”
Around 750,000 illegal Israeli settlers live in hundreds of settlements across the West Bank, including 250,000 in East Jerusalem. Illegal settlers carry out daily attacks against Palestinians with the aim of forcibly displacing them.
Regarding Israeli violations of Syrian sovereignty, Katz said: “We will not move an inch from Syria,” without providing further details.
Syrian government data shows that since December 2024, Israel has carried out over 1,000 airstrikes on Syria and more than 400 cross-border raids into the southern provinces.
After the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime in late 2024, Israel expanded its occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights by seizing the demilitarized buffer zone, a move that violated a 1974 agreement with Syria.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Metropolitan Police officers form a cordon to prevent hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists and trade unionists leaving following a blockade of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to demand that the UK government ceases arms sales to Israel on 28th November 2024 in London, United Kingdom. [Mark Kerrison/In Pictures via Getty Images]
When the Metropolitan Police declared it would arrest anyone chanting “globalise the intifada” after the Bondi Beach killings in Australia, it did more than just shift the boundaries of public order policing.
It blurred the crucial line between violent incitement and political expression, while openly revealing its own partiality.
Within days, two people were detained in London for simply shouting “intifada” at a protest. This is not about managing risk; it is a blunt attempt to muzzle anti-genocide activism.
Two facts should expose ministers and senior police officers’ inequity.
First, Australian investigators have identified the Bondi attack as inspired by the Islamic State group (IS), not a Palestinian-organised act. Yet, in Britain, politicians, Israeli embassy officials, and media voices have rushed to tie Bondi to a Palestinian protest slogan, offering no evidence but plenty of noise.
Second, our criminal law already contains clear thresholds for when speech becomes criminal. Encouragement of terrorism requires a statement likely to be understood as a direct or indirect call to commit terrorist offences (Terrorism Act), and prosecutions for racially or religiously aggravated public-order offences rest on harm, intent and context (Crime and Disorder Act 1998).
The Crown Prosecution Service and the Terrorism Act set those tests. They are not suggestions to be ignored simply because some elite and lobby groups in the country support illegal Israeli actions.
Banning or policing a slogan by decree turns ambiguity into a weapon.
“Intifada” is an Arabic word, not an Islamic one, meaning “shake off”. In Palestine, it surged in 1987 as a rallying cry to shake off or rise up against Israeli colonial occupation.
Slogans are the language of frustration, not tidy definitions for opponents to twist. When authorities adopt the most hostile interpretation, it paves the way for racist policing and a slide toward authoritarianism.
In Hong Kong in 2019, protesters were arrested for chanting “Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times” because the Chinese government branded “revolution” as sedition. Now, British police and the government treat “intifada” the same way.
Criminalising the word intifada is only possible because Palestinians have been racialised within the Israeli Zionist framework, which filters their language and political expression through Israeli racist and colonialist lenses.
So a slogan calling for an end to genocide and occupation – actions illegal under international law – is projected as “violent”. The slogan intifada can only be construed as violent to those determined to keep violence alive.
Banning a slogan also has a chilling effect, making it harder for peaceful campaigns to mobilise.
In fact, the repression of the right to a slogan saps organisations that rely on open, public participation while doing little to deter rogue, clandestine individuals.
The predictable result of the ban is the extermination of peaceful mobilisation and the further radicalisation of rogue individuals. Either outcome should make democratic politicians uneasy.
Deeply biased
A grotesque double standard is at play. The new policing stance echoes the demands of pro-Israeli lobbyists and Zionist interests eager to equate a vague slogan with violence.
Meanwhile, British citizens who aid genocide with weapons, money, or rhetoric are often excused as merely expressing political views or grief.
Police actions are both disastrous and deeply biased. The government is suppressing genuine solidarity with an occupied people, while tolerating rhetoric and actions that fuel ethnic hatred, genocide and daily violence against Palestinians.
This selective zeal of suppressing anything highlighting Israeli violations shatters any claim to impartiality and reinforces the charge of institutional racism.
Policing slogans hands a strategic victory to those eager to delegitimise marginalised, oppressed and underprivileged voices.
Hong Kong showed how Chinese authorities seized on a slogan, exaggerated its most alarming meaning, and used it to justify prosecutions that suffocated dissent.
London is following the same script – stoke fear, blur the line between protest and terror and make arrests routine. The end result is a democracy that punishes words while quietly supporting violence abroad.
If governments and police genuinely feared violence on our streets, they would follow the evidence.
They would investigate those British citizens who travel to fight, stop sending weapons to parties accused of international crimes and prosecute those backing illegal occupation, starvation and genocide, instead of criminalising vague political speech that calls for justice and peace.
The solution is both simple and urgent. Police chiefs must show how their new approach aligns with the legal standards set by parliament and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Ministers must resist turning politics into a security game to please powerful lobbies. Courts must remember that criminal law is not a stage for political drama.
Democracy endures because we tolerate uncomfortable, even ugly, speech. Democracy withers when the state decides which Arabic words are dangerous and whose voices are silenced.
We all agree that violent terrorism and hate must be eradicated. That is exactly why the law must be applied fairly.
Arresting people for chanting a vague slogan like “globalise the intifada”, without any plan for violence, is repression masquerading as public safety, and it is anti-Palestinian racism.
This article was first published at Middle East Eye on 23 December 2025
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
This work by Middle East Monitor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Genocide denier and Current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is quoted that he supports Zionism without qualification. He also confirms that UK air force support has been essential in Israel’s mass-murdering genocide. Includes URLs https://www.declassifieduk.org/keir-starmers-100-spy-flights-over-gaza-in-support-of-israel/ and https://youtu.be/O74hZCKKdpAKeir Starmer objects to criticism of the IDF. He asks how could anyone object to them starving people to death, forced marches like the Nazis did, bombing Gaza’s hospitals and universities, mass-murdering journalists, healthworkers and starving people queuing for food, killing and raping prisoners and murdering children. He calls for people to stop obstructing his genocide for Israel.Orcas discuss Genocide-supporting and complicit Zionists. Donald Trump, Keith Starmer, David Lammy, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting are acknowledged as evil genocide-complicit and supporting cnuts.