Changes to law would give police ‘licence to kill’, UK rights groups warn

Spread the love

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/feb/09/changes-to-law-armed-police-uk-accountability-review

Later this year, new laws will be introduced giving anonymity to firearms officers who shoot someone, unless they are convicted. Photograph: Grant Rooney Premium/Alamy

Review into accountability soon to report as police seek greater protection from prosecution over use of force

Police want changes to the law giving them “a licence to kill”, leading rights groups have warned as the government prepares to give officers new protections from prosecution.

A government-ordered review into police accountability is expected to report within weeks. It followed fears of a walkout by angry armed officers in London after a police marksman, Martyn Blake, was tried for murder over the shooting of Chris Kaba. Blake was acquitted in October by a jury in three hours.

Police say they want the system to be fairer and protect officers who use force as part of their duties. Rights groups believe the system holding police to account is already too weak, and diluting it would “undermine public trust”.

In a letter seen by the Guardian, groups including Inquest, the Centre for Women’s Justice, Liberty and Black Lives Matter warn the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, against weakening police accountability.

“This review is less a kneejerk reaction but rather a dangerous and calculated attempt to use a high-profile case to push for less scrutiny and accountability of police actions,” they said.

“The number of cases where police officers are prosecuted for a death is vanishingly small (since 1990 there has only been one successful prosecution of an officer for manslaughter and none for murder).

Article continues at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/feb/09/changes-to-law-armed-police-uk-accountability-review

Continue ReadingChanges to law would give police ‘licence to kill’, UK rights groups warn

Over 40 legal experts demand probe into Met’s policing of Palestine demonstration

Spread the love

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/over-40-legal-experts-demand-probe-mets-policing-palestine-demonstration

Police officers at a national march for Palestine in central London, January 18, 2025

OVER 40 legal experts have signed a letter to the Home Secretary demanding an independent investigation into the Met’s policing of London’s pro-Palestine protest at the weekend.

Saturday’s rally was met with a heavy-handed police presence which saw the arrest of 77 protesters — the most at any national demonstration for Palestine.

Organisers said there were a “series of complex restrictions” preventing people from assembling at Whitehall at various times, which resulted in arrests on “ flimsy pretexts including simply for inadvertently standing in this central area at the wrong time.”

The Met claims that protesters broke through police lines in a co-ordinated effort to breach the conditions.

But protest organisers backed by video footage contest this, stating that a small delegation, including an 87-year-old Holocaust survivor, who were seeking permission to lay flowers, were invited through.

Among those arrested was Stop the War’s Chris Nineham, chief steward of the protest, who has since been banned from attending demonstrations as part of his bail conditions.

Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign which helped organise the protest, was also subsequently charged with offences under the Public Order Act.

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/over-40-legal-experts-demand-probe-mets-policing-palestine-demonstration

Continue ReadingOver 40 legal experts demand probe into Met’s policing of Palestine demonstration

Chris Nineham – State of War, The Police, Palestine & the Politics of Protest

Spread the love

Chris Nineham – deputy leader of the Stop the War Coalition and Chief Steward for many of London’s demonstrations against the Israel Hamas War and the British government’s involvement (source) – was arrested for some reason at the Gaza protest in London yesterday. There’s also a video of him getting arrested.

This video is from 2 months ago. Among other things, he says

The police and the establishment in this country … are conducting a campaign of vilification and repression against the movement … it’s really a campaign against freedom of speech in general in this country and certainly on the issue of Palestine.

We should take no lectures from the Metropolitan Police or any other police force about hate crime and about intimidation …

Continue ReadingChris Nineham – State of War, The Police, Palestine & the Politics of Protest

Thoughts of the day 15 December 2024

Spread the love

I’ve been watching this video and thinking of the road rage incident I was involved in last Sunday. A car driver used his car as a weapon driving deliberately at me riding a bicycle. I wasn’t even knocked off my bike but it could have been much worse. His car had huge wheels, over a metre high. He dented his wheel arch with my handlebars, then was blaming me for the damage. If my handlebars had been an inch or two lower, my forearm and handlebars and the rest of me would have been getting dragged round with his wheel and I would have had life-changing injuries.

The police weren’t interested, I’m lower status than a car driver. The car driver and the police agreed that he has a right to deliberately drive into cyclists. I got arrested for thumping him and his missus. He was stamping on my bike wheel so I thumped him to make his stop. We started fighting, his missus got in the way and I unfortunately hit her too, she was stupid throwing herself in the way to protect him.

I’m getting a helmet cam. If I’d have had one, this car driver driving into me, threatening me, trying to steal my bike and stamping on my wheel would have been recorded. You should be wearing a helmet if you ride a bike. Get a cam for it.

8/5/25 This car driver deliberately ran into me then took my bike saying that he’s stealing it – that’s happened to me before in road rage incidents.

I’m not certain that him driving into me was caught on CCTV but the rest of it should be. The police can say that CCTV didn’t exist of course as they often do.

I stayed about 8 metres away for about 20 minutes. He then started stamping on my bike’s back wheel as he was calling the police. I wonder why he was calling the police – cyclist not being adequately deferential and respectful to him? I think that I can be heard on the police recording “Get off my bike cnut <smack of a thump in the face>. I only intended to smack him once but he retaliated and we got into a fight. I started winning because I’m a fit cyclist. His missus got in the way to save her husband. I’m fighting and his missus gets in the way … I smack her. It’s all over.

Policeman wasn’t interested in my account and I was arrested. The police claimed that there was an independent witness but I would demolish that so-called independence in seconds. Police were happy to arrest and prosecute me for smacking him and his missus (assault) despite him stamping on my bike wheel for no reason without any provocation apart from hatred for cyclists. Police are not willing to prosecute him for using his car as a weapon (assault, possible motoring offences), chasing me down the road (assault), stamping on my bike (criminal damage) just because he’s a cnut.

Continue ReadingThoughts of the day 15 December 2024

Thoughts of the Day 29 October 2024

Spread the love
Deputy Labour Party Leader Angela Rayner calls for police to kill and harass innocent people.
Deputy Labour Party Leader Angela Rayner calls for police to kill and harass innocent people.

There are news reports that Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott have been urged to apologise for backing gangster Chris Kaba after criticising police following his death. [ed: uncertain that he should be called a gangster.]

He was unarmed and police didn’t know who he was when he was killed. There were claims following his inquest that he had shot somebody 6 days previous to him getting killed by police. He was never tried of this alleged crime of course because he was dead. You can’t retrospectively justify his killing when an unarmed, unknown man was killed by armed police.

Continue ReadingThoughts of the Day 29 October 2024